 Fixing speed in melee?, Just might work. |
  |
 May 4 2004, 12:59 AM
Post
#26
|
|||
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu  Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178  |
You forgot the "notworthy" smiley. 8) Seriously, though, it's okay. You don't have any experience with martial arts, no big deal. You're preferring a cinematic style to a more realistic one. That's cool if that's what you want. Just don't go around thinking your rules are realistic, ok? I promise, I won't send the gaming police after you! :cyber: |
||
 |
 
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 01:01 AM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
Yes, I have no experience at all. I am a mere peon compared to you. You and you alone, like the much beloved katanaphiles and their mystical reverence of Japanese steel, know the truth about the power of Kung Fu. It is unstoppable, unbeatable, and whatever other whizbang baloney you want to go on about it. Even a magically-enhanced adept with more magical power and speed than you can even imagine has nothing on the power of some ordinary bloke with a few years of demonstrational Kung Fu under his belt. <bows again>
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 01:45 AM
Post
#28
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 214 Joined: 8-June 03 Member No.: 4,696 |
Right... because the current system of the master martial artist who can counterattack in effectively 0 time is totally counter to drama; I certainly know that no chop-socky film I've ever seen depicts the ability of unaugmented people to react many times faster than the norm. I don't have a particular problem with your desire to shoot down Lime, but please at least make the objections sensible. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 02:36 AM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
Random thought, somewhat in line with AC Lime's proposal, but taking into account some of the stuff Cain said.
For characters *not* on Full Defense, Defending/Counterattacking is only possible one time per opponent per initiative pass available to the combatant. This does not require the use of an action (it is still reflexive), but represents inherent ability to track and process the movements of individual opponents. Simply put, the *fastest* unaugmented combatant is not capable of reacting quickly enough to the raw speed with which a wired combatant can attack without special attention. Note that unaugmented individuals are still fully capable of defending themselves against multiple attacks from different opponents. When characters *are* using Full Defense, they are more capable of defending themselves against faster opponents. For each attack from a combatant beyond that which the defender could normally counter, the defender's [effective skill is reduced by 1]/[TN to defend is increased by 1] (circle one) Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 03:01 AM
Post
#30
|
|||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 29-April 04 Member No.: 6,291 |
Dude, chill out. He's simply stating a fact. He knows a lot about Karate, which by no objection on your part, I assume you don't. He's not saying you're worthless, he's saying he has expertise in a relevant field in the nicest way possible. If I say something about a .45 calibur round, and Captain Dave corrects me, I default to him, because he knows a shit lot more about guns than I do. I don't get offended, because it's MY fault I don't know about guns (and I'm ok with that.) Don't get all defensive when someone's trying to tell you a fact in the most polite way possible. I accepted that I don't know jack about Martial Arts a long time ago, and shut up, and I didn't get offended. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 03:06 AM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
What makes either of you think I don't know what I'm talking about? Ever consider that I'm not the type to brag about my achievements, or assume that my personal experience makes me the defacto master of all things relating to the subject?
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 03:11 AM
Post
#32
|
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
I accept that Cain knows a lot about martial arts. I contend that Cain has never, and will never, fight someone with Wired Reflexes II, and that, as such, combat against superhumanly fast opponents lies outside of the realm of his personal experience. I believe that this is all Mr Lime wants Cain to admit, as it is specifically combat against superhumanly fast opponents that comprises the subject of this thread, and that is not something to Cain's real world experience really applies.
