![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Shadows of Copenhagen Member No.: 17,824 ![]() |
Something I'm unable to work out: How well do watcher spirits "watch"? Can they see people approaching in realspace? (I'm ruling yes, since all life is visible on the astral to the astrally perceiving). More importantly, how far does their vision extend, and how well do they see through obstructions, magical and non-magical?
I'm thinking if they're force 1, so INT 1 and no Perception, they must be nearly blind unless something living brushes by them? Or what? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,748 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Good ol' Germany Member No.: 7,015 ![]() |
in SR4A they really suck at what they're supposed to do
They have INT1 , a Perception skill of 1 and with even one "1" they glitch. As a Houserule we gave Watcher a "watch Specialisation" so they had 4 Dice. not very much better, but not a complicated Houserule with a small but simple Dance Medicineman |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Shadows of Copenhagen Member No.: 17,824 ![]() |
in SR4A they really suck at what they're supposed to do They have INT1 , a Perception skill of 1 and with even one "1" they glitch. As a Houserule we gave Watcher a "watch Specialisation" so they had 4 Dice. not very much better, but not a complicated Houserule with a small but simple Dance Medicineman Yeah, agreed. I do something similar (give them Perception 1 (S: Astral) Usually.) It's probably for the best, watchers shouldn't be extremely observant sentries, you need bound spirits of greater force for that. E: and thanks, you've always been a solid contributor when I've had problems! The medicineman, indeed (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,188 Joined: 9-February 08 From: Boiling Springs Member No.: 15,665 ![]() |
E: and thanks, you've always been a solid contributor when I've had problems! The medicineman, indeed (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) *Said in old Asian man's tone of voice* Always pay heed to your elders. They have great wisdom. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,147 Joined: 2-May 10 Member No.: 18,539 ![]() |
Remember that watching usually implies conscious observing, which means that they should get the Observe in Detail +3 perception modifier in most circumstances. That gives them 5 dice, which is at least a little better than 2.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,102 Joined: 23-August 09 From: Vancouver, Canada Member No.: 17,538 ![]() |
The other trick is to give them the teamwork bonus for NPC mooks where they get a +1 to the test per watcher after the first, up to a maximum of +5. You only make a single test for the group though. So a group of 4 watchers would get a +3 bonus to the test but you make a single test for all 4 of them. Combine it with specialized watchers like Medicineman uses ( we use that rule too) and the Observe in Detail bonus Sephiroth mentions and you get a decent pool for a group of watchers.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Shadows of Copenhagen Member No.: 17,824 ![]() |
Thanks, this is good stuff!
Remember that watching usually implies conscious observing, which means that they should get the Observe in Detail +3 perception modifier in most circumstances. That gives them 5 dice, which is at least a little better than 2. Isn't this only applied if you observe a small, specific object or situation in detail? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
Thanks, this is good stuff! Isn't this only applied if you observe a small, specific object or situation in detail? Applied if searching for something specific. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Shadows of Copenhagen Member No.: 17,824 ![]() |
Applied if searching for something specific. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) That's what I thought. Watchers are pretty great if you send them to track down a specific targets location, but as sentries they're poor. I dig the special rules and acting in concert, makes them the decent replacement for a bound guardian spirit they were probably intended to be. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
That's what I thought. Watchers are pretty great if you send them to track down a specific targets location, but as sentries they're poor. I dig the special rules and acting in concert, makes them the decent replacement for a bound guardian spirit they were probably intended to be. "Intruders" is something specific... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 252 Joined: 30-October 09 From: Shadows of Copenhagen Member No.: 17,824 ![]() |
"Intruders" is something specific... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Oh okay. I thought it had to be a lot narrower. Well, that settles it, there are a variety of good rules I can use here. Thanks everybody! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cyber.gif) |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th April 2025 - 04:09 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.