RoaminNose
Mar 15 2005, 05:03 AM
I have a character who wants to use a Micro Flare Launcher (3rd Ed, 293) as a weapon. He's a bit fire-focused, and while it won't be his primary, he's going to try it often enough for it to be a problem.
3rd Ed provides damage and ranges for it, but my question is what skill should I use, assuming that the character can't take points in Micro Flare Launcher? Would it default to SMGs (since it uses SMG ranges)? If so, would I have to apply a penalty for defaulting to a skill, or would I just use SMG skill with the +2 TN modifier specified by the book?
And before anyone says anything, yeah, I know it's not exactly... discreet to employ a low-powered incendiary that lights up a city block as a weapon.
Sandoval Smith
Mar 15 2005, 04:56 AM
It may use SMG ranges, but that's to reflect it's a pistol sized device that launches the flare farther than a pistol round would go. I'd say it'd default to launch weapons, or pistols.
hahnsoo
Mar 15 2005, 05:05 AM
Launch weapons, in my mind, because it amounts to basically a portable rocket.
RoaminNose
Mar 15 2005, 05:36 AM
Fair enough, makes sense to me.
So, now, using Launch Weapons, do I apply a +2 for defaulting to the skill with something that isn't really designed to be a weapon on top of the +2 denoted in the launcher's description, or just the latter?
Sandoval Smith
Mar 15 2005, 05:33 AM
I'd say just the penalty for defaulting, because in the case of the flare launcher, 'not intended for use as a weapon' is more of a semantic arguement, since it does launch an incendiary at high velocities.
RoaminNose
Mar 15 2005, 05:47 AM
Alright. It seemed to me that the penalty denoted in the weapon's description was probably the same thing as the defaulting penalty, but I wanted to get a second opinion. Thanks.
BitBasher
Mar 15 2005, 06:00 AM
But its simply not made to be accurate hence the extra plus 2, it's designed to hit the sky, in that general direction, not a person sized target. It likely it isn't even a stabilized round, and has a lot of simple randomness to it's flight path.
Sandoval Smith
Mar 15 2005, 06:17 AM
Good point. I was just picturing a flare flying out in a straight line, not thinking about how when your only real goal is to get altitude, straight becomes a very relative term.
mfb
Mar 15 2005, 07:43 AM
indeed. maybe things will be different in 206x, but the flare rounds i've seen used rebel fiercely against the straight-line autocracy imposed upon them by the Man.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.