IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> movement in combat, resolving movement and attacks in combat
daforsto
post Jun 4 2004, 04:47 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 4-June 04
From: UP of Michigan - Laurium/Houghton
Member No.: 6,377



My question is how to resolve an attack with the movement rules in SR3. I have searched the forum, but not found the answer. I apologize if this has already been addressed elsewhere.

It is my understanding that a player can run their quickness times their run multiplier in a single combat turn, but that movement is divided equally over the total number of initiative passes that will occur in that turn.

What happens when a player wants to attack a target that will be within range in the turn, but not during their initiative pass ?

In example :
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Player A has a quickness of 5 and a run multiplier of x3.
Player B is 8 meters away from player A.

player A wants to attack player B.

Player B's initiative is 28, player A's initiative is 8.

First Actions :
~~~~~~~~~
For some reason player B chooses not to attack player A and instead spends his first initiative pass contemplating the meaning of life.

Player A starts running at player B. Player A can cover 15 meters in the turn, but during the first initiative pass will only cover 5 of those meters. Player A wants to attack player B. Is this flat out impossible ?

Player A will reach player B in the turn. Player A gets an action this turn. How do you resolve this situation without allowing the slower character to move faster than the quicker character, or act out of turn ?


--Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 04:56 PM
Post #2


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



The way I do it, it works like delaying an action. In this case the player would get to attack in the second pass instead of the first, around 8. He still gets his one action, he just gets it a pass later because he was moving. He doesn't move any faster, he moves slower, in the second pass instead of the first.

If he had rolled an 18 instead of an 8 then he probably would have lost his first action because he was running during it, since that's all he cared about. If he had a gun he could have used his first action to fire his pistol twice while running up to the bad guy then spend a free action to drop the pistol and sluggerize him in the second pass.

Bottom line: movement takes time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Jun 4 2004, 04:59 PM
Post #3


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



I've had players iss chances to strike simply because they could not get into range in time. Sure, the troll with the claymore is gonna whallup you good, but only if he can catch you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Jun 4 2004, 05:04 PM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



Thank god for high quickness and close combat.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
daforsto
post Jun 4 2004, 05:22 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 4-June 04
From: UP of Michigan - Laurium/Houghton
Member No.: 6,377



Let me complicate the scenario.

Player B is a physad with Deadly Hands, Distance Strike and a Magic Rating of 9.

Player B can reach out and kill player A from 9 meters away.

Player B's first action was non-agressive. Player A then charged player B. During player Bs second action he can easily dispatch player A before A's attack was ever landed. However A never got to determine the outcome of his first action.

Is there a solution to this ? Is A just plain out of luck ? The same situation can be realized if player B was holding one of those nasty guns...

--Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 08:08 PM
Post #6


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



B is out of luck all the way around. B won initiative and can use killing hands and distnace strike to smear him without moving from his spot. I don't know what else you want there, but A is freaking toast unless some near divine intervention happens. He has to survive at least one set of distance strikes before he can reach B regardless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 4 2004, 08:22 PM
Post #7


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Unfortunately, this is where the initiative system fails, plain and simple. Some people play with SR2's initiative system instead (basically, just SR3's, only backwards), but I'd say you're better off rewriting it. There's really no other way around this problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Jun 4 2004, 08:43 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Im not sure what the problem is. It makes going first a pretty big deal, which it sorta should be. Movement is a little hard to handle because how far changes with what everyone rolls, but its pretty fair. Being able to act fast and move fast is an advantage, and given the nature of SR Im fine with that.

