IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Phys-ads, retinal duplication and finger prints, Screwed?
Bearclaw
post May 14 2004, 06:01 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



Phys ads have a serious weakness that should be fixed.
There's only so good a phys ad B&E specialist can be, because there is no phys-ad power equivalent to retinal duplication, or finger print matching. Has anyone come up with a rule for this, or should I just shut my filthy little mouth?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post May 14 2004, 06:03 PM
Post #2


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Given how physads basically win the game everywhere else, I think I'm fine with this.

Besides, retinal duplication doesn't really work and finger print security can be bypassed in other (far more practical) ways.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post May 14 2004, 06:05 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Buy the cyber, geas the point. Or do a phys-mage and use the spells. Thats really about it. That or nano-tech.

IMO, phys-ads arent really at their prime in dealing with technology because it requires tools (namely cyber or spells) to overcome. Thier at their best in combat, at stealth, and at movement flexibility (namely, they can run jump climb swim better and in more areas than anyone else, sometimes being able to do things the opposition deemed 'impossible'). Theyre also great at being anti-magic combatants, ignoring spells and disrupting spirits, only they cant provide spell defense.

Im sure people will suggest making powers to fill the void etc etc but in my view thats just something they cant do without bending a little to something non-power based.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post May 14 2004, 06:05 PM
Post #4


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



I guess if you want to be uber sneaky, you must go path of the mage. Physical Mask beats both measures.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 14 2004, 06:08 PM
Post #5


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



There are decent palm print bypassing tools that are non cyber and non magical. You could also simply get micro-vision and learn some B/R electronics for bypassing those pesky maglocks altogether.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post May 14 2004, 06:11 PM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



I forgot about the microvision bonuses. thanks.
But, in many secure places, to get in the door you must pass a mag-lock (card swipe, key punch, print or retinal print) which is right in front of the glassed in (on your side of the door) security station. Can't really be breaking open the box right in front of them.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 14 2004, 06:13 PM
Post #7


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



That's where a maintenance uniform and a good etiquette skill comes in handy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post May 14 2004, 06:46 PM
Post #8


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Well to be fair, I work in a jail... we have over a thousand employees and after a month you recognize everyone anyway. Social skills are gonna be a must even if you do have a valid ID. Control os very good at spotting new people, even with the right prox badges. And yes, FYI my building does use maglocks run through a central system. :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post May 14 2004, 06:54 PM
Post #9


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Believe me, I understand that some folks do eventually learn the face of the people.
But take Joe Average, chances are he's lucky to recognize his boss out of uniform. He wouldn't know John the Maintenance guy from some other shmoe with similair build and hair color, unless he drank of a regular basis with him.
That's the point of Acting and Etiquette, to look like you belong and don't need to be bothered.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
durthang
post May 14 2004, 09:26 PM
Post #10


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 78
Joined: 1-October 03
Member No.: 5,668



QUOTE (Nikoli)
Believe me, I understand that some folks do eventually learn the face of the people.
But take Joe Average, chances are he's lucky to recognize his boss out of uniform. He wouldn't know John the Maintenance guy from some other shmoe with similair build and hair color, unless he drank of a regular basis with him.
That's the point of Acting and Etiquette, to look like you belong and don't need to be bothered.

That really depends on how much traffic the check point gets on a given shift. If you have the same fifty people coming through every day, you'll get to know all of them pretty well. probably even talk to them alittle while you wait for their clearance to come through.

On the other hand, if you have a large number of people coming through, and not always the same day or time, remebering eveyone can get alittle tricky.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fahr
post May 14 2004, 09:33 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 320
Joined: 13-August 02
From: Austin, Republic of Texas (not CAS)
Member No.: 3,094



another aspect I have learned from my job (Programmer supporting police, fire, ems, jail) is acting as a contracter there to do something, I almost never get hassled, they assume once you are past the initial entrance, that you are supposed to be there.

SR application, legwork could reveal the correct sub who fixes the maglocks, while breaking in, calim to be from that company doing an "upgrade" if you act professionally, and quickly, like you know what you are doing, than they will likely not hassle you. at least not as much. It also depends on how alert the gaurd is, i.e. are they expecting intrusion?

won't work for every situation...

-Mike R.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post May 14 2004, 11:35 PM
Post #12


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



IIRC, these things are only available on cyber-eyes right? So why not just go the low-tech approach, 'Cyber-eye on a Stick'™! Take a normal eye, modify it a bit, add a battery and just carry it around in your pocket.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Centurion
post May 14 2004, 11:45 PM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Joined: 2-September 03
From: San Antonio
Member No.: 5,571



Also makes an interesting conversation piece to boot.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luke Hardison
post May 15 2004, 12:44 AM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 17-November 03
From: Texas
Member No.: 5,828



QUOTE (FlakJacket)
IIRC, these things are only available on cyber-eyes right? So why not just go the low-tech approach, 'Cyber-eye on a Stick'™! Take a normal eye, modify it a bit, add a battery and just carry it around in your pocket.

QUOTE
Unless an improvement [of an adept's senses] involves radio or similar technological phenomena, any sense provided by cyberware can be provided by this power.

Description of the Improved Sense Adept Power, SR3, p. 170

I think that's what everyone is refering to for adept powers. If it's available with technology, it's available with magic, subject to GM approval. And it's natural!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post May 15 2004, 12:48 AM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



Yes, but you would need photographic memory and a really close look at a person's eyes to mimic them.

