![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 956 Joined: 16-June 07 From: Like a coyote, always on the move Member No.: 11,931 ![]() |
Ok, so I've just got my copy of SR5 (been poor and running without for some time now), and I've noticed some huge changes in the way a lot of stuff, Matrix included, works. One of the biggest changes I've seen is how TMs work, with no longer having complex forms that are basically the same as programs, and now having basically their own set of rules. So I'm curious, based on the experiences of those who've played both SR4 and SR5, how do the new techies rate up to the old? I kind of get the impression that they still become the ultra-powerful hacking gods later on but are karma sinks while hackers are the money sinks. Other than that, I haven't had a chance yet to really get a feel for the new Matrix rules, and thus haven't quite got a feel for the new TMs.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
TMs in SR5 are pretty suck-ass. There is no aspect of being a Matrix specialist where they are better than a mundane decker in SR5's rules. The overwhelming consensus is that they're straight busted in the new edition and you're better off playing a regular decker. You'll pay less in chargen resources and generally feel better about yourself.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
I tried building a hacker and a technomancer not long after the SR5 core book came out, trying to make them comparable matrix masters. I never finished either of them because the mundane human hacker character was coming out so much better than the elf technomancer. If I was to ever play one of them in a game I would have chosen the hacker over the technomancer, hands down. With the supplement books & errata that have since been released I'd still go for the hacker.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 956 Joined: 16-June 07 From: Like a coyote, always on the move Member No.: 11,931 ![]() |
Well, that sucks. Is there any point at all to TMs then? Other than the ability to have much less worries about GOD and noise and so on, that is.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
most of what you need to do as a technomancer will still involve regular hacking, so i wouldn't even say less to worry about as far as OS/GOD and noise is concerned.
with that said, i will say that there is *one* area where i cannot agree that hackers are better than technomancers. technomancers are *much* stronger at supporting someone who is actually good at what they do in the matrix. if you are a hacker you want to become best friends with a technomancer. sprites and complex forms are really quite useful for making someone else truly excel in the matrix (and can even be decent outside of the matrix if we're talking about machine sprites only). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
Well, that sucks. Is there any point at all to TMs then? Other than the ability to have much less worries about GOD and noise and so on, that is. most of what you need to do as a technomancer will still involve regular hacking, so i wouldn't even say less to worry about as far as OS/GOD and noise is concerned. So in short it means technomancers are with that said, i will say that there is *one* area where i cannot agree that hackers are better than technomancers. technomancers are *much* stronger at supporting someone who is actually good at what they do in the matrix. if you are a hacker you want to become best friends with a technomancer. sprites and complex forms are really quite useful for making someone else truly excel in the matrix (and can even be decent outside of the matrix if we're talking about machine sprites only). |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 956 Joined: 16-June 07 From: Like a coyote, always on the move Member No.: 11,931 ![]() |
Well, it seems to me that CFs can help work around those issues. Like Resonance Channel can be used to get around noise issues, or Puppeteer to make something else (like the deck of the spider at the facility you're dealing with) do the hacks for you. Plus Transcendent Grid helps get around the whole "crossing grids" issue. I mean, yeah, still looking at it, it feels like TMs got nerfed a TON, which makes me sad. I've always liked the decker/TM types (which sadly makes me unpopular with a lot of groups because it ends up leaving them nothing to do while I'm in the matrix), and thought that TMs could be something awesome. Now... meh.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
datajacks and programs help deal with noise far cheaper in chargen resources, and don't make you feel like you just got punched in the face. rebooting your deck after hacking something to clear OS if you don't need constant access to whatever you hack after hacking does the job just fine without making you feel like you just got punched in the face by a troll (no seriously, did you look at the fading code on it? you probably need at least rating 4 to keep enough hits to do *anything* at all against even the crappiest systems, and that's already 8 points you have to resist).
