IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

43 Pages V  « < 22 23 24 25 26 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Storm Front is out!, Leading to SR5!
Pepsi Jedi
post Mar 21 2013, 07:13 AM
Post #576


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,139
Joined: 31-March 10
From: UCAS
Member No.: 18,391



First Among Equals
[ Spoiler ]


QUOTE (RHat @ Mar 21 2013, 01:58 AM) *
Artful Dodger

[ Spoiler ]


QUOTE (RHat @ Mar 21 2013, 01:58 AM) *
Sleeping with the Enemy - just want to echo that this one was a very good read.

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post Mar 21 2013, 08:43 AM
Post #577


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



QUOTE (Ixal @ Mar 20 2013, 08:07 PM) *
The people in the real world already have a very low attention span. How do you think it will be in the 6th world where you are bombarded by ads every second of the day and instant gratification becomes even more exploited by the companies?
Besides, you do not throw your old Ares gun into the recycler because the new one is a pile of crap. No, you do something far worse (from Ares pov). You keep it and don't buy a new one. They do not make any money with that. Or you go to the competitor when you need your "gun fix". People who bought Ares for their whole life would now look what the competitors have to offer.



Probably like how, IRL, nobody will buy Microsoft again with their 360 Red Ring of Death, or Windows Vista?

Or like anybody will ever buy a Mercedes again with their Class A first model failure?

IRL at least, you need a streak a poor quality product to hurt a compagnie's rep'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post Mar 21 2013, 08:58 AM
Post #578


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 21 2013, 01:49 AM) *
One needs to ask themselves:
If this gun has a 1 in 6 chance (or 2/3rd in SA mode) to work properly ... HOW in the name of all that is Quality Assurance, did it even get into production? The premise is just plain stupid.


Totally agree.

Whatever is written to explain that, it's just idiotic.

But I guess it's easy to adress IG: that malfunction starts to occur after a month of use for exemple (or less in case of intensive use).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post Mar 21 2013, 09:09 AM
Post #579


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



Actually, it makes sense.

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sk8bcn
post Mar 21 2013, 10:15 AM
Post #580


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 702
Joined: 21-August 08
From: France
Member No.: 16,265



Because, you have like million products done day 0? Failure at serial number xxx, call them back and change them with fixed product.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post Mar 21 2013, 10:41 AM
Post #581


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



QUOTE (sk8bcn @ Mar 21 2013, 04:15 AM) *
Because, you have like million products done day 0? Failure at serial number xxx, call them back and change them with fixed product.


So the manufacturing order was messed with too to ensure a massive initial production run. Not that hard to imagine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 10:44 AM
Post #582


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



Yes. Yes, it is too hard to imagine. Hence, the statement that the premise is stupid.
It requires a massive amount of suspension of disbelief and only works in the pinkest of mohawk worlds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post Mar 21 2013, 11:00 AM
Post #583


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



So, they can cause the product to be sent to manufacturing, but influencing the size of the manufacturing run is too much?

It's not a massive suspension of disbelief. Someone hired a hacker for the specific purpose of inserting communications (and probably keeping questions from reaching the wrong place) to cause the Excalibur to go to a large production run. What's so hard to believe about that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 11:06 AM
Post #584


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



Because it is not a small arms producer. It is ARES. A megacorporation that is apparently first incapable of communicating with a load of production sites, THEN can't pull a flawed production before churning out billions of guns that can't shoot straight, and THEN selling a shitload of them, and is THEN incapable of giving out a product recall.

If you seriously don't see the flaw in this line of thinking, I recommend taking off your rose tinted glasses.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mach_Ten
post Mar 21 2013, 11:13 AM
Post #585


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,113
Joined: 24-January 13
From: Here to Eternity
Member No.: 70,521



**EDIT**

snip - talking bollocks

entirely plausible and possible that Ares didn't consider a faulty line to be worth a full recall.

but agree with all above, no way a AAA takes a dive over a fault, there has to be more to it
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 11:17 AM
Post #586


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



edit: redacted, was in reference to bollocks (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RHat
post Mar 21 2013, 11:20 AM
Post #587


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,962
Joined: 27-February 13
Member No.: 76,875



Oh, I'm sure that they COULD have done a recall - they clearly chose not to, because it wasn't their cheapest option (seriously, recalls are only done when they're cheaper than the price of not doing one). Once a shitload of the things were made, it seems a business decision was made to attempt to recoup as much of the cost as possible through large volume up front sales. Or do you seriously think they wouldn't have tried to get some of their money back?