In the example, A has a total movement of 15 (presuming he doesnt increase it on any turns with a complex action to roll atheletics) spread out over 3 actions (because theres 3 actions this turn) so he moved 5 per phase.

B is 9 meters away.

Sequence would go like B acts, A moves (now 4m away) and delays action, B acts, A moves and uses delayed action to engage. While the speed for B wasnt listed, he could have moved away as well, if desired, which might have prolonged it.

Bottom line: if youre slow, and you try to charge a fast guy thats ~27 feet in front of you, youre screwed. Not seeing the issue.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 08:47 PM
Post #9


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
Unfortunately, this is where the initiative system fails, plain and simple. Some people play with SR2's initiative system instead (basically, just SR3's, only backwards), but I'd say you're better off rewriting it. There's really no other way around this problem.
I don't see what the problem is, I think this is working just fine in the above scenario.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
daforsto
post Jun 4 2004, 08:54 PM
Post #10


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 12
Joined: 4-June 04
From: UP of Michigan - Laurium/Houghton
Member No.: 6,377



[COLOR=blue][COLOR=blue][COLOR=blue]
QUOTE (The White Dwarf)
...
In the example, A has a total movement of 15 (presuming he doesnt increase it on any turns with a complex action to roll atheletics) spread out over 3 actions (because theres 3 actions this turn) so he moved 5 per phase.

B is 9 meters away.

Sequence would go like B acts, A moves (now 4m away) and delays action, B acts, A moves and uses delayed action to engage.  While the speed for B wasnt listed, he could have moved away as well, if desired, which might have prolonged it.

Bottom line: if youre slow, and you try to charge a fast guy thats ~27 feet in front of you, youre screwed.  Not seeing the issue.


Seperate but related issue :
I was under the impression you could not hold an action across initiative passes. So in this case if A were to hold the action, it would be gone before B took his second action...

I really don't have a problem with the system, just looking for clarification/validation.

--Dave
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Jun 4 2004, 09:00 PM
Post #11


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Now for the monkey wrench.

Say A does expend the complex action to boost quickness. Say he gets 4 successes (lucky him)

Phase 1, Player A begins to move, expends complex action to move faster. Base Quick is 5 for a normal speed of 15, but with 4 successes, has boosted quickness to 7, for a speed of 21, applicable in subsequent rounds. He moves 15/3=5 meters

Phase 2, Player A now moves 8 meters due to the incresed speed that wasn't applicable before (21-5)/2

Phase 3, Player A moves an additional 8 meters, completing the 21 m run in less than 3 secodns.

This sound about right to everyone else?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 09:01 PM
Post #12


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Yes, you can hold an action across passes. I think you can hold an action across combat turns, but I need to look that up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 4 2004, 09:05 PM
Post #13


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (BitBasher)
QUOTE
Unfortunately, this is where the initiative system fails, plain and simple. Some people play with SR2's initiative system instead (basically, just SR3's, only backwards), but I'd say you're better off rewriting it. There's really no other way around this problem.
I don't see what the problem is, I think this is working just fine in the above scenario.

Well, here's the problem: if runner A were not jacked and only had one action per turn, he could clear the total distance and attack without opening himself up in the way the speed freak would. Hence, completely broken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 09:10 PM
Post #14


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE (Arethusa @ Jun 4 2004, 09:05 PM)
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Jun 4 2004, 04:47 PM)
QUOTE
Unfortunately, this is where the initiative system fails, plain and simple. Some people play with SR2's initiative system instead (basically, just SR3's, only backwards), but I'd say you're better off rewriting it. There's really no other way around this problem.
I don't see what the problem is, I think this is working just fine in the above scenario.

Well, here's the problem: if runner A were not jacked and only had one action per turn, he could clear the total distance and attack without opening himself up in the way the speed freak would. Hence, completely broken.

Er no, movement is divided by the number pf passes in the turn, not by the Character's passes in the turn. If there are 4 passes and player A has 4 actions and a running speed of 20 and player B has 1 action and a running speed of 20, then they both still only move 5 meters per pass. Player A just gets an action on each pass while Player B gets an action in the first pass, and the rest of the passes he completes his movement.

