IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> AR Zones, Don't you love them?!
Kagetenshi
post Sep 6 2005, 08:56 PM
Post #51


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



Right, it's time for me to bow out for a day or two and cool down. If no one else has explained it by then I'll pick it up again.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Sep 6 2005, 09:00 PM
Post #52


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



"sorry sir, we dont have to care. we are a megacorporation" :D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kigmatzomat
post Sep 6 2005, 09:01 PM
Post #53


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 26-August 05
From: The land between the north , the south and the midwest.
Member No.: 7,626



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)

I will repeat it again: the only reason why spam zones, as presented, would be able to exist would be due to the complete fucking idiocy of everyone involved in design or purchasing of the new systems.

Idiocy or genius? Marketing genius, that is. Think about it; you're a corp and you generally end up giving many of your employees their comms. (Okay, they're buying it with their taxes but we don't call it that) Do you enable them to shut off the spam? Don't you want them to see the spam? If they are in your office building during the day and a corp-owned apartment at night, what spam is bad spam?

Today we have cell phones that are artificially locked to one carrier, with hardware features that are enabled or disabled based on the carrier's planned pricing schema, computers given out at schools that kids are accused of hacking if they run iTunes, ad-sponsored internet and spyware and you really think that in the future setting of corporate jurisdictions that people would be allowed to disable the advertising?

In the future only criminals will have spam blocking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Sep 6 2005, 09:05 PM
Post #54


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



"comlink blocking spam detected. termination of commie traitor user authorized" :rotfl:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Sep 6 2005, 09:07 PM
Post #55


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Sep 6 2005, 02:56 PM)
Right, it's time for me to bow out for a day or two and cool down. If no one else has explained it by then I'll pick it up again.

You explained It, i got It, i rejected It. Why? The short version is finding fault in your assumption that highest security will be chosen over functional use and crappy design effort. History has repeatedly shown otherwise. Also because it's a game and the concept makes for more fun play than being a nitpicking turd worrying over the minute technical details about this and that. YMMV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Sep 6 2005, 09:25 PM
Post #56


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



So, being a guy without an SR4 to reference, lemmie ask a really simple question...

Is it possible to firewall and immunize your computer so that malicious crap like spamzones don't bother you? I'm looking at it like this: a windows 2000 box, when installed and put on the internet, has a median time-to-compromise of about 20 minutes, according to security studies I've read. Yes, on average, only 20 minutes until your computer gets compromised when you don't take steps. Now, on the other hand, my home computer is pretty damn rock solid when it comes to getting by without popups, data mining cookies, malicious active X, etc.

I *assume* it's possible to immunize your computers, your cyberware, and your senses. Is it? Because if not, that's a huge reason not to have any cyberware, ever, at all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
prionic6
post Sep 6 2005, 09:46 PM
Post #57


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 21-June 04
From: Germany
Member No.: 6,429



If a device is hackable it can be targeted by spam. Most Users will have a firewall of 1 or 2. An agent loaded with exploit and edit woulb be able to do it. And don't tell me it's illegal.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Adarael
post Sep 6 2005, 10:01 PM
Post #58


Deus Absconditus
******

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 2,742
Joined: 1-September 03
From: Downtown Seattle, UCAS
Member No.: 5,566



Well, my concern is 'are there preventative measures available to non-specialized characters', more than 'will Joe Average be able to defend himself?'

And as to rote-spam machines gaining illegal access to someone's pan via a frame... If a basic, cheap-o spam box can bypass a firewall rating 1 or 2, the companies making those security measures have no business calling them security measures. *G*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eidolon
post Sep 6 2005, 10:08 PM
Post #59


ghostrider
********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 4,196
Joined: 16-May 04
Member No.: 6,333



QUOTE
Also because it's a game and the concept makes for more fun play ...  YMMV


MMDV, thanks. I think it's a ridiculous addition. I'd leave it out if I were GMing 4th (not likely).

Why? Because to me it's the same as putting every little fantasy monster in SR just to please the D&D players (of which I am one, and it still pissed me off to see "dryads and cyclops and dark elves <read:drow>" in the freaking game).

It's lame, it's only there as a "hehehe, look what we put in", and frankly the only reason I can see a GM actively using it for in a game is to fuck with the players, and there are far less petty/stupid ways of doing that. :cyber:

I could see the version where you walk up to a soda machine, and a 3d holo pops up when you're within 3 feet with a hot elf chick telling you how great FizzyPop is, but having that being fed to and generated by your own 'ware?

And as was mentioned before, the norms might put up with that shit, but a runner sure as hell wouldn't. There's no way in hades that a runner wouldn't figure out a way, or pay someone to figure out a way, to filter that crap out.

