![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#301
|
|||
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 ![]() |
In AR, any virtual information is overlayed on real-world objects within your vision/perception. While you can open windows to other nodes that are not within your vision, why would you hack into multiple targets just to get to a person that may or may not be within the scanning range of the hacked device, when you can just go VR and "fly around" to where he is (without making any hacking rolls from node to node)? It would be inconvenient to go limp in the middle of a shopping mall, I suppose, but it would be equally as inconvenient to try to hack through multiple nodes to finally get to a node that is actually within scanning range of your target (considering the low signal rating that the majority of consumer electronics has, you'll have problems doing this). This all assumes that 1) You do not have your target's datatrail 2) You have no idea of the physical location of the target 3) The target is using a commlink 4) The target is out of range of your own commlink. If the target has bought or sold something recently, you can use Track to fulfill number 1 (you have his datatrail now). If you knew the physical location of the target, the point would be moot to do the above complicated steps. If the target isn't using a commlink, you wouldn't be able to track his PAN (but you might be able to find any RFIDs on his person). If the target is within range of your commlink, just roll a Data Search + Scan Extended test to find him. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#302
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,896 ![]() |
But isn't "flying around" in VR actually hacking into each of the nodes you are passing through anyway? Basically, that should just be faster than doing it in AR but not different beyond that (aside from a +2 dice pool bonus if you were running hot). I'm not trying to be a jerk on this, but I'm not sure I understand the distinction your are making between "flying around" in VR and doing the same thing in AR. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#303
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 ![]() |
Thanks for the awesome feedback:
Am I thinking correctly, if the Hacker is in the Mall, and searching for the Target in the Mall, the Hacker can: Go VR, "fly" through all the nodes until the Hacker finds the Target. Of course the Hacker would be "out of body" so the Mall Rats could nibble on you, which could be good or bad depending on what kind of mall rats we are talking about. Go AR, use a nearby Node to do a search through the Mall Nodes. This wouldn't be so much flying, as accessing the other remote nodes through the current mode, I envision this as similar to windows within windows. Probably should be sitting down while doing this, but still, even with the negative perception and other modifiers, you can watch the Mall Rats sneaking up on you, while you munch on your Nuke It burrito. Go AR, Load up an agent into the nearb Node, and have it go do the search and report back to you? I don't think we covered this one yet. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#304
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 ![]() |
i dont see the need to go node to node just to find someone using AR, just query the local matrix uplink and i would guess that 99% of them are listed there :P
if i can bring up the "website" of a company on the other side of the world using AR i should allso be able to access any node connected to the matrix without the need to go jumping from node to node. only time i can see that being needed is if you dont have a matrix uplink within range and your target isnt within range of the comlink. so basicly it would be the backup plan. still, this is me going by logic, not the rules :P |
|
|
![]()
Post
#305
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 ![]() |
The "Finding someone in the Mall" scenario is along the lines of tracking down soemone whom you don't really know, but can identify visually. e.g. imagine your out "casing" a location, and you notice someone interesting, maybe they have some unusual gear or something, or talked to someone and you want to find out who they are. You've followed them for a bit, and they have entered good old Auburn Mall. In the meantime you haven't gotten close enough to scan them or get more identification. They walked to the mall, so Hacker didn't get a vehicle license etc...
So Hacker gets in the Mall, and decides to Hack the Mall network to see if the Target can be found, and then through the Mall network get the Targets ID, and then use the data trail to track the person rather then all this footwork. Hacker can: Go VR, fastest, but huge penalties to act in meat body, and hack the nearest Node and start zipping around the Mall cameras and sensors till you can spot the Target. Then scan the target to see if you can pick up an identity out of the various PANs in the area of the Target. Go AR and do as above, less penalties for doing so much AR in the Mall and slightly slower, you get less actions in AR then VR, but essentially the same actions. Upload an agent to do the above and report back to you. Once the target is found, and you know the PAN identifier, you can likely simply track the PAN through the Mall, without risking any direct observation. You can also start backtracking the data trail of that PAN through various other networks or areas you have passed through, and start various other investigations based on the identifier. Anyway, that seems to be the gist of it. Does any of it seem unreasonable? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#306
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,896 ![]() |
Sounds about right. And it illustrates just how complicated it could get if the Target were to be continuously Spoofing their PAN ID.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#307
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 ![]() |
There is added complexity, but I think the net effect is a good one. Definately incentive for interactive hacking. The Hacker is incorporated directly into the "action" and it isn't a matter of data research while "offline" from the rest of the teams activities. There is also the effect that almost the entire team is going to be hooked into AR and interacting with the Hacker. All good.
