![]() ![]() |
Jul 19 2013, 11:21 PM
Post
#51
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Yes, that argument could work for a gamer looking at pure numbers. Sir Jalynsfein, however, is of the old breed that still does things because of the flavour and style and does not see small faults as a discrepancy or lack, but rather an opportunity to exceed and overcome. Indeed, This is my perspective. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2013, 11:28 PM
Post
#52
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 332 Joined: 11-June 13 Member No.: 109,479 |
I feel there's a difference between a challenging concept and a mechanical penalty. Playing a Street Sam with low starting resources? An Adept with low starting magic? A hacker with mediocre mental stats? A weapon specialist with a lame leg? Challenging concepts, sure, but they're fair. Starting with 25 less karma than everyone else at the table, though? That's not a challenging concept and it's not fun. Essentially, that's what I believe playing an Aspected Mage does to a character. Your assignment of 25 karma to the discrepancy value is probably selling the Full Magician option short. -Wired_SR_AEGIS |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2013, 11:34 PM
Post
#53
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Starting with 25 less karma than everyone else at the table, though? That's not a challenging concept and it's not fun. Essentially, that's what I believe playing an Aspected Mage does to a character. Which is NOT an Objective statement. It is very, very Subjective, but at least you recognize that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) . |
|
|
|
Jul 19 2013, 11:43 PM
Post
#54
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 12-July 13 Member No.: 127,121 |
Anyway, to throw in my $.02 on the subject at hand, I prefer a solution that adjusts the Aspected option on the Priority chart. Something to the tune of the following (pending more analysis):
First, remove it from B priority altogether. Then change C to "Magic 3, one Rating 4 Magic skill group OR one rating 2 Magical skill group and 5 spells" and priority D to "Magic 2, one rating 2 Magical skill group OR one rating 3 Magical skill and 3 Spells." You trade general magical knowledge for more specialized talent; mechanically, you're trading long-term potential for an initial bump. In return, you're also going to have to work a bit harder to start with a high Magic score, but for the C and D priority levels, you're getting some nice returns. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd February 2026 - 01:20 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.