IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> MATRIX & REALITY, What equipment can link the two things?
Kanada Ten
post Feb 19 2005, 01:57 AM
Post #51


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Feb 18 2005, 03:18 AM)
hmm, this made me think about how cp2020 handled "decker" meat interaction. if you where after a simple security camera then you just fired up a program while haveing access to the net. higher prgram rateing, higher chance that you found the camera. maybe a bit to simple?

Hypothetically, one could upload agents and programs onto a WMI system (after breaking the encryption) and then communicate with them (issue commands and recieve data), thus take over cameras or such. It'd be a complex agent though. I kind of like it, actually. You'd still have to deck to locate the systems and crack them... Or use an even more complex agent. Actually, one can do this without WMI - you just need to hack on a cellular connection to whatever dataline you tapped.

This post has been edited by Kanada Ten: Feb 19 2005, 01:55 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 19 2005, 08:25 AM
Post #52


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



SO, at the end, what's the solution for the Remote controll utility?
Using the module with the cyberdeck without any rigger deck?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 19 2005, 08:34 AM
Post #53


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



that's what i would do.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 19 2005, 08:35 AM
Post #54


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



ah, Ok I found the answer by myself.
Matrix page73 says that a decker needs remote control utility + rigger protocol emulation module + a device to link himself to the drones.
Possible links are: CCSS, wireless link & RIgger COntrol deck:
1) CCSS is not our case.
2) I do not understand so much the reference to wireless link (Is not any rigger'deck a wireless system?)
3) Rigger control deck is our case.

In any case the rigger protocol emulation module remains an option for rigger control decks which permits the rigger to infiltrate the networks or ccss of other riggers...it is not exactly teh option for the cyberdeck we are looking for!!
TO teh hell all this tremendous phanta-technology!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 19 2005, 08:36 AM
Post #55


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



there is, in SR, no such thing as a wireless link to a drone that doesn't involve a remote control deck. so, yeah. you're basically stuck using an RC deck anyway, which makes the RC utility basically useless.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 19 2005, 08:51 AM
Post #56


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



well it is not useless because it permits you to rig a drone while you are decking, in other words the decker could even play with the normal group through his drone.
Without the RC utility you cannot rig anything while you dive through the matrix.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Necro Tech
post Feb 19 2005, 08:58 AM
Post #57


UMS O.G.
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 444
Joined: 18-May 04
Member No.: 6,335



QUOTE (mfb)
there is, in SR, no such thing as a wireless link to a drone that doesn't involve a remote control deck. so, yeah. you're basically stuck using an RC deck anyway, which makes the RC utility basically useless.

Just use a radio. A remote control deck is just a big fancy one with crazy bandwith. Or use a cell phone in the city. Its just a WIFI by a different name.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 19 2005, 09:17 AM
Post #58


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



well, I've always supposed the the remote control deck too be a kind of radio.....so what's the difference between "wireless link
& Rigger control deck" which is written under the remote control utility description???
And again: do you use the rigger protocol emulation module as an option for the cyberdeck (and use it with a different meaning that the one stated in R3R?)?.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 19 2005, 09:45 AM
Post #59


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



not according to R3, necro tech. it's crazy and senseless, but MSST is, according to R3 page 41, a "combination of specialized hardware and software components," so you can't use decks or radios to transmit it.

the RPEM should, under any sane GM, be allowed to connect to a cyberdeck, luca. there are no specific rules that say so, but since you're basically allowed to attach any electronic you want to your cyberdeck, and the RC program specifically mentions using an RPEM, it can be assumed that the RPEM can be plugged into a cyberdeck with little or no problem.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Feb 19 2005, 10:17 AM
Post #60


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



the RPEM takes care of the hardware part of the MSST, the RC utility takes care of the software side, then you need something to transmitt the data over and in my view a radio should fit the bill nicely. mind you, it will only handle captains chair mode...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 19 2005, 07:47 PM
Post #61


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



well, radio or remote control deck which has a flux rate of 2 (SR3 p.236) and it is, therefore, a kind of radio. I should say that you must use this and not the radio.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 19 2005, 09:32 PM
Post #62


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



that's logical, yes. but if you want to follow the rules, you can't use a normal radio. if i were your GM, i'd allow you to do it--but i'm just saying, that's against the actual rules.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hahnsoo
post Feb 19 2005, 10:13 PM
Post #63


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,587
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 7,014



It is difficult to use radio or wireless underwater, so underwater drones require a cable. You can rig just about any drone with a cable or a direct beam linkup (microwave, laser, etc.). The Remote Control Deck has built-in wireless, but that doesn't necessarily mean that you can ONLY use a wireless link to control drones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 19 2005, 10:19 PM
Post #64


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



right. i'm just saying, there's no rules for it. i completely agree that it makes sense, and i'd definitely allow a player to put together a system like that in any game i run. but the rigger and decker rules are really complex, so i just want to make sure it's clear that, by the book, the only way to communicate with a drone is through an RCD. otherwise, somebody might get confused.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 20 2005, 09:40 AM
Post #65


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



OK, I've searched again in RIgger3 Revised.
Page44 under the label "Drones, robots & the Matrix"
It is stated that a decker wit ha remote control utility (p.73 Matrix) can control "drones or the components and drones of a rigged security system through the matrix, provided that a communications link has been established between the user and the drones or the security system. This link can be achieved through a wireless link (p.33 Matrix), CCSS or a rigger control deck hooked into the Matrix".
Ok if this is the official version of the thing I have still some doubts:

1) even if you have a wireless link (which is put here as an alternative to the RC deck) I think that the rigger control deck is a MUST. WIthout it how can you establish how many drones you can use? (the double of the rating according to SR3 p156)

2) The rigger protocol emulation module is useless, although mentioned in Matrix it is not mentioned in here....and at the end of the day, from its description page 98 of R3R it is clear that it is not the stuff mentioned in Matrix page 73 in the description of the RC utility (what the hell you do with the rating of this module if you use it to control drones from the matrix?)

