IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> strange spell design question, (for an adept, no less!)
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 03:07 AM
Post #1


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



So one of the adepts in my group really wants something that's sort of like Killing Hands, but related to electricity and good for frying electrical stuff, glitching cyberware, etc etc. She's as not-munchkin as possible, and it really fits in with the character concept, so even though there's nuttin' in the rules supporting her, I want to work this out. I'm right on the edge of just coming up with something and calling it good, but I figured I'd solicit for opinions first.

We're thinking of working with the semi-official Knack adept power and generating a restricted-target, range-touch elemental manipulation spell. Spell design rules in MitS seem to imply that purchasing a version of Lightning Bolt that's touch range, restricted target: electronics would be at a drain level of (Damage Level -1). That's peachy. But I can't seem to figure out how that spell would work.

I know that combat spells against objects use the object resistance table for TN (SR3 P182), where elemental manipulations use a base of 4. Damaging manipulations don't appear to have a Threshold. Does that mean that Lightning Touch: Electronics always rolls against a 4 and doesn't ever get opposed in any way? If not, where is the reference to the object resistance table? It does seem clear that non-living non-magical targets don't get to make Resistance Tests...

If this is all true, a Force 1 Lightning Touch:Electronics (D) spell would kill any electronic device in a single unopposed test. Coming from an adept (who purchased this at 1power point) there's no drain on this thing... Kinda burly.

Also, any other suggestions for how to handle this sort of ability would be greatly appreciated.

Finally - yes, I know most things use optical components. :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Oct 23 2004, 03:09 AM
Post #2


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Get the PC to take Killing Hands and add Elemental Damage. Which book was it that had monks with Killing Hands + Fire?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 03:14 AM
Post #3


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



It was Brainscan. SOTA:2064 adds the "Elemental Effect" modifier to Killing Hands for .5 Power Points.

The thing is, that's all too powerful, the PC wants something more specific. And hence more affordable; this is an existing character adding powers at initiation, not a new char.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 23 2004, 03:15 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



SOTA64 has an elemental strike power. It requires that the adept already knows killing hands. With a simple action, the adept can surround his hands in an elemental aura, which adds elemental secondary effects to subsequent attacks. The specific element is chosen when the power is purchased - presumably, the power could be taken multiple times for multiple elements, but I dont think I'd allow more than one element to be active at any given time.

Oh, and the monks with the firey killing hands were in Brainscan.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Oct 23 2004, 03:16 AM
Post #5


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Brainscan I think had the monks with Fire Hands and it seems that SotA64 has an Elemental adept power. I think that the Power Point cost was Killing Hands cost + .5 PP. So the elemental effect of Lightning added to Killing Hands would work in the manner of a spell at the Force equal to the Adepts Magic. Combined with Distance Strike and zap!

QUOTE
If this is all true, a Force 1 Lightning Touch:Electronics (D) spell would kill any electronic device in a single unopposed test.

A spell must have a Force equal to 1/2 the OR of any object to affect it. Page 182 Spellcasting, SR3. So at least force 4 for most electronics, 5 for cyberware.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post Oct 23 2004, 03:18 AM
Post #6


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



How is a light killing hands with lightning secondary effect potential too powerful?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 23 2004, 03:19 AM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



Ok, so you already knew that. If 0.5 PP is too expensive, I doubt you're going to design a knack thats cheaper. Dont forget that elemental spells have to have a force equal to or greater than 1/2 the object resistance, so you'd need a knack with an effective force of 4 or 5 to affect most things.

Edit: yay rapid sequence of redundant posts!

This post has been edited by Jason Farlander: Oct 23 2004, 03:20 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Oct 23 2004, 03:19 AM
Post #8


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE
The thing is, that's all too powerful, the PC wants something more specific. And hence more affordable; this is an existing character adding powers at initiation, not a new char.

Killing Hands Light costs .5 and Elemental Strike costs .5 together with a geas of chanting "Kami-hami-ha!" for .75 PP with the effects, I don't think we're unreasonable...

[edit]
QUOTE
yay rapid sequence of redundant posts!

I was just going to say that...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 03:23 AM
Post #9


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



Killing Hands Light with Lightning does nothing. MitS p51-52; if the spell causes light damage there is no secondary effect. If the spell causes Moderate, object resistance gets a +4 bonus, meaning cyberware and computers cannot be affected. If the spell causes serious there's a +2...still pretty much impossible. It takes a Deadly to give even a reasonable chance of breaking something.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Oct 23 2004, 03:26 AM
Post #10


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



You could take Killing Hands: Serious and go Full Offense. You can be fairly certain the computer will not jump up and get into a defensive stance.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Oct 23 2004, 03:31 AM
Post #11


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE
Killing Hands Light with Lightning does nothing.

Well, one can stage up the damage with successes and inanimate objects without armor will take deadly everytime.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 03:43 AM
Post #12


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



QUOTE (Kanada Ten)
QUOTE
Killing Hands Light with Lightning does nothing.

Well, one can stage up the damage with successes and inanimate objects without armor will take deadly everytime.

Oh. Yes. Yes, of course.

Missing that one there means I have to turn in my "actually knows how to play this game" nametag, doesn't it? :(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Oct 23 2004, 05:38 AM
Post #13


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



QUOTE
The thing is, that's all too powerful, the PC wants something more specific. And hence more affordable; this is an existing character adding powers at initiation, not a new char.

You could always apply a condition geasa: "Only when striking inanimate objects". That limits the scope of the power nicely, and reduces the cost.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 23 2004, 06:14 AM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



can't geas powers 0.5pp or less, unless my math is mistaken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jason Farlander
post Oct 23 2004, 06:21 AM
Post #15


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,049
Joined: 24-March 03
Member No.: 4,323



QUOTE (mfb)
can't geas powers 0.5pp or less, unless my math is mistaken.

Sure you can. It just ends up with the same power point cost as the ungeased ability.

...making it completely pointless, but still possible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Oct 23 2004, 06:23 AM
Post #16


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



Sure you can; it just doesn't do you much good, normally. However, if you bundle it with it's prerequisite power, Killing Hands, then a generous GM can apply the beasa benefit to both powers as one package.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 23 2004, 07:42 AM
Post #17


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



well, okay. i'll rephrase. "i'm enough of a min-maxer that there's no way i'd geas a power with 0.5pp or less cost, since i get no game benefit."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Oct 23 2004, 11:14 AM
Post #18


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (Kanada Ten)
So the elemental effect of Lightning added to Killing Hands would work in the manner of a spell at the Force equal to the Adepts Magic. Combined with Distance Strike and zap!

The new Elemental Strike is incompatable with Distance Strike (thank Dog for small mercies!).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 08:46 PM
Post #19


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



These are all certainly options. The only concern is that the adept in question is a gun adept, and is hence pretty much useless in melee. In fact, she don't even have a melee skill. So she spends her power point on Killing Hands L with the Elemental Strike option, and then she's defaulting. She's never going to get the successes to stage up damage to the point that the elemental strike will even count.

May have to have a limited-target version of Killing Hands that goes off Willpower, or something. And that gets a bit messy...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Oct 23 2004, 09:02 PM
Post #20


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



eh, if you're gonna go that far, may as well just stick with your original idea of using the Knack power.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Oct 23 2004, 09:19 PM
Post #21


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



yeah, that's what I'm starting to think. Killing Hands + Elemental Strike doesn't seem to do it for her - plus in order to have a reasonable chance of breaking the device, she'd need to inflict D damage...and thus it would already be broken, and the elemental effect don't matter.

regardless, I think this is going to end up as House Rule City.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2025 - 06:23 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.