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 03:45 AM
Post
#33
|
|||
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
This is exactly my point: a person moving at 5 times the speed a normal, unaugmented but highly trained human is capable of is far and away beyond the experience of anyone on this board. How this has escaped so many people thus far is beyond me. For fuck's sake, in the other thread, Bitbasher went so far as to claim that reloading a weapon in 0.6 seconds is not a reflection of speed. Does Shadowrun do a good job of constructing an initiative system that remotely reflects realistic differences in speed between normal, unaugmented human beings? Absolutely not. It is built from the ground up to accomodate raction enhancement. Once you accept that this is just how Shadowrun is built, you can't keep claiming real world experience, because all your real world experience, at the very best, stops at 10 + 1d6, and that's probably being pretty generous. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 03:56 AM
Post
#34
|
|||
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
It is not, in my mind, a physical impossibility to reload a weapon in 0.6 seconds simply through extremely fast and extremely accurate movement of sensory information through nerves. You don't need to be capable of moving any faster. Just like your running speed remains the same regardless of Init, your hands don't move any faster to reload the weapon. Your movements are so precise that you can nab the magazine, eject the old one and slam the new in without any loss of momentum. For the martial arts discussion, it is a good thing to distinguish between reaction speed and overall physical speed. With really fast reactions, assuming you have the skills to go with it, you can, for example, react to the fact that someone is trying to block your strike by attempting to redirect your blow while underway. Regardless of how much wires you've got, the strike won't get there any faster. I won't touch the actual debate on the matter, however, not with a 20-foot Dikoted Stun-Pole. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 04:01 AM
Post
#35
|
|||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
What if the pole also had an Ares Viper Slivergun attached and contained an ally spirit? |
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 4 2004, 04:04 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
Note also that Reflexes (specifically Reaction) includes your ability to perceive what's going on around you hence the use of Intelligence (Shadowrun's Perception attribute) being used in its calculation.
When fighting someone augmented well above you, he's not only capable of doing more, but he's aware of what's going on while doing it. At best, you might be lucky to perform some evasive actions to block incoming attacks, but there's no way you should not only be able to see all of those attacks coming in, but also reacting to them. It's simply beyond your ability; you can only do so much regardless of your skill level... that's the entire point of Reaction, Initiative, and augmented Reflexes. Likewise, it does include speed. Obviously not running speed, but since Quickness is used to measure your Reaction speed -- and it's a dynamic adjustment based upon your Quickness as well -- it obviously has something to do with it. So yes, someone with Reaction 20 and Initiative 5D6 is performing at levels little Mr. Normal with Reaction 6 and Initiative 1D6 can't even dream of, let alone stand a chance against when it comes to their ability to land telling blows. I have little problem with Mr. Normal initiating or using the melee equivalence of a Full Defense that carries on throughout an entire Combat Turn. But when it comes to performing actions that's going to leave your opponent in a bad way, he shouldn't be able to do much more beyond twice his normal action speed (hence what's becoming the popular house rule suggestion for allowing one counterattack per normal attack you have available). But after you hit a limit, that's it. You just can't react any faster than that. Cain and BitBasher seem to prefer to just dismiss the notion of Reaction and Reflexes altogether, preferring to assume that they're just numbers that don't really mean anything. Unfortunately, that's not the case. They *do* mean something. Something significant. And I think it's that significant meaning that those who aren't happy with the rules as written are dissatisified with. |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 04:13 AM
Post
#37
|
|||||
|
Traumatizing players since 1992 Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,282 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 220 |
What AE said. :D That is not outside of the realm of a modern day person, it is extreme, but not impossible.
<spanish accent>
Those words, I do not think they mean what you think they mean. </spanish accent> :D |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
May 4 2004, 04:42 AM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
:please:
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 04:47 AM
Post
#39
|
|||||
|
Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,901 Joined: 19-June 03 Member No.: 4,775 |
It's not, and I should point out I never said it was. I was just saying that you've got to be damn fast to do it, and I hold by that. Anyway, hell, I think I linked to a video of a guy doing just that in an older thread to prove my point about skill benefitting speed, which is most certainly does. My point, however, is that the guy reloading in 0.6 seconds, in Shadowrun, is still a normal human being. He'll never be able to use skill to reload that quickly. It will always take him 3 or 1.5 seconds to reload. The only way he will ever be able to reload in .6 seconds is if he tears out his spine and replaces it with something more efficient. And that's my point: when you move at such speeds in Shadowrun, you only do so because you are far and away orders of magnitude faster than even the best of the best of us normals can dream of, and no amount of training will ever remedy this. The rules should reflect this instead of allowing a slow guy to kill a fast opponent far faster than he would be able to if the fast guy stood completely still in the way of oncoming attacks. This is absolutely wrong. Can a real human being reload in 0.6 seconds? Yeah. It's been done. SR's combat mechanics are specifically designed to be dehumanizing. They're not made to allow normals to be different from eachother; they're made to show that people should do what they're built for, and if you aren't built for combat, you shouldn't get in it. The firearms rules make this absolutely clear. I see no reason that this shouldn't carry over in melee. Whether you like this dynamic or not has nothing to do with whether exceptionally inhuman speed should be applied as a benefit to melee. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
May 4 2004, 06:32 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 29-April 04 Member No.: 6,291 |
Just a question. I was under the impression that once you were in melee combat, the only way you could do anything else besides a Melee roll in any of your turns (besides unGaeas'd magic of course) was to Break Melee, and suffer an automatic hit.
