My Assistant
![]() ![]() |
Aug 12 2013, 11:02 PM
Post
#76
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
For that matter, why the assumption that every hit on the opposing side removes 1 from the maximum power of your artifact, when the actual rule is that your net hits are the power of the focus? Net hits: My hits minus its hits. This is equivalent to each one of its hits subtracting from maximum power, because my hits are capped at the [Force] of the formula. If I'm regularly capping out the number of hits I can get (i.e. rolling 14 dice against a limit of 4) then each hit the focus gets on the other side of the roll reduces the maximum power of the focus. |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2013, 11:29 PM
Post
#77
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 25-March 11 Member No.: 25,679 |
Net hits: My hits minus its hits. This is equivalent to each one of its hits subtracting from maximum power, because my hits are capped at the [Force] of the formula. If I'm regularly capping out the number of hits I can get (i.e. rolling 14 dice against a limit of 4) then each hit the focus gets on the other side of the roll reduces the maximum power of the focus. Aah, OK, I understand. Thanks for explaining. |
|
|
|
Aug 12 2013, 11:35 PM
Post
#78
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
It seems all of this nonsense is the result of the limit being set on the wrong value. Instead it should be something like the (primary) mage's Magic. (if using limits at all...I would entirely throw 'em out myself).
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2013, 11:47 PM
Post
#79
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 43 Joined: 25-March 11 Member No.: 25,679 |
Hmm. I don't think Limit should apply here at all, and the game should just content itself with saying, "net hits in excess of the Force of the Focus formula are lost."
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 12:32 AM
Post
#80
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
Yeah, or change the amount of time it takes to make the focus or something.
Or maybe in the magic splatbook, have some "quirks" that can be chosen based on how many net hits exceeded the threshold. A |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 12:54 AM
Post
#81
|
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 |
Why would you need a Force 9 focus? Isn't that just going to unnecessarily raise your difficulty and give dice to the opposing side of the roll? Wouldn't it be better to try to max out your dice for achieving a Force 6 focus, needing 3 fewer hits for yourself and giving the opposition 3 fewer dice to roll? For that matter, why the assumption that every hit on the opposing side removes 1 from the maximum power of your artifact, when the actual rule is that your net hits are the power of the focus? Assume 9 dice on the opposing side (virgin telesma, force 6 focus). Average dice will give them 3 hits. If you can manipulate your dicepool such that you can gain 9 hits on the roll, would that not give you a reasonable shot at crafting your 6 force focus successfully? Or is it Astral Limit that is the issue? Assuming you need an Astral limit higher than the fairly easy to achieve 8 at chargen, take a few levels of 'Focused Concentration' and hang an 'Increased Logic' spell on yourself, or quicken said spell, and your mental and astral limits will jump immediately. Alternately, you can take Indomitable at chargen. Three times. +1 limit each time. [ Spoiler ] your hits are capped at the force of recipe you're using. your net hits are used to determine the rating of focus you actually get. so yes, every hit on the other side of the equation does reduce the force of the focus. that is exactly what is happening. because you are capped at 6 hits on a force 6 focus formula, and you will only be able to get 6 net hits on that if the opposing side of the equation has 0 hits, period. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 01:56 AM
Post
#82
|
|
|
Douche ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Banned Posts: 1,584 Joined: 2-March 11 Member No.: 23,135 |
A much cleaner rule would be:
Choose a Force to work at, must be equal to or greater than the formula Force. Make an Artificing + Magic [Force] (Formula Force) test. Succeeding with no net hits takes double time, net hits can be divided into the base (formula force days) time. Hits (after applying the limit) above your Magic make the drain physical. Drain is Force + OR. Drain values based on working Force rather than the formula force. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 08:47 AM
Post
#83
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 143 |
So we did a bit of playing around with the rules tonight.
