 Question re: environmental modifiers |
  |
 Aug 1 2013, 10:37 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Target  Group: Members Posts: 32 Joined: 9-September 04 Member No.: 6,639  |
This is probably one of those moments when I'm simply blind, but in the example on p. 176, it implies that having two environmental modifiers of the same level (-1 in this case), bumps the modifier to the next level (-3); that is: they aren't cumulative (-1 + -1 = -3 in Shadowrun math). Where is the rule that this example references?
|
 |
 
|
|
Aug 1 2013, 11:56 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,039 Joined: 23-March 05 From: The heart of Rywfol Emwolb Industries Member No.: 7,216 |
Pg 173
To determine the Environmental modifier, take only the most severe environmental condition and use the associated modifier. If there are two or more environmental modifiers tied for most severe, bump the modifier up a category. Note that Range is an environmental modifier. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 02:58 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.