Additionally, there is literally no such thing as perfect system security. And because there isn't, it's entirely possible that someone (or a team) extremely capable found their way in; after which they took extremely low grade actions that wouldn't likely be noticed in security audits because they look like normal behaviour for whichever user. Maybe Horizon used some of their brainwashed technomancers.

I think you've misidentified who has the overly rosy view here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 11:27 AM
Post #588


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



Sure. Rationalize lazy writing all you want.
The fact remains, it is a gun that is working correctly in only 1 of 6 cases.
If you intend to fire such a gun in a combat situation anywhere, you, as the end user, first test it (which means, btw, firing it). Then you realize it's shit, take it back to the shop and say "I want my money back".*
Just look at the internet shitstorms that happen today already over faulty products that are way less likely to kill you.
A load of examples have been already stated and Apple is still not going down for almost killing people with their maps (Australian police warned about the app being a health hazard for leading people into dangerous wilderness).
If you want, you can make it work. Sure. But the mohawk is pink, and nothing you can say will change that.

*This does not count if you're an army. Then you take that shitty M-16-SA-80bur and give it to your soldiers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mach_Ten
post Mar 21 2013, 11:31 AM
Post #589


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,113
Joined: 24-January 13
From: Here to Eternity
Member No.: 70,521



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 21 2013, 11:27 AM) *
*This does not count if you're an army. Then you take that shitty M-16-SA-80bur and give it to your soldiers.


That part was not bollocks (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) damn their eyes.

it does strike me as a bit of a far fetched "We need something big to shake up the setting, We've had dragons, we've had meteors ... I Know ... lets kill off ARES!"

can you imagine the looks of "WTF?!" at that creative writing meeting ?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 11:35 AM
Post #590


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



I have no problems with a megacorp going down, tbh. It has been done before. The falls of Fuchi, Cross Applied Technologies and Novatech were a lot more plausible and well executed.

But having people not buy cereal anymore after ALL OF THE guns failed in some PR spawned Desert Wars somewhere in the middle east? Yeah ... No.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 21 2013, 11:48 AM
Post #591


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



Like the dragon conflict, the Amazonia/Aztlan war, the Denver shakeup, and the artifacts plotline, the Ares plot is a good idea by itself. Absolutely nothing wrong with making a mega shake or even fall. But there's ideas and there's their execution, and CGL again shows it cannot deliver there (orr ather, certain writers seem to be too lazy to deliver). Like all the other ideas, it is turned into a train wreck by lazy writing and nonexistent content editing and care for the line.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Mar 21 2013, 01:52 PM
Post #592


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,088
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Fatum @ Mar 21 2013, 01:48 AM) *
Actually, most corp contracts are not even that easy to get out of.

Exactly. Large-scale procurements constantly end up with enormous cost overruns and arrive years late, but it's not like the company which did not deliver in time gets fired. In fact it does not even have an effect on future offers or public reputation, the company/consortium pays a token amount in damages ("if you fine us too much we'll have to lay off people") and that's it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 21 2013, 02:18 PM
Post #593


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



Weapons are as highly political business anyway, and weapons procurement programs often more economic stimulus than actual transactions on a free market. Even weapons performance often is secondary to them being produced by producers favored by the governent (or local manufacturers, if present). See the M-16, F-35, Rafale, A400M ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wakshaani
post Mar 21 2013, 02:26 PM
Post #594


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,598
Joined: 24-May 03
Member No.: 4,629



QUOTE (bannockburn @ Mar 21 2013, 06:06 AM) *
Because it is not a small arms producer. It is ARES. A megacorporation that is apparently first incapable of communicating with a load of production sites, THEN can't pull a flawed production before churning out billions of guns that can't shoot straight, and THEN selling a shitload of them, and is THEN incapable of giving out a product recall.

If you seriously don't see the flaw in this line of thinking, I recommend taking off your rose tinted glasses.


