QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Jan 17 2013, 03:25 PM)
RAW, the scanner sees right through you, trivialising any efforts to ever hide anything.
Realistically, the scanner won't penetrate your epidermis, rendering it next to useless for it's intended purpose.
If you read my quote in full, you should realize that is exactly what i'm saying. Realistically, the scanner won't penetrate your epidermis rendering it next to useless when scanning anything internal.
QUOTE
(a) Says who?
(b) How is the scanner to know the intent of my character? I read that as items which COULD be found, whether that bothers you or not.
It still (inexplicable) gives the scanner an extra die to find the things I do care about.
Not a bad house rule, but thats still what it is, a house rule. RAW, the grade of the pocket doesn't change the difficulty for the scanenr to find things inside it.
"To determine if the detector scans cyberware or a
prohibited item, roll the Device rating and compare the hits scored to
the thresholds given on the Cyberware Scanner Table."
which i agree is silly that it would matter at all, but regardless it only cares about prohibited items and cyberware. And if that cyber (by applying our realistic concepts) is invisible to the scanner, then it wouldn't count toward that number right?
Which is to say, I'm not here to argue RAW, i'm here to provide my opinion on creating a playable interpretation of the rules.
QUOTE
And, extension to the extreme: that would imply that high-grade Dermal Sheathing would conceal everything in your body ...?
Wouldn't matter since it would be below the skin anyway if you tried to apply RAW to my house rule.
QUOTE
Um. Adept. Remember? 0.125E would drop his Essence from 5.1 to 4.975 ... and his Magic from 5 to 4 ... and cost him more than one ability. Not an option.
depends on if you have more essence lost from cyber or bio, since whichever is lesser is cut if half. if you have more bioware than cyber, it would only cost .0625 essence. If essence is an issue otherwise, try increasing grades of other cyber?
QUOTE
Which doesn't change anything, really. The entire idea of those scanners being hand-held at all is, IMO, the problem.
I agree, I think the above type of scanner would work ok as a handheld device, but anything that did something deeper like the book would have you believe would have to be a walkthrough unit that would have to use a composite of ultrasound, millimeter wave scan, MRI, and or some other form of low energy imaging. MRI in particular would be relatively safe and could give a very deep image, but would most definitely be a stationary device.