QUOTE (hobgoblin @ Apr 2 2009, 08:51 AM)

if your referring to the need to have some object to fondle, then yes.
at least one person i know, that smokes, have said that the worst problem with trying to quit is not having that object between the fingers.
I was referring to a comment about addiction possibly being a general non-issue in the sixth world.
But yes, for nicotine smoking, self-conditioning to certain tactile stimuly (having the cigarette to fondle and cling to, sucking on it, inhaling and exhaling) are what constitutes the habituation, as the initial and even at that point very minor "kick" one gets out of smoking (amounting to nothing but slight dizzynes and probably a little nausea) wears off long before addiction comes into play.
It has often been stated that these haptic informations are linked to very primordial experiences of nurturing (leading to cigarettes being dubbed "adult pacifiers"), which might explain their strong appeal.
Positive initial feedback from the peer group may be another crucial factor.
Don't know wether any of this is true, but the effect is definitely there and, in my opinion and speaking from personal experience as a long-time chain smoker, a much bigger problem than the rather moderate symptoms of physical withdrawal.
Same goes for other intoxicants, even though withdrawal may be much more painful in these cases.
But just consider that there's a very high percentage of people who get hooked again after months or even years of abstinence from alcohol, heroin and the like.
They're completely clean at that point, there's no physical substance craving whatsoever, and still they keep coming back to their old habits.
As well, there's addiction issues with substances who aren't even physically addictive in the first place.
The body doesn't develop any cravings for most recreational drugs -in fact alcohol, nicotin, barbiturates or heroin are the exception rather than the norm in that regard- and still, people habitually consume substances such as marijuana or amphetamine.
Moreover, even in the case of physically addictive substances (i tend to avoid the terms "hard" and "soft" drug, as they are both poorly defined and unclear about the real risks from consuming a given substance, which depends on a large variety of different risks), users often develop habitual consumption patterns
before they get hooked physically.
This may not be true in the case of nicotine, which causes physical dependency very quickly, but it's certainly the case for most alcoholics, who get used to drinking daily sometimes years before "the shakes" start to kick in.
Of course, to bring this back to ingame issues, there's PAB in SR, so there is a valid and reliable cure for mental habituation to a substance in the 2070s.
But i certainly wouldn't undergo brainwashing just to quit smoking, especially if i could as well get a new set of cloned lungs instead of letting some shrink screw with my head.
Of course, the possibility of PAB treatment indicates that the upper class (once more, seeing a pattern here?) may have very few cases of burnout level addiction, if any.
Which reinforces statements in Arsenal how common substance abuse is even among the elite, as long as it doesn't affect the bottom line.
And smoking cigarettes certainly doesn't, quite to the contrary.
So i completely agree with everyone here who believes that smoking will be more widespread and accepted in SR than in the contemporary USA.