IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Implication of the decker / rigger change., Low cost deckers???
Edward
post Apr 19 2005, 01:15 PM
Post #1


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Implication of the decker / rigger change.
Low cost deckers???

Without the need for a clunky cyber deck and presumably without the need for programs (where would you store them if you had no cyber deck?) what will deckers spend there money on. I have always seen a decker as a resources a pick but now it seems they need nothing.

There is some talk about a form of C^2 deck becoming the standard but that doesnít make much sense to me, why would thy do away with the external cyber deck in favour of something so costly and essence intensive, the only reason to take one was covert operation.

Also riggers will become more powerful, with les spend on there interface hardware (RCD) they will be able to spend that money on more starting vehicles.

And what will happen to the otaku. There howl advantage is gone if nobody needs a deck, I can see a howl plot line of the depressed otaku that are no longer special.

Edward


Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 19 2005, 01:50 PM
Post #2


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



The "clunky" disappears. But that doesn't mean no deck. It -might- mean internal only deck, but not nessasarily. But in any event they are going to need the wi-fi hardware and -some- way to translate that into human senses.

Exactly how you arrived at RCD stuff I'm not sure?

P.S. I heard from a friend's cousin's mother who's hairdresser is a playtester that in 2069 Otaku are exposed as all being flesh forms of software bug spirits. Ares steps in and does The Right Thingô and shoots them all. The end. :rotate:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vuron
post Apr 19 2005, 02:03 PM
Post #3


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 468
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 7,185



Honestly Otaku need to universally suffer from a 9mm migraine.

As for the decker/rigger change maybe the deck replacement for the future uses modular pieces that can both access the wireless matrix and help command drones.

If I really wanted to increase playability of Riggers I'd place thier reaction boosting equipment within the deck replacement like reaction enhancers for the SR3 decks. That way you can save the essence cost and limited utility of VCRs that impact thier playability and have them be able to enhance themselves in different ways.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 19 2005, 02:11 PM
Post #4


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Vuron)
Honestly Otaku need to universally suffer from a 9mm migraine.

As for the decker/rigger change maybe the deck replacement for the future uses modular pieces that can both access the wireless matrix and help command drones.

If I really wanted to increase playability of Riggers I'd place thier reaction boosting equipment within the deck replacement like reaction enhancers for the SR3 decks. That way you can save the essence cost and limited utility of VCRs that impact thier playability and have them be able to enhance themselves in different ways.

What I'm curious about is whether or not the mobile deckers are going to be able to avoid dropping to the floor like sacks of dung everytime they interact through their decks. Where they have two modes, one roughly akin to astral perception, the other akin to astral projection.

Picture the team going down the hallway in a facility. There is a camera there. To the rest of the team it looks like, you know, a camera. A lens, a body, an antenna for linking with the building's internal network. But to the deck he sees it as an active entity that he can interact with from a distance. The icon of the camera overlaid HUD style with the rest of the hallway. Perhaps it can only defend itself from probing, perhaps it has more active defenses in that it attacks those that are wi-fi active. But in any event the decker can try neutralize it or subvert it. Perhaps even being able to switch from "perception" to "projection" to then get into the building network and into the host.

That, I think would be cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vuron
post Apr 19 2005, 02:23 PM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 468
Joined: 17-March 05
Member No.: 7,185



I think the base command chair mode shouldn't require RAS override but if you want to really max out the capabilities of a vehicle or drone it should cost you a bit.

So if you mainly want some drones to supplement your team you can walk around with them but if you want to take firm control of a specific drone you need to lay down against a wall and enter that device.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NightHaunter
post Apr 19 2005, 02:34 PM
Post #6


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 360
Joined: 18-March 02
From: Plymouth UK.
Member No.: 2,408



C'mon leave the otaku alone.
Evolution is when somthing changes to cope with changes in its environment and unless i'm mistaken computers are a, not all that recent, change in our environment.
Also evey few centuries evolution jumps foreward.

On second thoughts just shoot a few. :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Apr 19 2005, 02:50 PM
Post #7


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



Ok we have slights against the playability of riggers. I found them to be the most powerful combat archetype at char gen (magicals with invoking may win latter).

