IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

11 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Vampire: The M/R vs Shadowrun 4
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 05:35 AM
Post #226


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



aggravation removed
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Jun 17 2005, 05:47 AM
Post #227


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE
You know what, I'd love to see this thread end as much as anybody, I think its retarded.


Then why did you start it?

I mean, seriously. Read how you opened this fucking thread. Go back to page one and just read that opener. Read it. Right now. Stop reading this post, go back to page one, and read that opening post. That set the tone. That threw down a (retarded, six-fingered) gauntlet, set the precedent for the argumentative nature of the thread, set the standard for the level of intelligent argument readers could expect to find, showcased your awesome intellect, you name it. Read that opener. The fact you yourself called that opener "stupid" or "a mistake" or whatever five pages in shouldn't surprise anyone.

You started the thread. You revive it every time you think of two new RPG names to toss together. You keep it alive, with your "nuh uh/yeah huh" level of argument. You've got no one to blame for this thread but yourself.

QUOTE
Yet I still see people suggesting that FanPro is publishing the lastest WoD game and people keep posting here telling me that I'm wrong, they don't ever really respond to anything I say, they just accuse me of eating paint chips or being kicked in the head, and leave it at that.


We got all the actual arguing out of our system about eight pages ago, and/or on other threads that've tackled this same stupid issue. The simple fact is the new SR4 system (what we know of it) has an awful fucking lot in common with the nWoD system. Period. Everyone but you understands that, you're nitpicking on every tiny difference in the system as an excuse to say it isn't so, and we're all tired of listening to you. "Shadow: The Running" just gets more fun to say every time you have a heart attack an start underlining things. I'm sorry you can't see that the core die mechanic is amazingly similar. I'm not sure why you aren't able to just let us go on being "wrong" (in your head), instead of kick-starting this thread every few days and repeating your argument (or mentioning new games to compare/contrast, or whatever).

I'm also not sure why you're so fucking sensetive. It's the internet. If you can't handle a little bit of name-calling or sarcasm, you really probably don't belong on-line. You get awful hung up on every teensy little classical satirical argument ("Boohoo, the mean man said I ate paint chips!"). Get a little thicker skin.

QUOTE
If any mods read this, I'd be happy to see this thread locked or deleted.  Its obvious no one reads it, and the people who do don't have anything productive to say.


If you really want the thread locked, PM them. Don't wait for a mod to happen to stumble across the crappy 9th page of a crappy thread. If you want it locked, ask them to lock it (very directly; don't just give vague, whiney, permission and expect them to read it, it's not their job to read every post, ever).

And has it occured to you that we're done saying anything productive because it all, magically, bounces off you? People try to say productive things to you, you repeat your initial argument (with a few new random words underlined), and the cycle starts over. It gets a little tiresome after a while.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 05:59 AM
Post #228


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Critias, you clearly put a lot of thought into that post, and I find that wildly hypocritical. Basically, for a subject you don't care about, or have any vested interest in, you sure manage to post in it an awful lot, and you're definitely passionate about it.

Unless you're just trolling... or flaming... where have I seen those two words before?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Jun 17 2005, 06:20 AM
Post #229


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



QUOTE
Critias, you clearly put a lot of thought into that post, and I find that wildly hypocritical.


You either don't know what "thought" means, or "hypocritical." I'm not sure which, but, well, what you just said makes absolutely no sense, and I'm trying to figure out what other words were supposed to be there, that aren't. No luck so far, I'll let you know if I think of something.

QUOTE
Basically, for a subject you don't care about, or have any vested interest in, you sure manage to post in it an awful lot, and you're definitely passionate about it.


I...what?

I'm still just not sure what you're trying to say. How do I not care about SR4? Or not have a vested interest in it? Or...? What? I really don't understand. Please explain whatever it is you're trying to say, here. Slowly, and carefully, break down whatever ideas it is you're trying to convey. I don't know what the fuck makes you think I don't care about SR4, or (as an extension of certain arguments/stances I've put forth) how it relates to nWoD.

QUOTE
Unless you're just trolling... or flaming... where have I seen those two words before?


So the post starts with me "hypocritically" putting a lot of thought into a post, and ends with me trolling/flaming? I'm really lost, here, Nerby. Help a brothah out. Try reposting whatever it was you meant to just post, but maybe you could try English this time. I'm really lost, here, slick. The individual words you're using make sense (or, rather, are decipherable as English), but when you string them together in the order you've put them, it's gibberish.