QUOTE (Nikoli)
Phase 1, Player A begins to move, expends complex action to move faster. Base Quick is 5 for a normal speed of 15, but with 4 successes, has boosted quickness to 7, for a speed of 21, applicable in subsequent rounds. He moves 15/3=5 meters?
Right.

QUOTE
Phase 2, Player A now moves 8 meters due to the incresed speed that wasn't applicable before (21-5)/2

Phase 3, Player A moves an additional 8 meters, completing the 21 m run in less than 3 secodns.
No, he moves 7 meters the last 2 turns, because his speed is 21, which divided by 3 passes is 7 meters per pass. He doesn't magically move faster to make up the difference because he was going slow earlier.

Just like if a person has a speed of 21 but stands still his first pass he doesn't get to move 21 meters on his last 2 passes, he moves 14 meters his last 2 passes because he can move 7 meters per pass.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Jun 4 2004, 09:11 PM
Post #15


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



And, you have to declare your movement in the first pass.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The White Dwarf
post Jun 4 2004, 09:21 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 614
Joined: 17-June 03
From: A safehouse about to be compromised by ninjas
Member No.: 4,754



Dave, yes you can hold your action across passes. So for your listed values, A could hold at 8, B would act on 18, A could hold again, B would act on 8, A could hold again, tho by now hed probably not want to. And as BB said, Im 99% sure you can hold across turns, just have to use it before you act again. So presuming you rolled the same values, and that my memory is correct, B would again act on 28, A would have to use his action or lose it, as he is next on 8.

Nik, heres the way that would go down, as I scan:

A has the quickness 5, and run of x3. A rolls 8 ini, B gets 28.

B on 28: wastes action, pretty birdy
A on 08: uses complex action to run, raising quickness to 7 for this turn. He now runs 7 meters this turn, rather than 5 (7x3=21, 21/3actions=7). A is now out of actions due to using his for the athletics test. Note that A is now within 2 meters so could in theory initiate a melee attack but has no actions, he would have to rely on B to do so.
B on 18: whatever
A on 00: could continue moving, at his base speed of 5. Way I read it using atheltics only works on the turn you use the action, to sprint extra hard, but your GM may say otherwise.
B on 08: whatever
A on 00: could finish his move
new pass, presume same rolls.
B on 28: whatever
A on 08: Now having an action he could melee, unless resloved by B starting an attack earlier.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 4 2004, 10:08 PM
Post #17


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (BitBasher)
QUOTE (Arethusa @ Jun 4 2004, 09:05 PM)
QUOTE (BitBasher @ Jun 4 2004, 04:47 PM)
QUOTE
Unfortunately, this is where the initiative system fails, plain and simple. Some people play with SR2's initiative system instead (basically, just SR3's, only backwards), but I'd say you're better off rewriting it. There's really no other way around this problem.
I don't see what the problem is, I think this is working just fine in the above scenario.

Well, here's the problem: if runner A were not jacked and only had one action per turn, he could clear the total distance and attack without opening himself up in the way the speed freak would. Hence, completely broken.

Er no, movement is divided by the number pf passes in the turn, not by the Character's passes in the turn. If there are 4 passes and player A has 4 actions and a running speed of 20 and player B has 1 action and a running speed of 20, then they both still only move 5 meters per pass. Player A just gets an action on each pass while Player B gets an action in the first pass, and the rest of the passes he completes his movement.

My mistake. Been a while since I looked at those rules.

QUOTE (Nikoli)
And, you have to declare your movement in the first pass.

I could've sworn I saw a entry in the rules somewhere that said you could declare it at any time during a turn but suffered movement penalties for the rest of the turn, regardless of whether you kept moving or not. Is this errata, or am I just misremembering?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Jun 4 2004, 10:26 PM
Post #18


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



QUOTE
I could've sworn I saw a entry in the rules somewhere that said you could declare it at any time during a turn but suffered movement penalties for the rest of the turn, regardless of whether you kept moving or not. Is this errata, or am I just misremembering?
No, that sounds right to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Calvin
post Jun 4 2004, 11:35 PM
Post #19


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 27-January 04
Member No.: 6,021



Official rules allow you to start moving in the middle of a combat turn if you've been stationary. House rules are often more flexible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 11:11 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.