![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 53 Joined: 25-March 09 Member No.: 17,015 ![]() |
I have always seen the Quality of Lightning Reflexes (page 98 Runners companion) as a Quality for a Mundane unaugmented character...Something to advance a non-magical/Technomancer or cybered so they can be competitive. I was reading the book and it doesn’t say mundane...It says that it can’t be combined with any other reaction or initiative enhancement, but the way it seems to read is a Magical (adept, Mystic adept, or Magician) quality or a Technical (technomancer) could take the Quality.
Any thoughts on the spirit of the quality? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,700 Joined: 1-July 10 Member No.: 18,778 ![]() |
Yes, they can, they just generally shouldn't because of the harsh stacking restrictions. Free Spirits gain a reasonable benefit from it, though.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,782 Joined: 28-August 09 Member No.: 17,566 ![]() |
Its a decent quality in Karmagen, actually. 30 karma for two points of reaction is just as expensive as reaction 6.(with german errata)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,373 Joined: 14-January 10 From: Stuttgart, Germany Member No.: 18,036 ![]() |
it's a good quality for those races, that don't need initiative enhancements (Banshee, Vampire, Free Spirit, ...), because they already have multiple natural IPs
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 ![]() |
It's not specifically an unaugmented mundane quality - it's just that most augmented or awakened characters will consider initiative enhancements at some point, so it is not usually viable for them. How useful it is for free spirits or infected depends on whether or not you consider their natural extra IPs to be an "enhancement".
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
... I think some people here are confused about the differences between Initiative and Initiative Passes. Initiative Passes are their own distinct Special Attribute listed separately from Initiative - SR4A, page 68, first and second paragraph of the page. Initiative is no more than the sum of someone's Reaction and Intuition, whereas Initiative Passes are a different attribute which determines how many times a Combat Turn someone(/thing) can act.
Any bonus to your Initiative Passes will not interfere with your ability to get a bonus from Lightning Reflexes. Also, note that it says they do not stack ("not cumulative") and not that the bonus goes away. You can have Increase Reflexes cast on yourself to get +3 to your Initiative and 4 IP and still have the +2 Reaction from this quality, although you don't factor that 2 in for calculating Initiative. Still a net bonus. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
It's also worthwhile with a junkie, as drugs can give you the extra initiative passes without losing the benefits of the PQ.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Former Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 814 Joined: 15-July 12 Member No.: 53,042 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 ![]() |
I don't get where this idea comes from. I've never run into a situation where having 2 passes "wasn't enough". Three or more is just overkill. There are situations where 3 passes are simply not enough and I found myself wishing my character had a 4 pass. Sure, if you are careful to take jobs that have easier opposition, then having more than 2 passes is overkill, but the higher paying job tend to feature opposition with 2 or more passes themselves. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Former Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 814 Joined: 15-July 12 Member No.: 53,042 ![]() |
There are situations where 3 passes are simply not enough and I found myself wishing my character had a 4 pass. Sure, if you are careful to take jobs that have easier opposition, then having more than 2 passes is overkill, but the higher paying job tend to feature opposition with 2 or more passes themselves. Possibly a third pass may be necessary if and only if every opponent you're facing has a third pass--pointless to go beyond the same number as the opposition, and far too high in both essence and nuyen cost. Four passes will really never be necessary (highly doubtful any corp would put enough resources into a single individual for that kind of speed). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 3-July 10 Member No.: 18,786 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
Possibly a third pass may be necessary if and only if every opponent you're facing has a third pass--pointless to go beyond the same number as the opposition, and far too high in both essence and nuyen cost. Four passes will really never be necessary (highly doubtful any corp would put enough resources into a single individual for that kind of speed). You would be toast in some of our games. we once fought our way through a facility where they were testing K-10's reactions with other combat drugs. A ghoul on K-10, cram and Nitro is bad. 30 is a real nightmare. Anyway, a rigger hot-siming a drone is getting 3 IP in meat space easy, with minimal resources spent, so going up against 3 IP opposition shouldn't be really rare. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 ![]() |
