IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Problems with the "power" of my mage, Need some advice!
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 04:03 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



Hi everyone!

Recently I've encountered a rather .... silly problem I have with my mage.
We play ghost cartels campaign and the enemies get stronger and stronger but my mage somehow lacks the firing power.

as info: I got 6 Essence, 6 Magic Points and 10 Drain

Now my problem is that everytime I cast I need to overcast to keep up with the bad guys. Most of the time I eat as much damage as the enemys because of drain but I'm fine with that. Now we adopted the (english rulebook) optional rule that manabolt gains additional drain with every nethit, this is a big hindrance for me. Now I've "reskilled" to lightning bolt, Fireball, Flamethrower and stuff like that but the drain is just silly on those things ..
I've calculated that if I cast Lightning bolt (F/2 +3) on Force 8 (4+3 = 7 Drain) it would cost just as much as casting levitate Force 12 (F/2 +1 = 7 Drain) and that I would do much more damage with the levitation spell than I ever could with a lower Lightning Bolt.

With a force 12 Levitation spell i can lift 2.5 tons of wheight. The speed is calculated with Force x Nethits meters per turn
Force 12 with 12 hits would be 144m/3s or 48m/s. This would be 172 km/h. Since the speed is high enough to be similar to a traffic accident you could use the rules for running someone over with a car. Since the Speed is between 61-200 meters per turn the "victim" would suffer the cars body x2 in damage. Typical cars have a body of 8 or 10 that would mean 16P or 20P damage that most likely can't be evaded and every combat phase after the first you just can smack him again since you can hold on to the Force 12 levitation spell with only a -2 modifier.

Is there something wrong with my thinking or are elemental spells inferior to levitation as a combat spell (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) ?

Edit: Just that you know my mage needs to keep up with a sniper maniac that uses the biggest sniper rifle with apds shells. most of the time he does 18P damage with -8 armor ... that's why the enemies use a lot of edge and my mage is in this unfortunate situation
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Jul 18 2012, 04:13 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:03 AM) *
Hi everyone!

Recently I've encountered a rather .... silly problem I have with my mage.
We play ghost cartels campaign and the enemies get stronger and stronger but my mage somehow lacks the firing power.

as info: I got 6 Essence, 6 Magic Points and 10 Drain

Now my problem is that everytime I cast I need to overcast to keep up with the bad guys. Most of the time I eat as much damage as the enemys because of drain but I'm fine with that. Now we adopted the (english rulebook) optional rule that manabolt gains additional drain with every nethit, this is a big hindrance for me. Now I've "reskilled" to lightning bolt, Fireball, Flamethrower and stuff like that but the drain is just silly on those things ..
I've calculated that if I cast Lightning bolt (F/2 +3) on Force 8 (4+3 = 7 Drain) it would cost just as much as casting levitate Force 12 (F/2 +1 = 7 Drain) and that I would do much more damage with the levitation spell than I ever could with a lower Lightning Bolt.

With a force 12 Levitation spell i can lift 2.5 tons of wheight. The speed is calculated with Force x Nethits meters per turn
Force 12 with 12 hits would be 144m/3s or 48m/s. This would be 172 km/h. Since the speed is high enough to be similar to a traffic accident you could use the rules for running someone over with a car. Since the Speed is between 61-200 meters per turn the "victim" would suffer the cars body x2 in damage. Typical cars have a body of 8 or 10 that would mean 16P or 20P damage that most likely can't be evaded and every combat phase after the first you just can smack him again since you can hold on to the Force 12 levitation spell with only a -2 modifier.

Is there something wrong with my thinking or are elemental spells inferior to levitation as a combat spell (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) ?

First off, with your Levitate example, you need net hits for speed, so it wouldn't really work out as well as you think all the time. Using the Ramming rules on Levitate would be a GM's House-Rule (and not a bad one, by the way), so don't count on simply the rules to allow you to do so.

