Armor stacking is silly. |
Armor stacking is silly. |
Aug 9 2013, 04:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 755 Joined: 8-August 12 From: Geogia Member No.: 53,120 |
so in SR4 I found that it is possible to stack armor to about +6 above heavy military armor, why is this? it does not make sense to me.
|
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 04:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,575 Joined: 5-February 10 Member No.: 18,115 |
Yeah, we know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
SR5 handles armor much more nicely, but if you're not ready or don't want to make the jump, just nix FFBA. Easy. ~Umi |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 04:54 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
Yeah, we know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) SR5 handles armor much more nicely, but if you're not ready or don't want to make the jump, just nix FFBA. Easy. ~Umi Or, you know, just do not abuse it to stupid levels. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 05:22 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,575 Joined: 5-February 10 Member No.: 18,115 |
I was speaking more from a GM point of view than that of a player who doesn't want to be a jerk and exploit an overpowered option.
~Umi |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 05:23 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 21-August 09 Member No.: 17,527 |
Or, you know, just do not abuse it to stupid levels. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) Restraint is a trait that's as uncommon as common sense. At least in my experience. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 05:53 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
I was speaking more from a GM point of view than that of a player who doesn't want to be a jerk and exploit an overpowered option. ~Umi I know... Ahh, well... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wobble.gif) QUOTE Restraint is a trait that's as uncommon as common sense. At least in my experience. Also sad but true... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif) |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 06:13 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
so in SR4 I found that it is possible to stack armor to about +6 above heavy military armor, why is this? it does not make sense to me. You're not trying hard enough if you're only at +6 above Heavy Military Armor. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) Granted, not a starting character here (nor one I'd threaten a GM with for gameplay), but if he were in Heavy Military Armor, with helmet, his armor would stand at 41/39. I could make it even higher if I tried. |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 07:13 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,930 Joined: 9-April 05 From: Scandinavian Union Member No.: 7,310 |
I've found that it's something you have to make your mind up about as a group... Do you restrict the ridiculous stacking promoting more careful and deliberate play or you do it by the book and expect everyone pull out every trick to stay alive... Cyberlimb armour, adept armour, armour spells...
Problem with the latter is that the players that aren't in the know gets kind of screwed over... problem with the former is that the players in the know feel restricted and screwed over (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 07:23 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 17-March 05 From: Who ordered the pizza? Member No.: 7,184 |
Now wait a minute. What am I missing here? I thought the only armor you could ever stack in SR4 was FFBA and a helmet. And even if you did get to 41, wouldn't that drive AGI/REA down to 0 because of the armor encumbrance rule? Or are you counting cyberware enhancements?
Sorry, I guess my real question is how did you get to 41/39? |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 07:32 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,930 Joined: 9-April 05 From: Scandinavian Union Member No.: 7,310 |
Cyberlimb armour, helmets, shields, NA, orthoskin and so on...
|
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 07:37 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,748 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Good ol' Germany Member No.: 7,015 |
QUOTE Sorry, I guess my real question is how did you get to 41/39? Cyberarmor 20/20 (Torso Arms,Legs) Softweaved Delta Amyloid Rheingold Combination 14/6 or Cyberpirate Combi 14/7 FFBA 6/2 Armor Spell 6/6 thats 46/35(or 36) and unencumbered if STR 6 and BOD 6 or if You get it as a taylormade Suit you only need STR 5 and BOD 4 (Calculation was made by Memory only .I hope its right) JahtaHey Medicineman |
|
|
Aug 9 2013, 07:43 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 109 Joined: 28-March 13 Member No.: 85,198 |
Now wait a minute. What am I missing here? I thought the only armor you could ever stack in SR4 was FFBA and a helmet. And even if you did get to 41, wouldn't that drive AGI/REA down to 0 because of the armor encumbrance rule? Or are you counting cyberware enhancements? Sorry, I guess my real question is how did you get to 41/39? FFBA only counts as 1/2 for encumbrance purposes. Securetech stuff can add another +2/+2... built in armor/cyberlimbs don't count for encumbrance... so yeah, it's not impossible to achieve stats higher than heavy military armor. (Military armor is out right stated to be incompatible with anything else, so no, it can't be stacked). |
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 01:51 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
Now wait a minute. What am I missing here? I thought the only armor you could ever stack in SR4 was FFBA and a helmet. And even if you did get to 41, wouldn't that drive AGI/REA down to 0 because of the armor encumbrance rule? Or are you counting cyberware enhancements? Sorry, I guess my real question is how did you get to 41/39? Cyberlimb armour, helmets, shields, NA, orthoskin and so on... Pretty much. Two partial cyber arms at Armor 3, two partial cyber legs at Armor 4, cyber torso at Armor 4, Orthoskin 3, & Mystic Armor 2 (yes, this character is Essence 2.# and a Mystic Adept) for a total of 23/23, then the Heavy Military Armor w/ Helmet for 18/16. Yes, this does encumber the character some, but the encumbrance only impacts the character's ability to evade attacks, not soak damage.Trust me, I could go even more disgusting. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) I'm sure someone else already has. |
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 04:23 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
Minding that net hits on attack test go into damage, the ability to evade attacks and the ability to soak damage are all but the same, dice-wise.
