IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Do pads hurt single shot's, potential for quality over quantity
Wounded Ronin
post Oct 19 2004, 03:47 AM
Post #51


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



Well, I would agree that in some situations if you don't have a weapon and you can't run away fast enough, you're boned. Indeed, the situation # 1 and # 2 that I mentioned above in this thread.


But I think that in a sense unarmed combat ability is more versatile for civilians than carrying a weapon while not being very good at unarmed combat. The reason is that the lethal response that a weapon provides may not be legally appropriate for all situations even if you may be in some danger.

For example, let's say that someone is very angry at me and is determined to beat me to the ground and then stomp on my skull repeatedly until I stop moving. If I have little hand to hand combat ability but I have a firearm, what am I going to do? If I shoot him, then the disparity of force is in my disfavor and I just used lethal force against a non-lethal unarmed attack. But if I don't shoot him and merely pull the gun without the intention of shooting him, I can easily be disarmed. And if I don't defend myself at all, I could still be seriously hurt or even killed. The gun dosen't really provide the flexible response that unarmed combat would in that situation. The scenario would be similar if he had some kind of blunt object. It would only become a situation where you'd really need a firearm if he had an edged weapon or another firearm and intended to slay you on the spot. And in that case, even if you had a firearm, you could still easily be killed.

The other thing is that if you survive a situation using unarmed combat, the disparity of force would usually be in your favor legally because you were unarmed. But if you stab someone or shoot them then the disparity of force may easily be counted against you.


Furthermore, if you are very comfortable with unarmed combat I think that it makes any weapons you do carry more effective. For example, if you carry pepper spray but are bad at unarmed combat it would be relatively easy to clamp a hand over the nozzle and disarm you if your attacker can clear the distance before you are able to hit his face. But if you are good at unarmed combat, the pepper spray becomes an absolutely nasty surprise in your arsenal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Oct 19 2004, 04:20 AM
Post #52


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



If you have no other options and kill him when he is clearly intent on causing you serious and even lethal harm, it's unlikely you'll get convicted of anything in any sensible court of law (take note: such courts only exist in about half of America, and not many other places, at the moment). Ultimately, if you get in a situation where lethal force is involved, I'm not even sure I'd advise sticking around for the cops to show up even if you were within all sensible boundaries. Far too many stories about guys going to jail for completely reasonable uses of force in self defense.

Anyway, while I can understand your friend's point, personally, I view carrying a weapon as an extension of capability. While it's not sensible to always carry, where one can and can effectively, I'd rather have it than not. That doesn't mean I'll use it if I get in a fight, but the option is there. What is most important, however, is to remember that any weapon is just a weapon; you must always remain in control of the situation, and being armed is absolutely secondary.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 19 2004, 05:05 AM
Post #53


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



Well said, Arethusa. (Except for the splitting ere the cops show. You want to carry a gun, you'd better be willing to put some faith in the justice system. As you said, some are easier to believe in than others. Pick where you frequent carefully.)

Ronin, if you want to continue this dicussion, I suggest we do it somewhere more appropriate. Say, the SST forum on Bulldrek. Say the word and I'll set it up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Oct 19 2004, 05:08 AM
Post #54


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



That would probably be a good idea. But, what is the URL?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 19 2004, 05:11 AM
Post #55


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



http://www.bulldrek.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Oct 19 2004, 05:14 AM
Post #56


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



OK, I've registered.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raygun
post Oct 19 2004, 05:15 AM
Post #57


Mostly Harmless
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 937
Joined: 26-February 02
From: 44.662,-63.469
Member No.: 176



We're in the Self Defense thread in the Semi-Serious forum.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wounded Ronin
post Oct 19 2004, 05:16 AM
Post #58


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,640
Joined: 6-June 04
Member No.: 6,383



Most excellent. I'm writing up a response now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Oct 19 2004, 05:19 AM
Post #59


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (Raygun)
Except for the splitting ere the cops show. You want to carry a gun, you'd better be willing to put some faith in the justice system. As you said, some are easier to believe in than others. Pick where you frequent carefully.

Before this thread completely goes to Bulldrek (forgive the half unintentional pun), I should clarify that that wasn't entirely (or even mostly) serious, though I'll admit I have an unfortunately skeptical view of self defense laws, at the moment. That is all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Oct 20 2004, 12:17 AM
Post #60


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



When talknig baout hiding guns it's probably for the best that SR uses a numerical rating, if we argue or not. Just hiding a toy on your person isn't the same thing. There's a weight to a gun. It's not just a bulge under your coat but a weight that affects how you move.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crusher Bob
post Oct 20 2004, 01:12 AM
Post #61


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,598
Joined: 15-March 03
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 4,253



Is that 5kilograms of death dealing metal under your jacket, or are you just happy to see me? Ah for the glorious days, back when the concealability of the Great Dragon ATGM was 4...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Oct 20 2004, 01:27 AM
Post #62


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



There are times when I have trouble believing that 3rd edition is deeply and thoroughly sane in comparison to the previous versions with which I have no experience.

This is not one of those times.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Oct 20 2004, 03:11 AM
Post #63


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Snow_Fox)
Just hiding a toy on your person isn't the same thing.

If it's a toy that is weighted to be about a pound and a half, it probably tells you a lot about what you can do with smaller guns.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Snow_Fox
post Oct 22 2004, 03:43 AM
Post #64


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,577
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Gwynedd Valley PA
Member No.: 1,221



It's hard to discrib, but even the difference between loaded and unloaded is notciible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th November 2025 - 06:15 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.