and not having to sustain a CF that gives you -2 to all actions (the same as crossing a grid) does a equally good job of dealing with the grid penalty, but again, costs vastly fewer chargen resources. heck, just flat out most likely having a higher dice pool helps more for that matter. basically the only technomancer build anyone has found that works at all is called in some places the "petnomancer". and mostly consists of registering a bajillion services constantly during downtime on the strongest sprites you can reliably manage (mostly machine sprites, again, they're great at supporting your team in the meatworld). with a stable of sufficiently high rating sprites, you can be almost as good as a hacker, with a few unique tricks, at the expense of burning so many resources on hacking that you basically can't function at all outside of the matrix. having said all that... they work a heck of a lot better with alternate chargen systems (still not well, just better), and if you're not playing official games lots of people seem to use houserules to help them out. but yes, technomancers basically needed some nerfing (if you only cared about the matrix, there was no competition), but they got way too much of a nerfing in combination with hackers getting a bit of a buff in some ways, and kept every last one of their disadvantages. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 956 Joined: 16-June 07 From: Like a coyote, always on the move Member No.: 11,931 ![]() |
Not saying they didn't need a nerf. After the release of Unwired, with all the new echoes giving the ability to have 4 IP in meatspace and 5 in the 'trix, plus everything else, they were ungodly OP. But as you say, this is a step too far. Especially with the complete remake of how the matrix works, removing ranks for programs, etc. and just in general nerfing all around.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
Running Target ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,076 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Rock Hill, SC Member No.: 7,655 ![]() |
Not saying they didn't need a nerf. After the release of Unwired, with all the new echoes giving the ability to have 4 IP in meatspace and 5 in the 'trix, plus everything else, they were ungodly OP. But as you say, this is a step too far. Especially with the complete remake of how the matrix works, removing ranks for programs, etc. and just in general nerfing all around. If they had unlimited karma, sure, they could have all of those IPs. But just because it was POSSIBLE doesn't mean it was LIKELY. Folks focus so much on the theoretical unlimited advancement of technomancers while ignoring the fact that most campaigns will probably never last that long. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
Prime Runner Ascendant ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17,568 Joined: 26-March 09 From: Aurora, Colorado Member No.: 17,022 ![]() |
If they had unlimited karma, sure, they could have all of those IPs. But just because it was POSSIBLE doesn't mean it was LIKELY. Folks focus so much on the theoretical unlimited advancement of technomancers while ignoring the fact that most campaigns will probably never last that long. Exactly... Though to be fair, Technomancers were pretty powerful right out of the box in SR4A. Nothing that you could not contend with, though. |
|
|
![]() ![]()
Post
#12
|
|
Neophyte Runner ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,351 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Behind the shadows of the Resonance Member No.: 17,653 ![]() |
Not saying they didn't need a nerf. After the release of Unwired, with all the new echoes giving the ability to have 4 IP in meatspace and 5 in the 'trix, plus everything else, they were ungodly OP. But as you say, this is a step too far. Especially with the complete remake of how the matrix works, removing ranks for programs, etc. and just in general nerfing all around. An adept at character creation could have 4 IPs in meatspace, and a hacker could have 5 IPs in the matrix at the same time. A technomancer couldn't match the adept's 4 IPs until after 4 submersions (44 to 70 karma), or the hacker's 5 IPs after 2 submersions (18 to 29 karma), or in total somewhere between 77 to 123 karma, and that's assuming said technomancer started at Resonance 6.Heck, an adept hacker that sacks some Magic at creation could do both right out of the box, but the technomancer can't. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 875 Joined: 16-November 03 Member No.: 5,827 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
chargen technomancers *were* OP in SR 4. but it had nothing to do with IPs.