Limits in magic are kind of weird. Other than artificing that is. I noticed it first when someone summoned a spirit. They were limited by the Force. It actually puts spirits into the category where the higher the Force of the spirit is, the more services you can get out of them. 2 spirits, Force 4 and force 8. Sure, drain is going to suck on that Force 8 spirit, but you're also likely to have say, 5 services with it, compared to the 2-3 with the Force 4. It just seems odd to me that the more powerful it is, the more services you're going to get out of it potentially (maybe its just the 3rd Edition player in me where I'm used to the more powerful summonings having fewer services). Spell limits seem fine to me, though we were just messing around with them and I didn't get to see them in action too much. Reagents seem different. I want to say they're abusable by upping the limit on Force 1 or 2 spells, but then I consider that the effects of alot of spells are probably limited by the force. Though it may be an expensive work around for Direct Combat spells. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 09:20 AM
Post
#84
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
So we did a bit of playing around with the rules tonight. Limits in magic are kind of weird. Other than artificing that is. I noticed it first when someone summoned a spirit. They were limited by the Force. It actually puts spirits into the category where the higher the Force of the spirit is, the more services you can get out of them. 2 spirits, Force 4 and force 8. Sure, drain is going to suck on that Force 8 spirit, but you're also likely to have say, 5 services with it, compared to the 2-3 with the Force 4. It just seems odd to me that the more powerful it is, the more services you're going to get out of it potentially (maybe its just the 3rd Edition player in me where I'm used to the more powerful summonings having fewer services). Spell limits seem fine to me, though we were just messing around with them and I didn't get to see them in action too much. Reagents seem different. I want to say they're abusable by upping the limit on Force 1 or 2 spells, but then I consider that the effects of alot of spells are probably limited by the force. Though it may be an expensive work around for Direct Combat spells. If we take an extreme example, summoning a F1 spirit results in no services 33% of the time and only 1 service 66% of the time, no matter how powerful a mage you are. And now someone will interject with "but reagents!"... Reagents are the canned answer to every problem with magic that might be caused by the badly implemented limit rules. Sure it doesn't make sense that you'll get more services from a higher Force spirit, but reagents! I feel like the spirit of Billy Mays needs to be hawking these things. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 09:59 AM
Post
#85
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 10-August 13 Member No.: 141,090 |
Hmm. I don't think Limit should apply here at all, and the game should just content itself with saying, "net hits in excess of the Force of the Focus formula are lost." I extremely like the idea and would solve all limit related silly issues. ( Artificing + Magic [MAGIC] vs Force + Object resistance ) [Force] You might say I am overdoing on the Limit front, but that's SR5 is about. This would solve - the silly example I was able to put together couple of pages back. - resolve situation where you have to use a higher focus formula to get the intended focus. - the teamwork bonus would still make sense as top notch focus 6+ can be only made by groups or with specialized equipment. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 10:53 AM
Post
#86
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 315 Joined: 9-May 10 Member No.: 18,563 |
I assume they screwed this up, and still intend mundanes to be able to design formulas, so I'd use Logic instead of Magic since that's the linked ability in the Skills chapter. So your uber formula researchers have 9-11 Logic dice (assuming Cerebral Booster or a quickened Increase Logic) and 10-12 Arcana dice, plus speciality and Edge. Yeah, to get seriously powerful formulas you'll need a team of badasses doing a teamwork test. I imagine a magical Manhattan Project trying to create a Force 12 formula. I am guessing they used Magic instead of Logic because they wanted shamans not to suck at it. While I like the idea of a Manhattan Project to create a high-Force focus formula (I mean, that's the basis of several runs right there), with RAW the way it is, you are way better off using a Force 1 focus formula and like 20 guys doing teamwork tests to bump the limit up when you create the focus. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 12:03 PM
Post
#87
|
|
|
Target ![]() Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 23-September 10 From: Austria Member No.: 19,068 |
One thing that might make crafting at least somewhat more viable if you simply take the Limit as the Cap for your net successes, but still base the comparative roll against all your hits regardless of Limit.
i.e. somebody has 9 hits with a Limit of 6 and the Focus has 2 hits. This takes away 2 from his 9 total hits (down to 7) and leaves him with 6 net hits (because his Limit is 6). This also solves at least some of the problems with high and low end Forces. (Eventhough it still means you can never get more than 1 Service from a Force 1 Spirit) |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 02:11 PM
Post
#88
|
|
|
Immortal Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,289 Joined: 2-October 08 Member No.: 16,392 |
One thing that might make crafting at least somewhat more viable if you simply take the Limit as the Cap for your net successes This of course, breaks down when it hits the rest of the rules. 6 net hits maximum for most weapons (+2 with smartlink)? Means that you might as well not dodge any more, 'cause there's no chance that your reaction is going to reduce nethits below the Limit. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 04:30 PM
Post
#89
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 143 |
One thing I was thinking when I was half asleep last night, and I don't know if it will work, and it doesn't really fit into the whole SR5 structure, but for spirits, why not make magic your limit, and the force of the spirit a negative dice pool modifier?
