IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The up-side of SR4, Wait and see
Smiley
post Mar 30 2005, 05:19 AM
Post #1


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



I've seen many, many people posting about how much they love SR3 and that they're distrustful of SR4. Well, SR3 was a bit of a departure from SR2 and WAY off from SR1. Change can be good. Just because things are evolving, doesn't mean that Shadowrun is going to be a totally different, unplayable game now. Give SR4 a chance before you get all pissed off. Wait until you KNOW FOR A FACT what has changed and HOW IT HAS CHANGED before you judge it. I think that the developers have earned a little trust, don't you? Aren't they entitled to the benefit of the doubt? Haven't they proved that they know what they're doing?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Penta
post Mar 30 2005, 05:23 AM
Post #2


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,978
Joined: 26-February 02
From: New Jersey, USA
Member No.: 500



They haven't, not really, and...I'm a cynic about such things.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Catsnightmare
post Mar 30 2005, 05:24 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 488
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 90



Not after this 'hackers' name change crap they haven't.
And I'm starting not to like the hints being dropped of the change in dice mechanics either.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 30 2005, 05:35 AM
Post #4


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



They changed a name and they updated some tech. That's so catastrophic that everyone has their undies in a bunch? Calm down, for God's sake. It's not the end of the gaming world.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Mar 30 2005, 05:28 AM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



I can't agree either— and hell, I like the hackers name change and the furor over it is getting pretty damned annoying. I simply haven't seen much from these guys, and neither have the rest of you. Recent FanPro work has been better, yes. Certainly a step up from the disastrous crap that somehow passed for publication when Mulvihill was around. I'll admit I'm reasonably optimistic about this, and I do think people have been unreasonably quick to jump at current devs and declare them false prophets and all the other silly bullshit that's been flying lately. But I'm not going to advise blind faith, either. That's a bit too far in the opposite direction.

That said, the blind judgement a lot of people have been getting into lately needs to stop. That shit's just as narrowminded, and arguably more annoying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Deamon_Knight
post Mar 30 2005, 05:36 AM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 256
Joined: 24-October 04
Member No.: 6,784



Take it with a grain of salt Smiley! What the heck else would we be talking about? Its the old story about headlines; "Planet Doomed" is news, "Planet A-OK" is just not as interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Smiley
post Mar 30 2005, 05:43 AM
Post #7


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,102
Joined: 23-March 04
From: The Grizzly Grunion, in a VIP room.
Member No.: 6,191



QUOTE (Arethusa)
I can't agree either— and hell, I like the hackers name change and the furor over it is getting pretty damned annoying. I simply haven't seen much from these guys, and neither have the rest of you. Recent FanPro work has been better, yes. Certainly a step up from the disastrous crap that somehow passed for publication when Mulvihill was around. I'll admit I'm reasonably optimistic about this, and I do think people have been unreasonably quick to jump at current devs and declare them false prophets and all the other silly bullshit that's been flying lately. But I'm not going to advise blind faith, either. That's a bit too far in the opposite direction.

That said, the blind judgement a lot of people have been getting into lately needs to stop. That shit's just as narrowminded, and arguably more annoying.

I think this is the first time me and Arethusa have been totally on the same page. I'm not advising towards blind faith either, I'm just saying that the developers have earned the benefit of the doubt and that everyone should wait for more info before they start rending their garments and decrying SR4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Horror
post Mar 30 2005, 05:39 AM
Post #8


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: 28-March 05
Member No.: 7,251




Well, I love every change so far - even the change of deckers to hackers.

I have complete faith in the design team.



The Horror
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sandoval Smith
post Mar 30 2005, 06:16 AM
Post #9


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,144
Joined: 22-September 04
Member No.: 6,690



What could we do to amuse ourselves if we didn't have gems of irrational, seething, rage, like the guy who posted the,"Opinion? Yeah, I got one?" thread?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Necro Tech
post Mar 30 2005, 06:19 AM
Post #10


UMS O.G.
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 444
Joined: 18-May 04
Member No.: 6,335



As long as we are talking upside, anyone wanna take a bet on wether or not the invisibility question gets resolved?

Also, the FAQ no longer applies. :grinbig:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Mar 30 2005, 07:36 AM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (Necro Tech)
Also, the FAQ no longer applies.

You mean the FAQ that when they updated it on 3/1/05, no longer had any wording to the effect "There are no plans for SR4 at this time"? Which was aproximately two weeks before they even made a formal anouncement that SR4 was coming?