they were ridiculous because you could, for example, thread your stealth up to 12 (or more practically about 10) and then stack on a registered sprite supporting the CF to get up to 18 (again, more practically you didn't want to soak fading on threading 6 hits). which meant almost no system had a hope of detecting you. or do the same with command and roll something like 30 dice on most tests they do with a drone (codeslinger in control device, gunnery ballistics specialization, remote operation specialization in vehicle skills), hot sim bonus, and I think you could cram a bit more in potentially). or create a doomsday one-shot technomancer by threading attack up to ridiculous levels. or thread a custom-designed psychotropic attack as needed for every situation. and they could get huge karma breaks on submersion by joining a group (which included no-strings-attached temporary groups that just want to submerge) and feeding a registered sprite to a free sprite, thus gaining access to some very powerful echoes (note: the cool echoes are not the ones that give you meat IPs in general. the good echoes let you do stuff like create widgets for yet another +3-4 bonus to everything you do in the matrix, or get a floating echo that you can trade around your submersion group, , etc). like I said, they needed some nerfing. if you wanted to be the master of the matrix and don't mind being absolutely awful outside of the matrix, technomancers were crazy good. it was a definite problem. but you still needed a ton of karma to make it work, and you were generally awful in any situation that wasn't solved in the matrix. but they went overboard. they took away all the powerful options, kept the huge karma costs, kept all the drawbacks of being a technomancer, took away the ability to function the same as a decker, and left you unable to protect anything as a technomancer. so now you get an extremely expensive option that doesn't do well in or out of the matrix. except in the field of supporting an actual hacker. like I said, they do that really well. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#15
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 ![]() |
Sadly, that seems to be their overall approach to anything that was too powerful in SR4; instead of simply fixing the problem, they indiscriminately bash the whole works with a nerf bat, to the extent that it is often simply unplayable. They did the same thing with SURGE and the sensitive system flaw, both of which could have been fixed with a few simple changes.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#16
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Sadly, that seems to be their overall approach to anything that was too powerful in SR4; instead of simply fixing the problem, they indiscriminately bash the whole works with a nerf bat, to the extent that it is often simply unplayable. They did the same thing with SURGE and the sensitive system flaw, both of which could have been fixed with a few simple changes. nah, mind control spells are honestly probably worse. if you can cast at a high enough force, your victims get one roll to resist and are then yours to do with as you please until you decide to let them go. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#17
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 ![]() |
Actually, in both SR4 and SR5, the target gets to spend a complex action to reduce the spellcaster's net hits. Mental manipulations are not really good for long-term control, more for quick things like "Shoot your buddy" or "Enter your security code for this door". SR5 makes them weaker in one way (resisted with two mental Attributes, and get the roll to reduce the caster's net successes every turn rather than every (Force) turns), stronger in another way (the target uses the rules for noticing magic to be able to tell they were mentally controlled - unlike mind probe, which is obvious to the target).
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#18
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Actually, in both SR4 and SR5, the target gets to spend a complex action to reduce the spellcaster's net hits. Mental manipulations are not really good for long-term control, more for quick things like "Shoot your buddy" or "Enter your security code for this door". SR5 makes them weaker in one way (resisted with two mental Attributes, and get the roll to reduce the caster's net successes every turn rather than every (Force) turns), stronger in another way (the target uses the rules for noticing magic to be able to tell they were mentally controlled - unlike mind probe, which is obvious to the target). "While the spell is sustained, the target may take a Complex Action on their turn to resist by making a Logic + Willpower Test with a dice pool penalty equal to the spell’s Force;every hit the target gets reduces the caster’s net hits by 1" "The spell ends when your net hits are reduced to zero." so yes, resisted with two attributes, but if your log + wil is 6 dice and i cast the spell at force 6, you are rolling 0 dice after your first, initial roll. which is to say, you don't actually get to resist at all beyond your first attempt if i cast at high enough force. you're mine to do with as i please until i'm finished with you unless you block the entire spell in the first place, and you will never break free unless you have edge; if i feel like controlling you for the rest of your natural life (or, more likely, until you walk through enough wards) and have the means to sustain the spell for that long (ie quickening or a sustaining focus; considering how disposable your minions are likely to be, i recommend the focus which can also be used for other manipulation spells), i can do so. and you might not even notice. it's only force 5 for standard corporate security, gangs, regular thugs, and most mundane animals. a little bit more can buy you permanent lieutenants or superior minions. force 6, for example, is useful for a variety of paracritters (some can be obtained with a mere force 5 as well). so yeah, mind control got slightly nerfed in a sense (two attributes to resist instead of one)... but in another way, it became possible to make it truly permanent. likewise, while direct combat spells got nerfect, indirect (particularly AoE) got a buff. frankly, most magic really didn't get much worse, if at all, compared to the rest of the world. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#19
