IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

20 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> [SoA2064] Sota 64 Finally
Siege
post Oct 7 2004, 12:32 AM
Post #51


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Since nobody else has posted, I'll do a quick skim:

And sorry, I'm not debating the merits of the mage camera, I am simply noting it's presence in the book.

[ Spoiler ]


None of them are really, really scary - but considering I play goofball adepts anyway, I have way too many choices now. :grinbig:

Oh, a Geas for all you melee types: "Berserker". Apparently "Shamanic Mask" can also be a geas, but it isn't specifically spelled out in the text.

The spy gadgets include rules on "Disguising" gear, such as the hollowed out book trick, the pen transceiver, a brief case rocket and so on. Other fun toys include low-light contact lenses, a "null" suit which is amazingly incompatible with armor and gecko climbing gloves that cannot, under any circumstances, get wet. Which means you'll never see them in Seattle.

Lessee...photo manipulation software, infrad film and yes, a cellular trigger for activing things with a phone call. "Reach out and Touch Someone" takes on a whole new meaning.

As for the shock section, I haven't read it yet - I was drooling over all the new toys, the fanboy that I am. I will, however, endeavor to read the section tonight. :grinbig:

-Siege

Edit: My roomie is demanding his copy back at very large knife point, but I did skim the shock section.

The whole "Ork tusker popularity" craze left me cold and the "gangsta" rap parallels were a tad uninspired, but the rest seemed quite entertaining. The "Top Ten" lists were highly amusing and great plot hooks if any GM is so inclined.

The Corp Culture notes do add a depth of role-playing options that usually aren't explored particularly thoroughly, but now you have a use for that "wardrobe and fashion" knowledge skill. :grinbig:

The Gambling was a tad large for the amount of impact it will have on most games, in my humble opinion.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Oct 7 2004, 12:46 AM
Post #52


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



Just to be an ungrateful bastard, any chance of adding a quick explanation of what the powers are/do? Some of them are fairly obvious, some I can take a guess at but others less so. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Oct 7 2004, 12:50 AM
Post #53


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



I would think not at this point. I think we can wait until they're all loaded into the NSRCG in a few weeks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 7 2004, 12:50 AM
Post #54


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



these sound fun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 7 2004, 01:03 AM
Post #55


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



I wouldn't mind, but I think that's treading a little close on "Incoming! Angry author(s) inbound!"

Most of the powers are self-explanatory - just because I am a surly bastard. :grinbig:

-Siege

Edit: Although the "Aid Spell" will turn adepts into a mage's best friend. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zenmaxer
post Oct 7 2004, 01:33 AM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 20-September 04
Member No.: 6,682



Okay, this rocks, I'm definately snagging this book, especially as adepts are my fave chars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SilverWolf_assas...
post Oct 7 2004, 02:08 AM
Post #57


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 5-October 04
Member No.: 6,728



What is this nasty rumor I heard about social adepts. .??

Smokes, a guy. . so cyberware, no skills higher the 4
"When the going gets tough, I like to smoke the whole pack at once."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 7 2004, 02:12 AM
Post #58


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



A more general note about adepts and Paths - a number of Paths are mentioned, but game mechanics and adepts behind these Paths are a tad lacking.

Is this a deliberate omission?

For example, the "Path of the Invisible" gives vague descriptions, but there isn't a thorough mechanical evaluation of the pros and cons of these roughly-sketched out Paths.

And my roomie noted the book is a little light on solid mechanics and instead focuses more on fluff, which isn't necessarily bad - but more numbers would be useful to balance the fluff.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siege
post Oct 7 2004, 02:15 AM
Post #59


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,065
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Fayetteville, NC
Member No.: 3,916



Adepts now have options for impacting things other than massive sneakiness or walking quisinarts o death.

They can buy IA: Social skills at a steepish cost and certain adept powers are now geared towards human interaction.

-Siege
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 7 2004, 02:16 AM
Post #60


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



QUOTE (SilverWolf_assassin)
What is this nasty rumor I heard about social adepts. .??

Check out the list of powers Siege posted... note the presence of powers such as "Commanding Voice," "Enthralling Performance," Improved Social skills, "Kinesics" and a few others.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 7 2004, 02:56 AM
Post #61


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



infusion, hahaha, infusion focus, hahahaha, hahahaHAHAHAHA, HAHAHHAHAHA! I HAVE THE POWER OF GREYSKULL!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 7 2004, 03:03 AM
Post #62


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



dont you mean that, by the power of greyskull, you have the power?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 7 2004, 03:22 AM
Post #63


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i will pretend for a moment that i am not too mad with power to concern myself with your petty mortal concerns, mortal, and answer your question. in a word: no, my utterance was correct. i have the power of greyskull. it is in my pocket, and i call it George.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 7 2004, 04:14 AM
Post #64


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



Infusion is pretty bad-ass, especially if you throw in a couple of Infusion Foci.

On the subject of Foci, the Adept Focus is cool, but it might open a whole can of worms in regards to magic loss. Hmmm...

I dislike the whole idea of Improved Ability: Social Skills! I can see a case being made for some of the individual skills, but not as a blanket rule.

Multi-tasking...Mmmm, munchie goodness! :lick:

I can't believe that nobody has mentioned Living Focus?!?

I'm not too thrilled about Penetrating Strike, but it costs a lot.

