IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Depleted Uranium
TheMadDutchman
post Aug 11 2013, 06:20 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 19-June 07
From: Florida
Member No.: 11,950



Hey, was there a SR4 supplement that had info on DU rounds?

I've got the corebook, Havens, Augmentation, and Arsenal, but I don't think it's in any of those.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stahlseele
post Aug 11 2013, 06:21 PM
Post #2


The ShadowComedian
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 14,538
Joined: 3-October 07
From: Hamburg, AGS
Member No.: 13,525



who's ranium?


no, not to my knowledge . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tzeentch
post Aug 11 2013, 06:48 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 746
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 459



No. And for smallarms it wouldn't be appreciably different from APDS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tanegar
post Aug 11 2013, 06:48 PM
Post #4


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,654
Joined: 29-October 06
Member No.: 9,731



You can always fluff APDS rounds as being made of depleted uranium.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slide
post Aug 11 2013, 06:50 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 364
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 127,215



just remember kiddos, Uranium is self sharpening (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tzeentch
post Aug 11 2013, 07:07 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 746
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 459



Some tungsten alloys will do the same thing (they are not pyrophoric, like DU is, but that only comes into play at higher velocities than a small-arm will produce).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Aug 11 2013, 07:11 PM
Post #7


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



"It's ok. I'm sure they'll listen to Reason."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slide
post Aug 11 2013, 07:13 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 364
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 127,215



QUOTE (Draco18s @ Aug 11 2013, 02:11 PM) *
"It's ok. I'm sure they'll listen to Reason."

Good old Fisheye. Poor Bruce Lee. you get 1000 cool points.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Flaser
post Aug 11 2013, 07:25 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Joined: 28-March 13
Member No.: 85,198



Also: unless it came from spent nuclear fuel, depleted uranium is not particularly radioactive... it's very toxic though and will give you plenty of grief through its chemical properties alone, especially since after a DU penetrator (tank) round has done its job, it leaved behind a fine dust of DU that's easy to inhale, ingest and contaminate your clothes/body with.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Aug 11 2013, 07:42 PM
Post #10


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (Slide @ Aug 11 2013, 02:13 PM) *
Good old Fisheye. Poor Bruce Lee. you get 1000 cool points.


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slide
post Aug 11 2013, 07:54 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 364
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 127,215



QUOTE (Flaser @ Aug 11 2013, 02:25 PM) *
Also: unless it came from spent nuclear fuel, depleted uranium is not particularly radioactive... it's very toxic though and will give you plenty of grief through its chemical properties alone, especially since after a DU penetrator (tank) round has done its job, it leaved behind a fine dust of DU that's easy to inhale, ingest and contaminate your clothes/body with.


Depleated nuclear fuel is not depleated uranium. Depleated uranium is the left over from the uranium enrenchment process where they extract U-235 from masses of U-238. Its stable for a heavy element and has a stupid long half life.
Depleated nuclear fuel is composed of fission fragments which are a number of elemental isotopes not found in nature roughly half the size of U-235.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Flaser
post Aug 11 2013, 08:04 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Joined: 28-March 13
Member No.: 85,198



QUOTE (Slide @ Aug 11 2013, 09:54 PM) *
Depleated nuclear fuel is not depleated uranium. Depleated uranium is the left over from the uranium enrenchment process where they extract U-235 from masses of U-238. Its stable for a heavy element and has a stupid long half life.
Depleated nuclear fuel is composed of fission fragments which are a number of elemental isotopes not found in nature roughly half the size of U-235.


*Spent* nuclear fuel will have the majority of it's U-235 content burnt up (and for reactor grade fuel it was never more 3-5% to begin with), so it's mostly U-238 (like *real* depleted uranium), a whole bunch of highly radioactive trans-uranics and fission products. I wrote "unless it comes from spent nuclear fuel", because there were cases when spent fuel was used to fabricate DU rounds rather than plain 'ol DU from the enrichment process. (Why anyone would do such an insane thing is beyond me, but it *did* happen).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slide
post Aug 11 2013, 08:25 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 364
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 127,215



ok, to be fair I only delt with military grade reactors, they are a bit more concentrated (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Aug 11 2013, 08:25 PM
Post #14


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (Flaser @ Aug 11 2013, 08:04 PM) *
*Spent* nuclear fuel will have the majority of it's U-235 content burnt up (and for reactor grade fuel it was never more 3-5% to begin with)

The majority yes, but a "spent" fuel rod still contains far more U-235 than natural uranium. The problem is that is also contains fission products with high neutron absorption, which would turn the fuel rod into a control rod if not replaced.

QUOTE
I wrote "unless it comes from spent nuclear fuel", because there were cases when spent fuel was used to fabricate DU rounds rather than plain 'ol DU from the enrichment process. (Why anyone would do such an insane thing is beyond me, but it *did* happen).