What are the rules, if any, for taking a simple action to fire a gun in your hand at an opponent in Melee? Or doing other 'mundane' things? |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 09:07 AM
Post
#41
|
|||||||||||
|
Grand Master of Run-Fu Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 6,840 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Tir Tairngire Member No.: 178 |
Why should I waste time looking at the incoming attacks? It's not that difficult to block the main lines of attack without trying. Why do you think people hold up their arms in a combat stance? You refuse to tell me how experienced you are in various martial arts, so I'm going to try and use examples everyone's seen in the movies. The basic cat stance-- neko-ashi-dachi-- not only consists of footwork, but set arm positions. Those arm positions are set where they are for a reason-- because there's no way any single attack can come in without you being able to block it with more than three inches of movement on your part. (Combination attacks are a different matter, natch.) So, the other guy has to move his whole body several feet to hit you. You have to move one arm three inches to defend. I don't have to be looking to know where the other guy's attacking. I can figure that out in a dozen different ways, six of which don't involve vision in the slightest. And I suck at that trick. If you're skilled, you don't waste time waiting for the other guy to attack before you defend-- you already have a defense in place before he moves.
In reality, speed is a result of skill, and not the other way around. If you're super-skilled, you can reload a gun inside of 0.6 seconds. If you're super fast but unskilled, you'll never pull it off, regardless of how fast you can move.
Let me try this for an example. How familar are you with guns? I know hardly anything about them; but one thing I can do is empty a single-action revolver inside of three seconds. In less than three seconds, I can easily send six shots downrange with an old, single-action revolver; with a semiauto pistol, I can empty the clip in about a second or so. Granted, I'll be lucky to hit the back wall when firing like that; but I can easily do so. If I were a Shadowrun character, in theory I'd need an average initiative of 61 in order to do that trick. Now, let's take a look at the RoF of firearms in Shadowrun. At first glance (and second and third) it looks like they've got this insanely slow Rate of Fire. I can get a ten-year-old child to fire shots many times faster than the rules allow. Does that mean said ten-year-old has superhumanly fast reflexes? (And unlike me, some of those ten-year-olds at NRA conventions *can* make every one of those aimed shots hit.) Shadowrun slows things down for the sake of playability and sanity. In reality, people are capable of moving and acting many times faster than the rules allow. So, on the one hand, I have met people who can act as fast as the Shadowrun-equivalent of Wired 3. (Heck, if you use the RoF standard, all of us much have Wired.) I *have* met people who can turn four opponents into paste inside of three seconds, on "attack" and "defense". In real world terms, none of the tricks you describe are that unbelieveable.
I don't know about superhumanly fast, at least in real-world terms. What I do know is this-- I'm an old man. You youngsters have an incredible advantage on me in terms of raw speed. As you get older, your nerve conduction velocity decreases. And I only test at about average on reaction time tests-- many of the kids I sparred with timed out at much, much faster than I can ever touch. They're much faster than me, in terms of reaction *and* quickness. And there are those instructors who I trained with, who I outquick and outreact on a regular basis. Compared to them, I'm superhuman; compared to me, the kids are superhuman. So, why is my typical reaction to the instructors: "Could you do that slower? I couldn't see your hands move before they hit me the first six times"? Because they're more skilled, and are faster in effective speed. When the tables are reversed, and I get to be the crotechety old guy, I don't win through raw speed-- I win by being treacherous, and never attacking where they expect me to. People become surprised, react to the wrong things, and it *looks* like I just moved at superhuman speeds. But in reality, I didn't move all that fast. Martial arts are similar to stage magic in that regard. It may look like the magician is moving incredibly fast; but in reality, he's not doing anything that quickly. He's just doing it so well that you think he *had* to move fast. But, let's be fair and put this to numbers. A fast sammie, with wired-3, will have a reaction of at least 20 and 4d6 initiative. That gives him an average initiative score of 44 or so, which translates into instigating five melee attacks per three seconds. Which means, if he's skilled, he can take out five people inside of three seconds. Well, that's not really that fast. I've done that in demos and katas, in fact. People who are much more skilled than I am can do that in reality. So, if you look at it that way, I *have* fought-- and beaten!-- people who can move equivalent speeds. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
May 4 2004, 12:54 PM
Post
#42
|
|||||
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,049 Joined: 24-March 03 Member No.: 4,323 |
In SR terms, those youngsters might have a reaction of 1 or 2 higher than you. Thats not significant, and definitely nothing even remotely on par with the difference between augmented and unaugmented reflexes.