Have you thought of just getting a gun? The Optional Rule that your GM has chosen seems specifically designed to screw mages and encourage Overcasting and Multicasting. There's a recent thread about changes to spell drain that you may want to read over with your GM that has a number of other ideas about trying to balance the disproportion between Direct and Indirect Combat spells. Levitate would only be "superior" to Indirect Combat spells if your proposed House-Rule were inacted (alternately you could Levitate the target straight up and drop them - falling damage is completely RAW) and Levitate doesn't have the secondary effects of elemental spells, which is what makes them attractive in the first place.

Alternate combat options are Crowd-Control magic (Control Thoughts, ect.) or defensive magic (Physical Wall, Shape [Element], ect.). Alternatively you can pick up the Increase [Attribute] spells for your drain stats to help out with your Drain Resistance Tests, making both Indirect and Direct spells easier to reliably cast.

EDIT:
QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:03 AM) *
Edit: Just that you know my mage needs to keep up with a sniper maniac that uses the biggest sniper rifle with apds shells. most of the time he does 18P damage with -8 armor ... that's why the enemies use a lot of edge and my mage is in this unfortunate situation

Ahh, here's your problem. The point of the game is not a competition between players to deal the most damage you can, the point of the game is to survive while completing your missions. With this mindset you and your group are going to end up dead unless your GM is specifically running a more "hack and slash" version of SR.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 04:21 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



I get your point about the nethits. But still elemental spells feel very very weak in the ghost cartels campaign since almost any swat team has either fire or electric protection added to their armor and make the bonus of 1/2 armor from elemental damage useless.

Lifting someone with levitation is rather difficult since he's an "unwilling" subject. You need to win a Force x2 opposed test against the enemys strenght+body. But with a force 12 levitation spell I probably could even throw around trolls (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

I rather despise using things like "mind control". I know it would be an easy and effective way to kill people by forcing them to pull all the pins of their grenades but I see my mage more as a "force of nature" that hits with spells and manipulation than with mental spells. If I ever need to redo a mage I could think about that and create the right char concept (for example a mentalist or psychic).

The problem I have with guns is, that my mage has agility 3 and no skill in guns. That just leads to a heavy karma drain I could use otherwise for better stuff. I rather would choose an option where I could raise my magic attribute or something like that to keep up with the team
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 04:23 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



QUOTE (Neraph @ Jul 18 2012, 05:13 PM) *
Ahh, here's your problem. The point of the game is not a competition between players to deal the most damage you can, the point of the game is to survive while completing your missions. With this mindset you and your group are going to end up dead unless your GM is specifically running a more "hack and slash" version of SR.


I know that it isn't a competition and I don't want to be the "top damage dealer" of my party. But because the other players are hitting so damn hard, the GM needs do adjust the enemies or else it becomes a cake walk for our group. And because of that my mage is very very weak and if he gets shot, he almost dies in 1-2 shots. While scaling the enemies made it more challenging for the other players, it made running in the shadows a living hell for my mage (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jul 18 2012, 04:28 PM
Post #5


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



You are using Levitate wrong.
Levitate enemies up high and simply drop them.
Or levitate something in front of them to stop them from attacking.
Or levitate something in front of you to stop them from attacking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Jul 18 2012, 04:28 PM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



Use the Blast element instead. -1/2 Impact armor and the Force of the spell is added to the damage dealt to determine Knockdown, which means even if you deal no damage chances are you knock down the enemy anyways.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Medicineman
post Jul 18 2012, 04:39 PM
Post #7


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Good ol' Germany
Member No.: 7,015



Why don't you use Manabolt or Stunball ?
Drain is much lower and its harder for the Enemies to resist( no 1/2 Impact Armor) and its more effective on Spirits....
or (maybe even better)
Why do you have to deal with the enemies at all ?
You've got Streetsam Chummers that can deal out lots of damage,so why don't You instead use Buff Spells, or Intelligence (as in Military Intelligence) Spells like Clairvoyance,or Protection Spells, or Healing spells,or Illusion Spells,or,or,or.....
You don't need to compete with the Streetsams !

with a better Dance
Medicineman
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 04:57 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



