IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Right, enough of this sustained spell nonsense...
TinkerGnome
post Sep 9 2003, 08:35 PM
Post #151


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



Here's an idea, let me know what you guys think:

AAA Astral Security
Type: Dedicated
Members: 10-12
Strictures: Oath, Fraternity, Belief (Code of Ethics), Deed
Resources/Dues: High Resources/no dues
Customs: AAA Astral Security sprang into being as the brain child of Carter Douglas, an ex-shadowrunning sorcerer. The group is dedicated to providing afordable security to smaller companies who cannot afford to hire mages full time. Starting with just himself back in 2059, in the last few years, Carter has hired on several individuals like himself, groggies and half-awakened who have the power to make wards but not the kind of mojo it takes to get ahead in the corporate world.
Joining the company requires an oath of non-disclosure about the group's security practices, clients, and other sensitive data. While a few of the magicians in the company are part timers (ie, have other jobs) there are six full time employees who handle the various tasks of setting up and monitoring wards at area businesses.
Business: AAA is fairly straightforward with their services. They set up a ward, and if it is broken, they will call in an alert to the company which handels the establishment's physical security. Reguardless of whether the alarm was real or not, mages will arrive to reward the establishment within a designated amount of time based on their contract.
Contracts: There are a handful of service levels available from AAA Astral Security. They include:
Minimal: Force 1 ward, placed by three mages. This tends to deter floating spirits looking for a place to crash, or at least alerts someone to their presence. Response time for astral cleaning and rewarding is generally within 12 hours. Emergency calls will be answered in under 4 hours. Cost: 600 :nuyen: per month and 300 any time the wards must be reset.
Basic: Force 3 ward, placed by three mages. This offers a more rigid astral security that may actually stop intrusion instead of just causing an alarm when it does. Response time for astral cleaning and rewarding is generally 8 hours or less. Emergency calls will be answered in under 4 hours. Cost: 1,200 :nuyen: per month and 600 any time the wards must be reset.
Premium: Force 5 ward, placed by three mages. One bound watcher spirit with orders to respond to intrusion as prescribed by the customer. This type of security is tighter and proof against everything except deliberate intrusion. Cost: 5,000 :nuyen: a month (Carter has an enchanter on staff). Resetting the wards is generally free. Resummoning the watcher will cost more (depending on how much time is left in the month).
Elite: Force 6 (or better) ward, placed by three (or more) mages. One bound watcher spirit and one bound force 5 elemental (or more). Cost: 25,000 :nuyen: per elemental to be bound and then 5,000 a month or more.

These prices are for establishments with area less than 700 cubic meters for floor space. Larger buildings may incur an additional charge.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Sep 9 2003, 09:43 PM
Post #152


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



The other thing to remember is that only low-force spells are legal. Anything higher requires a permit, and may or may not be acceptable in all areas.

Also: It's legal to carry and own soda cans, but that doesn't mean you can bring them into a movie theater. There may not be a law, but that doesn't mean they have to let it in, either. The same holds true with armor (see the Armor and Society rules); someone flashing a lot of obvious magical defenses might be considered exactly the same.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 9 2003, 11:35 PM
Post #153


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Cain,

You are right in one way. Most private establishements have the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason. This was weaked during the Civil Rights era, but it remains generally true today....

HOWEVER.....

The right to refuse service does NOT give you the right to destroy someone else's property even if they try to sneak into your place of business against your wishes. That is what wards (can) do. A typical commercial ward is highly unlikely to damage the focus/quickened spell of a serious shadowrunning mage, but it is VERY likely to destroy those items that are in fact legal....and even a posted notice will not save you from a lawsuit in such a case.

Hence wards in anything that is remotely public would be vanishingly rare, and near as I can tell would only be found in places where public security outweighs all other considerations (airports, courthouses, white-house, etc etc).

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Sep 10 2003, 01:44 AM
Post #154


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



Actually, a posted notice will absolve most people of liability. For example, there are clearly-posted notices at the courthouse, to declare all weapons. Should you fail to declare a weapon, and are summarily jumped by half-a-dozen rent-a-comps plus a cop or two, you're going to have one hell of an uphill battle to prove that they didn't respond appropriately-- and they could respond with serious force. Those notices do mean that you probably won't succeed if you try and sue for damages.

