IPB
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Shapeshifters and cultured bioware
mfb
post Nov 8 2004, 07:48 PM
Post #51


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



edit: bah. stupid multi-page threads.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 07:50 PM
Post #52


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Says who? Regenerating the body in general seems to me to be easier than regenerating a specific custom organ in a specific custom fashion rather than just wiping it.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cymophane
post Nov 8 2004, 07:54 PM
Post #53


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 8-November 04
Member No.: 6,816



Letīs say our shapeshifter is hit right into his chest and some part of his heart is badly damaged but the heart still keeps working...i donīt think the whole heart will die, suppurate out of his body and then regrow, i rather think the shapeshifters body begins to rebuild the damaged body part.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 07:54 PM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



So you are saying that it would be easier for the body to grow a whole new liver becuase one lobe is damaged, then it would be for the undmaged lobe to simply grow the other lobe over gain with it's Toxing Extractor DNA.

BTW I use this example becuase you can remove either lobe of a liver from a human being and the liver will regrow over time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 07:55 PM
Post #55


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



But if the heart continued to malfunction, the parts that malfunctioned would be replaced by standard tissue.

The bioware supplying the extra abilities was malfunctioning and got replaced with standard tissue.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cymophane
post Nov 8 2004, 08:00 PM
Post #56


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 8-November 04
Member No.: 6,816



yes, but thatīs where the regeneration roll kicks in:

as long as thereīs still a working part of the organ left (say, the organ rolled all but 1) it will regrow in itīs actual state (as a bio-enhanced one), if the organ is totally destroyed, it regrows as an original (unaugmented) one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 08:01 PM
Post #57


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



Do you just refuse to see what we are saying? If parts were being regrown it would be becuase of the mitosis of nearby cells. In this case the cells with the altered DNA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cymophane
post Nov 8 2004, 08:02 PM
Post #58


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 8-November 04
Member No.: 6,816



"The bioware supplying the extra abilities was malfunctioning and got replaced with standard tissue."

Why? M&M says that bioware is able to regrow when itīs damaged but not totally destroyed. Regeneration does so, only faster.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 08:05 PM
Post #59


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



But if you read the Stress Rules, bioware can never be reduced below 1 Stress once it gets any, so you have an injury that only heals with the destruction of the modified organ.

If the 'ware did persist for some reason, I'd probably treat it as a permanent Light or Moderate wound as the body continually tries and fails to repair the damage.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 08:07 PM
Post #60


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



Who says Bioware stress exists in my game? My players have too much to do and keep track of already.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cymophane
post Nov 8 2004, 08:07 PM
Post #61


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 8-November 04
Member No.: 6,816



Well, thatīs right, but the rules arenīt perfect...i would rule that it regenerates even that point. I think that would fit the whole regeneration idea.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeel De Mort
post Nov 8 2004, 08:10 PM
Post #62


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 403
Joined: 27-August 02
From: Scotland
Member No.: 3,175



Okay, next:

What about vampires? What if someone is Infected with HMHVV and turns into a vampire, but previous to that had had, oh, let's say a kidney replaced? What if it was a clonal replacement, would it always regenerate? What about Type O?

What about replacement limbs clonal/Type O - do they fall off when someone starts regenerating for the first time, or do they regrow just like everything else?

If cultured implants are forced out, why aren't cultured replacement organs?

If replacement limbs/organs are not regenerated, but a new "real" one grows in their place, how did the body know to do that? How does it know not to regenerate bioware, or genetech?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 08:10 PM
Post #63


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Then go for it, but don't try to claim it's canon.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 8 2004, 08:11 PM
Post #64


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



The real question is what would happen if you cut a shapeshifter exactly in half. Would they regrow into two shapeshifters that would then be the most in sequence tap dance duo in the History of the World, or would they have three left feet?

The fundamental problem I have is that it is using technological means to alter what is a magical creature. I think it is an intriguing idea, perhaps worthy of designing an adventure around. (Corp kidnaps shifters, one escapes, her body wracked with malfunctioning organs making her rabid or crazy, that the group gets involved with and has to help, possibly hitting the original facility to get research data or get the other shifters out, etc etc.)

But Bioware is a relaively new technology (ten years or so), and shifters have never been studied extensively, so I don't think the two would go together like chocolate and peanut butter. For it to filter down to the street level, or be anything other than a laboratory exercise, would be beyond the scope of the current timeline. I'd save it for a Ghosts of Mars shadowrun game set in 2164 or some such.