While that is a popular claim by scaremongers, there have never been any documented cases. Because as you said, why would anyone be so insane? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Aug 11 2013, 08:55 PM
Post #15


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



DU is about as toxic as the rest of the heavy metals. You really don't want to eat or inhale lead, cadmium, thallium, mercury etc. IIRC, the alpha emitter part is not nearly as likely to kill you as the inherent toxicity is.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lionhearted
post Aug 11 2013, 08:57 PM
Post #16


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310



I thought DU rounds were starting to disappear in favour of tungsten...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Aug 11 2013, 09:04 PM
Post #17


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



DU is a better material for making penetrators out of then tungsten carbide (WC). WC is often more politically acceptable than DU, and DU is also harder to get a hold of due to controls.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Aug 11 2013, 09:19 PM
Post #18


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (kzt @ Aug 11 2013, 09:04 PM) *
and DU is also harder to get a hold of due to controls.

The major reason why DU projectiles were introduced was that uranium enrichment produces vast quantities as a useless (read: cheap) byproduct. I'm sure there is enough to go around for countries without enrichment plants, too...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kzt
post Aug 12 2013, 05:16 AM
Post #19


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,537
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Albuquerque NM
Member No.: 9,234



QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 11 2013, 02:19 PM) *
The major reason why DU projectiles were introduced was that uranium enrichment produces vast quantities as a useless (read: cheap) byproduct. I'm sure there is enough to go around for countries without enrichment plants, too...

True, but most depleted uranium is actually in the form of uranium hexafloride. This is bad stuff. It needs to be reprocessed to uranium before it's safe, and there are some sort of permits required in the US to posses more then a few pounds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FuelDrop
post Aug 12 2013, 05:23 AM
Post #20


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,389
Joined: 20-August 12
From: Bunbury, western australia
Member No.: 53,300



As I understand it from the above posts, DU rounds are toxic and very slightly radioactive while spent fuel rounds are very toxic and lethally radioactive.

So, a drone with hardened electronics and shielding against radiation should have no problem carrying and using spent fuel rounds, which are probably a contravention of every weapon treaty ever signed ever. I would hate to be on the receiving end of that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Draco18s
post Aug 12 2013, 11:57 AM
Post #21


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,289
Joined: 2-October 08
Member No.: 16,392



QUOTE (kzt @ Aug 12 2013, 12:16 AM) *
True, but most depleted uranium is actually in the form of uranium hexafloride. This is bad stuff. It needs to be reprocessed to uranium before it's safe, and there are some sort of permits required in the US to posses more then a few pounds.


Make dioxygen diflouride out of it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sengir
post Aug 12 2013, 02:49 PM
Post #22


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 3-October 09
From: Kohle, Stahl und Bier
Member No.: 17,709



QUOTE (FuelDrop @ Aug 12 2013, 05:23 AM) *
So, a drone with hardened electronics and shielding against radiation should have no problem carrying and using spent fuel rounds, which are probably a contravention of every weapon treaty ever signed ever. I would hate to be on the receiving end of that.

Why am I just reminded of Project Pluto?

And just to make that clear again, such "spent fuel rounds" are a purely hypothetical scenario
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lionhearted
post Aug 12 2013, 02:52 PM
Post #23


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,930
Joined: 9-April 05
From: Scandinavian Union
Member No.: 7,310



Spent fuel rounds sounds really inconvenient... Toxic bullets sound great... Until you realise it works both ways.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Flaser
post Aug 12 2013, 03:03 PM
Post #24


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 109
Joined: 28-March 13
Member No.: 85,198



QUOTE (Sengir @ Aug 12 2013, 04:49 PM) *
Why am I just reminded of Project Pluto?

And just to make that clear again, such "spent fuel rounds" are a purely hypothetical scenario


In retrospect I shouldn't have even mentioned the damn thing as it's just that... a rumor.

Frankly manufacturing rounds from spent fuel is probably more trouble than its worth. Here is why: when a spent fuel bundle is removed from the reactor pool at last, it's placed in a cooling pool where it stays for a whole year (or more, I'm not sure and can't find hard figures), just *cooling*. Afterwards the bundle can be stored without cooling, but it's still burning hot to the touch as the fission products and some of the transuranics are still undergoing fission decay producing heat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv-mFSoZOkE

So if you wanna manufacture rounds out of this, you gotta deal with something that's burning hot, radioactive (emitting alpha, beta, gamma... all sorts of nasty) and chock full of various elements with varying chemistry that could influence your tools are you're milling/stamping whatever to produce rounds... so all in all, having thought about it I think the whole idea of "spent nuclear fuel" used for DU rounds highly suspicious.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Slide
post Aug 12 2013, 03:34 PM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 364
Joined: 12-July 13
Member No.: 127,215



DU is about as radioactive as the ceramic plate you eat off of at the cafeteria. Does that make you feel more, or less safe?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 04:14 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.