Small Vector Thrust Craft Design? |
Small Vector Thrust Craft Design? |
Apr 24 2004, 07:17 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 328 Joined: 1-October 03 Member No.: 5,667 |
I accidently posted the following question to the Welcome to the Shadows Forum here . . . if any of you have further input, I'd welcome it!
Is there any way to design a Vector Thrust Aircraft that is the size of a car or truck? I'm thinking like a Body 4 or 5 along the lines of the Harrier fighter craft. From what I see in Rigger 3, there is only a body 7 chasis that is WAY expensive. I considered using the Drone UAV with a body of 3 and increasing it's cargo to the max of 25 and then putting in seats and controls - but I'm not sure that's an adequate solution becuase I'm sure other things like canopy etc are not included in the rules. . . which also brings up the point of how exactly does one "convert" a drone into a vehicle which can carry passengers? |
|
|
Apr 24 2004, 07:44 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
Deja Vu...
To give a vehicle a cabin, you basically only need to add Entry Points. Otherwise, it's considered Open if the Entry category reads --. Hovercar Version (See the cover of New Seattle) Chassis: Large Vector-Thrust UAV Power Plant: Electric Fuel Cell (Fan-Driven) Minimal Design Requirements: Increased Cargo Space +12 (Total CF of 14) Increased Load +200kg (Total Load of 210kg) Added Manual Controls (-2 CF, -10kg Load) Added Seats (2 Bucket) (-12 CF, -200kg Load) Total Cost: 390 DP (0.60 Mark-Up) = 23,400 nuyen Hoverbike Version Chassis: Mediuml Vector-Thrust UAV Power Plant: Electric Fuel Cell (Fan-Driven) Minimal Design Requirements: Increased Cargo Space 7 (Total CF of 8) Increased Load 100 (Total Load of 110kg) Added Manual Controls (-2 CF, -10kg Load) Added Seat (1 Bucket) (-6 CF, -100kg Load) Total Cost: 163 DP (0.60 Mark-Up) = 9,780 nuyen |
|
|
Apr 24 2004, 08:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Traumatizing players since 1992 Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,282 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 220 |
I would think that if you made it a passenger vehicle it would automatically lose the Drone markup. Otherwise I can just build my sprts cars off of drone chassis at absolutely no penalty for a fraction of the cost, all automakers could, same for all other vehicles.
|
|
|
Apr 24 2004, 08:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
Sure could.
Unfortunately, there are no Body 3 Car drones let alone a "sports car drone," so I don't really see how you'd be able to modify one into a cheaper sports car. About your only option is a 'cheaper" Sand Buggy (Body 2) using a Medium Wheeled Crawler. Of course then your CF is limited to 12 (35 with the Sand Buggy) -- which is just barely enough for two seats leaving you with no space for manual controls. Your off-road Handling would suck in comparison (6 vs. 4), and the chassis cost would actually be more expensive (40 w/ 0.40 Mark-Up for the Sand Buggy vs. 120 and 0.25 Mark-Up for the Crawler). So, uhm, yeah. Okay. Good deal there. I can see why the megacorporations are flocking to that trend now. But then again, maybe I don't understand what you mean by "lose their drone Mark-Up." Drones have their own chassis. Any standard vehicle is turned into a drone just by adding Sensors 1 or higher and an Advanced Drone Pilot -- it doesn't affect their Mark-Up whatsoever. There is no "Drone" Quality Factor either, with Quality Factors being about the only things that do affect the Mark-Up of a vehicle. |
|
|
Apr 24 2004, 10:46 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 328 Joined: 1-October 03 Member No.: 5,667 |
What exactly is that (0.60 Markup)?
|
|
|
Apr 24 2004, 11:18 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 665 Joined: 20-November 03 Member No.: 5,834 |
Basically it's how you determine the cost of a vehicle, multiply it's design points by the markup, then multiply that by 100. So for instance with a .6 markup a car with 100 design points would cost 6,000 :nuyen:.
|
|
|
Apr 25 2004, 12:08 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Makes you wonder why the Mark-Up values don't vary from 10 to 250 instead of 0.1 to 2.5, eh?
|
|
|
Apr 25 2004, 04:38 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 665 Joined: 20-November 03 Member No.: 5,834 |
Ya know, that is an excellent idea.
|
|
|
Apr 25 2004, 04:43 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,006 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Probably because of the rounding that goes on somewhere in there, IIRC.
~J |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 03:15 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.