(In the interest of full disclosure, I should also point out that I house ruled Regeneration. There's a couple of variations by critter, but Shapechangers heal Stun every three seconds, and they heal Physical Wounds at the rate normal people heal stun.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 08:13 PM
Post #65


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



Did I try to claim it's Canon? Do I care if it's Canon? Do my player care if it's Canon? The answer to all the above a resounding NO! I kicked all the rules lawyers out my group. We're here to have fun. Sometimes to do that the rules go out the window.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 08:16 PM
Post #66


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



More accurately, don't try to claim that it is consistent logically or thematically with canon.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 08:25 PM
Post #67


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



You remind me of a player I used to have who always tried to make sure he had the most powerful character. He did this by being the most ruthless rules lawyer I had ever seen. Any interesting idea the other players had and spent time researching reason why it would work, he would shoot down based on the it's not in the books argument. Every time I allowed it to go through despite his objection he would kill that character either directly or by setting them up.

I will say it fits thematically and logically, becuase unlike you I understand that when man is challenged he doesn't play by the rules. Everything in the Shadowrun universe needs to be taken with huge amount of salt. Somethings I keep the way they are becuase it helps with the game balance. Other things i look at and say "Well, guess someone was asleep at the wheel." And still other things I have added in to make life interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 08:32 PM
Post #68


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



The original question was, in essence, "can you do this". Since we can do anything the GM allows, including having the Moon as a dikoted weapon focus, the only reasonable assumption is that the question addresses whether or not it is reasonable to do this in Canon.

Bioware can be implanted by placing it on top of your head and letting it crawl into the proper place in your game. That isn't how it works in canon, and things rationalized by the top-of-head method won't apply in canon.

And I have no idea what relevance "when man is challenged he doesn't play by the rules" has to the discussion. Thanks for the implication that I'm as stupid as someone who seems to have forgotten that the other players are going to be watching his back, though. On the other hand, if that's all you have you're being blatantly unfair, because if the rules and flavour text neither state nor imply that something should happen, the player has, get this, no canon support. All they have is GM fiat, and it is not only reasonable but good that someone point this out.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Nov 8 2004, 08:34 PM
Post #69


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



I don't see how being against shapeshifters getting bioware is in any way a play to have the most powerful character? Not that it really matters.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Nov 8 2004, 08:39 PM
Post #70


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE (lorthazar @ Nov 8 2004, 02:25 PM)
You remind me of a player I used to have who always tried to make sure he had the most powerful character.

As opposed to a bioware-totting shapeshifter that regenerates and automatically repairs all Stress to that bioware, neverminding that regeneration in and of itself is already way overboard. Right. Okay. I've gone and slipped into Bizarro World again.

I hate to break it to you, but it sounds exactly the opposite to me. You sound like the type of player who wants to break the game and have the most powerful character.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mercer
post Nov 8 2004, 08:40 PM
Post #71


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,326
Joined: 15-April 02
Member No.: 2,600



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
More accurately, don't try to claim that it is consistent logically or thematically with canon.

~J

Or (and I'm not taking sides), don't try to claim that Canon is always logically or thematically consistent. Sometimes the official rulings don't make a lot of sense, and sometimes they just go against the style of play a GM or a group has developed. SR has had a lot of masters over the years and its drifted back and forth, at times in a direction that I disagreed with (not that anyone should care).

Shapeshifters are a good example of this. They originally had a set of rules in the 1st and 2nd ed books based around them as critters. And when the Companion came out, they rewrote them as a PC race, which I disagreed with. I didn't understand why a pc shapechanger would have a Ess of 6 and a NPC would have an 8. Either shapechangers pcs should have worked just like npcs, or they should have rewritten the entire critter. Which is really neither here nor there in the context of the current discussion, I just thought I'd bring it up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Nov 8 2004, 08:40 PM
Post #72


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Why bother asking what other people think, if you're going to call them oppressive munchkin rules lawyers if they give an answer you don't like?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lorthazar
post Nov 8 2004, 08:40 PM
Post #73


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 25-October 04
Member No.: 6,789



Yes, I agree it is good to point out that within the Rules Canon it is questionable.

As for the Thematically and Logically Canon, it fits quite well. Several times in Paranormal Animals of North America and Shadowtech were there references to geneticist playing around with awakened animal DNA. Extend this even a tiniest fraction and you could see how some experimental ShapeShifter bioware could exist.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cymophane
post Nov 8 2004, 08:43 PM
Post #74


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 8-November 04
Member No.: 6,816



"...a bioware-totting shapeshifter that regenerates and automatically repairs all Stress to that bioware.."

Donīt get me wrong, i know that it is unbalancing or at least very powerful. But i started the thread to see if anybody has good and reasonable arguments besides game-balance that say it doesnīt work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Nov 8 2004, 08:46 PM
Post #75


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 16,898
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Again. Shapeshifter genetech, yes, but that is materially and significantly different from shifter 'ware.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th April 2022 - 09:29 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.