The BBB makes it clear that anyone whom an establishment feels is "looking for trouble", they can deny entrance to. Given that, and the fear and misinformation the general public has towards magic, it wouldn't be surprising for small businesses to have some form of cheapo magical security.

The argument you're citing works against "booby traps"-- there are laws against excessive security, which vary from state to state but generally ban any form of lethal trap for home security. However, if you're entering a place illegally, you lose considerable civil rights, and generally property damage is not recoverable.

For example, if a farmer has a clearly-posted electrical fence, and you try and trespass on his land and are injured by the fence, you have little to no recourse. If the fence wasn't clearly labeled, you may be able to present an attractive nuisance defense, or that the farmer was negligent in not clearly marking it as dangerous. However, if things were marked clearly, then you're out of luck.

Low-force wards (rating 2) could therefore be very commonplace. As always, it depends on the GM. You will most likely be tripping alarms wherever you go, as you break through ward after ward. The exact responses should, of course, vary.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 01:53 AM
Post #155


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Um Cain,

I happen to know that if even if a farmer had a clearly labeled electric fence, he is still liable for harm done to trespassers.

This would be doubly true for the destruction of private property that had no threatening use (like Executive Protection or healing potions) since most magical items are actually in mundane (not awakened) hands.

In short, liability is a real *bitch* and no business will risk it in a public place. Now if there is a place where public security is the overriding concern (courthouses, airports, security vaults, etc, etc) that is different...but not a Joe's Resaurant. No way in hell.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Sep 10 2003, 02:20 AM
Post #156


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



is there any evidence that Seattle in SR, or the UCAS for that matter is lawsuit happy like the USA today? I don't recall seeing anything of that nature.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 03:20 AM
Post #157


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Bitbasher,

On the other hand there is no information that says that it isn't either. As such I think we have to assume that it is since the players are assumed to be familiar with the default world culture today (21st century US for better or worse). Any deviation in culture needs to be documented if it has game effects.

For that matter, if anything SR IMHO would be more lawsuit happy. You have a massive undertrodden populace that slaves away for big business with little hope of advancement or even a decent life. A good solid lawsuit can easily make even a megacorp pay you a quick million nuyen in "hush" money. Who wouldn't take this? In fact it was a lawsuit in SR that created the Shiawase decision. Thus I would have to conclude (until I can be shown otherwise) that SR is actually more lawsuit happy than the modern USA.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Person 404
post Sep 10 2003, 04:45 AM
Post #158


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 8-June 03
Member No.: 4,696



QUOTE
In fact it was a lawsuit in SR that created the Shiawase decision. Thus I would have to conclude (until I can be shown otherwise) that SR is actually more lawsuit happy than the modern USA.


The Shiawase decision was made in 2001. So, not necessarily indicative of the following 63 years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 04:52 AM
Post #159


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Person 404,

In of itself, no, but there are other things that tell me that SR is probably even more lawsuit happy. I have already stated what they are....untrodden people look for ways to get back at the "big bad" corp (in fact SR is built around this). A good stiff lawsuit is one of the best ways to do this....and the Megacorps know it (which is one reason they insist on extrality).

In addition to that, the fact remains that most players will be from (or at least have the values of) 21st century America. That is simply because for better or worse, the US is the current cultural collossus. *That* means that worlds will assume a 21st century US culture and then explain the deviations from there. Since the SR world does not specifically state that lawsuits are uncommon then, we must assume that they (still) are.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Sep 10 2003, 09:50 AM
Post #160


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,948
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



I would say less lawsuits.

What was the result of the Shiawase decision? It let corps say frag off!

Joe Shmoe files his big damage lawsuit against a biz. Business hires shadowrunners for some easy wetwork. Less costly than the pre-trial defense costs and way less than the 1M :nuyen: hush money.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sphynx
post Sep 10 2003, 10:40 AM
Post #161


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,222
Joined: 11-October 02
From: Netherlands and Belgium
Member No.: 3,437



Actually (can you believe I'm defending anything Polaris says?!?) the Shiawase decision was only for international company. Your typical business (such as a restaurant) doesn't fall under the Corporate Extraterritoriality laws. Laws of the governing government are still abided by for non-international corporations. So, the right to have a Ward would have to be decided by UCAS (in Seattle) and what rights civilians have according to that government.

