IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Heh Rayman, check it out., Check it out ! Taser Bullets ???
The Question Man
post Jun 4 2004, 09:28 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,722



:eek: Hoi Chummer, thought you might get a kick out of this one. When Science Fiction becomes Science Fact. :D

http://www.discover.com/issues/jun-04/rd/e...ets-save-lives/

Fades to Black

QM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tjn
post Jun 4 2004, 09:44 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 476
Joined: 30-December 03
From: Fresno, CFS: taking out one durned furriner at a time.
Member No.: 5,940



So, in effort to pull it to SR... does John LeBourgeois win Dunk's nonlethal bequest some 50 years before he dies? :P

My second thought is... okay, one shot does 50k volts and does bad things to muscles and nervous systems to shutdown the individual.

Would that really be much of a difference in the case that supposedly inspired this guy? 40 rounds before he hit the floor? Um... that much stun overflow, even at one box a stage... Guess Mr. Amadou Diallo would have had to have been a Troll. :rotate:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 4 2004, 10:02 PM
Post #3


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Gun. Raygun. Though I do find the image of a machinegun toting, armless, legless cartoon character vaguely amusing.

In any case, point about the Diallo case was that they could've put him down with one round had they had Shockrounds, or so the advertisements claim. Of course, lots of people would suggest that cops just be better trained, but that's neither here nor there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 4 2004, 10:35 PM
Post #4


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



True. Their marksmanship in the Diallo case was horrible.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Number 6
post Jun 4 2004, 10:37 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 10-May 04
Member No.: 6,316



Yep. By being better trained they coulda saved the taxpayers almost $5 in bullets.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JaronK
post Jun 4 2004, 10:41 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 942
Joined: 13-May 04
Member No.: 6,323



Well, and not killed the guy, which some would consider more valuable.

JaronK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 4 2004, 10:53 PM
Post #7


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Without video evidence, it is impossible to determine what actually happened.

However, if Mr. Diallo did something like reach in a pocket while turning around, most cops would assume that to be a threatening gesture.

Especially in the face of three officers with drawn weapons.

Now, since we don't have video evidence, it's equally possible the officers opened fire without any provocation and were just incompetent.

However, the fact remains the marksmanship was atrocious, especially for close quarters work.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 4 2004, 10:57 PM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



Not to mention that 40 rounds on target and many more off tends to ring false with most people as professional, cool headed action.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 4 2004, 10:58 PM
Post #9


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



QUOTE (Number 6)
Yep. By being better trained they coulda saved the taxpayers almost $5 in bullets.

And not discharged so many rounds, endangering innocent bystanders which are relatively abundant in urban settings.

But the $5 dollars in expended ammo counts too.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hasaku
post Jun 4 2004, 11:46 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 197



3 cops managed to put 40 rounds into him. I'm assuming nobody stopped to reload just to be a dick about it. Allowing for high capacity magazines that's, what, 5 missed shots? Hardly "many more off."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 4 2004, 11:51 PM
Post #11


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



QUOTE (Hasaku)
3 cops managed to put 40 rounds into him. I'm assuming nobody stopped to reload just to be a dick about it. Allowing for high capacity magazines that's, what, 5 missed shots? Hardly "many more off."

Court TV's story.

41 rounds discharged, 19 actually struck the target.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Jun 5 2004, 12:04 AM
Post #12


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



More info here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hasaku
post Jun 5 2004, 12:17 AM
Post #13


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 197



Ah. Discover needs to realize that “the police put 40 bullets in him before he hit the ground" is not the same as "the police fired 40 bullets at him before he hit the ground."

But it sounds more dramatic, so run with it. It's only news after all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Jun 5 2004, 01:11 AM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



Put these puppers in an Ares Alpha and street sams REALLY have the playing field levelled for them against spirits. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
otomik
post Jun 5 2004, 01:19 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 269
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 752



NYPD is one of the worst places a cop would work for. At the time all the weapons they issued or authorized were fed a standard pressure 115gr. 9mm Ball from 15-shot magazines. 9mm is NYPD's only authorized cartridge and police departments are notorious for cutting weapons training at any budget crunch.