QUOTE (Medicineman @ Jul 18 2012, 05:39 PM) *
Why don't you use Manabolt or Stunball ?
Drain is much lower and its harder for the Enemies to resist( no 1/2 Impact Armor) and its more effective on Spirits....
or (maybe even better)
Why do you have to deal with the enemies at all ?
You've got Streetsam Chummers that can deal out lots of damage,so why don't You instead use Buff Spells, or Intelligence (as in Military Intelligence) Spells like Clairvoyance,or Protection Spells, or Healing spells,or Illusion Spells,or,or,or.....
You don't need to compete with the Streetsams !

with a better Dance
Medicineman


I don't use manabolt since we use the optional rules for direct mental combat spells. Casting a force 8 manbolt has normaly 4 (F/2) Drain but with the optional rules (mandatory in the german rulebook we use) The manabolt gets 4 (F/2) Drain +1 Drain for every nethit you use to raise damage. So I can easily eat up to 12 Drain just for a Force 8 manabolt with 8 nethits ....

Looks like I should reskill to support magic, but my mage is specialized into combat magic by Mentor spirit and Spellcasting specialization.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VykosDarkSoul
post Jul 18 2012, 04:58 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 27-February 12
From: Nebraska, USA
Member No.: 50,732



QUOTE (Medicineman @ Jul 18 2012, 11:39 AM) *
Why don't you use Manabolt or Stunball ?
Drain is much lower and its harder for the Enemies to resist( no 1/2 Impact Armor) and its more effective on Spirits....
or (maybe even better)
Why do you have to deal with the enemies at all ?
You've got Streetsam Chummers that can deal out lots of damage,so why don't You instead use Buff Spells, or Intelligence (as in Military Intelligence) Spells like Clairvoyance,or Protection Spells, or Healing spells,or Illusion Spells,or,or,or.....
You don't need to compete with the Streetsams !

with a better Dance
Medicineman


Beat me to it Medi.... If you have a sniper dealing that kind of dmg, and comparable from the other team members, make yourself usefull in other ways.
Like use Levitate to quickly and easily get your sniper into a better shooting positions.
Or throw up a barrier at a corner so when the enemy pops out to shoot you he is firing point blank into a "brick" wall.
Use Levitate on explosives, or take their guns away from them, etc etc etc.
I for one am a fan of the "utility" mage in SR, as opposed to the "D&D" mage. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VykosDarkSoul
post Jul 18 2012, 05:00 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 27-February 12
From: Nebraska, USA
Member No.: 50,732



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:57 AM) *
Looks like I should reskill to support magic, but my mage is specialized into combat magic by Mentor spirit and Spellcasting specialization.


Aha...well, in that case...how about this?

Just because the guy you are shooting your spells at has elemental protections, that doesnt mean his surroundings do. Blow the floor out from under him, start the building he is in on fire, etc. And remember, Electricity is nasty nasty nasty, even if you only get 1 point of dmg.


(edit: i must let it be known that I am generally discouraged from playing the mage in a campaign, at least until others have had a chance to try it out. My gm’s don’t want to know what fun new thing I will come up with to do with the spells that exist….anyone ever heard of a game called BloodDawn?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Medicineman
post Jul 18 2012, 05:03 PM
Post #11


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,748
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Good ol' Germany
Member No.: 7,015



The manabolt gets 4 (F/2) Drain +1 Drain for every nethit you use to raise damage. So I can easily eat up to 12 Drain just for a Force 8 manabolt with 8 nethits ....
Then use a Force 9 Manabolt with only 2 Nethits (discard the unnessecary Hits) which deals 11 Damage
for a Drain of 6 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
or a Force 11 Manabolt with only 1 nethit
Damage 12 and Drain 6

Hough!
Medicineman
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 05:13 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



Another question I've got is:
I learned the spell "demolish assault rifles" but the rules how to handle that test are rather unclear to me.
First you need to beat the object resistance (core book p183) and after that you try to get past the armor and structure rating of an object (core book p166).

But neither in the object resistance table nor in the structure table it is defined what kind of "material" a gun is and how much resistance it got (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sarcastic.gif)
I've read it 3x now and I'm still confused -_-
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
All4BigGuns
post Jul 18 2012, 05:32 PM
Post #13


Former Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 15-July 12
Member No.: 53,042



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:57 AM) *
I don't use manabolt since we use the optional rules for direct mental combat spells. Casting a force 8 manbolt has normaly 4 (F/2) Drain but with the optional rules (mandatory in the german rulebook we use) The manabolt gets 4 (F/2) Drain +1 Drain for every nethit you use to raise damage. So I can easily eat up to 12 Drain just for a Force 8 manabolt with 8 nethits ....

