IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ghost in the Shell 2, could it be an example of a hacker?
Sepherim
post Mar 30 2005, 11:32 PM
Post #1


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 326
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Vigo (Spanish Kingdom)
Member No.: 1,446



Just seen the movie, and, as I was watching Batou move around I couldn't help but think one time and again about SR4s new Matrix. It seems like quite a good example of the new Matrix, don't you guys think?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 30 2005, 11:29 PM
Post #2


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Probably, unfortunately.

Not that I don't love GitS, but the tech level is much higher than Shadowrun.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sidartha
post Mar 31 2005, 02:06 AM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Joined: 27-January 04
Member No.: 6,025



Second Kage.
While cool, GitS is not shadowrun and the ability to do some of the things that Batu and Katsuragi(pardon me if I misspelled that) is wildly unbalancing
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 03:01 AM
Post #4


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Batou and Kusanagi.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Mar 31 2005, 03:10 AM
Post #5


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



You didn't misspell it so much as give her a new name. It's Kusanagi.

And, yes, while I would like to see SR take note of GitS and incorporate at least some concepts from it, the two are very incompatible.

[edit]

Curse you, Kage.

This post has been edited by Arethusa: Mar 31 2005, 03:11 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 31 2005, 06:07 AM
Post #6


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



QUOTE (Arethusa)
And, yes, while I would like to see SR take note of GitS and incorporate at least some concepts from it, the two are very incompatible.


I agree with the taking the ideas but not so much on the fact that they are incompatible (with the exception of full body replacement).

Bring cyber limbs into being worth it. Adjust the essence loss of head comms which as it stands will cost you a bucket load of essence just to have a cybered Pocket Sec! It would take a reworking of the areas involved but not so much as ot be not doable.

[EDIT] Though to be fair i'm thinking more along SAC then Innocence which i havent seen yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 31 2005, 06:29 AM
Post #7


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



QUOTE
(with the exception of full body replacement).

Which, under current (mainly M&M) rules, is possible, but anyway.

SAC? I recently tried to build a Tachikoma. Worked out reasonably well, though Robot Pilot 5 propably isn't AI, just an advanced SK. Scary what these things (maxed out robot pilots) get for pools!

Then again, until Twist did whatever Twist did to awaken her, Morgan was only an extremely advanced SK, too, so ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Mar 31 2005, 06:46 AM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



The incompatibility I'm talking about exists more in terms of paradigm than necessarily in specific technologies (though the vast majority of technological concepts are incompatible with Shadowrun, at present, as well). This applies to SAC, though Innocence is a fair bit more extreme in many respects.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 31 2005, 07:04 AM
Post #9


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



QUOTE (hermit @ Mar 31 2005, 06:29 AM)
SAC?

Stand Alone Complex

QUOTE
I recently tried to build a Tachikoma. Worked out reasonably well, though Robot Pilot 5 propably isn't AI, just an advanced SK. Scary what these things (maxed out robot pilots) get for pools!

This is something thats been bugging me for AGES Tachikoma/ Fushikoma is there a difference? I always thought it was Fushikoma but i've seen Tachikoma around a couple of times.

If anyone says one is made by Fushi, they get a virtual kick in the balls!

QUOTE (Arethusa)
The incompatibility I'm talking about exists more in terms of paradigm than necessarily in specific technologies

You mean Ghost Hacking right?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Arethusa
post Mar 31 2005, 07:12 AM
Post #10


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,901
Joined: 19-June 03
Member No.: 4,775



QUOTE (Shockwave_IIc @ Mar 31 2005, 02:04 AM)
QUOTE (Arethusa)
The incompatibility I'm talking about exists more in terms of paradigm than necessarily in specific technologies

You mean Ghost Hacking right?

No. I mean the concepts, paradigms, and themes that dominate Shirow's work (or at least GitS). Ghost hacking and its reflection on Shirow's/GitS's concepts of humanity and inhumanity, among other things, is one expression of this, but hardly the only one.

