IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Foci vs 'ware prices
Chance359
post Jul 15 2013, 06:05 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 993
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 313



So characters can start with almost twice the cash as in sr4, ware prices have gone up between 2 and 3 times. Looking over magic items prices, most foci are now cheaper. More cyber hate.

Sr4
Power focus Rating x 25000
Weapon Focus Rating x 10000

Sr5

Power focus Rating x 18000
Weapon focus Rating x 7000

ware prices:

cerebral booster R x 0.2, R x 31500 vs SR4 R x 0.2, R x 10000
sleep regulator 0.1 12000 vs SR4 0.15, 10000
synaptic booster R x 0.5, R x 95000 vs SR4 R x 0.5, R x 80000

muscle aug R x 0.2, R x 31000 vs SR4 R x 0.4, R x 7000
muscle toners R x 0.2, R x 32000 vs SR4 R x 0.4, R x 8000
tailored pheromones R x 0.2, R x 31000 vs SR4 R x 0.2, R x 15000

wired 2 39000 SR4 2 11000
3 149000 SR4 3 32000
5 217000 SR4 5 100000
muscle replacement R x 1, R x 25000 SR4 R x 1 R x 5000
dermal plating R x 0.5 R x 3000 SR4 R x 0.5 R x 5000
skillwires R x 0.1 R x 20000 SR4 R x 0.2 R x 2000
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Elfenlied
post Jul 15 2013, 06:25 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 8-January 10
Member No.: 18,018



Do note that Foci require Karma to bind, and the Karma in question is lost forever if you decide to "upgrade" your Focus.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jul 15 2013, 06:32 PM
Post #3


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Elfenlied @ Jul 15 2013, 09:25 PM) *
Do note that Foci require Karma to bind, and the Karma in question is lost forever if you decide to "upgrade" your Focus.

So, that always been the case and has nothing to do with the topic and do note those karmacosts went down too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Epicedion
post Jul 15 2013, 06:42 PM
Post #4


Douche
****

Group: Banned
Posts: 1,584
Joined: 2-March 11
Member No.: 23,135



I think the intent is for more foci to actually be used -- it was hard to pop a 200,000 nuyen power focus onto an enemy mage just so your mage could steal it after the fight, but if they're 30-60k apiece, finding one every now and then on a bad guy won't break the economy.

What I don't get is the disenchanting thing -- I can't think of a possible reason you'd want to disenchant a focus for reagents, since reagents are so cheap.

Let's say you have a Force 4 Power Focus (24 karma), worth 72,000 nuyen.

You're a decent disenchanter/alchemist, so you roll 15 dice to to convert a maximum of 8 reagents (let's say you get 6). So now you've got a whopping 120 nuyen worth of reagents. If you want to just sell the focus, you're still winning out even if you can only get 1% of its value (720 nuyen).

It's almost a better idea to pass them out as party favors.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Jul 15 2013, 06:50 PM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



It should also be noted that the addiction threshold for Foci also came down. You are now at risk for focus addition if the combined force of all active foci is greater than your Magic ATT. A steep drop from 2*Mag in SR4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Elfenlied
post Jul 15 2013, 06:52 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 8-January 10
Member No.: 18,018



QUOTE (Mäx @ Jul 15 2013, 06:32 PM) *
So, that always been the case and has nothing to do with the topic and do note those karmacosts went down too.


Of course it is relevant to the topic at hand. Sams can afford to have a high Resources rating, since they can always put Magic at E, and Resources at chargen went up dramatically. Whereas Karma is a very limited resource, which everyone needs all the same. Mages on the other hand will be hard pressed to even afford the 60k Resources at start.

So no, it isn't "cyber hate". Go play a Streetsam already, and realize that the grass is not greener for everyone else (apart from maybe Mystic Adepts).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LurkerOutThere
post Jul 15 2013, 06:56 PM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,946
Joined: 1-June 09
From: Omaha
Member No.: 17,234



Honestly here's the deal and i'm just going to come out and say it. If you had someone on the writing team who liked your archietype you got better in 5th edition. Evidently there were no street sam fans at the writing table. You had Critias presumably giving us boosted adepts, and presumably the abomination that is mystic adepts. You had Bull responsible for making sure Deckers (shudder) can hack peoples guns and brick peoples cybereyes, but there was no one who said, "Hey guys, ware should be cool, lets give people a reason to play Street Sam characters." That honestly more then anything is dimming my enthusiasm for 5th edition. i look at all these things i've got to house rule and all these thigns that won't get used unless I adjust them and I wonder how they went so wrong, how one entire portion of the house got neglected in favor of magicrun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mäx
post Jul 15 2013, 06:57 PM
Post #8


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,803
Joined: 3-February 08
From: Finland
Member No.: 15,628



QUOTE (Elfenlied @ Jul 15 2013, 09:52 PM) *
Of course it is relevant to the topic at hand. Sams can afford to have a high Resources rating, since they can always put Magic at E, and Resources at chargen went up dramatically.

No they didn't, like at all when compared to price hike on ware(seriously some of them are even significantly more expensive then SR3 where sams started with a cool mil) .
Seriously my SR4 combat face build used 320k (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nuyen.gif) at chargen, going to be pretty damm hard to try and rebuild her with the new prices.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LurkerOutThere
post Jul 15 2013, 06:59 PM
Post #9


Runner
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,946
Joined: 1-June 09
From: Omaha
Member No.: 17,234



QUOTE (Elfenlied @ Jul 15 2013, 01:52 PM) *
So no, it isn't "cyber hate". Go play a Streetsam already, and realize that the grass is not greener for everyone else (apart from maybe Mystic Adepts).


How about you do it, show me your build. I'll show you mine. When chance and I discuss shortcomings it's not theoretical, it's observatiosn actually found in play and in character creation. But I tell you what, go build the best street sam you can and see how he come out compared to an adept or a Mage Sam.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shemhazai
post Jul 15 2013, 07:08 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 598
Joined: 12-October 05
Member No.: 7,835



Isn't physical damage easier to deal out now than previously?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
X-Kalibur
post Jul 15 2013, 07:10 PM
Post #11


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,579
Joined: 30-May 06
From: SoCal
Member No.: 8,626



QUOTE (LurkerOutThere @ Jul 15 2013, 11:59 AM) *
How about you do it, show me your build. I'll show you mine. When chance and I discuss shortcomings it's not theoretical, it's observatiosn actually found in play and in character creation. But I tell you what, go build the best street sam you can and see how he come out compared to an adept or a Mage Sam.


Out of the gate, my money is on a well built sam over an adept. They might not be as fast, but they are tougher and make up for most shortcomings with their ware. I agree they took a slight nosedive with some of the costs (namely wires) but I'm willing to bet it would be a close fight with the sam usually taking the lead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th August 2025 - 11:44 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.