IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Lord of the Flies, Snake eyes & microdrones
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 02:56 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



Concept - Lord of Flies

NPC who uses snake-eyes inconjuction with a mass of micro-drones to have 100% knowledge of the local area, like a portable, self-moving CCTV system. The micro-drones are very small indeed, insect sized! A combination of crawlers and burrowers, but mostly flyers. The individual drone resolution is poor (current digital CCTV quality around 48kb/sec), but overlapping video feeds produce the quality. Each drone communicates to each other, with LoF somewhere within the swarm.

One problem, how do I get SR drones that small? :read:

Just for AE - The 2004 version :proof:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sargasso
post Sep 21 2004, 02:58 PM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: 9-September 04
Member No.: 6,641



Check out rigger 3, they've got plent of tiny drones. they even have tiny crawler drones, for that creepy element you're looking for. drones that small have body 0 however, and are destroyed by any sucessful attack. Also, you've got a maximum number of drones on your remote deck, you might consider having at least a few larger drones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 03:10 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



When I read through R3 the crawler drones came across as quite a bit larger than I needed.

If the drone has a very basic autopilot that is - don't crash/maintain distance to drone x - then I should be able to pilot the swarm with only a few drones, yes?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sargasso
post Sep 21 2004, 03:11 PM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: 9-September 04
Member No.: 6,641



No, no, they list very small crawlers. anything body 0 is as small as a paper back book or so. Body 1 means from the size of a toaster, to the size of a dwarf.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 03:20 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



If I saw a fly the size of a paperback book I'd reach for a gun, not a rolled-up newspaper!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GenoSicK
post Sep 21 2004, 03:20 PM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 16-September 04
From: Paris
Member No.: 6,669



They say that some drones with Body 0 are smaller tha the palm of the hand.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Sep 21 2004, 03:21 PM
Post #7


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Yea, He's looking for something the size of a cockroach or smaller.

In reality the problem with small rotodrones is that air starts to behave differently when the rotors are too small, which is why the smallest remote controlled rotorcraft today has rotors about 12cm across last I checked.

Doesn't happen in SR.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sargasso
post Sep 21 2004, 03:21 PM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: 9-September 04
Member No.: 6,641



Yep. Imagine walking around with a bulky coat full of twenty body 0 drones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Moon-Hawk
post Sep 21 2004, 03:28 PM
Post #9


Genuine Artificial Intelligence
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,019
Joined: 12-June 03
Member No.: 4,715



Ever see one of those ionic breeze air fresheners? There's a pretty solid breeze that comes out of one of those things, and there are no moving parts. Just ionized air. Now I'm not sure how much power that thing sucks out of my wall, but add 60 years of technology on there and you could have a sweet little jet engine. Sort of like a low-power caterpilliar drive for the air.
Imagine a drone constructed of lighter-than-air (or nearly so) polymers. If you could get it light enough, and get enough thrust out of that little engine, you might be able to come up with a smaller flying drone. But it could only operate in low-wind conditions, like indoors. A properly wielded desk fan could probably keep it at bay, but it's still a neat idea.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sargasso
post Sep 21 2004, 03:32 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Joined: 9-September 04
Member No.: 6,641



That's probably analagous to what powers mini-blimbs and other tiny drones. Tiny drone thunderbirds. :-P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 03:37 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



Bitbasher, did you check the link at the start. I know I said it was for AE ('cos I make flip comments), but unless the hand-model has very big hands the rotors appear to less than 12cm.

As for the brain it's small

And if you want very small.

The camera?

The RF trans gear?

So that just leaves a battery, no?

Yes, SR canon doesn't appear to have small drones, that's why I would like some contructive input.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 03:38 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



QUOTE (Moon-Hawk)
Ever see one of those ionic breeze air fresheners? There's a pretty solid breeze that comes out of one of those things, and there are no moving parts. Just ionized air. Now I'm not sure how much power that thing sucks out of my wall, but add 60 years of technology on there and you could have a sweet little jet engine. Sort of like a low-power caterpilliar drive for the air.
Imagine a drone constructed of lighter-than-air (or nearly so) polymers. If you could get it light enough, and get enough thrust out of that little engine, you might be able to come up with a smaller flying drone. But it could only operate in low-wind conditions, like indoors. A properly wielded desk fan could probably keep it at bay, but it's still a neat idea.

Love it! :love:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Austere Emancipa...
post Sep 21 2004, 03:50 PM
Post #13


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,889
Joined: 3-August 03
From: A CPI rank 1 country
Member No.: 5,222



I was wondering about that "for AE" bit...

Personally, I've no problem with this. I might allow gear using less CF and Load with a system similar to cyberware grades, house rule some micro-equipment to mount on it, and determine the final size by the weight and CF used.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 03:59 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



I'll give it shot when I get home and edit this tomorrow, see what you think.

