Sustaining Foci? |
Sustaining Foci? |
Mar 27 2012, 03:47 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 10-August 10 From: Madison, WI Member No.: 18,916 |
Hey guys, quick thing.
Sustaining Foci... 1. How many spells can you sustain at once with one? Is it just one? Would you need 3 separate foci to sustain invisibility, armor and increased reflexes? 2. Can you "break" a focus by overcasting through either a sustaining or casting focus? |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 03:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,328 Joined: 2-April 07 From: The Center of the Universe Member No.: 11,360 |
Hey guys, quick thing. Sustaining Foci... 1. How many spells can you sustain at once with one? Is it just one? Would you need 3 separate foci to sustain invisibility, armor and increased reflexes? On spell per focus. 2. Can you "break" a focus by overcasting through either a sustaining or casting focus? Not normally (on a glitch you might, but that is at the GM discretions). Note the highest force spell you can use in a sustaining focus is the rating of the focus. A casting focus is different (spell category or power focus), and just adds dice to your rolls and is not impacted by the force of the spell cast. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 03:56 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,373 Joined: 14-January 10 From: Stuttgart, Germany Member No.: 18,036 |
1. yes, just one
2. no. foci don't care whether overcasting or not. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 03:57 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
You need separate or 'stacked', yes.
You can't break it. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 03:57 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,547 Joined: 29-July 10 From: PAN Hidden Member No.: 18,869 |
Off the top of my head:
1. I think each focus can only sustain one spell. It's how I've always played them, but this may be a holdover from previous editions. 2. Don't think you can break a focus by overcasting. Also, not worth it for sustaining foci as they can only sustain a spell with a force less than or equal to their rating. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 04:18 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 10-August 10 From: Madison, WI Member No.: 18,916 |
So on #2, there wouldn't be any problem overcasting Armor through a sustaining focus with or without edge?
I'm not sure if I'm worried about breaking the focus so much as generating more hits than the focus force. Is the force of a spell hard-capped by the force of the sustaining focus? If I overcast an armor spell at force 10 through a force 5 sustaining focus...how many hits count? Let's say I get 9 hits. Without a focus, that's 9 hits. If I roll 9 hits through a focus...do only 5 count? |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 04:22 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,328 Joined: 2-April 07 From: The Center of the Universe Member No.: 11,360 |
You cannot put a force 10 spell in a rating 5 focus. If you used edge in casting for a force 5 focus to get more hits than normally allowed, the spell is still at force 5 and would work. Not that the number of hits you get is independent of the force of the spell for the purposes of sustaining foci, just that normally the force of the spell limits the number of hits you can get.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 04:24 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
So yes: there's no problem 'overfilling' a focus, because you can't do it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 05:06 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Old Man Jones Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 4,415 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New York Member No.: 1,699 |
Unless Edge gets involved.
Technically Edge hits can go over the focus limits, the way the text is worded. But many GMs don't allow that. -k |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 05:08 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
Yes, but as people said: that's hits, not force. The force can't go over.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 05:32 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 10-August 10 From: Madison, WI Member No.: 18,916 |
So...if I used edge and got like 8 successes through a force 5 focus...how many hits count?
I think I only mentioned overcasting because it is one of two ways to lift or increase the force cap. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 05:44 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Advocatus Diaboli Group: Members Posts: 13,994 Joined: 20-November 07 From: USA Member No.: 14,282 |
The GM has to decide. Some (many?) people think that Edge lets you 'store' and sustain as many hits as you like. (Some think that only hits from the Edge dice count? I dunno.)
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 05:59 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,328 Joined: 2-April 07 From: The Center of the Universe Member No.: 11,360 |
So...if I used edge and got like 8 successes through a force 5 focus...how many hits count? I think I only mentioned overcasting because it is one of two ways to lift or increase the force cap. By RAW all 8 hits counts. Though as pointed out, some GM's could house rule it otherwise. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 06:03 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
1. How many spells can you sustain at once with one? Is it just one? Would you need 3 separate foci to sustain invisibility, armor and increased reflexes? Even ignoring the "1 spell per focus" rule, you still couldn't maintain all three of those spells with one focus. One is an illusion spell, one is a manipulation spell, and the third is health. Sustaining foci are not "any spell" they're bound to a specific type (Health, Illusion, Manipulation, and so on). |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 06:38 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 10-August 10 From: Madison, WI Member No.: 18,916 |
I totally forgot about that Draco18s.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 10:05 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
Well, either most are or it's another typo to add to the mess as Lugh Surehand is listed as having two Force 10 Sustaning Foci (Street Legends, page 39; his pinky rings). No type of magic is indicated, unlike his combat and manipulation counterspelling foci.
