IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Old source books for story lines, is it a good idea?
Dustbin1_UK
post Aug 1 2005, 08:14 PM
Post #1


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 16-October 02
From: Leicester UK
Member No.: 3,459



Ya know! I have allot of old source books, (such as Renraku and the like.) and was wondering if anyone else ever uses out of date source books for inspiration in their games.

I just get sentimental and don't like to wave goodbye to some of the old dusty volumes I have.

I would love to take a team through the brainscan Renreaku adventure, but was wondering if anyone else found they were paranoid about the results of making such a decision?

Obviously SR4 is going to make life EVEN more interesting (though I can't wait to get my dirty mitts on it! :D ).

Any views on this would be nice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 1 2005, 08:24 PM
Post #2


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



I would say 'Yes.'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Aug 1 2005, 08:31 PM
Post #3


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



If the PCs haven't run it, they should at least have heard of it. It goes a long way to build the universe and provide a much richer environment to roleplay when all the oldies are used now and again.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Synner
post Aug 1 2005, 08:33 PM
Post #4


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Lisbon, Cidade do Pecado
Member No.: 185



All the time, in fact I have the recurring habit of dredging up characters and storylines that date back to SR1 material - Johnny Spinrad, the Moonlight/Midnight Thorns and some surprises in upcoming books.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dustbin1_UK
post Aug 1 2005, 09:24 PM
Post #5


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 83
Joined: 16-October 02
From: Leicester UK
Member No.: 3,459



QUOTE
I would say 'Yes.'

Oh good...urm... to what? :)
QUOTE
It goes a long way to build the universe and provide a much richer environment to roleplay when all the oldies are used now and again.

Now that was how I saw it.
QUOTE
and some surprises in upcoming books

Yeah! Now that's a good idea. I like the idea of linking new material to old.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 1 2005, 09:29 PM
Post #6


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



QUOTE (Dustbin1_UK)
QUOTE
I would say 'Yes.'

Oh good...urm... to what? :)

QUOTE (Dustbin1_UK)
anyone else ever uses out of date source books for inspiration in their games.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Aug 1 2005, 09:51 PM
Post #7


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



My answer's "not often". Trick is, I'm going to redefine all of your terms on you—very few sourcebooks are truly "out of date", as in "inapplicable". Only ones I can think of off the top of my head are the Native American Nations books, being as they were largely declared to be the fevered delusion of a weak mind. The original Seattle sourcebook, the Denver boxed set, the Lone Star sourcebook—none of these are out of date, though the material within may be in some late-2050s and beyond games.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Aug 2 2005, 12:11 AM
Post #8


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Didn't Nigel Findley write the two Native American Nations books? I thought that as far as Shadowrun authors go around here he was the one most well-regarded.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ancient History
post Aug 2 2005, 12:22 AM
Post #9


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,748
Joined: 5-July 02
Member No.: 2,935



Yes he wrote them and yes, he is considered one of the finest SR writers.

So far as writing quality goes, the books are outstanding. The problem is the logic creep - numbers of Amerindians, percentages for tribes, etc. I'd like to blame that on setting requirements rather than, say, poor research.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SL James
post Aug 2 2005, 03:17 AM
Post #10


Shadowrun Setting Nerd
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,632
Joined: 28-June 05
From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower.
Member No.: 7,473



Hmm.

If I couldn't accept the existence of the PCC, let alone the existence of metas, magic, and megacorps, I don't think I'd play the game. What the hell does it matter how well they predicted anything?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jrayjoker
post Aug 2 2005, 12:36 PM
Post #11


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,453
Joined: 17-September 04
From: St. Paul
Member No.: 6,675



Prediction is one thing, internally consistent logic and world settings are another entirely.

I have been rereading a lot of the old 1st and 2nd ed books for ideas that I can weave into the capital P Plot of my campaign. The little p plot takes care of itself usually.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 11:55 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.