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,116 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,449 ![]() |
You're right. I missed the implications of that little bit there.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#20
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
Folks focus so much on the theoretical unlimited advancement of FTFY. chargen technomancers *were* OP in SR 4. but it had nothing to do with IPs. they were ridiculous because you could, for example, thread your stealth up to 12 (or more practically about 10) and then stack on a registered sprite supporting the CF to get up to 18 (again, more practically you didn't want to soak fading on threading 6 hits). which meant almost no system had a hope of detecting you. or do the same with command and roll something like 30 dice on most tests they do with a drone (codeslinger in control device, gunnery ballistics specialization, remote operation specialization in vehicle skills), hot sim bonus, and I think you could cram a bit more in potentially). or create a doomsday one-shot technomancer by threading attack up to ridiculous levels. or thread a custom-designed psychotropic attack as needed for every situation. and they could get huge karma breaks on submersion by joining a group (which included no-strings-attached temporary groups that just want to submerge) and feeding a registered sprite to a free sprite, thus gaining access to some very powerful echoes (note: the cool echoes are not the ones that give you meat IPs in general. the good echoes let you do stuff like create widgets for yet another +3-4 bonus to everything you do in the matrix, or get a floating echo that you can trade around your submersion group, , etc). like I said, they needed some nerfing. if you wanted to be the master of the matrix and don't mind being absolutely awful outside of the matrix, technomancers were crazy good. it was a definite problem. Listing one-trick-pony moves and somehow stating that TM's were "OP" because of that is largely meaningless. We can one-trick-pony 200+ armor from chargen, or dozens of dice to shoot someone, or Magic 14, or any number of things with optimizing. The fact that optimization exists does not make one thing or another "overpowered." When it can do all things simultaneously it becomes overpowered. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#21
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
18 stealth does let you do an awful lot of things in SR4 matrix. 18 command before skills and miscellaneous bonuses lets you do pretty much anything you please in terms of rigging.
a chargen technomancer can do a lot of scary things while still being perfectly good at general matrix tasks in SR4. like, crazy scary things. there is no special stuff required to just start off with the ability to brainhack anyone connected to a sim module with whatever behaviours you want. the only special resource to start off with the ability to thread a CF to 18 was to start off with that CF at 6, which was heavily encouraged anyways. and it just got more and more scary with submerging, which you could do for the first time at something like 7 karma pretty easily if you started off with the right contacts. those technomancer builds are not so much one-trick ponies as they are general technomancer builds with a few extra tweaks to let them do crazy stuff. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#22
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
Compared to what I'm used to looking at, that's still a one-trick-pony. I hope you can consistently get 12 successes on a threading roll, by the way...
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#23
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 875 Joined: 16-November 03 Member No.: 5,827 ![]() |
Perhaps a quick 0 Karma 400 BP TM build with the basic values (we dont need every single equipmetn details chipped out) with some "karma stations" like 100 / 250 / 500 Karma would be better to understand what one would consider as an OP starting TM with extreme capabilities in SR4. There may be a lot of lost knowledge when it come to the secret tricks of TMs. And yes, dont forget drain rolls please.
Something like: Attributes Skills Important equipment CFs Sprites Dice Pool für Hacking Dice Pool for resist fading Dice Pool for X etc With 100 Karma he could do X, with 500 Karma he could da Y etc SYL |
|
|
![]()
Post
#24
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,542 Joined: 30-September 08 From: D/FW Megaplex Member No.: 16,387 ![]() |
Perhaps a quick 0 Karma 400 BP TM build with the basic values (we dont need every single equipmetn details chipped out) with some "karma stations" like 100 / 250 / 500 Karma would be better to understand what one would consider as an OP starting TM with extreme capabilities in SR4. There may be a lot of lost knowledge when it come to the secret tricks of TMs. And yes, dont forget drain rolls please. Something like: Attributes Skills Important equipment CFs Sprites Dice Pool für Hacking Dice Pool for resist fading Dice Pool for X etc With 100 Karma he could do X, with 500 Karma he could da Y etc SYL That would be helpful, but that's farther away from the point of this thread. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#25
|
|
Great Dragon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7,089 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 7,813 ![]() |
Compared to what I'm used to looking at, that's still a one-trick-pony. I hope you can consistently get 12 successes on a threading roll, by the way... you don't need to thread for 12 (and in fact, you can't do that anyways). you thread for 12 and use a registered sprite for the other 6 (in theory, you *could* even manage to get your CF up to 24, but i'm not about to suggest anyone try registering a rating 12 sprite registering a rating 6 sprite, on the other hand, will likely be unpleasant but possible). |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd August 2025 - 01:30 AM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.