Personally, I agree with the mojority that it'd be perfectly ok, and within a company's right to have said Ward, but that's because I believe UCAS would grant those rights.

Sphynx
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Sep 10 2003, 01:16 PM
Post #162


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



so let me see if get this straight: Megas w/ extraterritoriality can throw up wards wherever they so choose and if your stuff gets whacked...well, screw ya. b/c they have they're own laws. Right?

Now mom and pops, assuming that they not in the confines of Corp Xtra-T turf can't use wards for fear of getting sued....hmmm

I think you all have good points but some of can't see the forest for the trees. In RL, Polaris is correct about negligence. Back a few years ago some creep broke into some old lady's house, slipped on her recently waxed floor, broke his leg and in a (typical) miscarriage of justice sued her. AND won. That being said, in SR if I want a mom and pop place to have Ward, it will. I'm the GM. And until one of my players can produce legal codes of the UCAS circa 2055 or better, tough crap. Thats the way I see it.

As to the original post on this thread, you all have given me excellent ideas on how to make things difficult for the over zealous mage. Thank you. :spin:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IcyCool
post Sep 10 2003, 02:54 PM
Post #163


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 140
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 164



QUOTE (kevyn668)

I think you all have good points but some of can't see the forest for the trees. In RL, Polaris is correct about negligence. Back a few years ago some creep broke into some old lady's house, slipped on her recently waxed floor, broke his leg and in a (typical) miscarriage of justice sued her. AND won. That being said, in SR if I want a mom and pop place to have Ward, it will. I'm the GM. And until one of my players can produce legal codes of the UCAS circa 2055 or better, tough crap. Thats the way I see it.


Don't most of these travesties of justice happen in civil court? You know, the court where the judge is a gavel juggling monkey, and justice isn't just blind, she's in the courthouse mensroom sucking cocks for $5 a pop to support her crank habit...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zazen
post Sep 10 2003, 02:56 PM
Post #164


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,685
Joined: 17-August 02
Member No.: 3,123



QUOTE (kevyn668)
In RL, Polaris is correct about negligence. Back a few years ago some creep broke into some old lady's house, slipped on her recently waxed floor, broke his leg and in a (typical) miscarriage of justice sued her. AND won.

Do you have a link to an article about that or some form of evidence? I've heard several stories like that, always slightly different, and I don't buy them. They're told like urban legends.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TinkerGnome
post Sep 10 2003, 03:19 PM
Post #165


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,138
Joined: 10-June 03
From: Tennessee
Member No.: 4,706



If any of these were going to figure in as examples, they probably shouldn't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Sep 10 2003, 05:15 PM
Post #166


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



[goes to get pop-rocks and a Coke]

Urban legends? Don't know what youre talking about...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Sep 10 2003, 06:47 PM
Post #167


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



I certainly haven't heard of any *actual* cases like that. There have been some attractive-nuisance cases, but those are a different matter, and typically involve children.

Since electric fences are legal, but certain types of barbed-wire fences aren't, I'd say that a clearly marked and labeled electric fence generally clears a person of liability. Similarily, a clearly marked and labeled ward would clear a business of liability.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 07:52 PM
Post #168


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Cain,

I never said a ward or an electric fence wasn't legal. What I said (and this is true...check it out yourself) was that if a person injured themselves on your electric fence....even if the warnings were posted....then you as the property owner are liable.

The same applies to deadly force....just because someone is on your property even in violation of "No Trespassing" signs does NOT give you the right to use deadly force. This last varies from place to place but is generally true. [However in Texas, you do have the right to use deadly force on a trespasser as long as the tresspass is between Sundown and Sunup.]

The problem with the ward is not the existance of the Ward per se but the fact it destroys pefectectly valid and non-threatening public property. That is where the liability issue comes in.....and no small business will want to risk that. My parents owned a small business and this issue came up a lot (as artists they used many toxic chemicals....and liability was a big stink). In addition my grandmother was a small farmor with electric fences....and she was DAMN careful with the voltages again because of liability. Don't think that a small busines would be equaly cautious about wards in shadowrun.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Campbell
post Sep 10 2003, 09:02 PM
Post #169


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,028
Joined: 9-November 02
From: The Republic of Vermont
Member No.: 3,581



QUOTE (Sphynx)
Actually (can you believe I'm defending anything Polaris says?!?) the Shiawase decision was only for international company.  Your typical business (such as a restaurant) doesn't fall under the Corporate Extraterritoriality laws.  Laws of the governing government are still abided by for non-international corporations.  So, the right to have a Ward would have to be decided by UCAS (in Seattle) and what rights civilians have  according to that government. 