QUOTE (Shockwave_IIc)
QUOTE (hermit)
I recently tried to build a Tachikoma. Worked out reasonably well, though Robot Pilot 5 propably isn't AI, just an advanced SK. Scary what these things (maxed out robot pilots) get for pools!

This is something thats been bugging me for AGES Tachikoma/ Fushikoma is there a difference? I always thought it was Fushikoma but i've seen Tachikoma around a couple of times.

Wasn't it Fuchikoma? Also, as I recall, they were just called Fuchikoma in the manga and Tachikoma in SAC, but I could very well be wrong.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 07:42 AM
Post #11


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (Shockwave_IIc @ Mar 31 2005, 02:04 AM)
This is something thats been bugging me for AGES Tachikoma/ Fushikoma is there a difference? I always thought it was Fushikoma but i've seen Tachikoma around a couple of times.

In the manga it was Fuchikoma. Since there was in the latest disc of SAC the episode where the Tachikoma get returned to the lab, I assume that the Fuchikoma are the more docile, streamlined later model (though not that docile, obviously). I fully expect them to be introduced before the end of SAC.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
badwithmath
post Mar 31 2005, 07:54 AM
Post #12


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 24-March 05
Member No.: 7,227



Tachikoma is used in SAC.

The second season of SAC has a lot of interesting scenes that could be taken as visual cues for the new matrix. There are virtual meetings and some data hacking scenes that have helped me imagine how the current, SR3, matrix operates. I think people still need to "jack in" in order to access the net or to ghost hack another person's brain so this might not be as applicable to the new wireless matrix idea as you'd think.

One exception, now that I think of it, is the Laughing Man from SAC, who seemed to be able to access the net and ghost hack without plugging into a physical location. He could insert data files into other people's brains so they couldn't remember seeing him. Or he could just take away their sight, as he did to Batou. Substitute a building's security for a person's cyberbrain and the Laughing Man might be a good example for the new SR hackers. Its a powerful character concept.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RunnerPaul
post Mar 31 2005, 08:02 AM
Post #13


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,086
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 364



QUOTE (badwithmath)
One exception, now that I think of it, is the Laughing Man from SAC

Strikes Again!/HA-HA-HA?

What is it about guys with the name Laughing Man in cyberpunkish settings that they just have to break computer system rules everyone else is stuck with?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 08:49 AM
Post #14


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (badwithmath)
I think people still need to "jack in" in order to access the net or to ghost hack another person's brain so this might not be as applicable to the new wireless matrix idea as you'd think.

That's not actually true. You see better results from direct hacking, but there are definitely instances of remote hacking and computer use (see the tank episode when it peeps Pazuo's Eagle Eye data, or for that matter Pazuo's Eagle Eye system in the first place).

On the Tachikoma/Fuchikoma topic, the two are also of decidedly different design. The Fuchikoma is nontrivially smaller, lacks the bulge in the back, and is noticably a lot more cramped for the pilot.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 31 2005, 08:54 AM
Post #15


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



QUOTE
Tachikoma is used in SAC.

Yup. That's what I based them on.

QUOTE
What is it about guys with the name Laughing Man in cyberpunkish settings that they just have to break computer system rules everyone else is stuck with?

Actually, "Laughing Man" is a crappy translation of the Japanese name. I'll have to ask my friend for the japanese name, though.

QUOTE
One exception, now that I think of it, is the Laughing Man from SAC, who seemed to be able to access the net and ghost hack without plugging into a physical location. He could insert data files into other people's brains so they couldn't remember seeing him. Or he could just take away their sight, as he did to Batou. Substitute a building's security for a person's cyberbrain and the Laughing Man might be a good example for the new SR hackers. Its a powerful character concept.

Even in close-to-space-age GitS, this character was a very special, extremely competent hacker ("pinnacle of DNI interface hacker" is how he referred to himself; he was also a lab product of sorts). No way this should be the common SR4 hacker!

QUOTE
In the manga it was Fuchikoma. Since there was in the latest disc of SAC the episode where the Tachikoma get returned to the lab, I assume that the Fuchikoma are the more docile, streamlined later model (though not that docile, obviously). I fully expect them to be introduced before the end of SAC.