[edit] to clarify, anything is available subject to GM approval, and that is the basis of my 'yes'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post May 15 2004, 12:54 AM
Post #16


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



By no stretch of the imagination is retinal duplication a 'sense' :P

If you want to make a new power, then cool, but Improved Sense isn't the place for it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post May 15 2004, 02:18 AM
Post #17


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Dupe a retinal image? Really expensive contact lenses. If you want to be icky, buy an organic eye, have it altered and hook it up to a portable tank.

Dupe a fingerprint? Biotech to manufacture synth-skin with the target print on it and graft it to the subject's own digit. Or alter the subject's fingerprint with Biotech for a night -- it won't last, but it'll get the job done.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hasaku
post May 16 2004, 05:08 AM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 197



I like the cybereye on a stick idea, but the scanners are probably designed to read from a few feet away so people don't get their filthy human oils on its sleek, polished perfection...ahem. What this means is that the camera is always on, looking for a face. When it sees something like a face, it uses known reference points to find an eye and zoom in for a retinal scan. If it doesn't see anything resembling a face, it probably has no reference point for locating the eye and won't even try to read your eye-on-a-stick.

As for print scans, I prefer the custom made leather gloves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post May 16 2004, 05:13 AM
Post #19


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



Hasaku, while that's possible in 60 years, right now, all of the iris/retinal scanners I've seen require the eye to be placed directly in front of them (6-8 inches) and scan just the eye. They don't look for a face or anything of the sort. Of course, that's now, this is then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post May 16 2004, 05:25 AM
Post #20


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



Unless you're going to run into retinal scanners 24/7 (highly unlikely), nanite Retinal Tailors are all you need. Finger scanners can be defeated with Fingerprint Mapper nanites just as easily. An adept should be able to develop powers that duplicate these (I'd peg tham at 0.25/level each), but you'd need something to scan the prints in with in order for the power to manipulate your prints. A ritual sample would work nicely, I'd imagine. How about something like this:

Retinal Tailoring and Fingerprint Mapping
Cost: 0.25 points per level

If the adept has obtained a ritual sample of a subject, he need only meditate for one hour and then make a Magic (8) Test with target modifiers pulled from the following table. If successful, the adept manages to duplicate the target's retinal pattern (if using Retinal Tailoring) or fingerprints (if using Fingerprint Mapping) at a rating equal to the level of the power. The adept can then make an Opposed Test pitting the level of this power against an appropriate scanner in order to fool it. Once created, the altered prints last only as long as the adept keeps the power activated. The moment it's deactivated, his normal prints return and he has to repeat the procedure in order to activate it again. Only one set of prints can be duplicated at any given time.

Living Target in Presence: -2
Dead Target in Presence: -0
Eye or Finger/Hand from Living Target: -1
Eye or Finger/Hand from Dead Target: +1
Other Ritual Sample of a Living Target: +2
Other Ritual Sample of a Dead Target: +4
Adept knows the Sympathic Magic metamagic technique: -2
Adept is using Astral Perception: -1
Background Count: +count

Feel free to change those modifiers. I pretty much pulled 'em out of my ass.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moonstone Spider
post May 16 2004, 02:55 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 20-November 03
Member No.: 5,834



Adepts should get a power that mimics retinal duplication about the same time Cyberware comes out that let's the Sammie have Traceless Walk.

Magic and Cyber overlap in some areas but aren't meant to be identical, there's some things only magic can do and some things it can't do at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post May 16 2004, 03:22 PM
Post #22


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



I completely agree, but I don't think this is necessarily one of them. Radios, cellphones, skillwires, cybernetic limbs, easy attribute and armor boosts, cybernetic weaponry, vehicle control rigs, and etc. are all well within the strengths of cyberware. Something as simple (not to mention a waste of resources for most characters) like retinal duplication is neither going to be missed or game-breaking.

I mean even using the power above (3 Power Points total for both at only a Rating of 6 which is the highest he can get it without initiating) is going to put it on a 50-50 shot against Rating 6 scanners, assuming the adept even manages to get the power to work after acquiring a ritual sample of the person he needs to replicate (which is an adventure in itself).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post May 16 2004, 05:06 PM
Post #23


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



My problem lies in the inherent specialization of physical mimicry which currently leaps outside the current (arbitrary) boundaries of the adept.

Using the "magical turned inward" argument could justify a hell of a lot -- from shapeshifters to voice duplication and so on.

Which, don't get me wrong, has a perfectly reasonable application but it exists outside the realm of canon.

And to be fair, considering how limited adepts are in their spellpoints, I have a hard time seeing one dump points into so specific a power when the retinal security/print scanners are encountered so infrequently.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
A Clockwork Lime
post May 16 2004, 05:24 PM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,616
Joined: 15-March 04
Member No.: 6,158



That's the point. It's a worthless power for anyone except for a specialist who's going to encounter these things on a regular basis, and those that do will be a bit uncomfortable dishing out half their Power Points for the priviledge of only a 50% chance of success against a moderate- to low-rated scanner (Rating 6). Any facility worth protecting is going to have higher rated scanners.

Which is why I don't get the objection. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post May 16 2004, 05:47 PM
Post #25


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



QUOTE (A Clockwork Lime)
That's the point. It's a worthless power for anyone except for a specialist who's going to encounter these things on a regular basis, and those that do will be a bit uncomfortable dishing out half their Power Points for the priviledge of only a 50% chance of success against a moderate- to low-rated scanner (Rating 6). Any facility worth protecting is going to have higher rated scanners.

Which is why I don't get the objection. :)

My objection comes from further up in my post -- the power, while inoffensive and well within the realm of possibility, defies current and arbitrary limtations placed upon the manifestations of an adept's magic.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th January 2026 - 07:30 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.