That said, use it all you like. It's your game. I just didn't care for the idea that not liking it somehow meant being a "nitpicking turd" as you put it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 6 2005, 10:12 PM
Post #60


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



As soon as you run your comlink in 'passive' mode, this spam is gone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
prionic6
post Sep 6 2005, 10:15 PM
Post #61


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 21-June 04
From: Germany
Member No.: 6,429



Another question: How can a commlink differentiate between a normal device sendig AR information about how it can be used (with "arrows" and the stuff) and a spam sender sending an image or holo as a "panel"?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 6 2005, 10:19 PM
Post #62


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



QUOTE (prionic6)
Another question: How can a commlink differentiate between a normal device sendig AR information about how it can be used (with "arrows" and the stuff) and a spam sender sending an image or holo as a "panel"?

It would need an active program to "read" the AR data packets and filter them based on algorithms (just like today's Spam blockers).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Sep 6 2005, 10:30 PM
Post #63


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (eidolon)
That said, use it all you like. It's your game. I just didn't care for the idea that not liking it somehow meant being a "nitpicking turd" as you put it.

Worrying that it isn't realistic? Yup, that's where i'd rank that. -Especially- when the worry is based on faulty assumptions.

P.S. I doubt that mfb of all people suggested putting it in just cuz.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kanada Ten
post Sep 6 2005, 10:41 PM
Post #64


Beetle Eater
********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 4,797
Joined: 3-June 02
From: Oblivion City
Member No.: 2,826



Spam zones will actually be good places to have meets and similar, as it won't be a surprise to find many people switching their comms off in such zones. Therefore, lurking and setting up ambushes make a deal of sense in all the Dead, Static, and Spam zones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hobgoblin
post Sep 6 2005, 11:03 PM
Post #65


panda!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,331
Joined: 8-March 02
From: north of central europe
Member No.: 2,242



QUOTE (Adarael)
And as to rote-spam machines gaining illegal access to someone's pan via a frame... If a basic, cheap-o spam box can bypass a firewall rating 1 or 2, the companies making those security measures have no business calling them security measures. *G*

heh, have never stoped any real life companys form doing just that :silly:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kigmatzomat
post Sep 7 2005, 12:36 AM
Post #66


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 26-August 05
From: The land between the north , the south and the midwest.
Member No.: 7,626



QUOTE (Adarael)
Well, my concern is 'are there preventative measures available to non-specialized characters', more than 'will Joe Average be able to defend himself?'


Yeah, the same defense against someone hacking your gun works in spam zones without showing up as a dangerous criminal: carry 2 comms. One Comm is a judas goat decoy; it's your generic low-end unit with all the default settings and loaded with your public persona (legal or otherwise). The other is your "working" Comm with encryption, a decent firewall, and running in stealth mode.

And hacking a Comm will likely end up tantamount to an act of agression between megacorps. I mean, if a junior VP of Renrakan Widgets bops down to the mall for a quick bowl of noodles away from the board room and gets his Comm hacked with spam by The Gap you can be sure there will be some retribution.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 7 2005, 12:42 AM
Post #67


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (kigmatzomat)
Yeah, the same defense against someone hacking your gun works in spam zones without showing up as a dangerous criminal: carry 2 comms.  One Comm is a judas goat decoy; it's your generic low-end unit with all the default settings and loaded with your public persona (legal or otherwise).  The other is your "working" Comm with encryption, a decent firewall, and running in stealth mode.

This becomes really important when owning a implanted commlink, too, as one can hardly ditch it. ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Sep 7 2005, 03:20 AM
Post #68


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



QUOTE (Rotbart van Dainig)
This becomes really important when owning a implanted commlink, too, as one can hardly ditch it. ;)

You should be able to reassign a identifiers to it though?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Sep 7 2005, 05:37 AM
Post #69


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
I will repeat it again: the only reason why spam zones, as presented, would be able to exist would be due to the complete fucking idiocy of everyone involved in design or purchasing of the new systems.

that, or the laws which regulate such zones, combined with intelligently-designed security systems that automatically block anything which registers as being overly distracting (eg, your highway example). VR has been around for four decades, in SR, and every simsense trick you can think of to pull in AR has more than likely already been pulled and countered in VR.

sure, you could hack someone's AR interface and fill it with black squares while they're doing 120mph down the freeway. but doing it legally, without tripping the user's own basic security countermeasures, after forty years of ASIST and nearly a century in the trenches of the spam war? i'm going to have to go with "no fuckin' way" for a thousand, jack.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fistandantilus4....
post Sep 7 2005, 05:48 AM
Post #70


Uncle Fisty
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,891
Joined: 3-January 05
From: Next To Her
Member No.: 6,928



I just have this great mental image of those adds that always pop up "Shoot the cowboy and win a latptop" with a little cowboy that jumps all over the place, and you can't get rid of the damn pop up, because the 'X" is at the far left, and as soon as you scroll over, it extends its' self, so you're perpetually trying to get the 'X" instead of the damn cowboay, so eventually you have to lock and up and go to task manager to close the damn thing stopping EVEYRHTING you're doing.

