QUOTE (pbangarth @ May 17 2010, 05:34 PM)
I'm not sure what it's like in the US, but I believe in Canada any civil lawsuit could sue only for the profits from the use of copyrighted material. If the DS owners make no money, they couldn't be sued for anything.
In the US, the number is for damages - and damages is generally defined by the offended party. That's why Mitnick was accused of causing something like $10M in damages by reading copies of Bell's SBU technical manuals. There's no way he made $10M in free phone calls.
A corporation can file a lawsuit against DSF just by filing out some forms and paying the $20 filing fee. Once that's in, they can request a judge shut down the forums, on the grounds that they are actively harming business. The judge can agree or not, but it depends a lot on the locality and the money involved. The corporation can then make a formal request for discovery, requiring DSF turn over all information that may possibly be infringing (whether it's infringing or not is up to the courts to decide). The corporation then runs text searches on the database archives for any rules quotes (of which there are many. I know, because I've written some of them myself.) Every part of the Shadowrun books are copyrighted, and can only be used with permission of the copyright owner, and that permission can be retracted at any time.
Since DSF isn't a business, they really have no case for turning the servers back on prior to their day in court. They can put up a nice message, but that assumes they have time to do that while dodging lawyers. In the end, DSF would almost certainly win, if they spent cash on a lawyer and fought it the whole way, but they don't have cash, and in the interim, it's a huge hassle that would drive most hobbyists to call it quits.
Not saying it's likely, but with corps like Microsoft and Hasbro around, I don't think it's outside of the realms of possibility.