Unless some nice person has time on their hands in the next couple of hours :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kryton
post Sep 21 2004, 04:16 PM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 3-December 03
From: Boston, Mass
Member No.: 5,874



Logically this is how I would approach the issue:

Nanites are microscopic drones or just really really tiny particle sized drones essentially. They have a specific function ect. so level of self movement within the body. For a machine that small to move you would need some really compact electronics something possibly like a DNA computer or just super sized small computers or something which is fundementally small. If a nanite can perform the complex and precise movements within the body using very very very small electronics making an insect sized drone should be feasable. With nanintes and nano tubes and other stong very small structures getting a insect sized drone or slightly smaller drone should work in theory. When you get that tiny the physics for movement may be different so your propulsion would be totally different. Talk to a Aerospace engineer or someone who's had an engineering class involving fluids for the proper shape. With nano fibers the size and weight issue shouldn't be a problem. You may though need a signficant amount of power to transmit a signal? I'm not sure how that would work maybe it's not an issue. In high school I say a guy do a performance showing planes he made powered by flys so possibly the drones might mimic insects in how they move. The only issue that might come up is power. If electronics do have room temp. super conductors that might not be an issue either. Maybe Setzo could pipe in he's an engineer I think, not sure which discipline though?

Theoretically it's possible. There may be legistlation is in check so that such drones are A. very very expensive and B. prohibitied by law because of the ease of intruding on citizens. Maybe that's why the other drones are so large. Micro or tiny drones may require some serious cred. The marines and army are doing research into micro-drones right now. I've seen a survelance drone the size of a small book that's used for infantry recon. So in 60 years and the technology listed in Sota 2063 it should be possible for a large research corp. Technically you could possibly do something like that from the SOTA 2064 but I don't even want to guess what the TN's would be. Technically what your trying to do isn't cannon. It sounds possible but it's not cannon. As long as it's a NPC I'd say go with it because it's a cool idea and adds a cool fear into the game. If it's a PC I'd be very weary. But for a NPC you pretty much have to start making up stuff because I don't thing Rigger 3 really works well for a microsized drone. I could be wrong but maybe it's a R&D thing for Ares or another mega-corp. If you had say the individual working with an insect shaman that could make a really nasty and creative threat. One interestnng idea would be if they're winds were photoreactive? Giving them solar powered movement. They might fit in a large suit case even if they were tiny enough. You may have some limits on flying time though? What I don't know specifically. Also how much noise do they make? I would be nice and say that characters have at least a TN of a 4 if not 3 to see them because of they're odd mechanical movement. I would just try to be fair since your partially in uncharted territory.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 21 2004, 04:35 PM
Post #16


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



You're right about the flight problems and their solution, I didn't have the heart to bring it up before. Insect flight systems are pretty well worked out now. But as to spy-drones the size of bugs, do you realise that the American government has been funding a research group since 1999. The two models needed for insect flight were developed in 1997 (rotational stall) and 1999 (lead edge vortex compression).

Can anyone explain how multiple low-res capture devises can produce a single high-res image?

Anybody got suggestions on electronic costs for near the cyberware sized set these would need?

As to noise, ALL flies make a noise, but these are a bit wrong, scare the PCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 21 2004, 05:20 PM
Post #17


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Sargasso)
Yep. Imagine walking around with a bulky coat full of twenty body 0 drones.

Keep in mind that Body 0 drones take up 0 + (0*1.5) CF, or 0 CF. You can fit an infinite number in your pockets.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kryton
post Sep 21 2004, 05:33 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 3-December 03
From: Boston, Mass
Member No.: 5,874



Possibly using a computer interpolation system to take and combine the images. I've heard of a interesting Nasa uber telescope idea. You have camera's set at intervals on a rigging in space. Each camera has a specific focal length at specified distances. The images are then fed into a computer and the final image is magnified so that you don't actually need a big telescope just lots of little one's spread out in a line with different focal lenghts. So maybe it could work on that prinicple. Another is with multiple camera's maybe you could get a true 3d image? Maybe also the more images you have the computer can cut out the nasty bits and put together the picture using the good bits and ect. This is really cutting edge stuff so I'm just guess. I'm not an engineer by any means. It sounds at least possible. Also don't forget that shadowrun is Science Fiction so we may be making some guessing as to feasiblity. I've always wondered how feasible a data jack is in real life or even a cyber limb that doesn't need recharging every 5 hours of use. We're by no means cutting edge science fiction so a little fudging here and there is okay. If it adds a cool fear or aspect to the story go for it. I've always thought style over substance was an essential part of cyberpunk fiction.

That fly guy I mentioned had a bet. He bet a propulsion engineer that he could make a fly powered air plane. The engineer bet $30 bucks he couldn't. After ten years and $300 later the fly powered plane flew. Sometimes even engineers disagree. There some definite engineering hurdles that have to be met of course but this is fiction so go from there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kryton
post Sep 21 2004, 05:45 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 3-December 03
From: Boston, Mass
Member No.: 5,874



Yeah the new rules really sort of break down after a certain point. Not much you can do really. That would be a great area though. Maybe Jon Setzo has some ideas since he wrote most of Rigger 3's vehicle construction rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Sep 21 2004, 06:46 PM
Post #20


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114




Interesting idea, Botch. Some ideas:

- You could treat the entire swarm as a single system with a sensor rateing and range (maybe "flux") based on the size of the swarm. Attacks which destroy multiple little drones (like fire, maybe) reduce the rateing of the whole system, where as a single gun shot would have very little effect. That way the rateings and abilities of individual flies become less important.