The four cops at the diallo shooting carried a Glock 19 (with modified horrible NY heavy trigger), 2 Sig-Sauer P-226 (DAO) and a S&W 5946 (horrible DAO).

I wouldn't feel comfortable if the only choices i had in sidearms were DAO 9mm FMJ, and it gives me the feeling that their training program is little more than spray n pray.

http://www.thegunzone.com/glock/phase3.html

about the Taser Bullet, he says he has yet to test it. nuff said.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Jun 5 2004, 01:40 AM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



What does DAO mean, again?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Jun 5 2004, 01:42 AM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



Double Action Only
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 5 2004, 01:43 AM
Post #18


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



QUOTE (Phaeton)
What does DAO mean, again?

Double Action Only.

It means the gun lacks a cocking hammer and can be pulled without cocking the hammer first.

A DA and DAO pull are significantly heavier than a SA (Single Action) pull.

By comparison, a SA requires the hammer to be manually cocked before firing the first shot. A SA has a much lighter pull than the DAO.

A DA/SA is a combination of the two, allowing the shooter either to fire without a hammer cock or to cock the hammer, enabling the lighter pull.

As a side note: You'd think agencies would save weapons training as the last place to skimp, given the bad PR and inevitable lawsuits that arise from accidental or indiscriminate fire.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phaeton
post Jun 5 2004, 01:48 AM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 973
Joined: 3-October 03
Member No.: 5,677



@ Capt. Dave/Siege: Ahhhh, right...Thanks!

Back to the drifted topic...*sigh* I guess they get more target practice on-duty than in training. :dead:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 5 2004, 01:53 AM
Post #20


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Poor standards in training require more initiative from officers to keep their weapons skills sharp.

Unforunately, expecting officers to pursue such training outside of department mandate is more of an ideal than any real basis in fact.

As I understand it, most departments handle weapons training like a college course -- you take it and then move on to your next course. Given how mission-critical this happens to be, I would expect a heavier emphasis on such duties.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Jun 5 2004, 02:00 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



Maybe it's because I live in a small Ga. town, but 90% of the officers here train
with weapons a lot. Our S.W.A.T. team is made up of beat officers, and I
know they keep up their training.

Oddly enough, they've only had to shoot one person. Most of them feel that if they have to use their weapons, they should be able to use them effectively.

Hell, they'll get a few of them together at the range
off duty to practice for fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 5 2004, 02:03 AM
Post #22


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Another Georgia geek -- glad to meet you. :grinbig:

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capt. Dave
post Jun 5 2004, 02:06 AM
Post #23


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 407
Joined: 22-March 04
Member No.: 6,183



Same here :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Jun 5 2004, 02:09 AM
Post #24


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



A few quotations off of The High Road.

QUOTE (The High Road)
I can tell that the UAPD officers carry a glock, just by the shape of the grip. They seem taken aback when I ask which one.


QUOTE (The High Road)
I met a police officer eating at a chinese restaurant as I wait for my order. I asked the PO about his carry, if they get to choose their sidearm... he said, "I don't even know what I carry" ...and then, he pulled it out, showed me the pistol (loaded I assume). I told him that it was a GLOCK, and he said, "Is that what this is?"


QUOTE (The High Road)
I got pulled over 3 weeks ago (for unsafe lane changed), stupid me with all my gun periodicals everywhere, gave it away that I was armed. The PO asked me if I have a gun, and I said yes. He asked me to pull it out with my weak hand. As I took it out of the bag, he noticed that the magazine wasn't there. He said, "How the heck are you gonna be ready if anything were to happen?" So I said, huh? But he kept talkin' about where to keep my gun and mags. And finally he said, "that's a pretty gun, is that a Beretta?" I said, no sir its a Taurus. We ended up talking more and not once he asked me for my CCL.


I don't know what towns or even what states these posters were from, but I can say that that is exactly what I'd expect from the police in my town, and I don't think it's an uncommon phenomenon. Certainly, there is more to being a cop than shooting straight, but that's really no excuse.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Jun 5 2004, 02:16 AM
Post #25


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



It's not especially surprising given how little firearms training is given in some areas.

However, I choose to console myself with the idea that these are the exception and not the rule.

Yes, I have a first class ticket to denial.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 03:39 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.