IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Dunk, 6 feet under or not?
Do you believe that Dunkelzahn is truly dead?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 110
Guests cannot vote 
Crimson Jack
post Dec 2 2004, 03:18 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,129
Joined: 11-June 03
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 4,712



There's enough of a mystery surrounding his "death" and I know that my gaming group and myself have all discussed what the options would be if he hadn't actually been assassinated. What do you think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 03:30 AM
Post #2


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Dude, Dragon Heart Trilogy, dude.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Dec 2 2004, 03:36 AM
Post #3


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Ignoring canon for a moment, I don't think Dunkelzahn will return. Both the Draco Foundation, which is the equivalent of his spirit, and Ghostwalker, equivalent of his body, have replaced him and the need of him.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Dec 2 2004, 03:43 AM
Post #4


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Yes, Dunkelzahn is dead. He and Billy Burnout made a valiant try at stemming the tide of Horrors, but they have failed and died in the process.

The destruction of humanity is fast approaching.

~J

[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Dec 2 2004, 03:51 AM
Post #5


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I clicked other. Ye didnae have one for "He's dead, Jim!" ! :rotfl: !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Dec 2 2004, 03:55 AM
Post #6


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Voted "other" as stated above, the whole thing was answered in the Dragon Heart trilogy of novels.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 03:55 AM
Post #7


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



You forgot "He's dead. But he's working an angle."

Best Gov Schwarzenegger voice, "I'll be back."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlakJacket
post Dec 2 2004, 04:13 AM
Post #8


King of the Hobos
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,117
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 127



[ Spoiler ]
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Dec 2 2004, 05:07 AM
Post #9


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



Dunk's spirit is kicking around out there by canon. But I highly doubt that he'll come up again in published material. The Big D represents the "Old Guard" when it comes to FanPro publications, IMO.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Dec 2 2004, 05:08 AM
Post #10


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



In my view of the setting, I prefer it with Dunkelzahn actually having been assassinated. It leads to much more interesting stories than the total munchkinfest that was that idiotic triology (nevermind my continued beef as to why they killed off Dunkelzahn).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 05:23 AM
Post #11


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



I do not get it. The characters in the books are powerful, but I do not understand why people constantly label them as munchkins? Or why do people constantly diss Ryan Mercury?

IMO, that should be the level of skill/power that a Prime Runner should be. Superman levels. It is Canon even, members of Assets Inc are Superhuman. That is comparable to Renraku Red Samurai.

Perhaps all this bitching is the inability to accept that power levels like that are Canon and that while you may say,"That's not happening in MY game" or "That'll never have happened if I was the GM", a published example proves you wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Dec 2 2004, 05:27 AM
Post #12


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,001
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,514



Because to a lot of people he lacks depth, not saying I agree or disagree, and reeks of someones pet project.

I like the idea of him (Dunk) being dead, like Doc F, but I don't think we've dealt with it much yet.

So why did they kill him off Doc? From your view?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paul
post Dec 2 2004, 05:33 AM
Post #13


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,001
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Michigan
Member No.: 1,514



Also almost every-no every published book lacks the depth that I put into my games. SO when I say that won't happen in my game-I mean it. Not just because it contradicts me-which I could care less about personally, but because 99% of the books suck. And badly.

I think the definition of Prime Runner doesn't apply to all the characters in all the books. Some? Yes. Ryan Mercury? Definitely. Jane? Sure. Sam Verner? No. Kham? No. Wolf and Raven? Yes. Doger? Sort of-in the decking world he is obviously a step above, but still no Fast Jack.

The bitching is because if Canon were the books it'd be worse than it already is at points. The books barely hold up together in my opinion. Burning Bright, my favorite book, is a different world from Nights Pawn.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 05:50 AM
Post #14


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



The point is that I've not seen anyone (ANYONE) complain that Burnout is too powerful yet. But there is evidently a lot of negative opinion on Mercury. In fact, I've never seen anyone bitch about how munchkin the antagonist is in the books. Why? I really don't know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Dec 2 2004, 05:54 AM
Post #15


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



He's a cyberzombie?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Dec 2 2004, 06:00 AM
Post #16


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE
In fact, I've never seen anyone bitch about how munchkin the antagonist is in the books. Why? I really don't know.

Well... It might be because the antagonist needs to be as powerful as the hero, eh? And I think that's the real problem people have with many of the primary characters, especially Ryan: they are heros.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kevyn668
post Dec 2 2004, 06:11 AM
Post #17


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,751
Joined: 8-August 03
From: Neighbor of the Beast
Member No.: 5,375



Moreover, he didn't really do anything that far fetched when you consider that he basically traded his soul in addition to the Talent for the ability to move real fast and store a minigun in his back.

Add to that he had the spirit of a Great Dragon fused with his body later in the books. :)

The problem I have is with Darke. Or more specifially the hordes of angsty teenagers that think working for the Most Unholly is *cool*. :please:
[ Spoiler ]


Ryan Mercury has the classic traits of a munchkin. He has no parents, no family, was trained by a Great Dragon (let me know if you'd let a PC get away with that), and is a cold hearted killer with a likable, easy-going personality. Munchkin through and through. He also has a weakness for "perky, brown nipples."

