IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Boots faster than anything else, UEFI / GOP / Ultra-Fast Boot from SSD to Windumb 8
_Pax._
post Apr 16 2013, 01:50 PM
Post #26


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



QUOTE (nezumi @ Apr 16 2013, 08:23 AM) *
The metro UI takes one extra click (click "DESKTOP" or "CHROME" or whatever I'm jumping to).

Really, though, what your computer boots to, should be a user-controllable setting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 16 2013, 02:09 PM
Post #27


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



Actually, i picked up rumors about a possibility of booting directly to desktop under windumb 8, because a bit of code has been found in an .dll file of windumb 8.1(windows blue) it seems.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 16 2013, 05:55 PM
Post #28


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Apr 16 2013, 08:50 AM) *
Really, though, what your computer boots to, should be a user-controllable setting.


Yes, it's called Linux ;P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Apr 16 2013, 09:20 PM
Post #29


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 16 2013, 11:24 AM) *
Hmm, strange and ever stranger . .

What is your time to the windows boot screen (the hardware boot) and time to desktop/login screen (system boot)?

The first part does not really benefit from SSD speed, even if my HDDs need a moment to spin up if I use them, this should be a few seconds at most. I had trouble with the RAID configuration of my fathers PC a few years back, those caused a ton of waiting time until I disabled "Auto" settings as far as possible. Your motherboard seems to have a ton of features, too. Have you turned everything unused off?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 16 2013, 09:38 PM
Post #30


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



yeah, i have, but i can't turn off the raid, because my old system is still on a raid0 of 2xVelociraptors . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Apr 16 2013, 09:51 PM
Post #31


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



Go SSD for your system. It´s worth the effort. I actually had the SSD lying around for half a year before installing it, and would have done so early if I had known the difference.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 16 2013, 09:53 PM
Post #32


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



My Win7 Main System is on a Samsung Series 830 256 GB SSD.
My Vista Old System is on a Raid0 of 2x74GB WD Velociraptor 10k rpm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Apr 17 2013, 06:28 PM
Post #33


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



What are you keeping the Vista around for? To many installations to loose?

Is it the hardware boot that is taking the time?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StealthSigma
post Apr 17 2013, 07:43 PM
Post #34


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,536
Joined: 13-July 09
Member No.: 17,389



My overall boot time is about 15-20s.

The time spent on BIOS is 11-16s.
The time spent booting Win7 once BIOS has POSTed is 4s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 17 2013, 08:02 PM
Post #35


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



yep, too much stuff i'd lose with the Raid0.
And yes, it's taking pretty long to get into the windows boot image screen.
and that takes quite long till the password prompt appears too <.<
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Apr 17 2013, 10:10 PM
Post #36


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



If you don't like the Metro UI, just hit Win + D and get to desktop..?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Apr 18 2013, 02:32 AM
Post #37


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



It's not just that I dislike Metro, Bigity. It's that I dislike having to boot INTO Metro. I want to be able to boot straight to my desktop ... like Win7 already allows me to do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 18 2013, 09:30 AM
Post #38


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



as i mentioned before, there are rumors floating about in the IT crowd thatWin 8.1 will allow booting into desktop and maybe even bring back the start button/menue . .
if that is the case, then yes, i will consider it a valid option for a new OS . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Apr 18 2013, 12:49 PM
Post #39


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 9,334
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



With Windows Blue everything will be good again!

Windows Blue is to Windows 8 what Windows 7 was to Windows Vista. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 18 2013, 01:46 PM
Post #40


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



if they can repeat that, then it will be a good OS to use.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Apr 18 2013, 03:07 PM
Post #41


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



And, they will be perpetuating the cycle: "Do not early-adopt even-numbered iterations of Windows. Wait for the second Service Pack, and/or, wait for an odd-numbered iteration."

Win95: okay
WinME: not so good
WinXP: okay
Vista: not so good
Win7: okay
Win8: not so good
WinBlue: ...?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Apr 18 2013, 04:40 PM
Post #42


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,546
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



I'd probably include 95 as the 'not so good' and 98 as the 'okay'. But yeah, my understanding is that (excepting XP), most of those are the first version (which is terrible) followed by the revision. 98 is 95 updated, 7 is Vista updated, etc. XP is the odd man out, but only because it was based on Windows NT, which wasn't made for consumer PCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Apr 18 2013, 05:40 PM
Post #43


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



I think the pattern is one where:

For one generation, Revolution - MS introduces amazing new features and abilities .... which don't always work out so well in the real world, as they did in their staffmeetings.

For the next generation, Refinement - MS refines, polishes, and generally improves upon what already exists ... fixing what can be fixed, leaving alone what works fine, and dumping the rest.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

See, for example IMO Vista was just fine .... after Service Pack 2. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Starmage21
post Apr 18 2013, 07:39 PM
Post #44


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 745
Joined: 13-April 07
From: Houston, Texas
Member No.: 11,448



QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Apr 18 2013, 12:40 PM) *
I think the pattern is one where:

For one generation, Revolution - MS introduces amazing new features and abilities .... which don't always work out so well in the real world, as they did in their staffmeetings.

For the next generation, Refinement - MS refines, polishes, and generally improves upon what already exists ... fixing what can be fixed, leaving alone what works fine, and dumping the rest.

Lather, rinse, repeat.

See, for example IMO Vista was just fine .... after Service Pack 2. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


I agree with this assessment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Apr 18 2013, 08:11 PM
Post #45


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



I gotta say that I'm not seeing many valid reasons for classifying Win8 as 'not so good' other than a dislike to hitting an extra couple of keys.

But hey, I know alot of people like the Win7 interface more than 8.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Apr 18 2013, 08:40 PM
Post #46


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



Bigity .... I can't give you more reasons, because I haven't used it.

When it came time to build this PC, I knew two things. One, I had seen Win7 in action, and it clearly would do everything I ever needed. Two, I dislike the Metro interface intensely, but Win8 insists on presenting me with it at every boot-and-login.

So. I had reason to avoid Win8, but no reason to avoid Win7. Guess which one I went with?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Apr 18 2013, 08:45 PM
Post #47


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



And that's fine, but I'm saying I'm not sure that quantifies it as 'not so good' outside of your opinion. Just bantering around here some.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 18 2013, 09:29 PM
Post #48


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



*Looks at old case* "Let's see how fast I can get this to boot." *Kicks it off a bridge* "Acceleration of gravity, apparently."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Apr 18 2013, 11:13 PM
Post #49


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



QUOTE (CanRay @ Apr 18 2013, 11:29 PM) *
*Looks at old case* "Let's see how fast I can get this to boot." *Kicks it off a bridge* "Acceleration of gravity, apparently."

Mr.Clarkson, is that you?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CanRay
post Apr 19 2013, 12:06 AM
Post #50


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,358
Joined: 2-December 07
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Member No.: 14,465



QUOTE (Stahlseele @ Apr 18 2013, 06:13 PM) *
Mr.Clarkson, is that you?
Nah, I had a character I used for Role Playing sessions in tech support training called "The Gunny".

He was told to boot his system. "I HAVE BOOTED THE SYSTEM AND IT IS NOW ON THE FLOOR!"

The person I did that to later thanked me as he came close to having the same issue when working numerous times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st December 2024 - 09:35 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.