Well, there's always this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1u0LlIDQKM

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bannockburn
post Mar 21 2013, 02:28 PM
Post #595


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,647
Joined: 22-April 12
From: somewhere far beyond sanity
Member No.: 51,886



Good point, Wakshaani (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
On the other hand, Portal is a mohawk game in a crapsack world and Aperture is an always 2nd place kind of corporation that's not even that big in the context of said world (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
But hilariously insane (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 21 2013, 03:37 PM
Post #596


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE (RHat @ Mar 21 2013, 12:58 AM) *
First Among Equals
[ Spoiler ]

Yes, it's a different one with unfortunately similar initials. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Prince Jake Foster is an ork, born and bred in Portland's orkish ghettoes, and a major liberal/progressive reformer in current Tir politics. Land of Promise outlines the various Princes in the months leading up to the election, Storm Front had to handle their election itself (to keep things sympatico with their election schedule and where it fell on the timeline, it couldn't be in LoP or even Dirty Tricks).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smirnov
post Mar 21 2013, 04:53 PM
Post #597


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 16-September 10
From: Moscow, Russia
Member No.: 19,051



I find it hilarious that people who critisize CGL over one sloppy book argue that a company can't lose it's face and reputation over one sloppy product.
And yes, i understand the difference between small publishing company and transnational megacorp. Still, the irony is sweet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Patrick Goodman
post Mar 21 2013, 05:02 PM
Post #598


Tilting at Windmills
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,636
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Amarillo, TX, CAS
Member No.: 388



QUOTE (Lionhearted @ Mar 20 2013, 11:43 AM) *
@Patrick, Bad things in correlation to the direction you want to take with the infected, or just bad for them?

Not 100% sure I understand the question, but it's been that kind of a day so far.

Much of the bad stuff for the Infected, as far as the disease is concerned, have happened and are filtering down. There are still bad things happening to individuals, of course, and some communities are facing issues. There's the deal in Asamando to deal with, and that could get ugly fast. Fear the Dark is still out there (and we get to meet the lady who coins that term in "Sail Away Sweet Sister," if I ever get the chance to finish it with all the other stuff going on right now), so that needs to get resolved. Something happens in a small town in Texas at some point down the road. Thomas McAllister has a tough row to hoe coming up. Infected rights has taken a good solid shot to the tender parts.

As far as what I'm doing to the Infected, I think the worst is over. I could be wrong, but I'm thinking that it's time to try and clean up.
QUOTE
Also Im starting to suspect Nath is an AI, the amount of hard raw data you produces is scary...

Oh, hell, we could have told you that....

QUOTE (Angelone @ Mar 20 2013, 08:16 PM) *
I agree you'd think the Azzies would be the ones to play with that fire. With their (word I don't know) for dangerous magic.

I think the word you're looking for is "penchant." I could be wrong, but don't think I am.
QUOTE (Pepsi Jedi @ Mar 20 2013, 10:30 PM) *
Sleeping with the Enemy:

Patrick. Good work man.

Thanks; glad you enjoyed it.

How much worse? I could be a real jackass and make it a lot worse, but as I said elsewhere, I think we're getting close to the bottom on that ride. I'm much more about rebuilding than tearing down, in spite of what some people might think about me and what I'm doing.

As for a non-feral wendigo: Most of them aren't, but yeah, I'll see what I can do.
QUOTE (RHat @ Mar 20 2013, 11:58 PM) *
Sleeping with the Enemy - just want to echo that this one was a very good read.

Again, thanks. Glad you enjoyed the ride.
QUOTE
[ Spoiler ]

Yeah, looking back, I probably should have done something about that for Storm Front, but I'm not thinking it should be anything horrendous to cobble together for transitional purposes.
[ Spoiler ]

Does that help? It's not official, but it's how I'd wind up house-ruling it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 21 2013, 05:42 PM
Post #599


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



Question: How old is /dev/ by Storm Front?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smirnov
post Mar 21 2013, 05:45 PM
Post #600


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 16-September 10
From: Moscow, Russia
Member No.: 19,051



She was born in '57 (according to Artifacts Unbound), it's '75 in Storm Front, so she's around 17-18. Way to go for a teen to track down Kane

Edit: confused the book, the date still accurate
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

43 Pages V  « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2025 - 11:45 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.