Gimme a break. :S

It is true that Burnout shares most of the above traits but he lacks the crucial weakness of the nipple thing. (she worked for Polish Intel?! C'mon on now...) :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 06:32 AM
Post #18


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (kevyn668 @ Dec 2 2004, 02:11 PM)
Ryan Mercury has the classic traits of a munchkin. He has no parents, no family, was trained by a Great Dragon (let me know if you'd let a PC get away with that), and is a cold hearted killer with a likable, easy-going personality. Munchkin through and through. He also has a weakness for "perky, brown nipples."

I don't know about the "perky, brown nipples", but I would certainly allow "cold hearted killer with likeable, easy-going personality" and "trained by a Great Dragon". I don't recall Caimbeul having parents or family, but I've not seen anyone call him a munchkin yet. Wolf doesn't have family or parents either, but I've not seen people calling him a munchkin either.

By the way, what is wrong with heroes? Do they have to be wimps? Is there some defination somewhere that a hero may not waltz all over the opposition? If so, Mr Chao Yun Fatt in the various John Woo movies has played more munchkins than I can remember. And yet, I've yet to see someone say,"That's sooo munchkin!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Dec 2 2004, 06:33 AM
Post #19


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE (kevyn668 @ Dec 2 2004, 01:11 AM)
The problem I have is with Darke. Or more specifially the hordes of angsty teenagers that think working for the Most Unholly is *cool*.
[ Spoiler ]

It's not just angst ridden teenagers who make deals with demons. Look at Saudi Arabia, they made a deal with one hoping to get a bully of their back, and in turn must pay the price. It happens all the time with humanity (look at the Cold War "allies" of the various nations). We're constantly looking out for our best interests at the moment, but rarely have the foresight of consequences. Besides, both Darke and Ryan became tools of that which empowered them, and the loss of freewill is a heavy price, in my humble opinion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Johnny the Bull
post Dec 2 2004, 06:42 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 243
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Abu Dhabi
Member No.: 318



QUOTE (Doctor Funkenstein)
In my view of the setting, I prefer it with Dunkelzahn actually having been assassinated. It leads to much more interesting stories than the total munchkinfest that was that idiotic triology (nevermind my continued beef as to why they killed off Dunkelzahn).

Well, as a genre convention anyone that does pose a threat to the World Order ™ gets killed off by powers that be. Even the most powerful 'man' of the age. I think the Big D as president was supposed to give people a glimpse at a different life, then snatch it away from them.

The whole coming back thing just reeks of Messiah references.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stumps
post Dec 2 2004, 06:49 AM
Post #21


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 11-December 02
From: The other end of your computer screen
Member No.: 3,724



QUOTE (toturi)
By the way, what is wrong with heroes?

Nothing.
Unless you don't like heros.

QUOTE
Do they have to be wimps?

Hero's are never wimps.

QUOTE
Is there some defination somewhere that a hero may not waltz all over the opposition?

Yes.
It's called an Anti-Hero.

Anti-Hero's get beat up and nearly killed almost on a regular basis since they are meant to reflect a more human-down-to-earth-amazing-person character rather than a legend-demi-greek-god-super-human(Hero).

If you don't like Hero's, then often, you'll like Anti-Hero's.
The opposite is also true, as well as the possibility for liking both.

In this thread, it seems there are a number of people who prefer the Anti-Hero.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Crimson Jack
post Dec 2 2004, 08:09 AM
Post #22


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,129
Joined: 11-June 03
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 4,712



Well, I feel like a Schmoo for not having read or *gasp* even hearing of said trilogy. I read one Shadowrun book once and even in high school I could tell that it was "schlockily" written. I haven't picked up one since. Can someone do one of those little '30 second movie reviews' on the books for me?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BitBasher
post Dec 2 2004, 08:24 AM
Post #23


Traumatizing players since 1992
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 3,282
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 220



Yeah, Read Burning Bright.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Dec 2 2004, 08:28 AM
Post #24


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



yes, there's something wrong with heros: they don't belong in SR. i mean, Worlds Without End had friggin' immortal elves fighting horrors head-on in it--but not a hero in sight. there shouldn't be any noble, selfless people in SR, or at least not any noble, selfless people who get the happy ending at the end of the story. SR just isn't about heroes and happy endings.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Dec 2 2004, 08:35 AM
Post #25


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



It isn't? I thought it is all about heroes. It is Canon even, for example,


QUOTE (P 251 SR3)
Whether stealing data from megacorp's top secret database, providing security for a visiting dignitary when the drek hits the fan or busting a valuable researcher out of a high-security corp enclave, the player characters are the heroes.


Are you sure you are playing SR or just some game you think is SR, mfb?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th April 2026 - 01:51 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.