The idea of a hacker seeing a cameras a assessable icon from the real world is stupid. It implies that the camera is using a wireless interface witch can be decoded in a reasonably short time frame. (seconds). This means the security contractors ignored basic protocols to prevent signal interference. Wireless connections may be convenient but they are inherently insecure. If a computer hacker can pull this kind of stunt it only proves that. And the first time somebody dose it every security installer will be buying rolls of cable by the dozen

What would make scene is an overlay interface on a hackerís vision that shows him where he is in the matrix. Allowing him to run overwatch in vaguely the SR3 fashion. While physically participating in the run (probably a -2 penalty to all tests while viewing both worlds). If he is in a building and its security host at the same time the program would automatically link a camera seen to the corresponding camera icon in the security host but only if you previously hacked into the security host.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 19 2005, 04:48 PM
Post #8


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i really wish people would pay attention to what the playtesters say, and do the minimal amount of sitting down and thinking that it takes to connect the dots. in this particular case, for instance, several of the freelancers have outright stated that there are still cyberdecks, and that the key word in that FAQ is "clunky". therefore, it might be logical to assume that there are still cyberdecks in SR4, but that they won't be cyberdeck-sized. they might be palm-pilot sized, or they might be 0.1 essence chip installed in your head sized. hell, they might be a computer that stays in one place, that you access over the Intarwebs. whatever form they take, though, it's clear from playtester comments that cyberdecks are still around in some form or fashion in SR4.

and, actually, wirelessly hacking a camera implies nothing about the camera. it merely implies that the computer the camera is hooked into has wireless connectivity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Apr 19 2005, 05:05 PM
Post #9


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



QUOTE (mfb)
i really wish people would pay attention to what the playtesters say, and do the minimal amount of sitting down and thinking that it takes to connect the dots. in this particular case, for instance, several of the freelancers have outright stated that there are still cyberdecks, and that the key word in that FAQ is "clunky".

The playtesters (well I only recall Patrick actually mentioning it) stated that the word 'cyberdeck' still existed in the manuscripts he had read. The FAQ blurb lists the cyberdeck's dissapearance as one of the main reasons for the change to the term 'hacker'. There are many conclusions that can be reached when only half of the facts are given, and wording is purposely oblique.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 19 2005, 05:13 PM
Post #10


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Edward @ Apr 19 2005, 08:50 AM)
The idea of a hacker seeing a cameras a assessable icon from the real world is stupid. It implies that the camera is using a wireless interface witch can be decoded in a reasonably short time frame. (seconds).

Sorry, I should have explained better. If the device was a node of a host system (typical in a building) prior to going down the hallway the decker would have established a presense on the host system network. This would be akin to a Login. Yes this bends reality, but unfortunately such is the encryption/decryption wierdness of SR that is done for playability. *shrug*

EDIT: That is to say, forcing or faking your way through a Login in a quick manner bends reality. That once you are in and validated by the system that you can see nodes (barring subsections that you need higher security rating to pass easily into) isn't that bad of a leap at all.

If the device was directly connected to the Matrix (public utility appliances, or installations where the host is the device because the facility is too small) then you'd see the icon straight up, but would still have to Login to stutbly influence it. Brute force might be an option without Login, roughly equivalent to today's DOS attacks.

Likewise if you weren't logged into the system when you went down the hallway and the camera was using wi-fi (a convience technology, admittedly unusaul in a Super-sekrit operation with high bankroll) you'd still see the icon, but could only brute force (DOS) attack it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Apr 19 2005, 05:36 PM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



QUOTE (mfb)
i really wish people would pay attention to what the playtesters say, and do the minimal amount of sitting down and thinking that it takes to connect the dots. in this particular case, for instance, several of the freelancers have outright stated that there are still cyberdecks, and that the key word in that FAQ is "clunky". therefore, it might be logical to assume that there are still cyberdecks in SR4, but that they won't be cyberdeck-sized. they might be palm-pilot sized, or they might be 0.1 essence chip installed in your head sized. hell, they might be a computer that stays in one place, that you access over the Intarwebs. whatever form they take, though, it's clear from playtester comments that cyberdecks are still around in some form or fashion in SR4.

and, actually, wirelessly hacking a camera implies nothing about the camera. it merely implies that the computer the camera is hooked into has wireless connectivity.