No. It means that he can engage in five separate actions for *every* single equivalent action an unagumented person can take. It means he could attack five separate people five times in the same time they could each attack him once. It means that he can attack every single person around him, move, attack another completely different group of people, move, attack another completely different group of people, move, attack another completely different group of people, move, and attack yet another completely different group of people. - as long as everyone he attacks is within running distance from his original position. If he is skilled and has multiattack, every one of those people could be killed. All in three seconds. And that *is* fast. Superhumanly so, even. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
May 4 2004, 02:06 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,665 Joined: 26-April 03 From: Sweden Member No.: 4,516 |
I have to agree with Jason Here - each action isn't one attack. If you are fighting five people, there are rules that allow you to attack each and every one of those five people on one action. It's damn difficult in shadowrun to do so and succeed, but that's beside the point.
In shadowrun some people are immensely faster than others - some rules take that into account, others don't. To take an overly exagerated example - Troll Cyberzombie Joe is fighting Human Mundane Lee. Assume Lee cannot damage Joe with anything short of an incredible attack roll (to get enough power to penetrate Joe's immense armor. Joe gets an initiative of 51, Lee gets an Initiative of 7. Joe attacks, Lee counters. Joe attacks, Lee counters. Lee attacks, Joe counters. Joe Attacks, Lee counters. Joe Attacks, Lee counters. Joe Attacks, Lee counters. Joe Attacks, Lee counters. If Lee is fighting three Joe's, he can effectively inflict damage on each of them 6 times a second. If Lee is fighting another Lee, he can effectively inflict damage twice in three seconds. If Lee stands in the street, and 30 Joe's run past just next to him, Lee gets a free melee attack against each Joe moving within a meter of him. This means he can effectively inflict damage 10 times a seond - 20 if each Joe also turns around and charges him. This means that if you are standing in the middle of a crowd of thirty people running past you one by one, you could in theory attack 30 people per combat turn with an initiative of 2(!), and thus a Quickness of 1 and an Intelligence of 1. That's 10 different people each second. And he still has the ability to quick draw an SMG hanging from a sling and shoot 10 rounds cover fire into that group. Are any of these examples realistic? No. Are the shadowrun melee rules fully realistic? No. Can we therefore apply what people can and can't do in reality? The answer should be obvious. If Lee is pummeled by Joe as in my first example, the simple fact that he is defending against against 6 times as many attacks as if he was fighting an equally fast opponent should make a difference. In shadowrun it does not. With the suggested 'speed rules' it would look like this: Joe gets an initiative of 51, Lee gets an Initiative of 7. Joe attacks, Lee counters. Joe attacks, Lee counters with a +1 TN. Lee attacks with a +1 TN, Joe counters. Joe Attacks, Lee counters with a +2 TN. Joe Attacks, Lee counters with a +3 TN. Joe Attacks, Lee counters with a +4 TN. Joe Attacks, Lee counters with a +4 TN. This seems more sensible to me. Another option is having Joe attacked by five Lees: Joe gets initiative of 51, each Lee gets an Initiative of 7. Joe attacks, with +4 TN, Lee counters with -3(because of Joe's reach). 5 Lee's attack, Joe counters each of them with +3 TN. Joe attacks, with +3 TN, Lee counters with -3. Joe attacks, with a +2 TN, Lee counters with -3. Joe attacks, with a +1 TN, Lee counters with -3. Joe attacks, Lee counters with -3. Joe attacks, Lee counters with -3. Canon rules: Joe attacks, with +4 TN, Lee counters with -3(because of Joe's reach). 5 Lee's attack, Joe counters each of them with +4 TN. Joe decides to not attack anymore, because he'd only get beaten, and the Lee's just stand around and look at him while he slowly takes out a gun, ejects the clip, and checks it (2 nd action), puts the clip back in again, readies the gun (3rd action), shoots two of the Lees (4th action), shoots two more Lees (5th action) and stands before the last, slightly panicked, Lee who doesn't even have the chance to start running away while Joe carefully aims at his head (6th action) Next Initiative, Lee stands as paralysed while Lee keeps aiming, and then puts a bullet in Lee's forehead. Yet had Joe attacked, each Lee would have had the chance to hurt him, instead of starting at the barrel of his gun two inches from each of their faces in turn... |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 02:21 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Again not commenting on the actual topic... But Joe would never get more than 1 attack on Lee before Lee gets to attack Joe, even if he's got Init 200 and MBW-4. Unless you're using some really weird Initiative rules.
