New Update!, SR4 Sample Char: Weapon Specialist |
New Update!, SR4 Sample Char: Weapon Specialist |
Aug 17 2005, 05:52 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
Check it out
Looks like one of the nicer pieces of artwork I've seen for the book so far. There are some other interesting points. Language Skills - Arabic - N? Starting Nuyen - 4d6 + 4*100? |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:00 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Built on 400 BP. To be honest, the character's a piece of drek compared to our current runners. To get anywhere near the style of my games, I'll probably have to use 600 or more BP.
Edit: At an average of 20 BP per stat, this character has 3s and 4s. That's not acceptable. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:02 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
Because of course we're all professionals on how the scale of power operates in the new 4th edition!
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:04 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
We'll, they're ignoring something the previous edition allowed for: Some people are just naturally that damned good at something, in addition to having lots of weapons and armor.
And if you live on the street, most of the people you will be threatened by are not going to be average in abilities. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:06 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
I havn't had enough to drink to write something here potentially embarassing to myself and highly insulting to you, but I have had enough to drink to giggle to myself and write this post.
Lets just leave it at that. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:07 AM
Post
#6
|
|||
Prime Runner Group: Retired Admins Posts: 3,929 Joined: 26-February 02 From: .ca Member No.: 51 |
Oh, really, give it a rest. There's no need or reason to jump all over people expressing discontent. Accept that some people disagree with you, correct factual mistakes if they're made, and don't worry about the rest. |
||
|
|||
Aug 17 2005, 06:08 AM
Post
#7
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 263 Joined: 18-October 03 From: Cal Free State Member No.: 5,734 |
N=Native is my guess. Also, it seems like 1 BP = 5000Y. |
||
|
|||
Aug 17 2005, 06:15 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 338 Joined: 17-September 04 From: Pueblo Sector of Denver Member No.: 6,672 |
This looks a lot more in line with how my group played low power.
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:16 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 458 Joined: 12-April 04 From: Lacey, Washington Member No.: 6,237 |
A lot of system hints come out here -
Dodge is an active skill. "Firearms Skill Group" and "Close Combat Skill Group" make it look like they may have collapsed the skills back together like SR2. The art for this one is totally awesome. As an aside, why isn't this chick on the cover? I swear she'd get way more players into the game :D |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:16 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Actually, I'm assuming SR world when I say that. This character has average stats and average abilities. I can see them as a shopkeeper, but as a runner I don't see them living long enough to justify the cost of building them as a character. And, being a weapons specialist, they would certainly be more proficient with shooting guns than making armor. The entire character is designed to where the flavor text outright lies about their combat skills.
Considering the fixed TNs and the average possibility of getting a 5, I would say that this character's skills are mostly a waste of points if they face anything that I suspect this system would define as challenging. The lucky edge for this character isn't a blessing, but a requirement. I'm sorry, but I'm beginning to see a DnD-style run progression with this. I can also see my typical first adventure outright killing a group of runners before they even have a chance to get to the actual challenge. Still, I'll give it a better examination when I have more information to work on. But as it stands, I'm seeing the earlier complaints about this forcing runners to be street-level punks only as beginning to gain weight. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:21 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
meh. the street-level thing is more of a GM call. if you want a higher-end game, you just add more points. the only thing that's changed there is the default power level of the characters.
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:24 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 511 Joined: 30-May 03 From: Tulsa, OK Member No.: 4,652 |
Hey, you have a mild allergy to seawater and not one, but two katana's on her gear list...
Although the skill group thing sounds interesting. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:24 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
Well, lets look at what we already know. All of this is in theory, she rolls 8 dice at a firearms attack. Agility 4 + "Firearms Skill Group (????)" 4. So, provided that its under favorable conditions, i.e. no penalties or bonuses, and the threshold is 7 or less, which seems likely to me, she can burn 8 dice for two automatic successes and knock someone with average body down by 20% of their health. If it were me, I would burn four for one automatic and roll 4 to try to get them into wound penalties.
