IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Maximising Touch spells, "I know Kung Fu..."
DrJest
post Mar 25 2005, 12:43 PM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,133
Joined: 3-October 04
Member No.: 6,722



I was idly fiddling with characters today (God bless the NSRCG) and whilst messing with a physmage I remembered something that I don't normally think of.

Spells like Death Touch and Stun Touch require, naturally, touching the target. A touch must, by definition, be an Unarmed Combat attack. As far as I can tell, there is therefore no reason why that "touch" can't be a smackdown from the attacking mage.

Suddenly my habit of picking up decent hand to hand skills for even my normal mages seems a much better idea. A physmage specialising in martial arts on the physad side becomes a terrifying thing to behold.

Am I right? Wrong? So far off the page I couldn't see it on a clear day with Vision Mag 3?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 25 2005, 12:56 PM
Post #2


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



It's not a bad one-two punch, but I'm not sure if it's strictly rules legal since both casting a spell and engaging in full-on melee combat are Complex Actions. I certainly do remember there's some sort of TN bonus if all you're out to do is touch someone (and that that sort of touch is allowed, even if a balls-out damaging attack isn't).

And, well, being able to mix it up a little isn't a bad thing. Have your Bruce Lee physmage dude barely graze a few people with touch-effect spells, and then go crazy and kung fu 'em once they've got a few TN mods. It'll cut down on his Drain and look cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Mar 25 2005, 01:46 PM
Post #3


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (p49 MitS)
Touching an unwilling subject requires a Melee Combat Test, but apply a -1 target modifier to account for the fact that the caster does not actually have to hit the target... The use of a touch spell cannot be used with an unarmed attack intended to cause damage.


You can't touch this... :eek:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Mar 25 2005, 01:58 PM
Post #4


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



No Hammer Time for you!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Mar 25 2005, 02:35 PM
Post #5


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



Also be careful, by making an Unarmed Combat test, the opponent may end up dealing damage to your PC instead.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sharaloth
post Mar 25 2005, 02:30 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 17-February 05
Member No.: 7,093



As an added bonus, if your enemy wins the melee role and hits you instead, the touch requirement is still met and they still get zapped!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DrJest
post Mar 25 2005, 02:37 PM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,133
Joined: 3-October 04
Member No.: 6,722



N ow there's a defence... "I just cast a touch-based spell. Still wanna punch me out?"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Mar 25 2005, 02:53 PM
Post #8


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Sharaloth)
As an added bonus, if your enemy wins the melee role and hits you instead, the touch requirement is still met and they still get zapped!

Unfortunately, that is not the way the books resolve touch range spells mechanically. The caster needs to succeed in the unarmed combat test, not the defender.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Mar 25 2005, 03:06 PM
Post #9


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Even logically if your opponent is armed and hits you back he has not touched you, his weapon has.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dashifen
post Mar 25 2005, 03:06 PM
Post #10


Technomancer
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,638
Joined: 2-October 02
From: Champaign, IL
Member No.: 3,374



I did this once and the GM allowed the character to design spells at the beginning of the game, too, so I remade all those low-level wizard spells from that other game, too: chilling touch, burning hands, shocking grasp, etc. Called them elemental manipulations, too, so the secondary effects would kick in, too. Drain sucked, but after I got Centering it wasn't too bad.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sharaloth
post Mar 25 2005, 06:30 PM
Post #11


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 17-February 05
Member No.: 7,093



QUOTE
Unfortunately, that is not the way the books resolve touch range spells mechanically. The caster needs to succeed in the unarmed combat test, not the defender.


Ahem:

QUOTE (MitS pg 49)
Touching an unwilling target requires a Melee Combat Test (p. 122, SR3),but apply a -1 target modifier to account for the fact that the caster does not actually have to hit the target. For example, if the caster misses but the target counterattacks and hits the caster, the touch requirement is met.


Emphasis mine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrinderTheTroll
post Mar 25 2005, 07:00 PM
Post #12


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 9-July 04
From: Modesto, CA
Member No.: 6,465



SR3.178 about Range for spells, mentions that "since you only need to touch a target you get a -1 TN". So reading that, it looks like if you intend to issue an ass whoopin' you would resolve as normal, otherwise you get a -1 TN for the purposes of touching only (no melee damage).


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nikoli
post Mar 25 2005, 06:55 PM
Post #13


Chicago Survivor
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 5,079
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Canton, GA
Member No.: 6,033



Sounds good.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
toturi
post Mar 26 2005, 12:20 AM
Post #14


Canon Companion
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 8,021
Joined: 2-March 03
From: The Morgue, Singapore LTG
Member No.: 4,187



QUOTE (Sharaloth @ Mar 26 2005, 02:30 AM)
QUOTE (MitS pg 49)
Touching an unwilling target requires a Melee Combat Test (p. 122, SR3),but apply a -1 target modifier to account for the fact that the caster does not actually have to hit the target. For example, if the caster misses but the target counterattacks and hits the caster, the touch requirement is met.


Emphasis mine.

True. Must have been brain dead to post that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sharaloth
post Mar 26 2005, 12:28 AM
Post #15


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 17-February 05
Member No.: 7,093



S'okay, every bookninja has their offdays.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Mar 26 2005, 01:03 AM
Post #16


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



That overrides SR3 which states:
QUOTE
..The target number for the unarmed attack has a -1 modifier, since the caster only needs to touch the target.  One net success is sufficient for the caster to touch the target.

And while MitS may overrule it, I defiantly houerule it straight back again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DocMortand
post Mar 26 2005, 01:20 AM
Post #17


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,088
Joined: 8-October 04
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 6,734



QUOTE (Sharaloth)
S'okay, every bookninja has their offdays.

Heresy!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post Mar 26 2005, 03:16 AM
Post #18


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



The real fun of Touch Based spells is social situations. Say you have to extract an unwilling corp exec during an office party. The standard approach (blow it up with an assault cannon) may not work too well.
Instead put on a three piece suit and strut around like you belong, exchange business cards with your target, and shake his hand. Bam! 6D stun and he doesn't even hit the ground. You carry him to the door. "looks like my firend has has too much to drink. I'm going to call him a cab."

There needs to be a spell that makes people drunk.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Mar 26 2005, 03:22 AM
Post #19


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE (hyzmarca)
There needs to be a spell that makes people drunk.

I think one could describe the effects of Confusion or Chaos as such, though I kinda sorta thought they had an intoxicate health spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpasticTeapot
post Mar 26 2005, 05:07 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 560
Joined: 21-December 04
Member No.: 6,893



I think a "drunkeness" spell is highly appropriate. There are already a few "buzz" style spells out there (the original UB book has one, if I'm not mistaken) and "Boozify" is only another type of high, so to speak. It's a really useful spell, too; make it powerful enough, and the person will have no memory of what happened for an hour before and three afterwards. Elves would also be at a terriffic disadvantage, while Trolls will be almost unaffected due to their absurdly high mass. (The amount of alcohol needed to make a Troll tipsy may kill an Elf.)
The issue of Drain is easy enough; make it equal to the drain of an equivalent Stun spell but make it slightly higher to reflect the other side effects, etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Mar 26 2005, 06:23 AM
Post #21


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



As K-10 said, there is already a Health spell called Intoxication in canon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Mar 26 2005, 07:30 AM
Post #22


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



It has some hard numbers as I recall, but it's strong! Same modifiers apply as a chaos spell! +1/force/successes.

Cast at a low force at.. say... a social party for an extraction...
Someone that's already been drinking may not catch on, but that +2 you do will be a killer. Plus, since the force is still low, it's harder to spot (just don't have the shaman cast it).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 07:04 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.