A translation:

"You think when you post, hypocrite! You don't care about SR4 anyways, why do you post so much?! You are a passionate lover! Troll!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 07:35 AM
Post #230


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



What's hypocritical is that you put so much time into a post to explain why this thread is a waste of time.

The subject you don't care about is the subject of this particular thread. You clearly don't care about discussing, rationally, the similarities of the two games. You just say the same things, over and over, and nothing that happens in response makes any difference. You think this is a "yeah huh, nuh uh" level argument? Who's saying the other half? Who? Apparently, according to your post, its me. I'm just logging on with different screennames and arguing with myself. I don't know.

Why do you post so much bullshit? Why take time out of your life to make sarcastic, insulting, one-liners in a thread you don't even care about? That is the definition of trolling. And the personal shit that I need to grow a thick skin about? Thats the very definition of flaming.
QUOTE (Forum Guidelines)
#  No trolling. Don't make posts that are inflammatory or incorrect just to get people riled up.
# No flaming. Criticize ideas, not people. Verbally assaulting the character of a person is NOT permitted. (Name calling is best left to grade school.)

Everything you say is just inflamatory, inconsequential bullshit. And you repeat it over and over.

And I know the next response to this is how you still don't understand, I'm speaking in tongues, I'm a paint chip eating half breed retard. Whatever.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Critias
post Jun 17 2005, 07:39 AM
Post #231


Freelance Elf
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 7,324
Joined: 30-September 04
From: Texas
Member No.: 6,714



Swordfish mustardball.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 07:39 AM
Post #232


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Thats the first rational thing I've ever heard you say.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Crimsondude 2.0_*
post Jun 17 2005, 07:48 AM
Post #233





Guests






QUOTE (Nerbert)
Thats the first rational thing I've ever heard you say.

That's the funniest thing you've ever posted.

Especially the part about it being completely contrary to reality.

Superb wit.

I mean, really. That's hilarious!

You know, how your comment implies that everything you've heard from Critias has been more irrational than, "Swordfish mustardball." Oh, oh, I don't know how I can even type this. I'm holding my sides in pain from laughing so much. You know, because you said that swordfish mustardball was, "the first rational thing I've ever heard you say."

Ah ha! Ah ha! Oh, god, that's too funny. The way you verbally emasculated him on an Internet website by suggesting that everything he's written has been completely irrational.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh, man.

That was awesome!

Nerbert, you are a comic genius.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 08:00 AM
Post #234


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Like what? What has he said? I honestly can't think of anything. Everything people say to me I've tried to respond to with respect and sincerity. And apparently, somehow, I've earned the reputation of being a paint chip eating brain damaged mental ward out patient. If I say something that lacks clarity, am I told "Your post is unclear to me."? No. I'm told that I am so dysfunctional in my communication ability that I am literally speaking gibberish.

If I make a valid point, is it ever acknowledged? I don't know, no one has ever acknowledged anything I have ever said as being valid. And yet no one can clearly explain to me why everything I say is invalid directly. It has to be wrapped in sarcasm and personal insults first, and then it has to prefaced be repeating everything I have ever said that was clearly wrong, wether or not I've already admitted my mistake.

Wow, Crimsondude, I had a small amount of respect for you until you edited your small, pointless post into a very long pointless post.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Crimsondude 2.0_*
post Jun 17 2005, 08:07 AM
Post #235





Guests






Well, it's still better and less prone to mod deletion than my initial response.

But speaking as someone who rarely is understood around here, I can say that your posts come off the same way as mine do to a lot of people--that is, that they make no sense.

But your response to Critias. That was just really fucking dumb.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 08:09 AM
Post #236


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Was his reply to me not really fucking dumb? Was my dumbness so much greater then his that it required your full attention?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Crimsondude 2.0_*
post Jun 17 2005, 08:12 AM
Post #237





Guests






Because it's not true
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 08:16 AM
Post #238


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



Its remarkable then which falsehoods you allow to remain unchallenged, and which you feel the need to personally comment on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CradleWorm
post Jun 17 2005, 01:49 PM
Post #239


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 47
Joined: 22-March 05
From: Milwaukee
Member No.: 7,210



Okay guys, poor Nerbert has taken plenty of abuse for his belief that the dice rolling system, as we know it, is significantly different then WoD. I'm sorry to say Nerbert is incorrect. The difference between a 2 in 6 chance and a 3 in 10 chance is not enough to make the game system significantly different.