Now to figure out drones! |
|
|
![]()
Post
#308
|
|
The Dragon Never Sleeps ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 6,924 Joined: 1-September 05 Member No.: 7,667 ![]() |
Scenario. Rigger is using a nice roto drone to run surveillance to see who's been supplying the local gangers with ware and directions. Sure enough, who's that well dressed person that just left ganger HQ! Let's follow them and find out who they are! So Rigger is enjoying the one sunny Seattle day sipping a margherita on the balcony of some high rise, while the roto drone quietly follows the Target. So who is the Target? Rigger can:
Jump into the Drone and follow Target Home. Jump into Drone, Hack the local network, VR or AR and scan for the Target's PAN, go from there, data trail etc. Attach the Drone as a device to the local network, and use it to Hack, using VR or AR to scan for the Target PAN and go from there. Attach the Drone as a device to the local network, and load an Agent amd software to do the above and report back. One assumption is that the Rigger can do all this very remotely as long as there is sufficient Matrix connections between the Rigger and Drone. Is this correct, that now it seems far easier to do such long distance rigging? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#309
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
If you use the Matrix as repeater, indeed.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#310
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 26-February 02 Member No.: 1,896 ![]() |
Drone size question... how big are the various drone categories? I believe the "large" steel lynx drones used to be human sized. What about the others? I couldn't seem to find anything in the book on those. Also, I seem to remember the microskimmer being referred to as "a trash can lid" and made the assumption on its size from there. Now, the book seems to imply the current version is nearly the smallest there is...
Also, what are the perception thresholds for noticing micro and mini drones? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#311
|
|
Chicago Survivor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 5,079 Joined: 28-January 04 From: Canton, GA Member No.: 6,033 ![]() |
well, the MCT FlyBot, is stated as being the size of a large insect.
Now, having seen some truly large insects (a few inches long) I also wonder about that. Though the ocular drone cannot be very large as it has to exit via a space smaller than the part we see of an eye. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#312
|
|||
Mr. Johnson ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,587 Joined: 25-January 05 From: Berkeley, CA Member No.: 7,014 ![]() |
It's very possible that the technology has improved to the point where you have frisbee or smaller-sized microskimmers. It is, after all, a new model. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#313
|
|||
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
I thought that the Ocular Drone was the entire eyeball, You know, pluck it out of the socket and away it goes. |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#314
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
Eww. "Mom, that weird guy just pulled out his eye!"
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#315
|
|
Immoral Elf ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15,247 Joined: 29-March 02 From: Grimy Pete's Bar & Laundromat Member No.: 2,486 ![]() |
Exactly! :D
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#316
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
It's all fun until someone steps on it. ;)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#317
|
|||||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 445 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,567 ![]() |
I would assume so...since apparently if you have 2 implanted and take both out to use as drone's your effectively blind. |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#318
|
|
panda! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,331 Joined: 8-March 02 From: north of central europe Member No.: 2,242 ![]() |
time to pull a g'kar (or was it g'car?) and leave the drone somewhere.
better make sure i either have a spare eye i can pop in or some dark sunglasses. hmm, i would kinda love to have this kinda tech right now. god knows where i would be leaving all kinds of microdrones :P |
|
|
![]()
Post
#319
|
|||
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 445 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 7,567 ![]() |
Oh like we can't guess where you would leave them? |
||
|
|||
![]()
Post
#320
|
|
Shooting Target ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,978 Joined: 26-February 02 From: New Jersey, USA Member No.: 500 ![]() |
I had a stupid thought. Is it even possible to get multiple eyes beyond the first set? Not to have implanted with the first two, but just to keep around, so you can take an eye out, replace it with a spare, and use the former eye for surveillance?
(Can they just be inserted/removed on-the-go?) |
|
|
![]()
Post
#321
|
|||||
Running, running, running ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Dumpshocked Posts: 2,220 Joined: 18-October 04 From: North Carolina Member No.: 6,769 ![]() |
now now, lets keep it to the elf porn thread... |
||||
|
|||||
![]()
Post
#322
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 268 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 78 ![]() |
The rules state that most basic electronics don't have security and personal account user levels, they only have admin level. So the question is, does this mean that every basic consumer item out there has a +6 to it's hacking threshold, or is it a case of any access at all will give you admin rights?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#323
|
|
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
Both, actually - hacking it at all is a +6 threshold, but gives you admin rights. ;)
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#324
|
|
Moving Target ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 268 Joined: 26-February 02 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 78 ![]() |
Ok, next question. The books says to assume that nearly all commlinks/PANs will use encryption. Does this mean that you need to buy and load the encrypt program on your commlink, or is this device level wireless encryption a seperate beast we can assume is built in to most wireless devices?
If it's the former, I don't think it's safe to assume that most commlinks will be running encryption. If it does work this way, most (none?) of the archetypes in the book are running encryption on their commlinks, even if they've got an expensive model If it's the latter, then what exactly does one use the encrypt program for? |
|
|
![]()
Post
#325
|
|||
Hoppelhäschen 5000 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,807 Joined: 3-January 04 Member No.: 5,951 ![]() |
Not quite - after you installed the encryption on a file/device/connection, you don't need the Encryption Program to maintain it. The Rating of the encryption is limited by the device installing it, but there is no such thing as build-in encryption. |
||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th March 2025 - 08:09 PM |
Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.