- The guy could also have an implant similar in cost, essence and function to a nanite hive. The flies could fly in and out to recharge whatever little battery powers thier flight.

- Alternately, thier movement could be based on some kind of electromagnetic force. The Lord could have some kind of powerful electromagnetic feild generator which powers the little buggers (pun intended) and he could control them with subtle (computer mediated) changes in the feild.

- It would also be creepy if the guy didn't ever talk, but the buzzing of the swarm was laced with strange wispers.... muahahaha...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kryton
post Sep 21 2004, 07:25 PM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 3-December 03
From: Boston, Mass
Member No.: 5,874



That would be creepy if they did speak for him. Really creepy. What if they even had a swarm type of AI system.

One place they could be stowed would be if the guy was paralyzed they could be part of his prostetic adjustment. Maybe he's an ex-engineer who is stricken with Ceribal Palsey (msp?) or and had an accident. They could be stored in his wheel chair easily. Otherwise if he was a human they could be part of a cybernetic skin where they attach to his back or under a coat. I'm guessing a high essence cost though to be fair to the players. This has a good cyber-horror conotations. I really like it. Especially if they have the ability to break out of a subdermal layer.

Maybe the drones actually had insect digestive systems so they some how generate power through metabolic processes similar to how cyberarms are powered metabolically. Who knows?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Necro Tech
post Sep 21 2004, 07:28 PM
Post #22


UMS O.G.
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 444
Joined: 18-May 04
Member No.: 6,335



If you want a bunch of really small and cool drones, Deus might let you have his design specs. Then again, they had a flight time of only five minutes due to fuel restriction. They are absolutely possible and exist in cannon so making a ground drone version is certainly feasible. The range however will be crap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Method
post Sep 21 2004, 07:32 PM
Post #23


Street Doc
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,508
Joined: 2-March 04
From: Neverwhere
Member No.: 6,114



QUOTE (kryton @ Sep 21 2004, 02:25 PM)
What if they even had a swarm type of AI system.

A type of collective consciousness, perhaps? It could be granted by a sophisticated new IVIS system...

"We are The Flies... You will be assimilated...."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Sep 22 2004, 07:32 AM
Post #24


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Assuming you can build the drones (witch seems plausible) I will coment on the control and interpretation systems.

Using slandered rigging equipment your number of drones is limited to deck rating. 12 would be exceptional and you want 50+.

A control system based on the construction nanite control systems would be needed. You can not jump into any of these drones. Given that you only have 50-100 instead of 100,000+ the control programme can probably run on a computer you can carry. Probably a rather expensive mod for your VCD.

Real-time processing of the data feeds into a clean crisp image would require more processing power than you can carry easily. (Your processing 1mp of raw data per camera per drone per minute, and the size of the programme to process it witch would be big) what you could do is rather than making a pretty image produce a map feed. You would looses colour and resolution but you would have a symbology for where everything is that could be interpreted by a battle tack system.

I like the idea of hiving them a single sensor rating based on number of active bugs. But you should use there individual speed, fuel, and flux ratings.

I can see them being powered by there command signals similarly to the way a crystal radio doesn’t need batteries. Of cause they would not be very fast and eth transmitter would need to be very high flux and close to them.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Botch
post Sep 22 2004, 11:18 AM
Post #25


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 486
Joined: 4-August 04
From: Fomorian Wastes
Member No.: 6,538



Um, MP transfer.

Yep, 3D modelling was an intention.

Someone needs to help refine this, but a standard SR video feed has a 10x digital zoom capabilty, no? The size of an image file is directly effected by the resolution, so by removing the digital zoom capability of the videostream the MP requiement is also reduced. Reducing the colour interpretation also significantly reduces the amount of data to transfer. Zoom can be achieved by interpelation, like the telescopes or by simply moving closer. Also the video processing could be done a distributed processing basis. Each fly contributing to a part of the whole, obviously theres a balance point between very expensive flies and a very expensive deck.

The swarm comprises of 2 main types of fly. The fly that can be steered and the flies that fly around the fly he's flying. Say 1 in 10-20, requiring a much cheaper deck for 50+ flies.

Yes, I agree that range is limited and wind a problem. They should be able spread out through a moderate building at maximum range and "hunker down" and walk when the air speed picks up.

The electromagnetic field charging at short range is tempting. Maximum coverage leads to shortest duration type thing. Although once the fly settles down the power usage should drop, with the camera only transmitting changes in the visible areas. The fly's having to return to base for a little bit to "eat" give the PCs another avenue for tracing the source of the amorphous mass of communication.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 10:06 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.