Cyberdecks & Legality, quick question |
Cyberdecks & Legality, quick question |
Jun 13 2004, 11:09 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 26-June 03 From: Salt Lake City: Ute Nation Member No.: 4,811 |
What is the highest legal value for an MPCP in a cyberdeck (assuming no illegal persona programs )?
Why yes, I am establishing my decker's "other identity" - how did you guess? :D |
|
|
Jun 13 2004, 11:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Ain Soph Aur Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,477 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Montreal, Canada Member No.: 600 |
Any deck with masking is illegal, so you'd have to put 0 in Masking. Otherwise, I don't think there is a limit.
|
|
|
Jun 13 2004, 11:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 26-June 03 From: Salt Lake City: Ute Nation Member No.: 4,811 |
Found it! Matrix pg. 20: " in most locales, the MPCP of a cyberterminal is legally limited to rating 4 or less."
|
|
|
Jun 13 2004, 11:26 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 403 Joined: 27-August 02 From: Scotland Member No.: 3,175 |
Ouch! MPCP 4 and no Masking. Although you can get permits for them, it seems.
Does it say anywhere which utilities or utility ratings are illegal? Can't find that info.. |
|
|
Jun 13 2004, 11:35 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
MPCP 4 is the legal limit.
Any level of Masking takes a lot of explaining, if not being outright illegal. Any level of Evasion is also dubious, though less so than Masking. |
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 06:06 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 67 Joined: 11-March 03 Member No.: 4,238 |
Matrix- Pg: 20-21:
Evasion legality: 3P-S Masking legality: 2-S I can't find the legality rating for MPCP>4 at the moment, but it does state that "in most locales, the MPCP of a cyberterminal is legally limited to rating 4 or less." I would assume one could get a standard permit for that though, as having MPCP 8 or 12 still isn't going to make you less detectable by itself (as masking does). |
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 06:12 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Traumatizing players since 1992 Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 3,282 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 220 |
Yeah, but legal cyberecks dont even have a spot for a masking chip. It's easy to tell if a deck is legal or not, and it's pointless to have a rating 12 deck with no chance at masking. You're kind of screwed either way, either the deck is legal or it's not. Why have a rating 12 deck that you have a permit for but cant use for anything illegal because it has no masking?
|
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 08:19 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 226 Joined: 4-June 03 Member No.: 4,685 |
You know, even in future admins will want to have the fastest PC's available :)
Of course corps will usually use masking and much nastier stuff, but still... |
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 10:00 AM
Post
#9
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
How's that? One microchip looks like any other. |
||
|
|||
Jun 14 2004, 10:49 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 515 Joined: 10-April 04 From: Chicago, IL...Ich vermisse Deutschland. Member No.: 6,230 |
However, there was something in VR 2.0 stating that a legal MCPC doesn't even have slots for Masking. If there's an empty slot (or two), chances are someone can point the finger and say "that's a cyberdeck."
Don |
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 11:19 AM
Post
#11
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 214 Joined: 26-February 02 From: UK Member No.: 340 |
I can't imagine it would be hard for a deckmeister to install a Masking and Evasion chip so that it is not visible form outside (i.e. concealed within the case). It makes it slightly more difficult to swap out, but that won't be happening that often I imagine. |
||
|
|||
Jun 14 2004, 12:13 PM
Post
#12
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
What if the Masking program is burned on the same chip as another persona program? |
||
|
|||
Jun 14 2004, 12:16 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 515 Joined: 10-April 04 From: Chicago, IL...Ich vermisse Deutschland. Member No.: 6,230 |
It states somewhere that they are seperate chips. Your MCPC, as I understand it, has 5 slots: BSME plus icon chip.
Don |
|
|
Jun 14 2004, 12:57 PM
Post
#14
|
|||
Running Target Group: Members Posts: 1,428 Joined: 9-June 02 Member No.: 2,860 |
If you can come up with the page citation, I'd appreciate. As it stands, I think the chip burning rules are flexible enough to let you cram several persona programs onto one chip. |
||
|
|||
Jun 15 2004, 12:25 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 26-June 03 From: Salt Lake City: Ute Nation Member No.: 4,811 |
I assume that any good decker could gut a legal cyberdeck and install the components from their highly illegal "working" deck, but presumably security professionals are going to be able to detect the alterations.
I wanted a completely legal cyberdeck that will contain only information searching utilities and a Search frame or agent. A lot of my work as a decker is simply compiling background checks on people or places, and I can compile a preliminary report from entirely legal sources. When I need better info, I can arrange with my team for a safe jackpoint and bring out the 'big guns', but when I'm legally staying at a nice, secure hotel under a fake SIN I don't want compromised, why wander around with a million + nuyen of illegal matrixware? :eek: |
|
|
Jun 15 2004, 06:09 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 67 Joined: 11-March 03 Member No.: 4,238 |
Matrix, Pg: 167 lists a set of actual cyberterminals. They run with Cold ASIST, no masking, no evasion, thus are fully legal. They weigh in at 1,300-7,500 nuyen. Slot a browse 6 and a frame/agent on there, and you have a cheap, legal searching method.
Alternative: If it's a luxury hotel, SSG, pg: 121 suggests that public dataterms in A and AA areas may well have low end cyberterminals. You may be able to take an optical disc in with your utilities, and search to your heart's content on a 'free' (cost of calls not included) cyberterminal. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 03:25 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.