IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sustained Spell attached to projectile weapon, Am I reading this right?
Aardvark892
post May 21 2005, 03:31 AM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 29-March 05
From: White Sands Missile Range, NM
Member No.: 7,255



While reviewing the rules for sustaining Foci (pg. 191, SR3), I discovered something that I had read before, but not really paid attention to:

"The sustaining focus must be placed in physical contact with the target of a spell before it is cast in order to sustain it, so only spells cast on physical objects or beings can be sustained"

Now, am I to understand that you could very well attach a sustained focus to either a single bullet or projectile weapon?

"The focus remains active as long as it is in contact with the target of the spell, even if it is no longer in contact with its owner"

Maybe I've still got my head wrapped around 2nd Editions version of foci, but I thought you could not attach spells to projectiles. Any clarification would be appreciated.

Tim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JaronK
post May 21 2005, 03:38 AM
Post #2


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 942
Joined: 13-May 04
Member No.: 6,323



Well, you could do this, but it would be a sustained spell on the bullet... what sustained spell would really help? I guess you could make a silenced bullet, but since you'd likely destroy the sustaining focus when taking the shot, it hardly matters.

JaronK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aardvark892
post May 21 2005, 03:40 AM
Post #3


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 29-March 05
From: White Sands Missile Range, NM
Member No.: 7,255



Could an etching into a bullet, or even the bullet itself, be considered the focus? That is to say, could you use a bullet as the sustained focus for a spell on the bullet itself? Does that make sense?

Tim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JaronK
post May 21 2005, 03:57 AM
Post #4


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 942
Joined: 13-May 04
Member No.: 6,323



Makes perfect sense. What spell were you planning to use on it?

Anyway, it's really costly. I'd rather just buy a light machine gun and a few hundred rounds of Ex Ammo... it'd be cheaper and probably get the job done better, too.

JaronK
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mortax
post May 21 2005, 04:00 AM
Post #5


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 571
Joined: 9-January 05
From: In the 9th circle of hell
Member No.: 6,950



If you applied a mana barrier to it, whould the lvl of the barrier have some effect on a living target?

Never read mits and still play 2nd so.. I duno. thought.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fester
post May 21 2005, 04:29 AM
Post #6


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 19-February 05
Member No.: 7,098



not unles the living object was dual natured - even then would have to be houseruled one way or the other
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mortax
post May 21 2005, 04:39 AM
Post #7


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 571
Joined: 9-January 05
From: In the 9th circle of hell
Member No.: 6,950



um, doesn't a mana barrier affect anything living?

IE put up a mana barrier in frount of a motorcycle gang coming at you. Bike keeps going, people don't. At least, that's how it worked in 2nd, mana barrier acts as a barrier to anything with mana.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post May 21 2005, 05:13 AM
Post #8


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



No such spell in 3rd. Probably due in part to the motorcycle kill effect you just described. If you are playing in 2nd edition, no need to make a sustaining focus on a bullet (especially since they didn't exist in that rule set), just use some anchoring, it was actually worth taking as a metamagic then.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mortax
post May 21 2005, 05:13 AM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 571
Joined: 9-January 05
From: In the 9th circle of hell
Member No.: 6,950



What about physical barrier?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Herald of Verjig...
post May 21 2005, 05:17 AM
Post #10


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,066
Joined: 5-February 03
Member No.: 4,017



That one's still around, so you may get away with a hovering wall to decapitate a bike rider. However, it's slightly visible so they may get a test or two to evade it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post May 21 2005, 04:20 PM
Post #11


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



No reason you couldn't create the mana barrier spell though. It would actually have lower drain like astral barrier, because it's not a physical spell.

In the mean time however, see about just making a barrier say 2' tall in front of the bikes. Some GM's allow customizing size and design of the barrier, some don't, so ask yours.if you can't make them slam into a wall head on, make 'em go flying.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
frostPDP
post May 22 2005, 11:29 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 21-March 05
From: Freeport NY
Member No.: 7,205



The way I see it - Powerbolt effects anything physical. Manabolt anything alive.

So a mana-barrier would be just as plausible as a physical barrier. It just might not be common (or if you're playing a converted-from-SR2 char, it might be!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hyzmarca
post May 23 2005, 04:33 AM
Post #13


Midnight Toker
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,686
Joined: 4-July 04
From: Zombie Drop Bear Santa's Workshop
Member No.: 6,456



A knife with a levitation sustaining focus for a handle. Used as a permenant and more controlable fling spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:56 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.