So you're a starting mage with 6 Magic and 6 Summoning. You want to summon a spirit. At Force 1, you'd be rolling 11 dice (12-1) with a limit of 6. 3-4 hits on average. At Force 3, you'd be rolling 9 dice (12-3) so 3 hits on average. At Force 6, you'd be rolling 6 dice (12-6) for 2 hits. At Force 9, you'd be rolling 3 dice for a single hit. It seems like it sort of works. Of course, I don't think it works for anything but summoning, and sort of screws with the entire system, but its just an insomnia addled thought. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 07:46 PM
Post
#90
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 143 |
A couple of questions on Mentor Spirits.
Take the cat spirit for example. The Magician bonus is +2 dice for Illusion Spells, preparations and rituals. Is this bonus for casting and drain? Is it just for casting? Can I split the dice? The other question is the drawback. "Unless you pass X test, you cannot make an attack that incapacitates your target." How the heck am I supposed to know this? So can I cast a combat spell, and just hope that it doesn't incapacitate them? (like last night I cast clout, which pretty much knocked my target out). Can I not cast combat spells because it might incapacitate them? What exactly does incapacitate mean? Can I cast a direct Combat spell because I'm likely to only get 4 hits on the target, but not a indirect spell because I'm looking at perhaps 6 damage? |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 08:23 PM
Post
#91
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
The other question is the drawback. "Unless you pass X test, you cannot make an attack that incapacitates your target." How the heck am I supposed to know this? So can I cast a combat spell, and just hope that it doesn't incapacitate them? (like last night I cast clout, which pretty much knocked my target out). Can I not cast combat spells because it might incapacitate them? What exactly does incapacitate mean? Can I cast a direct Combat spell because I'm likely to only get 4 hits on the target, but not a indirect spell because I'm looking at perhaps 6 damage? Obviously, you do not cast incapacitating magic (Combat spells and some Illusion, Manipulation Spells) unless you pass the required test. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Cat likes to play with its prey, after all. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 09:15 PM
Post
#92
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 865 Joined: 31-December 03 From: Shadows of Britain Member No.: 5,944 |
You can't cast a spell that incapacitates the target without passing the test. So yes, that very much limits the options for combat spells to low force or not at all and so on. The +2 Dice reads just like Totems used to, so that's for Casting not Drain.
|
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 09:52 PM
Post
#93
|
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 865 Joined: 31-December 03 From: Shadows of Britain Member No.: 5,944 |
I'm also going to interject the "But Reagents" that phlapjack77 was anticipating. Why? Well that's why they are part of the system, the more I play through things in my head the more they are the new Expendable Foci or Fetishes of editions past. These are also the things that have always, flavour wise, made up the stock carried in those magic stores that gets mentioned on other threads. They are the new tool for magic and having them makes you just That much more effective, especially in a pinch. It's also the meeting between Hermatic and Shamanic traditions that we are told will be expanded in the magic book. Don't forget Shaman used to summon as a complex action but the spirit was gone at sunrise/set, foci and fetishes (depending on rules) could help with this. Hermatic required an elemental circle and Force x 1,000nuyen in summoning materials to summon elemental and then could put that elemental on standby. What you see in SR5 is a bonding of those 2 systems.
