Anti-Vehicle weapons, Does dikote count? |
Anti-Vehicle weapons, Does dikote count? |
Jan 18 2005, 08:21 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
Kind of like a shaped charge or bazooka shell?
Shaped charges can fry through insanely thick steel armor, that is why composites and ceramics got into the fracas in the first place IIRC. the ceramic could disipate the heat more safely than a chunk of steel plate, and the composite behavior made for lighter weight armor with similar and better protection. |
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 08:23 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Very much unlike shaped charges. More or less the exact opposite of shaped charges and HEAT (bazooka), actually.
~J |
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 08:25 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
So, just a big F-in' bomb? hit the wall hard enough and the shrapnel inside will take care of the contents?
|
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 08:38 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
More or less. Again, the head squashed against the side, so it ended up with a fair amount of area being exploded against. The outside of the wall tended to come out not that much the worse for wear, though.
~J |
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 08:49 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
Like a cannon ball with blackpowder inside, then. Right? (Only high explosive)
|
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 08:54 PM
Post
#56
|
|||
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
~J |
||
|
|||
Jan 18 2005, 09:26 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Neophyte Runner Group: Members Posts: 2,453 Joined: 17-September 04 From: St. Paul Member No.: 6,675 |
It would act very similarly to the HESH I believe. the shell would crask and the powder would flow against the wall/inside of broken ball until the pressure/temperature ignited it.
|
|
|
Jan 18 2005, 09:28 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Manus Celer Dei Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 17,008 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Boston Member No.: 3,802 |
Probably a similar mechanic, then. Though the blackpowder probably flowed into cracks more (not that HESH wouldn't, but the idea may have been slightly different).
~J |
|
|
Jan 19 2005, 05:00 AM
Post
#59
|
|||||
Great Dragon Group: Members Posts: 5,889 Joined: 3-August 03 From: A CPI rank 1 country Member No.: 5,222 |
Composite armor, as it applies to MBTs, basically means what you described above, except that it's almost exclusively ceramics and steel, and perhaps some other metals. Beyond that, well, I at least don't claim to know the exact design of Chobham armor.
mfb got the basic idea of it -- it's more or less an internal fragmentation protection layer, of materials such as kevlar. And whether or not that's correctly (in engineering-talk) called "spalling", it's largely there to catch the fragments created when a HEAT or kinetic energy weapon actually penetrates the armor plating. A very narrow "stream" HEAT weapon or a tungsten dart may easily pass straight through a tank without knocking it out or harming anyone inside, as long as the fragments from the armor plating are stopped. |
||||
|
|||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 04:35 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.