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 02:38 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
skill, in something like martial arts, means trained reflex. a reflex is going to be faster than a conscious action every time, even if your nerves are made of artificially-thickened molasses. high skill-low init can beat low skill-high init because high skill does his thing as a reflex, and low skill has to stop and think about what he's seeing, decide what to do about it, then get his body to follow his plan. should that process be easier for someone with an init higher than their IQ? yes, which is reflected by the fact that high init guys get to use maneuvers more often, and win ties more often. in the end, though, high init is no match for high skill.
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 03:13 PM
Post
#46
|
|||||
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 173 Joined: 4-March 03 Member No.: 4,196 |
Agreed.
Also agreed, but what Arethusa, A Clockwork Lime, and others have mentioned situations where skill levels are close.
snowRaven also gave an example of how space and time sort of break down in melee combat as well. I don't think the canon rule needs to be re-written, but I'm still very interested in what kind of house rules they come up with. |
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
May 4 2004, 04:50 PM
Post
#47
|
|||||||
|
Genuine Artificial Intelligence Group: Members Posts: 4,019 Joined: 12-June 03 Member No.: 4,715 |
Then you could have sex with it.
I would like to slightly correct this. Nerve conduction velocity is not a significant factor in this. As age increases, reflex speed does not significantly change. Reaction time is what increases. This is more an effect of the way older brains are wired together, compared to younger brains, with a small electrochemical synaptic effect. The end result is that older people make decisions more slowly, but they make better decisions. In this example, an older martial artist will not be able to react as quickly, but when he does it will be a far more effective move. If, however, you take an old man and tell him to push a button when a light goes on, he will be just as fast as a kid; there is no reaction, just reflex. (quickness test instead of reaction) If you tell him to hit the red button for the red light and the blue button for the blue light, he will be slower since there is a decision involved (reaction test) |
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
May 4 2004, 05:16 PM
Post
#48
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 693 Joined: 26-March 03 Member No.: 4,335 |
Same here, EK. I like the rule as is, where skill trumps speed big-time. But a part of me loves all crunchy bits of game systems. The challenge for this thread is to define how to give speed freaks that edge they so deperately want, without breaking the system too badly, or making high skills worthless.