Looks like I should reskill to support magic, but my mage is specialized into combat magic by Mentor spirit and Spellcasting specialization.


Teach the folly of using that rule by doing what the rule encourages--always overcasting at double your Magic and not using any hits toward damage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 05:37 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



QUOTE (All4BigGuns @ Jul 18 2012, 06:32 PM) *
Teach the folly of using that rule by doing what the rule encourages--always overcasting at double your Magic and not using any hits toward damage.


Yeah but it states that you need AT LEAST 1 net hit for the manabolt so that it can deliver it's damage.
For example I would cast a Force 12 manabolt with only 1 hit to do 13P damage and the enemy uses willpower to resist and only has 1 hit for resisting. Wouldn't that mean that the spell "fizzles" since it's 1 hit against 1 hit and thus I scored no nethit?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
All4BigGuns
post Jul 18 2012, 05:41 PM
Post #15


Former Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 15-July 12
Member No.: 53,042



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:37 AM) *
Yeah but it states that you need AT LEAST 1 net hit for the manabolt so that it can deliver it's damage.
For example I would cast a Force 12 manabolt with only 1 hit to do 13P damage and the enemy uses willpower to resist and only has 1 hit for resisting. Wouldn't that mean that the spell "fizzles" since it's 1 hit against 1 hit and thus I scored no nethit?


But you don't have to apply that net hit toward damage. You can choose to only deal the base damage with the spell, and this bypasses that bogus rule (which was rightly altered to be entirely optional here in the States).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Wrestling Tr...
post Jul 18 2012, 05:54 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Joined: 1-October 11
Member No.: 39,548



QUOTE (All4BigGuns @ Jul 18 2012, 06:41 PM) *
But you don't have to apply that net hit toward damage. You can choose to only deal the base damage with the spell, and this bypasses that bogus rule (which was rightly altered to be entirely optional here in the States).


As far as I read the rules you can't just say i want to use 8 hits but none of them to raise the damage. Every hit you add automaticly raises the DV of the spell.
For example a Force 12 manabolt with 6 nethits, the enemy roles 3 dices for defense and now you got 6 Drain +3 Drain from the nethits you scored and thus 9 Drain.
But if you only use 1 Hit to the spell and the other person scores 1 hit too, the spell fails since you didn't score any nethits.

This optional rule is really limiting mages -_-

EDIT: In the 20th Anniversary edition that rule is mandatory in the english book and not only in the german book :/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
All4BigGuns
post Jul 18 2012, 05:59 PM
Post #17


Former Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 15-July 12
Member No.: 53,042



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 12:54 PM) *
EDIT: In the 20th Anniversary edition that rule is mandatory in the english book and not only in the german book :/


In the early PDFs, yes, but once you get into print versions which came later, you find the true way which is optional (The Anniversary was probably out a year or a little more before I snagged a dead-tree copy, and the one I got shows the actual way).

And yes, that rule is serious bulldrek.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jul 18 2012, 06:01 PM
Post #18


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 11:54 AM) *
As far as I read the rules you can't just say i want to use 8 hits but none of them to raise the damage. Every hit you add automaticly raises the DV of the spell.
For example a Force 12 manabolt with 6 nethits, the enemy roles 3 dices for defense and now you got 6 Drain +3 Drain from the nethits you scored and thus 9 Drain.
But if you only use 1 Hit to the spell and the other person scores 1 hit too, the spell fails since you didn't score any nethits.

This optional rule is really limiting mages -_-

EDIT: In the 20th Anniversary edition that rule is mandatory in the english book and not only in the german book :/


Effect comes after successful targeting. You can have 8 net hits, and hit, then choose to not apply any to damage. So damage is Base Force.