Side Step...hello Dodge Pool. :)

If someone combined a few (or even not-so-few) of the more social powers and abilities with a couple of the social edges it could result in a very scary and potentially unbalancing character. :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Oct 7 2004, 04:16 AM
Post #65


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (mfb)
dude, it converts sound into sight. there is no image, before the chips in the ultrasonic cyber do their thing. that's a whole lot of processing. you can't cast spells on things you can hear but not see--unless you have ultrasound vision cyberware.

hmm, i just dug thru the m&m text and it seems that there is in fact a small limitation on the use of ultrasound and magic. the text says that a person that is under the cover of a invisiblity spell and the observer/caster have ultrasound he will see a outline but cant use said outline ot target the person coverd by the spell. the can maybe be transferd to other areas like say when a person is coverd in darkness so that you cant tell where he is except via the ultrasound image.

so this invalidates my statement about it being unprosessed but it allso invalidates your statement about ultrasound not limiting magic in any way.

this however brings up the waspsnest that is termographics. but i guess as infrared is just a part of the em band (below normal light) the modification done is basicly similar to the normal cybereye, only that it reacts to a diffrent band of the em spectrum. but as it behaves mutch like light the brain can interpet the input without needing preprosessing the way ultrasound needs. this leads to a black and white image (similar to modern night vision goggles) and not what thermographics stands for normaly, the classical robocop image. but then thermograph and infrared is more or less interchangeable terms.

but what bring the whole discussion about is the copout from the writers that cybereyes work when doing magic based on them costing essence. what they could have done was to try and give a explanation for why. but then sr rules are not know for being clean or easy to work with :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 7 2004, 04:25 AM
Post #66


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



whoops, you're right. missed that sentence. and, yeah, that's the crux of the whole argument--"it's been paid for with essence, so it interacts with magic" seems to only be true if the effect in question is unwanted by the person with the cyber.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 7 2004, 04:43 AM
Post #67


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



No, it doesnt actually invalidate the point about it being unprocessed. ultrasound is layered over normal vision, so you are still getting unaugmented visual LOS in all cases except those of full darkness and invisibility - circumstances under which, as you mention, ultrasonic vision does not grant LOS. SO the argument against digital manipulation still holds strongly.

Put another way - lets say youre holding up a little screen displaying a digital image of a person who is standing in front of you. You see both the digital image and the person standing there. Simply seeing the digital image does not negate your existing LOS to the target... but if the target were in a different room and you ONLY had the digital image, that image could not provide LOS to the target.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Oct 7 2004, 04:55 AM
Post #68


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



it invalidates the point about it being unprosessed by the very fact that the text lists a prosessor that turns the echo into visual images.

and one small problem with your post is that the same text says that its what thermographics allso does (put stuff on top of the normal vision). so does that mean i cant use thermographics to target someone with magic in complete darkness? or can trolls and dwarfs (that have it naturaly) do so but not others that have to get by cyberware?

ok so it can be brushed to the side by saying that the ultrasound stuff was someone that had not fully read up on thermographics or that thermographics is still a nonprosessed effect but gets overlayed by the fact that its plugged into the same optical nerves that normal vision goes into (it just uses passive sensors that react to heat, not normal light).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Oct 7 2004, 04:55 AM
Post #69


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



hobgoblin. Thankyou. I new there was a point in MM that suggested that untrasound vision was no good to mages. I had considered a teem of runners all with ultrasound vision (eyes, goggles or scopes) firing of ir smoke grenades like nobody’s business but I ad considered it would have to be a no spell caster team and was beginning to think I had it wrong.

This tells me that US will not ever grant LOS but will not interfere with LOS achieved with a different vision system.

I want back with my books. Well we there tomorrow.

My take on the “if you payed essence it works with magic” is that it only applies to things that can be natural. Speed, attributes, hearing sound and seeing with light and IR are all cybernetic enhancements of natural things. Ultrasound vision is not an expansion of a natural sense it is an entirely new sense that the brain has no natural way to process so the technology overlays it on the visual sensors.

If you where to implement it in a way more closely aligned to a bat’s sonar (a procedure that would probably require cultured biowear to give the brain the ability to proses object locations threw the hearing centres of the brain) you might be able to use it to target spells.

Witch brings up an interesting point, can you shape change into a bat and use its sonar to target spells, do you even get its sonar.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Oct 7 2004, 04:57 AM
Post #70


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



ok, now this is getting messy to say the least. and it all started by a comment about a camera being able to see the astral :silly:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 7 2004, 05:11 AM
Post #71


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



QUOTE (Edward)
This tells me that US will not ever grant LOS but will not interfere with LOS achieved with a different vision system.

Well said, Edward. My thoughts exactly, but with greater concision.

Nothing is invalidated because the processed input from US vision is not, itself, granting LOS.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SilverWolf_assas...
post Oct 7 2004, 05:17 AM
Post #72


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 26
Joined: 5-October 04
Member No.: 6,728



So in conclusion,
State of the Art 2064 is like crack.
It drives everyone crazy and if you don't have it then you can't possibly understand.
And in some states it will be outlawed.
Excellent work!!

--------------------------------
TheBlackDwarf, Decker
"Fear me Renraku. . . I am PAIN"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Oct 7 2004, 05:38 AM
Post #73


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



well, two more books to my must buy list i guess. sota64 and mrjlbb. gah...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 7 2004, 05:58 AM
Post #74


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (SilverWolf_assassin)
So in conclusion,
State of the Art 2064 is like crack.
It drives everyone crazy and if you don't have it then you can't possibly understand.

People would post more in the way of specifics, but that would sort of defeat the whole buying-the-book concept.

I'm sure if you're patient you will see more and more of SotA '64's minutae over time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Oct 7 2004, 08:38 AM
Post #75


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



QUOTE (Jason Farlander)
QUOTE (Edward @ Oct 6 2004, 11:55 PM)
This tells me that US will not ever grant LOS but will not interfere with LOS achieved with a different vision system.

Well said, Edward. My thoughts exactly, but with greater concision.

Nothing is invalidated because the processed input from US vision is not, itself, granting LOS.

I thought I was agreeing with you.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

20 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th February 2025 - 04:51 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.