Your first paragraph is hard to comply with when I donít know who is a developer and who is giving there private opinion, I am going on eth FAQ that said there is no such thing as a deck and thus the term Decker is no longer used (strange considering how well names tend to stick even after what they where named for is gone. It was 5 years after the R&I bank changed its name to bank west before people stoped referring to the R&I tower in Perth. Various cavalry units still derive names from horses in spit of the fact that horses have not been commonly used in warfare for decade and classes of musical instruments are named for materials that are no longer commonly used in there construction.

To your second paragraph you made my point for me. It makes no difference if the camera has a wireless connection or if a small computer attached to and physically close to the camera has a wireless connection to the rest of the security systems. There is a wireless system that can be quickly infiltrated or easily jammed on which the security cameras are dependant. Cables may be cut more easily but finding them takes time and they are very difficult to access for long enough to tap into without drawing attention. They are also relatively cheep.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 19 2005, 05:58 PM
Post #12


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Edward @ Apr 19 2005, 11:36 AM)
To your second paragraph you made my point for me. It makes no difference if the camera has a wireless connection or if a small computer attached to and physically close to the camera has a wireless connection to the rest of the security systems. There is a wireless system that can be quickly infiltrated or easily jammed on which the security cameras are dependant. Cables may be cut more easily but finding them takes time and they are very difficult to access for long enough to tap into without drawing attention. They are also relatively cheep.

Edward

The wireless connection might be all the way back at a public Matix switch point.

Yes, you could flood an area with RF jamming equipment, but SR3 had electronic jamming rules. So such could be overcome, you just need to pack a bigger amplifier. 8)

Rigger 3 also had network hardwire tapping and infiltartion rules. They might have added hardwire taps that have an wi-fi interface so you tap the building once and then roam from that tap.

In the end you're going to have to accept at least a small amount of bending of reality for the tech to work, otherwise you shouldn't be playing SR. Just the powering of cyberlimbs without at least recharge rules is a huge leap of belief.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 19 2005, 06:13 PM
Post #13


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



i'm going off what's been said by the playtesters on the boards. one of the things that several playtesters have said is that the FAQs don't quite give the whole story on the issues they touch.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raskolnikov
post Apr 19 2005, 07:59 PM
Post #14


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 1,525



There's a difference between accepting some flex in technology and pretending physics are different in SR. Hopefully, unlike old Decking, the designers will go with the prior.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 19 2005, 08:05 PM
Post #15


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Raskolnikov)
There's a difference between accepting some flex in technology and pretending physics are different in SR. Hopefully, unlike old Decking, the designers will go with the prior.

Ok, accepting a LOT of flex. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Apr 19 2005, 08:07 PM
Post #16


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (blakkie)
What I'm curious about is whether or not the mobile deckers are going to be able to avoid dropping to the floor like sacks of dung everytime they interact through their decks. Where they have two modes, one roughly akin to astral perception, the other akin to astral projection.

err, when you sleep you dont turn into a sack of potatos. you do toss and turn at times indepentet of what your dreaming of. still, i have allways found it a bit odd that a system like the RAS can be put into a cyberdeck and be able to override the brain while skillwires needs to go into the body to work. why not just place the right clips and links at the right part of the brain and spinal colom and then insert some signals? that is unless what the RAS realy does is put the user into dream sleep, gives a new meaning to sleeping on the job :P
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
audun
post Apr 19 2005, 09:47 PM
Post #17


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 381



QUOTE (blakkie)
Where they have two modes, one roughly akin to astral perception, the other akin to astral projection.
As for astral perception/projection analogies, what about overlay vs full imersion VR.
QUOTE
Picture the team going down the hallway in a facility. There is a camera there. To the rest of the team it looks like, you know, a camera. A lens, a body, an antenna for linking with the building's internal network. But to the deck he sees it as an active entity that he can interact with from a distance. The icon of the camera overlaid HUD style with the rest of the hallway. Perhaps it can only defend itself from probing, perhaps it has more active defenses in that it attacks those that are wi-fi active. But in any event the decker can try neutralize it or subvert it. Perhaps even being able to switch from "perception" to "projection" to then get into the building network and into the host.