If it's not a typo, then every magician that knows this are going to want to know how they were made. |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 10:23 PM
Post
#17
|
|
jacked in Group: Admin Posts: 9,046 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 |
Sustaining foci are not "any spell" they're bound to a specific type (Health, Illusion, Manipulation, and so on). Yep. That is something a lot seem to miss (like the writers of Street Legends, apparantly). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Bye Thanee |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 05:15 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 3-July 10 Member No.: 18,786 |
Yep. That is something a lot seem to miss (like the writers of Street Legends, apparantly). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Bye Thanee Well, they could be some ancient semi-unique artifacts. |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 06:07 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
I think it's likelier to be an incomplete description - from what I hear, the entries don't always nail down all of the details.
On Edge used for casting a spell onto a sustaining focus - keep in mind that it uncaps hits (assuming a GM allows it; it is RAW, but so is empathy software, and a lot of GMs nix that, too), but does not affect things dependent purely on the Force of the spell. In other words, Edge might let you meet the threshold of 4 to get the maximum initiative bonus even though you are using a rating: 2 sustaining focus for the increase reflexes spell. But you couldn't use that spell to sustain an increase [Body] spell if your Body was higher than 2, because the Force of the spell has to be equal or higher than the Attribute you are increasing. |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 12:37 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 |
Blech Double post
|
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 12:45 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 |
Sustaining foci are not "any spell" they're bound to a specific type (Health, Illusion, Manipulation, and so on). forgive me .... but this is the 1st Ive heard of this ... I know it is the case for spellcasting foci but never heard of it for sustaining Foci Source quote please ? *opens his own book to shuffle through* Edit .... wow ... ya I did miss this ... well learn something new every day hmmmm after closer inspection I see how this can be misinterpreted ... yet another instance of bad editing ..... Catagory is mentioned in the "Spell foci" Header ... and in the 1st 2 examples (Spellcasting / counterspelling) but not in sustaining ... horay for another RAW vs. RAI point .... you've mentioned that street legends it was "Overlooked" ? I have to wonder about that now I am now searching for other "flubs" to see if they are in any other printed stuff" ok ... after a brief Search through a couple of print mods I have found some examples Dawn of the artifacts 2 Dawn of the artifacts 4 Both have several examples of Sustaining foci not being catagory specific can anyone else find some examples in print where they are catagory specific ? |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 01:23 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
Seems pretty clear that sustaining foci are tied to a category, using SR4A, p199
Spell Foci Spell foci empower a magician’s Sorcery skills. There are three types of spell foci: Spellcasting foci, Counterspelling foci, and Sustaining foci. Each spell focus must be attuned to a specific category of spells (Combat, Detection, Health, etc.) when it is created, and this cannot be changed. I see what you mean about the "category appropriate to the focus" text examples, but I think an omission of that same text from the sustaining focus example doesn't mean anything. The rule has already been given on the very same page, so not repeating the rule in that particular example is not particularly interesting. |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 01:40 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 182 Joined: 22-January 07 Member No.: 10,736 |
Seems pretty clear that sustaining foci are tied to a category, using SR4A, p199 Spell Foci Spell foci empower a magician’s Sorcery skills. There are three types of spell foci: Spellcasting foci, Counterspelling foci, and Sustaining foci. Each spell focus must be attuned to a specific category of spells (Combat, Detection, Health, etc.) when it is created, and this cannot be changed. I see what you mean about the "category appropriate to the focus" text examples, but I think an omission of that same text from the sustaining focus example doesn't mean anything. The rule has already been given on the very same page, so not repeating the rule in that particular example is not particularly interesting. dont get me wrong ... Im not arguing the text .... however I AM Finding lack of support in Printed SR4 Mods .... Im abpout to go through all the missions and everything else Searching for something to support the catagory argument Im searching based on the fact that this is a fairly drastic change from previous editions (not that I havent seen anything like it before) |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 01:41 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
I think it's likelier to be an incomplete description - from what I hear, the entries don't always nail down all of the details. On Edge used for casting a spell onto a sustaining focus - keep in mind that it uncaps hits (assuming a GM allows it; it is RAW, but so is empathy software, and a lot of GMs nix that, too), but does not affect things dependent purely on the Force of the spell. In other words, Edge might let you meet the threshold of 4 to get the maximum initiative bonus even though you are using a rating: 2 sustaining focus for the increase reflexes spell. But you couldn't use that spell to sustain an increase [Body] spell if your Body was higher than 2, because the Force of the spell has to be equal or higher than the Attribute you are increasing. You got a source for this? I'm certain you are correct, but I am unable to locate the rules. |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 01:51 PM
Post
#25
|
|
jacked in Group: Admin Posts: 9,046 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 463 |
SR4A p. 182.
Note, that only Edge dice get a free pass past the spell's Force. If you use Edge to reroll your non-hits, for example, the whole test will still be limited by the spell's Force, because you do not use any Edge dice. If you add Edge to your dice pool before or after the test, you have to roll them seperately (or use different colored dice) to make sure, which hits count against the Force and which do not. Bye Thanee |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st May 2024 - 02:16 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.