Example A non maxed starting Mage : magic 6, summoning 4. Summoning a Force 1 spirit, well you're all but guaranteed to hit your limit of 1 and there is indeed a 33% chance that it won't work. That's with nothing but the skill and an act of will. Now you add some tools to the mix, say a Force 2 Summoning focus and a pouch full of Reagents. Now you're on 12 dice and for 80nuyen you can set that limit to 4, which is an average roll. Now you have a 33% chance of only loosing one service instead of nothing happening. What the system Does encourage is the mid range of Spirits Force (without Reagents). Low force means low number of services. High Force spirits mean its unlikely you'll summon them at all as the Force creeps towards your dice pool and drawing you closer towards an even roll off for physical drain. Mid range Force however, well you stand a moderate chance with a good dice pool of hitting that limit with a good chance of only loosing a 3rd of those hits leaving you with 2-3 services. Obviously those numbers creep upwards as karma gets spent. Reagents are a tool that makes the differance. The other way to look at it too is that a Low force spirit has real trouble existing away from the MetaPlanes to conduct those services and high force spirits will resist being drawn (note how most Free Spirits used to be High force). Mid force spirits however lack the strength to ignore the draw and are strong enough to act without dissipating. |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2013, 11:20 PM
Post
#94
|
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
How do you see Leadership mattering here? I only see the p. 142 Direct use, which is intended as a sort of inspirational pick-me-up before a skill test on their next Action Phase. I don't know that I'd allow it to help an ongoing multiday effort. But the teamwork rules on p. 49 seem to work fine: plus one limit per assisting team member just using the same skill, no leadership required. The extra dice are just gravy, since the limit is the real killer here. You really want those dice, because the last tests one is allowed to take carry a high risk of glitches. IF you are going for max. rating despite the changed BC rules AND want to design the focus yourself. What about magical groups providing a list of shared designs? Gets style into the rules part without providing even more power. Every member has the skull ring, but how strong? (Read the Kingkiller Chronicle books by Patrick Rothfuss, they have cool artificing inbetween tons of other stories. Great times.) |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 12:04 AM
Post
#95
|
|
|
Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,473 Joined: 24-May 10 From: Beijing Member No.: 18,611 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 12:09 AM
Post
#96
|
|
|
Awakened Asset ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
|
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 12:41 AM
Post
#97
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 |
I am guessing they used Magic instead of Logic because they wanted shamans not to suck at it. While I like the idea of a Manhattan Project to create a high-Force focus formula (I mean, that's the basis of several runs right there), with RAW the way it is, you are way better off using a Force 1 focus formula and like 20 guys doing teamwork tests to bump the limit up when you create the focus. Yup only shamans get advantages based on their stat choice hermetics can suck eggs. |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 12:43 AM
Post
#98
|
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,431 Joined: 3-December 03 Member No.: 5,872 |
I'm also going to interject the "But Reagents" that phlapjack77 was anticipating. Why? Well that's why they are part of the system, the more I play through things in my head the more they are the new Expendable Foci or Fetishes of editions past. These are also the things that have always, flavour wise, made up the stock carried in those magic stores that gets mentioned on other threads. They are the new tool for magic and having them makes you just That much more effective, especially in a pinch. It's also the meeting between Hermatic and Shamanic traditions that we are told will be expanded in the magic book. Don't forget Shaman used to summon as a complex action but the spirit was gone at sunrise/set, foci and fetishes (depending on rules) could help with this. Hermatic required an elemental circle and Force x 1,000nuyen in summoning materials to summon elemental and then could put that elemental on standby. What you see in SR5 is a bonding of those 2 systems. Example A non maxed starting Mage : magic 6, summoning 4. Summoning a Force 1 spirit, well you're all but guaranteed to hit your limit of 1 and there is indeed a 33% chance that it won't work. That's with nothing but the skill and an act of will. Now you add some tools to the mix, say a Force 2 Summoning focus and a pouch full of Reagents. Now you're on 12 dice and for 80nuyen you can set that limit to 4, which is an average roll. Now you have a 33% chance of only loosing one service instead of nothing happening. What the system Does encourage is the mid range of Spirits Force (without Reagents). Low force means low number of services. High Force spirits mean its unlikely you'll summon them at all as the Force creeps towards your dice pool and drawing you closer towards an even roll off for physical drain. Mid range Force however, well you stand a moderate chance with a good dice pool of hitting that limit with a good chance of only loosing a 3rd of those hits leaving you with 2-3 services. Obviously those numbers creep upwards as karma gets spent. Reagents are a tool that makes the differance. The other way to look at it too is that a Low force spirit has real trouble existing away from the MetaPlanes to conduct those services and high force spirits will resist being drawn (note how most Free Spirits used to be High force). Mid force spirits however lack the strength to ignore the draw and are strong enough to act without dissipating. I have no problem with a but reagents answer for some things but I'm sorry a weak force spirit should just be easier to get a crap ton of hits without reagents. |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 01:03 AM
Post
#99
|
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
I have no problem with a but reagents answer for some things but I'm sorry a weak force spirit should just be easier to get a crap ton of hits without reagents. Agreed, that is the strength of low force spirits. *sigh* (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
|
Aug 14 2013, 01:12 AM
Post
#100
|
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,962 Joined: 27-February 13 Member No.: 76,875 |
Perhaps Magic+Summoning[Astral], if indeed there must be a limit?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th April 2022 - 12:05 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.