Cyberware-Scanner Houserule |
Cyberware-Scanner Houserule |
Nov 3 2012, 09:26 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 881 Joined: 13-November 11 From: Vienna, Austria Member No.: 43,494 |
What do you think about the following house-rule?
Net Successes: 0 Location and rough number of cybernetic devices, RFID-Readouts, location of weapons and other items 1 Category of cybernetics, type of weapon 2 Purpose of cyber devices (e.g. eye-mod), presence and number of sub-systems (eg. cybereye-mods), weapon model (if in database) 3 Type and Rating of the devices, purpose of Sub-systems 4 Exact model of the Cybernetic device (if in database), Type and Rating of sub-systems Now, walking through a cyberscanner is not instant-doom for a sammy - if he got his permits to match the RFID-Tags on the ware, he should have no problem, but if he has no licenses, he is in for a bad day. |
|
|
Nov 3 2012, 09:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
The back-up plan Group: Retired Admins Posts: 8,423 Joined: 15-January 03 From: San Diego Member No.: 3,910 |
I'm a little confused here, since it looks like you want to make it harder to detect cyberware, but your table seems to just break down the details of what order information is given by net hits over the threshold. Is that what this table is supposed to be--a breakdown of info based on additional hits?
I don't see how the current rules are instant-doom for a Sammy. Can you expand on that for me? Are you rolling the Rating of the scanner, Ratingx2, something else? |
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 06:17 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
I never really liked rolling for a scanner anyway - they are usually reliant enough that they will not arbitrarily fail. If anything, it's the operator that should roll his skill+rating of the equipment to see if he actually uses it properly.
Imagine if having a pistol on you through an airport metal detector portal would not register 50% or even 20% of the time... |
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 07:15 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
It gets reported about once a month that someone accidentally carried a pistol through security and onto a plane. And that is only from the people who are dumb enough to then report it. Though TSA did spot the pocket knife I forgot and French airport security at Charles de Gaulle got all excited about my two carabiners.
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 07:46 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,654 Joined: 29-October 06 Member No.: 9,731 |
Carabiners? This kind of carabiner?
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 06:43 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 558 Joined: 21-May 08 Member No.: 15,997 |
That's a deadly weapon in France.
|
|
|
Nov 4 2012, 11:14 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,654 Joined: 29-October 06 Member No.: 9,731 |
I suppose, if it were one of the bigger ones, you could use it as an improvised brass knuckle or something...
|
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 05:48 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 05:53 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,654 Joined: 29-October 06 Member No.: 9,731 |
Same thing. Still not seeing how the French looked at that and automatically thought, "weapon."
|
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 12:40 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 3-July 10 Member No.: 18,786 |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 10:57 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
It gets reported about once a month that someone accidentally carried a pistol through security and onto a plane. And that is only from the people who are dumb enough to then report it. Though TSA did spot the pocket knife I forgot and French airport security at Charles de Gaulle got all excited about my two carabiners. Point is it is mostly human error, not the device being random. You could have the detector set not sensitive enough off course, but if it is calibrated properly, it works. |
|
|
Nov 5 2012, 11:25 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
Same thing. Still not seeing how the French looked at that and automatically thought, "weapon." Well Carabine is a french word for a type of weapon, so if you explained "oh no, it's just a carbabiner!" they might have gotten suspicious. In any case, golden rule is that if you don't know what it is, and it's made of metal, then you find out what it is. |
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 12:45 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,654 Joined: 29-October 06 Member No.: 9,731 |
Who the hell doesn't know what a carabiner is? They might not know the word, but I feel pretty confident that anyone manning a security post in a country sufficiently developed to have an airport has probably seen a carabiner before and has a rough idea of what they're used for.
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 01:13 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,537 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Albuquerque NM Member No.: 9,234 |
She showed it being used as an improvised set of brass knuckles. I don't speak French and she didn't speak much English, and arguing with security officials in a foreign country over $30 bucks worth of aluminum didn't seem like a good idea. So I said, OK, sorry about that, and collected my bag.
|
|
|
Nov 6 2012, 10:04 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,288 Joined: 4-September 06 From: The Scandinavian Federation Member No.: 9,300 |
She showed it being used as an improvised set of brass knuckles. I don't speak French and she didn't speak much English, and arguing with security officials in a foreign country over $30 bucks worth of aluminum didn't seem like a good idea. So I said, OK, sorry about that, and collected my bag. Good call. I didn't know this was, but I would be wary of anyone coming with metal items of that size. If in doubt, put it in your luggage. I've gotten swords through customs with no problems. |
|
|
Nov 8 2012, 02:51 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 586 Joined: 27-January 07 From: United States Member No.: 10,812 |
Point is it is mostly human error, not the device being random. You could have the detector set not sensitive enough off course, but if it is calibrated properly, it works. I think part of the problem with them detecting successfully is higher success rates also come with higher false positive rates. If I remember correctly, the facial recognition software they started using at airports for frequent customers ended up letting people through who weren't registered in the system, because the other option was constantly creating more hassles for the valuable customers because their hair was slightly longer/shorter out than when the picture was taken or they'd cut themselves shaving, or they were standing at a slightly different angle. Point being that the calibration is choosing which direction you want your errors, not removing them. The device not picking up the cyberware could be poor calibration, operator error, false positives, or false negatives. It's just easier to abstract it all into a success failure thing. Although understanding the system does make glitches/critical glitches (potentially) more interesting. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th May 2024 - 03:31 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.