That, I think would be cool.

If SR4 hacking would be anything like this I would definetly NOT play SR4. Hopefully it won't. Wi-Fi enabled security cameras is plain stupid (though not entirely unplausible, as people are stupid).
If you instead fly up a small drone which taps a cable connected to the camera and then is able to hack the camera (or the signal from the camera), SR4 hacking would be both plausible and cool.

Though, what you describe might be the SR4 version of Otaku (which I really aren't looking forward to).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 19 2005, 09:53 PM
Post #18


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



no, see. when the wireless decker sees that camera, the camera isn't the one that shows him its icon. the computer system that the camera is hooked up to shows the decker the camera's icon, because the decker has already hacked the computer via wireless connection and has access to the computer's physical security control functions. anybody who doesn't have that access, legitimate or hacked, sees just a regular camera with no icon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
audun
post Apr 19 2005, 10:25 PM
Post #19


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 381



QUOTE (mfb)
no, see. when the wireless decker sees that camera, the camera isn't the one that shows him its icon. the computer system that the camera is hooked up to shows the decker the camera's icon, because the decker has already hacked the computer via wireless connection and has access to the computer's physical security control functions. anybody who doesn't have that access, legitimate or hacked, sees just a regular camera with no icon.

And why would that computer be accessible via wi-fi? Besides sheer stupidity (AKA the Wireless Matrix hype). If the answer is that the hacker has physically connected to a part of the security system and has established a wi-fi connection to that connection, it sounds OK. Tapping the camera signal may be such physical connection, and I love the idea of having drones for that purpose (Hobgoblin's idea, at least where I first saw it).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Raskolnikov
post Apr 19 2005, 11:53 PM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle
Member No.: 1,525



It is possible the camera communicates with the network via an insecure standard data tansfer protocol, as opposed to a dedicated video fee protocol. There are advanatages to having every datatype use one communication protocol, it's the kind of thing we see today. The hacker may have gained access to the company system through the building matrix link, something needs to supply wandering managers with real-time data about their team members' workloads. The hacker may have come through the more guarded but potentially venerable servers for advertisement or matrix presence (webservers) or their communications interfaces (mail servers).

In a perfect, secure, world systems would follow a shelled security structure that isolated critical systems and chocked any access to the outside that they absolutely had to have. I doubt the new system will allow this, since it's not as cyber-punky, but they'd have to really screw up the system to match the ingrained vulnerability of architecture that the Matrix protocols represented. Never mind the sheer insanity of processing allocation and work division.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Apr 19 2005, 11:53 PM
Post #21


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



because it's the same computer that's used for research, accounting, sales, and the CEO's massive pr0n collection. at least, that seems to be how SR's hosts seem to work: you have one big computer that handles everything.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 20 2005, 12:17 AM
Post #22


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (audun)
QUOTE (mfb @ Apr 19 2005, 09:53 PM)
no, see. when the wireless decker sees that camera, the camera isn't the one that shows him its icon. the computer system that the camera is hooked up to shows the decker the camera's icon, because the decker has already hacked the computer via wireless connection and has access to the computer's physical security control functions. anybody who doesn't have that access, legitimate or hacked, sees just a regular camera with no icon.

And why would that computer be accessible via wi-fi? Besides sheer stupidity (AKA the Wireless Matrix hype). If the answer is that the hacker has physically connected to a part of the security system and has established a wi-fi connection to that connection, it sounds OK. Tapping the camera signal may be such physical connection, and I love the idea of having drones for that purpose (Hobgoblin's idea, at least where I first saw it).

