Grenade and rocket launcher rules question |
Grenade and rocket launcher rules question |
Mar 8 2012, 10:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 337 Joined: 1-September 06 From: LI, New York Member No.: 9,286 |
In regards to the rocket rules in SR4A on page 156.
QUOTE Resolving Rocket and Missile Fire Rocket fire is resolved in the same manner as for grenade launchers. See Grenades, p. 155. For grenade launchers it only has rules in the main book regarding a minimum firing range (5m for grenade launchers) and an extended test for the removal of that safety feature. Now, on page 139 of War! we have a second rule regarding grenade launchers. QUOTE Grenade Launchers and Targeting Minigrenades can be set to explode when they hit their target (or whatever they hit instead of the target). This allows a grenade Launcher to be used more like direct-fire weapons. A wireless capable minigrenade (the default manufacturing mode) can be set to contact detonation with a Change Linked Device Mode (p. 288, SR4A) at any point up to the time it is fired, even while it is in the grenade launcher. A minigrenade without wireless capability must be set manually with an Armorer + Logic (8, Complex Action) Extended Test. When using a grenade launcher with contact-triggered minigrenades, you can fire directly at a target. You must declare that your character is doing so before the attack. Make a Heavy Weapons + Agility Opposed Test against the target, using the normal rules for ranged combat (p. 150, SR4A), using net hits to add to the base Damage Value of the grenade for only the target that was attacked. The grenade also damages those within its blast radius normally, using its base Damage Value and ignoring the net hits from the attack. If the attack misses, roll for scatter (with a reduction for net hits) to determine where the grenade detonates, resolving the blast as normal. The ability to increase damage with net hits only works for exploding grenades; grenades that attack a target indirectly (e.g., gas or splash grenades) have their normal effect. Note that grenade launchers are heavy weapons, and as such any dice pool penalty due to uncompensated recoil is doubled. My question is: How do these two rules interact? One of the people in the group I run with (the GM... and the one who first brought up the rule) think that since the rule in War! is referring to minigrenades it only applies to minigrenades. I believe that since the title of the rule is regarding grenade launchers it also can be used for rockets due to the rule in the main book. The group has decided not to use the rule in War! regardless of how the rule is supposed to be handled but I am curious what everyone else thinks. |
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,705 Joined: 5-October 09 From: You are in a clearing Member No.: 17,722 |
The scatter for grenades is conceptually based on the fact that they hit and then roll before detonating on the next pass.
Scatter for rockets makes no sense to begin with. I say apply the impact rules for microgrenades to rockets because rockets have impact fuses by default. |
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:43 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 337 Joined: 1-September 06 From: LI, New York Member No.: 9,286 |
I agree that the rules regarding rockets make no sense as is. Say... Agility 6 + Heavy Weapons 6 + smartlink and specialization you're looking at 16 dice. That would be an exceptional person mind you. That is 4 hits on average. At 3d6 scatter (average roll being 10) that puts you 6 meters off target! That is nearly 20 feet!
Yes, I do know you can put an airburst link on it. That is not the point. Besides... rockets are supposed to be direct fire weapons... They lack the guidance and surface control systems that missiles have to fire indirectly. |
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:44 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 8-December 08 From: Ottawa, Ontario Member No.: 16,668 |
After rereading that section of WAR, I think that it does makes sense for rocket fire.
However the net hits could make rockets quite dangerous in the hands of an expert heavy weapons guy, or someone using edge, which seems alright. |
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:48 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Yeah, as Saint Sithney said: the problem is rocket scatter in the first place.
|
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:49 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 337 Joined: 1-September 06 From: LI, New York Member No.: 9,286 |
I agree that adding hits to the base damage makes them crazy deadly. Our group does not add hits for damage on a few attacks; Tazers, Stick-N-Shock, Gas/Toxins. There may be a few more but I don't remember right now.
|
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 10:51 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
Using direct hit rules, but no net hits for damage, on rockets seems like it could be a good idea.
|
|
|
Mar 8 2012, 11:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Personally, I don't add hits for grenades, either (any explosives). WAR! be damned. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 12:20 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Using direct hit rules, but no net hits for damage, on rockets seems like it could be a good idea. Makes 'em pretty deadly, though. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 12:31 AM
Post
#10
|
|
The ShadowComedian Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 14,538 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Hamburg, AGS Member No.: 13,525 |
Don't net hits reduce scatter instead of directly adding damage?
And then you apply the blast template with fixed damage drop off over distance? And really TJ . . IT'S A ROCKET LAUNCHER! THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE KILLEY! |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 03:03 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
And really TJ . . IT'S A ROCKET LAUNCHER! THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO BE KILLEY! Heh... No arguments here... I was just sayin' (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It really sucks to be told "You see a great white light, make a new character." Having fired over a thousand of the little bastards over my years in the Military, I can attest that they are not all that hard to shoot accurately. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It is just that if they are accurate, characters are going to die much more often. *Shrug* It works for me, but not everyone agrees on that. |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 03:56 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
Heh... No arguments here... I was just sayin' (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It really sucks to be told "You see a great white light, make a new character." Having fired over a thousand of the little bastards over my years in the Military, I can attest that they are not all that hard to shoot accurately. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) It is just that if they are accurate, characters are going to die much more often. *Shrug* It works for me, but not everyone agrees on that. It all depends on how often you shoot rockets at your PCs, of course... In general, if they managed to meet the business end of a rocket, maybe they deserved to permanently leave the shadows and go into the light? |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 03:32 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
It all depends on how often you shoot rockets at your PCs, of course... In general, if they managed to meet the business end of a rocket, maybe they deserved to permanently leave the shadows and go into the light? Very True. And Again, No arguments. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Was caught in an insurrection during a campaign, once - It lasted about 6-7 Game Sessions, If I Remember Correctly. It really sucks when 'runners are up against Military Grade hardware. |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 08:56 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
Very True. And Again, No arguments. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Was caught in an insurrection during a campaign, once - It lasted about 6-7 Game Sessions, If I Remember Correctly. It really sucks when 'runners are up against Military Grade hardware. ...or when they get ahold of it themselves, for that matter. (I'm reminded of my demolitions-freak of a player again...) |
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 09:05 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 337 Joined: 1-September 06 From: LI, New York Member No.: 9,286 |
So, anyone have ideas on how the rocket rule fits in with the new grenade launcher rule?
|
|
|
Mar 9 2012, 09:21 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th January 2025 - 09:30 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.