3) What the hell you do with the RC utility rating (except resisting Tar Baby IC)??

4) Decking a CCSS was outside this topic but, because iot is comprehended: it seems form this paragraph that to access a CCSS you need only the RC utility in you deck an a jack to jack in. IN reality R3R in the following pages (50, 94, 98) says that you need your cyberdeck + system-control Rig Emulator (SCRE) (page 94) + rigger-protocol emulation module (page 98) + the RC utility (page 73 Matrix). Again: What the hell to you do with the rating of the RIgger-protocol emulation module?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 20 2005, 09:59 AM
Post #66


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



1) you also need to know what rating wireless link is required to communicate with a drone--basically, how much Mp/s is required to maintain the three channels. this, and the reason you mentioned, is why i maintain that the rules don't support any form of drone control that doesn't involve an RC deck. sure, they say you can do it, but there aren't any real rules for it.

2) yep.

3) by the book, rating is unimportant.

4) the RPEM's rating is used in step 3 of "accessing a security system". check page 50 of R3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hahnsoo
post Feb 20 2005, 05:47 PM
Post #67


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,587
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 7,014



Even a rigger needs a Rigger Protocol Emulation Module to hack into a CCSS system. The RPEM does what it says: It emulates the protocols used to control drones and CCSS. The only time this really would be necessary is 1) If you don't have an RC deck and you are trying to perform RC functions or 2) You are trying to emulate someone else's rigger protocols (MIJI and CCSS).

I'd imagine that if you were trying to deck into drones hooked up to the Matrix that weren't your own, you'd need to use the RC Utility rating to lower the target number on the Slave test.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 20 2005, 10:36 PM
Post #68


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



Hahnsoo
, I do not think your point n.1 works. The rigger protocol emulation module is an option of a RC deck, therefore it dos not substitutes the RC decl. I think that the description of the RC utility in matrix is wrong in asking this module (teh description of the module does not do what matrix talks about).
ANyone nees a RC deck if wants to know how many drones are in his subscriber list. I still do not understand why the DC deck should be substituted by a wireless link (R3R page 44).
I think your point n.2 is right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 20 2005, 10:51 PM
Post #69


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



DOes anyone know the email-address where to ask the official answers to questions to authors (the guys of WizKids/FanPro)?
It could be a good thing to what's the real way in which the things are done for all the links between matrix & Reality (radio, cams, simsense, drones, etc....). I think that this topic has only shown how much the matter is complicated and how much the manuals are unclear about something which is fundamental because it deals with the integration of the deckers with the other runners.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Feb 21 2005, 12:23 AM
Post #70


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



info@shadowrunRPG.com is the only way I know of.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 21 2005, 02:19 AM
Post #71


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i've already asked them this same set of questions, ~2 weeks ago.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hahnsoo
post Feb 21 2005, 03:43 AM
Post #72


Mr. Johnson
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,587
Joined: 25-January 05
From: Berkeley, CA
Member No.: 7,014



QUOTE (Luca)
Hahnsoo
, I do not think your point n.1 works. The rigger protocol emulation module is an option of a RC deck, therefore it dos not substitutes the RC decl.

Well, I agree, not by its lonesome self. An RPEM, despite the cost, is not a substitute for a Remote Control Deck. But both a Remote Control Deck and RPEM use Rigger Protocols of some sort, and I would think that part of the RCD involves the Rigger Protocols built-in the RPEM. The real question here is, what are the component parts of an RCD, and what can substitute for what? Just like you can buy Smartlinks in component parts and substitute certain components.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Luca
post Feb 21 2005, 07:47 AM
Post #73


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 15-September 03
Member No.: 5,619



well, mfb, what was the answer then?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DocMortand
post Feb 21 2005, 08:31 AM
Post #74


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Joined: 8-October 04
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 6,734



Remember that RPEM is used in Electronic Warfare - it's trying to twist itself into an OPPONENTs RCD so that you can take over someone elses drones or at least disrupt. So it's not really a RCD, it's pretending to be a seperate one.

From what I understand, a RCD has a broadcast unit which has the three major control frequencies - master, slave and control(?). [I'm doing this from memory, so feel free to correct if I'm not on target] So the necessary units for a RCD are the broadcast unit, the receiver unit, and control unit where most of the gear goes. Into this goes all the toys - encrypt, decrypt, EW of all types, RPEM, etc. etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Feb 21 2005, 08:36 AM
Post #75


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



no answer as of yet. i've got two other questions in the FAQ queue that haven't yet been answered, either (though one's been discussed), so i'm not looking to get a reply any time soon. they all deal with SR's technical rules, and SR's tech rules, as you've noticed, tend to conflict a lot in their most complex sections. i don't envy the FAQ guy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th January 2026 - 08:58 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.