But who knows how armor and the like works. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:26 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 458 Joined: 12-April 04 From: Lacey, Washington Member No.: 6,237 |
Do we know that all skills cost the same? Armorer might be stupidly cheap or Firearms Skill Group so expensive that a 4 is worthwhile. It's also possible that there's been world change. A shopkeeper might have Firearms Skill Group of 0, a Security Guard might have it at 1 (with an Agility of 3 instead of 4), and so forth. "Average Stat" and "Average Skill" of 3 looks like they mean "average for a shadowrunner." Or not. Who the heck knows? :|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:29 AM
Post
#15
|
|||
Shadowrun Setting Nerd Group: Banned Posts: 3,632 Joined: 28-June 05 From: Pissing on pedestrians from my electronic ivory tower. Member No.: 7,473 |
I'd assume, and this is a major assumption, that Armorer is the equivalent of Firearms Group (B/R). |
||
|
|||
Aug 17 2005, 06:30 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Considering the average person starts off with 6 dice to play with for a skill, I'm betting that the average Threshold is 4-5. A challenging threshold would be 8, really challenging 10, majorly challenging would be 12, and superhuman would be 13+.
The problem is that we end up with a system where it is harder to magically pull off the impossible. No little old ladies lifting up trucks to save their grandchildren, no matter if it is an event known to happen in real life or not. Basically, the system screws the players. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:33 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
Actually, its a well known fact that a system that promotes randomness screws the players in the long run just by the simple fact that they tend to live longer, go more places and do more things then anyone else in the world. So they're more likely to be on the short end of a lucky roll then Bob the Archvillian. Bob's minions are going to be shooting at the players a lot more then the players are going to be shooting right at Bob.
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:34 AM
Post
#18
|
|||||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Please excuse the double post, if this is one. It depends. The word "armorer" can refer to a person who makes guns or a person who makes armor. Typically, most people separate them into weaponsmith and armorsmith to prevent confusion. In this case, I suspect the term applies to both. The knowledge skills probably determine the specialization. |
||||
|
|||||
Aug 17 2005, 06:35 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 527 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,118 |
She'll average two hits on any given melee or ranged combat test, given her statistics. If the average threshold for combat actions is 3 or higher, she will not succeed at them often and thus would be classifiable as "below average".
As far as the Armorer skill goes, I'd call Firearms Group B/R "Gunsmithing" if it were me. Still, that does seem like a fair assumption to make given the character's focus. I agree that the N probably refers to Natural, which likely means that her skill is probably equal to one of her attributes, likely Logic, when measuring it is necessary. |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:37 AM
Post
#20
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
You're forgetting about the rule "If your dice pool is greater then the threshold you may burn four dice for one automatic success." It wasn't in the FAQs but it was mentioned someplace on the forums in the previous months. |
||
|
|||
Aug 17 2005, 06:38 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 263 Joined: 18-October 03 From: Cal Free State Member No.: 5,734 |
A thought on the math: Regarding her attributes, if levels 1-3 were 5 BP each, and going from 3 to 4 (which she's done 3 times) costs 15 BP, that would add to 180 BP, and would explain why most of her stats are 3s...
What do you think? (rip away, it's just a theory) |
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:38 AM
Post
#22
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 807 Joined: 9-October 04 Member No.: 6,741 |
Actually, not true. As a DnD player, we dealt a lot with randomness. Certain options also existed to increase it. The problem is that these options always screw the players. Why? Most of the enemies are one shots. They're most likely going to die anyway. However, it increases the change the players die as well. However, that's not how it screws the players in this case. In this case, it screws them because it allows a GM to more easily kill them off in annoyance. In SR3, if I set a TN of 30, there is a chance the guy with one die can make it. In this case, if I set a Threshhold of 10 and that sample character must make the shot, everyone dies. |
||
|
|||
Aug 17 2005, 06:39 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Immortal Elf Group: Members Posts: 11,410 Joined: 1-October 03 From: Pittsburgh Member No.: 5,670 |
edit: what sabosect said.
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:42 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Target Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 17-August 05 Member No.: 7,563 |
Forgot she was an elf.
|
|
|
Aug 17 2005, 06:42 AM
Post
#25
|
|||
Moving Target Group: Members Posts: 442 Joined: 23-April 04 From: Pennsylvania Member No.: 6,280 |
That is a good point. There are a couple ways of getting around that though. First of all, Edge allows for the possiblity of shots in the dark by allowing rerolled sixes. Secondly, the team can run away from whatever obscene creature is giving them a threshold of 10. Finally, a good GM wouldn't do something like that without a good reason. Granted, not all GMs are good, and not all of them are reasonable. |
||
|
|||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st December 2024 - 02:00 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.