Or they system is connected to the Matrix proper, via hardline likely. The deck is using it's wi-fi system to go out to the Matrix to whatever wi-fi station, then through the Matrix hardlines into the host. Like an overwatch, only the decker/hacker also is there in the meat to see what his friends are doing and to work on whatever hardware isn't available via the Matrix.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 20 2005, 03:08 AM
Post #23


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



BTW those of you freaking about the idea of wi-fi security devices, keep this in mind:

1) 100's of thousands, if not millions of security systems in North America run partially or fully on remote radio frequency sensors. It is common for home security systems to use these. Why? Because they are much easier to install or extend in existing homes than it is to run wires. Lower end systems, yes. But 'runners aren't always going to be breaking into the Pentagon or Ares military compounds.
2) Even with wires running to security devices there is hot tapping, or at least in SR3 (Rigger 3) there was. The extra deterrent of having to hot tap isn't huge given the normal barrier (the walls) to hot tapping doesn't exist in SR for any building with an external keypad, cardreader, etc. They just need an Electronics check (i believe) to pop off the device cover and away they go with about the same difficulty of penetrating a SR3 radio frequency network (drones, Rigger 3).
3) There are security devices that require some sort of remote system, either direct LOS light based or radio frequency. Mobile drones are what spring to mind here. You could have the drones being controled by a separate system, perhaps with a dedicated rigger. But that's money and a barrier to coordinating security breach responses.
4) Even today business networks are often built partially with wi-fi nodes. Properly set up they are fairly hard to spoof into, but in SR(3) reality bends and you can crack advanced encryption schemes in minutes or even seconds. *shrug* Once on the system via a different subsystem it's a matter of the hacker working their way to where they want to be.
5) Millions more security systems right now rely on radio frequency activation/deactivation. If you happen to have a car made in the last 5 years there is a good chance it has one of these. Even some home security systems use key fobs, and remote garage doors (a primative electronic security system) have been around for decades now.
6) Security isn't about being undefeatable. It is about being a deterent. Being hard enough and/or risky enough to beat that it isn't worth the effort. But sometimes the payoff or difficulty is incorrectly estimated, giving the assailants the edge. Runners make a living out of exploiting edges.

So there are some situations where totally hardwired systems, or more likely fully issolated subsystems, are used. But there are plenty of reasons for using a system based partially or fully on RF (wi-fi) communications.

P.S. In Rigger 3 building security was already an overlap domain for Deckers and Riggers. That is why I suspect this is an area where the Hacker domain begins, with one foot in both the old fields.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Edward
post Apr 20 2005, 04:16 AM
Post #24


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,073
Joined: 23-August 04
Member No.: 6,587



A comprehensive security system in an era when RF can be intercepted and decoded in minutes and an electronic keypad can be used to hack into a hardwired system (not likely but that I will accept) a security system should be hardwired and every access point (including key pads and cameras) should be watched by a camera, this may sound like a lot of work but it is only 2 cameras in each room, corridor and 2 or more watching each entry. Now if somebody tries to tap into your hardwired system you will see him doing it.

Edward
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Apr 20 2005, 05:50 AM
Post #25


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Edward @ Apr 19 2005, 10:16 PM)
A comprehensive security system in an era when RF can be intercepted and decoded in minutes and an electronic keypad can be used to hack into a hardwired system (not likely but that I will accept) a security system should be hardwired and every access point (including key pads and cameras) should be watched by a camera, this may sound like a lot of work but it is only 2 cameras in each room, corridor and 2 or more watching each entry. Now if somebody tries to tap into your hardwired system you will see him doing it.

Edward

:nuyen: :nuyen: :nuyen:

Remember, the goal of security is only a deterent. The system you suggest can be cracked into as well, it just needs an initial obscurement of the camera.

EDIT: Or they come through the Matrix access line if the system isn't fully issolated. Full issolation would actually add a fair amount to the cost of running the system as you would need live meatbodies as go-betweens for the security responses to the outside world and to any mobile drones.

On the other hand even if you do get into the building's security system via RF you likely aren't guaranteed to go unnoticed indefiantely, or move from node to node and subsystem to subsystem with impunity.

P.S. Security can also be based on precieved risk and threat. In case you didn't know some businesses put up dummy cameras for security. Empty cases whose only working part is a small red LED. Another example is my house, which is protected by a security system....sign posted out front in my flower bed. Some day the SO will get around to signing up for a monitoring service. But until then there is the sign left over from the last people who owned the house.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2023 - 06:13 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.