With this in mind, let's do a quick summary: Melee combat:
Initiative boosts give:
The speedy folks want more successes due to their blinding reflexes. At least they are tired of getting beat up by folks who are better than them. The arguments for them getting beat up are simple: If your opponent is better than you, he instinctively can react when you leave yourself wide open. The arguments for them no getting beat up are simple too: If you are significantly faster, you should be able to overwhelm your opponent, because eventually he won't be able to keep up with your motions. Lets follow this reasoning: Three approaches are available for modifying the ratio of successes: changing the number of dice available, changing the TNs, and changing the ability to have two sides in a fight. Changing TNs is drastic and dangerous to game balance, so I'd like to avoid that. Denying somebody the ability to react at all is unfair to the mundane guy who's spent 30 years perfect his Art. He _should_ get the opportunity to let his fast, unskilled opponent smash his face repeatedly into his fist and foot. So how about this? Speed's biggest advantage is more actions. So let's make the speed-freaks advantage directly come from this surplus of actions. Even better, let's tie his advantage directly to how much of a surplus he has. How? Potential House Rule: A melee combatant gains 1 extra die on his attack action for every attack taken since his opponent has been out of actions in this combat turn. So we have 2 guys fighting: slow-poke Bruce Lee with one action and skill 6, and speedy Ed Gruberman with 3 actions and skill 5. Combat turn sequence: (I'll leave combat pool out, as both could use it up fast) Ed Gruberman attacks: 5 dice vs 6 dice. Probably Ed gets beat. Soak it. Bruce attacks: 6 dice vs 5 dice. Probably Ed gets beat. Soak it again. Ed Gruberman attacks: 5+1 dice (cause Bruce is out of actions) vs 6 dice. Odds are for a tie, but ties go to Ed. Ed Gruberman attacks: 5+2 dice (cause Bruce is still out of actions) vs 6 dice. Go Ed! And there we have it: Speed is a slight advantage, but not overwhelming, and of primary use when skill levels are close. What'ya think? I visualize this as the speedier guy getting blocked and countered by his more-skilled opponent the first few times, but eventually his opponent is unable to keep up with his lightning-fast moves. I probably won't use it myself, as folks in my games have plenty of reasons to pick up wires already, but I think it should be fairly reasonable. |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 05:24 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 117 Joined: 29-April 04 Member No.: 6,291 |
Lantzer - I personally like it. It's intuitive, simple to apply, and doesn't overwhelm the need for skill as opposed to speed. My take is that speed already gives you tons of advantages, so you don't really even need more. But for people who think hi-speed crackfiends should get some advantage over motherf**kin' ninja masters, those rules are definitely fair.
My 2c: I think that higher initiative means you move faster, personally, not that you react faster (that's a side-benefit). However, if A has 4 turns and B has 2 turns, A is only taking half as long to do their actions. It's already been stated (and I believe) that counterattacking takes much less time and effort than attacking. So even if A is twice as fast, it only takes half the effort for B to counter, so why shouldn't he be able to counterattack? Obviously this goes out the window when you've got something like 7 turns to 1, but I don't think any game I play in is designed to let Initiative 60+ exist. |
|
|
|
|
May 4 2004, 05:27 PM
Post
#50
|
|||
|
Shooting Target Group: Members Posts: 1,616 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 6,158 |
See, that's not what the debate is about at all. It's what several people (mostly those who are content with the current rules) keep clutching on to, but it's not. Especially since the chances are high that if you do have outrageous reflexes, you're a combat junkie as well and are likely to be the "master" in most combat situations. It's a logical problem. Logically, there's no way a normal person can have the superhuman reflexes of an augmented person. It's exactly the same as saying that because a guy with Strength 3 is arm wrestling a troll with Muscle Replacement 4 and a Suprathyroid Gland, you should gain the troll's superhuman Strength for the duration of that opposed test. It's a ludicrous notion. Reflexes -- Reaction and Initiative -- are core attributes of a character. They're a measure of how much that character can perform in the span of a three seconds. Saying that they gain OTHER character's augmentations in that time JUST because they're fighting them is beyond silly. Skill level doesn't matter at all here, just like the Arm Wrestling skill level of the human and troll above matter there. In both scenarios, the lesser character is gaining all the advantages the superior character has for no other reason than "just because." We've been using the counterattack house rules mentioned way back in this thread and the other related thread for quite a while and it's worked really well. No significant suspension of disbelief required; far less than the current rules, that's for sure. A defending character can still only perform a limited number of counterattacks before they just can't keep up, at which point they're limited to just desperately trying to hold off the flurry of incoming attacks. *That* is far more believable in my opinion. Under these rules, a "master" is still going to have no trouble taking down some snot-nosed punk since the not-nosed punk -- augmented or not -- is never going to succeed at landing a blow unless he gets phenomenally lucky. It'll just take an unaugmented "master" longer to do it -- which is EXACTLY how it should be. What, with him being UNaugmented and everything. Of course, we also got rid of the whole "ties go to the attacker" rule, too. Under the current rules, it's impossible for two dueling opponents to NOT damage the other side (Damage Resistant Tests not counting, as that's simply them absorbing the damage). Two equally skilled opponents should be able to hold off against each other for quite a while without landing a telling blow either way, at least for a cinematic game like Shadowrun. Never did understand why they handled ties like that for melee in the first place. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th July 2025 - 09:53 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.