Possibly a third pass may be necessary if and only if every opponent you're facing has a third pass--pointless to go beyond the same number as the opposition, and far too high in both essence and nuyen cost. Four passes will really never be necessary (highly doubtful any corp would put enough resources into a single individual for that kind of speed). I disagree. I feel that a character should have one more pass than his opposition. The 4th initiative pass may be overkill against most opponents, but when you are faced with powerful opposition that has 3 passes, that 4th pass comes in very handy. That's why edge can also be used to buy extra IPs. Edge is usually a finite resource. With some GMs, it is a very finite resource. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,389 Joined: 20-August 12 From: Bunbury, western australia Member No.: 53,300 ![]() |
I personally feel that 3 IP should be about standard for a combat character (either 'ware or magic), as 4 IP is too heavy a resource drain. however, keep a breather of Jazz around just in case you do need that extra boost for a fight or two.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
I don't get where this idea comes from. I've never run into a situation where having 2 passes "wasn't enough". Three or more is just overkill. I personally feel that 3 IP should be about standard for a combat character (either 'ware or magic), as 4 IP is too heavy a resource drain. however, keep a breather of Jazz around just in case you do need that extra boost for a fight or two. Four are easy to come by. Three IP is easy enough to do that all my characters ever have 3 IP for combat. Also, drugs IP-boosting stacks with drugs, but not with Magic or Technology, so that Jazz won't help your Wires or your Increases. EDIT: "Four are easy to come by" is primarily because I play MysAds standard. Increase Reflexes is a spell I always start with. Otherwise I play someone who can also rig, and 3 IP is a cakewalk with rigging. Heck, normally my MysAd is also a rigger, simply because rigging is so easy that literally anyone can do it with just a monetary investment in it ('link, trodes, Command program, and drone and you're a competent rigger). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Former Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 814 Joined: 15-July 12 Member No.: 53,042 ![]() |
I think I went as high as 3 once, but I never played the character because I didn't like how much essence and nuyen went into getting that.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
2 IP are not good enough. Also, Reaction increases are not the same as Initiative Passes. 2 IP are just fine. That is generally where I try to get, in some fashion. 3 IP is not bad, but more often than not, it is not all that necesary. ANd yes, we do go up agaisnt opposition that has 3 IP fairly often, and even 4 IP in that damned Zero Zone. Combat primary Characters shoot for 3 IP, usually, with non-combat characters shooting for 2. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Canon Companion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 8,021 Joined: 2-March 03 From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG Member No.: 4,187 ![]() |
2 IP are just fine. That is generally where I try to get, in some fashion. 3 IP is not bad, but more often than not, it is not all that necesary. ANd yes, we do go up agaisnt opposition that has 3 IP fairly often, and even 4 IP in that damned Zero Zone. Combat primary Characters shoot for 3 IP, usually, with non-combat characters shooting for 2. It is quite uncommon to have a really non-combat character. Most of the time, a PC is a combat character in some shape or form. Cybercombat is combat. Vehicular combat is combat. Astral combat is combat. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,018 Joined: 3-July 10 Member No.: 18,786 ![]() |
Personally, I'd be loath to play a character with only a single IP, but the opportunity cost for 4 generally seems too high. I tend to agree with TJ - 2 IP for characters not about combat (faces, non-combat mages, hackers, infiltration specialists, and so on), and 3 otherwise. It's different on the matrix of course, since everything thats even half-way important there runs on 3 IPs at least.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
Personally, I'd be loath to play a character with only a single IP, but the opportunity cost for 4 generally seems too high. I tend to agree with TJ - 2 IP for characters not about combat (faces, non-combat mages, hackers, infiltration specialists, and so on), and 3 otherwise. It's different on the matrix of course, since everything thats even half-way important there runs on 3 IPs at least. I don't see that at all. It's quite easy to pick up rigging in addition to whatever role your character has, and as long as you are not a TM/Awakened character, you can pick up the simsense accelerator/booster combo to get 5 IP fairly easy, even at chargen. Slap that on a decent drone and you're basically invincible. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 271 Joined: 5-July 11 From: Firebase Zulu Member No.: 32,769 ![]() |
I don't see that at all. It's quite easy to pick up rigging in addition to whatever role your character has, and as long as you are not a TM/Awakened character, you can pick up the simsense accelerator/booster combo to get 5 IP fairly easy, even at chargen. Slap that on a decent drone and you're basically invincible. Until someone shoots your drone and your rolling feedback because it was damaged and you were hotsimming it.. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th March 2025 - 07:45 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.