That FAQ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SykoBear
post Mar 30 2005, 09:46 AM
Post #12


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 32
Joined: 27-April 03
Member No.: 4,519



Hey guys,

It just occurred to me. Isn't it April Fool's Day in two day's time?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Mar 30 2005, 10:05 AM
Post #13


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Boy, you're right! They sure pulled a fast one on us. I just wish I could see the looks on the playtester's and developer's faces when someone tells them the whole thing's just a joke!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cougaar
post Mar 30 2005, 12:24 PM
Post #14


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 20-March 05
Member No.: 7,199



QUOTE (Deamon_Knight)
Take it with a grain of salt Smiley! What the heck else would we be talking about? Its the old story about headlines; "Planet Doomed" is news, "Planet A-OK" is just not as interesting.

huzzah for internet fora where anybody and everybody can get as worked up as they want to about whatever they want!

it's people who have nagging doubts and concerns mixed with people who take things too seriously and others who are just bored.

all in all, we can't really discuss all the things good, bad and ugly until we've got the finished product - and to while away the time we discuss all sorts of things.. whatever comes to mind.. it's a great way to generate interest and to get the masses hyped up about the coming new addition.

at times I find myself remembering how worked up people got because of the millenium - oh knows.. the Y2K bug that will spread disaster and mayhem!!one!eleven
in a couple of years most if not all people will chuckle over the "issues" discussed here.. I think there a few who are laughing already (not me, I just have a little giggle now and then)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Mar 30 2005, 01:18 PM
Post #15


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



I'll give SR4 a chance. There are things to be changed, a lot imo. We'll see if we like the changes rob and his boys are doing. If not - well, nobody has to use them. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Mar 30 2005, 03:00 PM
Post #16


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



Yea, or buy them.

Which means SR folds again, and now we don't even get SR3.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Mar 30 2005, 03:08 PM
Post #17


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



QUOTE (bigity)
Which means SR folds again, and now we don't even get SR3.


how exactly does the introduction of SR4 invalidate all of the materials of SR3 you have? just because the new edition comes out, doesnt mean you can't continue with the sr 3 things until you hear/make opinions on sr4. Hell, in That Game that Shalt Not be Mentioned™, theres still people playing FIRST edition!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vuron
post Mar 30 2005, 03:29 PM
Post #18


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 468
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 7,185



Actually plenty of people still play basic dnd but that's besides the point. Personally I'll give it a shot see if I like the rules and setting. Honestly I expect to probably have something akin to using the SR4 ruleset with a revised SR3 setting but that's just me. Of course at a certain point in time that pretty much kills adventure and sourcebook sales but that's an industry wide problem atm.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Mar 30 2005, 03:38 PM
Post #19


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



QUOTE (Aku)
QUOTE (bigity)
Which means SR folds again, and now we don't even get SR3.


how exactly does the introduction of SR4 invalidate all of the materials of SR3 you have? just because the new edition comes out, doesnt mean you can't continue with the sr 3 things until you hear/make opinions on sr4. Hell, in That Game that Shalt Not be Mentioned™, theres still people playing FIRST edition!

Because if SR4 tanks bad enough, and FanPro is counting on SR4 to keep the product line viable, then they won't be around to keep producing SR3 products.

Nobody said anything about not being able to use existing books. Except you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Mar 30 2005, 03:47 PM
Post #20


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



and thats my point, if people are still playing a ruleset that had a fighter, mage, cleric, thief, elf and dwarf as playable CLASSES, well, i think you'll be able to manage with sr3 if you don't like the direction sr4 goes. After all, they haven't had any sort of setting upgrade for what? nearly 20 years?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Mar 30 2005, 03:41 PM
Post #21


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



And if you asked those guys if they would like to get a new book now and then, what would they say?

My point is that there's nothing wrong with people being apprehensive about the SR4 changes. Because who knows what can happen if it doesn't sell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dizzo Dizzman
post Mar 30 2005, 04:13 PM
Post #22


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 91
Joined: 23-January 05
From: Washington, DC
Member No.: 7,007



We Fear Change. :|
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aku
post Mar 30 2005, 04:14 PM
Post #23


Running, running, running
*****

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,220
Joined: 18-October 04
From: North Carolina
Member No.: 6,769



I dont know what they'd say, but i can tell you it's generally not profitable for a gaming company to continue making products for obsolete (in their minds) products. I'm sure the number of people playing dnd/adnd/ even 3.0 is a small minority. Writing, printing and distributing books is expensive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SirBedevere
post Mar 30 2005, 04:38 PM
Post #24


Knight Templar
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 212
Joined: 20-June 04
From: Ipswich, UK Just South of the Stinkfens
Member No.: 6,424



Remember, inside every silver lining is a cloud. :cyber:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bigity
post Mar 30 2005, 05:12 PM
Post #25


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,840
Joined: 24-July 02
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 3,024



QUOTE (Aku)
I dont know what they'd say, but i can tell you it's generally not profitable for a gaming company to continue making products for obsolete (in their minds) products. I'm sure the number of people playing dnd/adnd/ even 3.0 is a small minority. Writing, printing and distributing books is expensive.

Maybe I'm not making myself clear.


FanPro continues to make SR3. They continue to sell books and make a profit (at least, I hope they are currently in the black at the moment, if not, maybe that is the driving force behind SR4).

Or

FanPro makes SR4. SR4 tanks (hope not), and FanPro goes the way of the dodo. Now we don't have any new SR, of any version.


So, people with concerns about SR4 changes are right (or at least have the right)to voice them, without being considered rude or dumb or whatever.

That's all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th May 2025 - 07:44 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.