And you should really read through your English book again. It is OPTIONAL in ALL 3 Hard-Copies I have, including the Precious, as well as in the PDF.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
All4BigGuns
post Jul 18 2012, 06:06 PM
Post #19


Former Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 15-July 12
Member No.: 53,042



Basically, all the optional rule does (as I mentioned before) is make it better to maximum-overcast for a bit of P drain that you can resist rather than "hold back" at Magic rating or less and use net hits for damage. Basically it penalizes the caster for being good at casting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jul 18 2012, 06:07 PM
Post #20


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (All4BigGuns @ Jul 18 2012, 12:06 PM) *
Basically, all the optional rule does (as I mentioned before) is make it better to maximum-overcast for a bit of P drain that you can resist rather than "hold back" at Magic rating or less and use net hits for damage. Basically it penalizes the caster for being good at casting.


Indeed... which is why it is a poor optional rule. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
forgarn
post Jul 18 2012, 07:05 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 250
Joined: 22-December 09
Member No.: 17,988



QUOTE (The Wrestling Troll @ Jul 18 2012, 01:54 PM) *
As far as I read the rules you can't just say i want to use 8 hits but none of them to raise the damage. Every hit you add automaticly raises the DV of the spell.
For example a Force 12 manabolt with 6 nethits, the enemy roles 3 dices for defense and now you got 6 Drain +3 Drain from the nethits you scored and thus 9 Drain.
But if you only use 1 Hit to the spell and the other person scores 1 hit too, the spell fails since you didn't score any nethits.

This optional rule is really limiting mages -_-

EDIT: In the 20th Anniversary edition that rule is mandatory in the english book and not only in the german book :/



First it depends on the force of the spell. If you cast the spell at force 8 and you have 10 net hits you can only use 8 of them max (because of the force of the spell)
QUOTE (SR4a, pg. 183)
The hits scored on the Spellcasting Test may not exceed the spell’s Force

Second,
QUOTE (SR4a. pg. 183]The spellcaster can always choose to use less than the total number of hits rolled in a Spellcasting Test.[/quote]

And third,
[quote name=)
After the Spellcasting is resisted the caster chooses whether or not to apply any net hits to increase the damage value of the spell as normal
(the net hits used to increase the damage value may be declared after the target’s resistance test). As an optional rule, every net hit applied also increases the Drain DV of the spell by +1.


I would highly recommend using the powerball/manaball/stunball as you can hit more than one target, mana is resisted with Will which most grunts are low on, physical spells are resisted with body which most mages are low on. There is no armor added to it, just the straight stat and for the most part they are throwing between 3-5 dice only giving them 1 - 2 hits. On your example of force 8 stunbolt with no net hits applied you are looking at 8 boxes of physical or stun damage (and for the "bad guys" they only have one condition monitor, so your 8 boxes of damage equals -2 on all their rolls except damage resistance). My son is a big fan of theses spells as well as the utility spells. If I were to add the optional rule to my game, he would just overcast everything at force 12 and then deal with the 6 drain (which he has set up to resist quite well) and not add any additional hits to the damage code.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UmaroVI
post Jul 18 2012, 07:10 PM
Post #22


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,700
Joined: 1-July 10
Member No.: 18,778



Yup. Elemental spells are for destroying nonliving, high-OR objects and for AEing people you can't see. You want to use Stunball at force 11, and just drop any extra hits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nata
post Jul 18 2012, 07:12 PM
Post #23


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 27-June 12
Member No.: 52,928



Buy yourself a detonater, and a few kilos of plastic explosive. Levitate the explosive into position, remote detonate it. Voila! Targeted demolitions nbetter than any grenade launcher.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Jul 18 2012, 07:16 PM
Post #24


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (Nata @ Jul 18 2012, 09:12 PM) *
Buy yourself a detonater, and a few kilos of plastic explosive. Levitate the explosive into position, remote detonate it. Voila! Targeted demolitions nbetter than any grenade launcher.

Grenades in SR4 work like this too. No specialized Equipment needed at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
All4BigGuns
post Jul 18 2012, 07:21 PM
Post #25


Former Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 814
Joined: 15-July 12
Member No.: 53,042



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Jul 18 2012, 02:16 PM) *
Grenades in SR4 work like this too. No specialized Equipment needed at all.


I think they're suggesting the Demolitions explosives as an attempt to try and get around the scatter rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 09:12 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.