IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Power Foci, And foci in general
Westiex
post Feb 1 2005, 08:14 AM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 165
Joined: 30-September 04
Member No.: 6,715



Couple of question in relation to foci

1. Can you 'dispell' a power foci? The rules suggest no, since there is no spell on them as such, so the only way to deprieve the mage of said foci would be to either destroy it or to kill the mage.

2. When a mage does enchanting, whether he's aiming to sell the goods off for neyen or to to use it for foci, does any of his astral signature remain? And would the metamagic technique cleansing work on it?

Thanks for your time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedmondLarry
post Feb 1 2005, 11:01 AM
Post #2


Senior GM
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,406
Joined: 12-April 03
From: Redmond, WA
Member No.: 4,442



1) No you can't dispell a power focus. In addition to destroying the focus or the magician, you can deprive a magician of his focus by bonding it to yourself.

2) My interpretation of the astral signature rules in the book is that your signature does remain on the goods that you create with Enchanting. I know of no rules in the books for removing such a signature, but would probably make house rules for it in my campaign if any player asked. Here are some references:
QUOTE (MITS.39-40)
"Enchanting is an Active Magical Skill"
QUOTE (SR3.172)
"Magical skills produce an astral signature on anything affected by them"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cochise
post Feb 1 2005, 11:11 AM
Post #3


Mr. Quote-function
***

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 1,317
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Somewhere in Germany
Member No.: 1,376



QUOTE (OurTeam)
2) My interpretation of the astral signature rules in the book is that your signature does remain on the goods that you create with Enchanting. I know of no rules in the books for removing such a signature, but would probably make house rules for it in my campaign if any player asked. Here are some references:
QUOTE (MITS.39-40)
"Enchanting is an Active Magical Skill"
QUOTE (SR3.172)
"Magical skills produce an astral signature on anything affected by them"

Somewhere further down the text it explicitly states that signatures of foci and on spirits cannot be removed ...
The only thing that can not be answered fully there is whether or not a magician who bonds a focus thereby removes the signature of the prvious owner ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James McMurray
post Feb 1 2005, 04:00 PM
Post #4


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,430
Joined: 10-January 05
From: Fort Worth, Texas
Member No.: 6,957



IIRC foci deactivate if they leave the user's person. If you can identify the focus you can atke it out simply by disarming the mage. That makes a high incentive for a mage to get a good unarmed combat skill.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 1 2005, 04:11 PM
Post #5


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



can't you attack the focus in astral combat and disrupt it?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LinaInverse
post Feb 1 2005, 04:24 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 292
Joined: 24-September 04
Member No.: 6,701



Sure you can. And the foci can fight back too. And the foci's owner can add in dice to help. If you're talking about a very high Force Foci, you're potentially taking your life in your hands going this route. Also, disrupting isn't the same as killing it. IIRC, to kill it for good, you have to bring it down to 0 Force, then do some kind of finishing action or it will rebuild over time.

As I've said before, sometimes it's just easier to kill the soft squishy center (ie, the mage's meat body) with bullets than deal with very high force spells, foci, etc. Most mages I've known/seen tend to be more powerful Astrally than Physically.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Feb 1 2005, 04:24 PM
Post #7


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



There was, once upon a time, a metamagic technique known as "Focus Blocking" which allowed you to essentially deactivate another magician's focus with a successful Dispel attempt ('course they could reactivate it later, but it had it's uses).

Yes, you can still attack and destroy astrally active foci, although you can no longer ground spells through them.

Your astral signature should be on the focus originally, but would be "overwritten" by the astral signature of whomever bonds the focus.

For those who play Earthdawn crossovers, you can rule the astral signature remains for references to thread magic, key knowledges, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Catsnightmare
post Feb 2 2005, 12:00 AM
Post #8


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 491
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 90



But does the astral signature remain on expendable spell foci once they've been used?
While on that subject are expendable spell foci active all the time or only when you're using them to cast a spell?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Feb 2 2005, 12:15 AM
Post #9


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



No books right now, but I seem to recall that the Severing Metamagic will serve to deactivate the Focus, or cut the connection between the mage and the Focus. Of course, I also recall that it is pretty weak, as the mage just has to spend an action to re-activate it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th June 2026 - 10:18 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.