Except that the relevant decision in this case isn't Shiawase, it's Seretech. It was the Seretech Decision that gave corporate security forces - given a reasonable claim to be acting in the public interest - the right to shoot people dead if they felt it necessary. And, to the best of my knowledge, the Seretech Decision was not restricted to the extraterritorial corporations created by Shiawase.

That being the case, if you get your focus popped by a ward installed nominally to protect customers from hostile magic, I'd say you're pretty much SOL, legal recourse-wise. Maybe you'll check it with the security mage like you're supposed to next time.

In any case, asserting that a world with Seretech as part of its legal precedent should be as liability-sensitive as contemporary urban legend is utterly ludicrous.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 09:18 PM
Post #170


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



John,

No it is not ludicrous. There is a difference between trespassers on private property and destruction of private property by those you have invited in. There is a big difference in fact...and given the hard realities of Shadowrun, I would be shocked if it wasn't as liability happy as today's world if not more. That is why A+ corps insist on extrality...so they don't have to worry about it.

In any event even if the Mom-and-Pop restaurant is cleared (and it probably won't be) the legal costs alone would be enough to discourage the practice of wards in public restaurants or other such places. There is no way a small business owner will risk a suit even if he wins. That I happen to know to be true as well.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bearclaw
post Sep 10 2003, 09:35 PM
Post #171


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,632
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Portland Oregon, USA
Member No.: 1,304



If you pay a mage 10,000 to anchor a bullet barrier/detect bullet combo to your tie tack, and it gets blown up by the ward of a movie theater, who pays to replace it?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Polaris
post Sep 10 2003, 10:04 PM
Post #172


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 1-June 03
Member No.: 4,664



Bearclaw,

The movie theatre pays. That is standard liability law. The theatre is a public place and you were wearing a non-threatening and perfectly legal item of property which the theatre destroyed.

That is why public wards will in general be avoided.

-Polaris
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 10 2003, 10:10 PM
Post #173


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE
Polaris
The theatre is a public place and you were wearing a non-threatening and perfectly legal item of property which the theatre destroyed.


The theater is not a public place. Shadowrun has no public places other than government run facilities. The theater is corporate property.

Did you show your permit at the door?

Did you follow the signs and only enter areas open for magical use?

You pay.

[edit] In short, you should ask your GM.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Sep 10 2003, 10:58 PM
Post #174


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



Polaris: I have checked it out. The precice laws vary from state to state, but in general, if you have a clearly-marked electric fence that is kept in good repair, and someone else in injured on it due to their own negligence, you're in the clear.

Other than that, what Kanada said. What's more, you can conditionally invite certain people-- requesting they check their weapons, not allowing certain items, that sort of thing. If someone sneaks into a movie theater with a very expensive bottle of champagne, then trips and breaks it, the theater isn't liable because you weren't supposed to bring it inside in the first place.

As always, and as agreed by everyone here, the final arbiter is the GM. He gets to decide how magically paranoid the world in general is. Why are you arguing against that?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tisoz
post Sep 10 2003, 11:05 PM
Post #175


Free Spirit
*******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,948
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Bloomington, IN UCAS
Member No.: 1,920



Why would Restaurants and such ward their entire dining room? I can see maybe a small warded private dining room but not the entire building.

"To protect their customers from offensive magic." What offensive spells are sustained? Every defensive spell except for Redirect is sustained.

What about the corpers who have Increase Charisma or other attribute locked on them? Or the one that has a mask spell to hide some deformity or scar? Or the businessman that has to deal with all languages in the global economy and has a translate spell sutained by a focus?

Most of the spells that are sustained are defensive or detection based and pose no threat to others. Sustaining foci are about the only foci that have an issue with wards, most other foci can be deactivated, pass through the ward, and simply activated again.

Wards on business property for security purposes make some sense, but not on places like bars and stores that invite the public to enter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2025 - 04:07 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.