Except it's been spammed into the street sams smartlink when he's trying to pop a gaurd, and all he sees is the stupid cowboy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blakkie
post Sep 7 2005, 06:07 AM
Post #71


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,718
Joined: 14-September 02
Member No.: 3,263



Punch the monkey! Punch the monkey! :love:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ef31415
post Sep 7 2005, 06:22 AM
Post #72


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Joined: 17-December 04
Member No.: 6,886



QUOTE (Kagetenshi)
The short answer is no, I don't love them. Dead zones make sense but aren't anything special. Static zones are crippled by a name that is only vaguely descriptive, while spam zones… make me angry from the sheer stupidity.

~J

Wait a bit.

There are already plans to use the geolocation of your cell phone, cross-indexed with marketing databases, to send you text messages with targeted advertising.

I'm not making that up. I used to work at a company that was actively developing the technology.

Give it about 5 years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Kagetenshi
post Sep 7 2005, 06:26 AM
Post #73


Manus Celer Dei
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 17,013
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Boston
Member No.: 3,802



QUOTE (ef31415)
QUOTE (Kagetenshi @ Sep 5 2005, 12:55 PM)
The short answer is no, I don't love them. Dead zones make sense but aren't anything special. Static zones are crippled by a name that is only vaguely descriptive, while spam zones… make me angry from the sheer stupidity.

~J

Wait a bit.

There are already plans to use the geolocation of your cell phone, cross-indexed with marketing databases, to send you text messages with targeted advertising.

I'm not making that up. I used to work at a company that was actively developing the technology.

Give it about 5 years.

I'm looking forward to it. Nothing like a little extra income under the junk fax laws.

~J
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
golden1
post Sep 7 2005, 12:53 PM
Post #74


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 14-July 04
Member No.: 6,482



having just rea teh section in question, it seems that joe schmoe, Yuor averge wage slave, is Totaly Screwed ™, just by walking down the street.

it's stated that there are bots out there that specialise in getting arround firewall 1, and 2. which means that with the cheapest comlink solution (300Y, REsponse 1, fw 1, Signal2, system1) is just going to be flooded by popups, the second that he walks in the door of his local "spam zone".

Ok. you think. Just stick the damn thing in passive mode. that's when the "acme spambot 2000" kicks in, an detects, and then by-passes the firewall, and (knowing most corps) sticks 3000 popups all over everything.

Then the local mall security bot hits him with a spotlight, and yells at him for not running an active PAN.

Lets face it people. Joe and Jane Q public are basically going to be facing a constant barrage of spam, popups, ads, and other unsavorys 24/7. Talk about long term brainwashing. hell, lets just think about that for a second. Most people on the streets are going to be subject to so much advertising so much of the time, that they're just going to tune it out. That's why the references to


QUOTE
"Manipulative Advertising tricks are legal (or atleast tolerate), including Filter-bypassing, Sensory Blastng iAR popups, Emotive Charge Sim feeds (Porm Stims being common), Viral Memes, Spyware, and so much more common in Tourist areas, and red light districts, Spamzones can be very distracking (-1 to -3 dice pool penalty)"


are just so damn worrying.

Not only from a "lets stick it to the public", but also "viral Meme's and Spyware"

Today spyware mostly just sits there, and sees what websites you're visiting, and occasionally checks to see what software you're running.

now imagine the 2070 version. It knows where you've been.(GPS) it knows where you're going (it has access to your date-planner). It knows who you call, and where they live (adress book), what their preferences are (assuming that you've atleast looked at their personal data on their own PAN). More worryingly, it can also be used to see if you've been in any of the corps competitors shops, and then, thanks to that Viral Meme, Start spamming Everyone arround you. Be afraid people. Be VERY VERY afraid.


AS for your average runner, the only reall solution seems to be to have a sacrificial Comlink, with a decent rating fake ID on it, and to have all your cyberware and running gear slaved (nay, HARDWIRED) into a second, top 'o' the line, Firewalled to hell and back, Anti spam / detection Sprite/frame running comlink, that stays "dark" for 99% of the time.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rotbart van Dain...
post Sep 7 2005, 01:20 PM
Post #75


Hoppelhäschen 5000
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,807
Joined: 3-January 04
Member No.: 5,951



QUOTE (blakkie @ Sep 7 2005, 05:20 AM)
You should be able to reassign a identifiers to it though?

When you can hack, yes - it takes some time, though.

QUOTE (golden1)
AS for your average runner, the only reall solution seems to be to have a sacrificial Comlink, with a decent rating fake ID on it,  and to have all your cyberware and running gear slaved (nay, HARDWIRED) into a second, top 'o' the line, Firewalled to hell and back, Anti spam / detection Sprite/frame running comlink, that stays "dark" for 99% of the time.

Cyberware can communicate with each other without using wireless.
So if you get yourself an implanted commlink/datajack, there is no need even buying wireless-enabled ware.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th June 2026 - 04:31 PM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.