|
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 06:58 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,930 Joined: 9-April 05 From: Scandinavian Union Member No.: 7,310 |
Minding that net hits on attack test go into damage, the ability to evade attacks and the ability to soak damage are all but the same, dice-wise. The means to aquire the soak pool is a bit counter intuitive though, especially as you can outdo heavy milspec armour using things like FFBA |
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 07:26 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
so in SR4 I found that it is possible to stack armor to about +6 above heavy military armor, why is this? it does not make sense to me. Answer 1: It doesnŽt make sense. Answer 2 (with GM hat on): Be happy and layer armor, IŽll cope. Promise. Just remember that an offensive tank build is more fun than only catching bullets - full cyber armor carries a very high opportunity cost. Answer 3: One player got his samurai milspec armor for the add-ons. |
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 10:23 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 693 Joined: 26-March 03 Member No.: 4,335 |
I'd get Military armor for the mobility (and other) upgrades. Power armor is cool.
Also, nothing is stopping a cyber-armored character from wearing milspec. (the cyber-armor isssue is separate from the layering issue). |
|
|
Aug 10 2013, 11:21 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Runner Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,801 Joined: 2-September 09 From: Moscow, Russia Member No.: 17,589 |
All in all, I think this is a fringe case, where the character has to skip on a lot of options to acquire a huge soak pool - but that exchange is not in their favour, because a single mage is enough to punch through any damage soak.
|
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 07:05 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 973 Joined: 8-January 10 Member No.: 18,018 |
Always remember: F11+ Stunbolts don't care about armor (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
|
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 08:57 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Awakened Asset Group: Members Posts: 4,464 Joined: 9-April 05 From: AGS, North German League Member No.: 7,309 |
If all players are layering armor, one can expect a DR of 12-16 dice. With SR4 levels of lethality hitting stuff is pretty likely, so anything with an expected DV of 5+ will work. So what to do about a tank having double/triple the DR dice?
|
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 09:00 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 973 Joined: 8-January 10 Member No.: 18,018 |
Poison and Nervestrike are also good choices. I've used the latter to great effects when two of my players were playing a Fomori Streetsam/Fomori Possession Mage with 40+ Soak DP.
Also, Called Shot for damage is amazingly good. -4DP for +4DV as a free action? Yes please! |
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 05:34 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 |
Pretty much. Two partial cyber arms at Armor 3, two partial cyber legs at Armor 4, cyber torso at Armor 4, Orthoskin 3, & Mystic Armor 2 (yes, this character is Essence 2.# and a Mystic Adept) for a total of 23/23, then the Heavy Military Armor w/ Helmet for 18/16. Yes, this does encumber the character some, but the encumbrance only impacts the character's ability to evade attacks, not soak damage. Trust me, I could go even more disgusting. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif) I'm sure someone else already has. With a 400BP chargen Ragewind is able to get near 250/250 armor, completely legit. Ridiculous, but legit. ... I'm almost ashamed that I helped him with that also. |
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 05:44 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 |
Now I'm curious...
|
|
|
Aug 11 2013, 05:50 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 |
All in all, I think this is a fringe case, where the character has to skip on a lot of options to acquire a huge soak pool - but that exchange is not in their favour, because a single mage is enough to punch through any damage soak. Unless they are a fomori ghoul with arcane arrester, astral hazing, and a Willpower of 7... Overall, though, tank builds can give new GMs fits, but tend to be one-trick (and not even an offensive trick) ponies that are still vulnerable to multiple other kinds of attacks. Things like mystic armor, orthoskin, or cyberlimb armor have a big opportunity cost - your ability to take a beating comes at the expense of being able to dish one out. FFBA and PPP were both designed to stack with existing armor, and aren't really that horribly unbalanced. The discrepancy with miltech armor is because they made it too close to SWAT armor, stat-wise. If you can start out with a base rating that is the same as light miltech armor, then add FFBA and PPP to it, of course you will have a better rating than miltech armor. |
|
|
Aug 12 2013, 01:41 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 01:11 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.