The basic dice rolling system is still the same. You roll a handfull of dice and count the number of them that have a value higher then some fixed number. It's simplistic at best.

Now, in Nerberts defense... There could still be significant differences in the system. Simply comparing how dice are rolled is not enough to compare two game systems. We can say there is common ground, based on the little bit we know. But, we don't know yet how the number of dice you roll is determined. We know part of the formula (Attribute + Skill) which is also the same as WoD, but we don't know how other things affect that number of dice.

In WoD, equipment adds or subtracts to dice totals. There is no concept of an opposed roll in combat, damage is determined by a single roll. I doubt shadowrun will keep the same game mechanic. But, all I can do for now is doubt. I don't know what the new rules say. I can say I'm looking forward to finding out.

So for the moment, lets all give Nerbert a break and lets agree on this... The basic mechanic of how dice are rolled does not differ significantly from WoD. How this is changed, modified, or interpreted in the game could be significantly different and we just don't know yet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Jun 17 2005, 01:50 PM
Post #240


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



You two should get married.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 17 2005, 02:09 PM
Post #241


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



Nerbert, I understand that you feel you have a point. And Critias also feels like he has a point. I think at this point in the conversation, neither of you are going to convince the other person. You're just going to continue defending yourselves in a mud-throwing contest. For your own personal sanity, I'd recommend you stop now, you're not winning any points (and neither is he). Your ideas will stand on their own as you've voiced them already. You can't do anything else to help your argument, and tossing insults will just make you more upset, so I suggest you simply stop responding to insults and let the thread die.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Jun 17 2005, 02:34 PM
Post #242


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



Or get married. :love:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Req
post Jun 17 2005, 04:24 PM
Post #243


Avatar of Mediocrity
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 725
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Seattle, WA (err, UCAS)
Member No.: 277



QUOTE (Jrayjoker)
Or get married. :love:

You keep saying that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eldritch
post Jun 17 2005, 04:35 PM
Post #244


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 19-August 02
Member No.: 3,139



Well you'd need to do a detailed comparison of 'Marriage'. The Setting and the mechanics, then we might all understand.

But you'd have to concede, that no matter what they are the same.
But you'd have to concede, that no matter what they are the different.

Then you have to serve Swordfish Mustardball at the reception.

And invite as many flying poo flinging monkeys as you can lay hands on.

:D

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fortune
post Jun 17 2005, 04:44 PM
Post #245


Immoral Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 15,247
Joined: 29-March 02
From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat
Member No.: 2,486



We could call it Marriage: The Nagging.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Jun 17 2005, 04:47 PM
Post #246


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Do I hear the voice of experience talking?

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nerbert
post Jun 17 2005, 05:36 PM
Post #247


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 442
Joined: 23-April 04
From: Pennsylvania
Member No.: 6,280



QUOTE (Nerbert)
Now, just to start this off, what do the games have in common, besides their dice system?

There it is, right in the opening post. I know the two dice systems are the same. I pointed out the difference in probability just to start the conversation. I deeply regret it. But there's fuck-all I can do about it now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nezumi
post Jun 17 2005, 06:30 PM
Post #248


Incertum est quo loco te mors expectet;
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,548
Joined: 24-October 03
From: DeeCee, U.S.
Member No.: 5,760



But the thing is, there IS something you can do! You can stop posting. Some people don't agree with you, and they never will! Some people have already been won over. But you're just wasting your breath now. Stop posting, and Critias will stop posting nasty things about your mother (in this thread) and everyone can be happier than they would be otherwise. (Actually, I'd sort of prefer you do keep posting, as I enjoy a good flame war.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eldritch
post Jun 17 2005, 06:51 PM
Post #249


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 511
Joined: 19-August 02
Member No.: 3,139



QUOTE
(Actually, I'd sort of prefer you do keep posting, as I enjoy a good flame war.)


Bring on the Flying Poo Flinging MOnkeys! I've got my unbrella!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Taki
post Jun 18 2005, 02:35 PM
Post #250


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 316
Joined: 18-April 05
From: France
Member No.: 7,343



Apparently stupid insults for fun are more offensive to moderators than stupid insults directly directed on people ...
In my message was insults -indeed-, because I found the flame war funny, and precisely to take fun of a lot of insulting posts.
Anyway, Moderator ... you don't do anything like a message on a post to say a deletion has been done because of : insults ?

Eh men, reading this whole post should tell humor is the only way ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

11 Pages V  « < 8 9 10 11 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st October 2025 - 03:37 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.