IIRC, they're still called Tachikoma in the second season. I guess it has to do with all this universe restart thing the Japanese love to do to popular movie worlds every once in a while (Kaiju movies are especially notorious for this). GitS-SAC assumers GitS 1 (and, possibly 2) never happened; they also changed Motoko's hair back to Manga violet from jet black (and set the hair style right too). There's no coherent canon in GitS.

QUOTE
That's not actually true. You see better results from direct hacking, but there are definitely instances of remote hacking and computer use (see the tank episode when it peeps Pazuo's Eagle Eye data, or for that matter Pazuo's Eagle Eye system in the first place).

I always wrote that off under EW and transmission hacking (Section 9 has it's members connected to each other, which makes them vulnerable for such attacks). Also, they were unprepared for this, so I guess this is rather extraordinary.

EDIT:
QUOTE
On the Tachikoma/Fuchikoma topic, the two are also of decidedly different design. The Fuchikoma is nontrivially smaller, lacks the bulge in the back, and is noticably a lot more cramped for the pilot.

Tachikoma are simply a complete remake of the Manga's Fuchikoma. They have a number of differences, one being the lack of machine guns in their mechanical arms.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 08:52 AM
Post #16


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



She also doesn't dress nearly as well as she did in the movie. So it goes.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 31 2005, 09:12 AM
Post #17


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



they're tachikoma throughout SAC; GitS1 and 2 never occur, in the SAC timeline (though there are parallels, just as there are strong parallels between Innocence and Man-Machine Interface).

i really doubt that ghosthacking is going to be possible in SR4 to any extent greater than it is in SR3. that is, it's possible, but it takes hours, and the subject is going to know something's up.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 09:13 AM
Post #18


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Where is that stated, out of interest? I had personally just assumed that it followed the timeline of the original manga and that the SAC covered the time before the Puppet Master incident and the first movie.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 31 2005, 09:16 AM
Post #19


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i read it in a site that i believe was official, several months ago. though i don't think there's anything in SAC or GitS1/2 that makes your idea impossible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 31 2005, 09:24 AM
Post #20


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



I agree with Mfb i've heard read it somewhere as well.

Although SAC, Gits (the manga), Gits 2 MMI, works
With the first film and Innocence being a different timeline.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hermit
post Mar 31 2005, 09:28 AM
Post #21


The King In Yellow
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,922
Joined: 26-February 05
From: JWD
Member No.: 7,121



Incidentally, those are the ones where Shirow had a prominent role in making them ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Mar 31 2005, 09:30 AM
Post #22


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,006
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



At least as far as we've gotten in the English translation of SAC, as mfb says there's nothing that requires a different timeline. It'll be interesting to see if they do in fact split it at some point (all that's necessary to go into GitS from where we are now in SAC is for Pazuo and Borma to resign, die, or be transferred and the Tachikoma to be replaced by the latest model, the Fuchikoma).

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 31 2005, 09:23 AM
Post #23


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



which ones? my favorite, of the three (manga, movies, anime) is SAC. the movies had too much pat philosophy, and i prefer my japanese cartoons without even the hint of silly big faces that the manga includes. though the manga is kickass.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockwave_IIc
post Mar 31 2005, 09:26 AM
Post #24


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,512
Joined: 16-August 03
From: Northampton
Member No.: 5,499



Question. taking the assumption that an "E-Brain" is at least in part a snake eyes system, would it not be possible to hack the mass's ala Laughing Man? Since the mass's won't have Encryption you could do it via the Electronic warfare rules?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 31 2005, 09:39 AM
Post #25


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



no. snake eyes only transmits sensory data. it might be possible to create illusions in a target's sensorium, but it wouldn't be possible to control them because there's no link to the target's motor functions.

and, actually, i'd assume that most people have at least encryption 3 on anything like that. though one might also assume that most people with wireless networks would take the basic step of using an encryption key...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 09:47 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.