Omer Joel
Feb 10 2005, 03:49 PM
My view on Israel:
History
The two major events in it's SR history already detailed in Shadowrun cannon are the "2004" chemical strike and the 2034 (?) EuroWar II in which Israel was attacked by the Alliance of Allah (AoA). In addition to this, the Israeli Prime Minister Haim Sichon was assassinated in 2017. So I have to begin from these facts.
The 2004 chemical strike caused massive political turmoil and a sharp turn to the far right; the hundreds of thousands of victimes caused an immense public outroar, which was harnessed by the extreme right to gain political support by blaiming the local Arab population of assisting the Lybians in one way or another. Race riots (and attacks on leftist activists) broke out, and the government was force to resign, declaring general elections at the end of that year. The riots, however, only intensified; eventually, IDF joint chief General Yair Berinski declared martial law and ordered the army to occpy major cities to restore order. The elections were cancelled and a "national emergency government" was established, with Berinski at its head and with sweeping powers. Most civil rights were suspended and the military was given a free hand in dealing with public unrest. Order was restored, at the price of freedom.
Backing the new martial law were several local corporates, who used the general nationalist sentiment to put forward a "protectionist" policy, namely the nationalization of foriegn corporate assets and the erection of tax barriers to give local industry an advantage. Moreover, trade unions and strikes were outlawed, and any labour dispute was swiftly and harshly dealt with - to the corporate favor, ofcourse. Resistance to this regime arose both from outside (foriegn corporates who wanted their assets back and the import/outport taxes removed, and from within, mainly from the workers who found themselves far more opressed and expolited than before, and the general citizenary crushed under the martial law's boot. Meanwhile, refugeees fleeing from the contaminated Tel Aviv area streamed to the Negev and to the extreme north, surrounding Beer Sheva and Kiriat Shmona with refugee camps, shanti towns and newly-built slums.
In 2008, the economical situation, coupled with an international embargo, gave rise to a severe food shortage, and to bread riots. The masses poured out to the streets in protest, and the military was split between those who joined the protest and those who followed their order to the letter. Fighting ensued, and eventually the riots were crushed, but the nationalist sentiment, the driving force behind Berinski's government, was more and more being replaced with a feeling of dissatisfaction, of discontent and of opression. Out of Bloody 2008 grew several resistance organizations, both political and guerilla, and the government was once more destabilized.
The VITAS epidemic of 2010 was the catalyst of change; the inadaquate medical system was unable to cope with a disaster on that scale, and the masses stormed the hospitals in demand of treatment. 6 years of military opression finally give off their fruit, and a revolution is narrowly avoided by Berinski's resignation and the declaration of open elections, in which Chaim Sichon (funded by several multinational corporations) is elected as Prime Minister. Despite the lifting of most military laws, the fast economical growth of the latter half of 2010 gave extreme profit to the multinationals - and nearly nothing to the local masses. Moreover, the Resource Rush hit Israel at its full force, almost tripling the level of pollution within six months and causing extreme environmental damage. A leak from the Ramat Hovav toxic waste storage facility added insult to injury by contaminating the nearby area and causing several thousands of deathes.
Out of the ecological issues and the broken economical promises (well, corporate profits were skyrocketing, but unemployment was only deepening) gave rise nin 2011 to several new radical political factions, mainly the Matriarchal Revolutionary Party (MRP), combining socialist and ecological demands with a mystical world outlook and Mother Earth worship. The strange events of 2011 and 2012 gave fuel to the new movements, but also to a fundementalist Jewish sect, headed by a "Messiah" and claiming that the Day of Judgement was coming; the Messiah performed miracles, some of which even whistood scientific evaluation. To everyone's surprise, MRP's leader, Moriya Kedem, has performed similar deeds, claiming that she was calling Mother earth to her help. Open violence broke out when Sichon tried to sign an agreement with the Palestinian authorities and to evacuate several settlements, and the Messianic movement intervened, using "miracles" to prevent this. However, by 2013 it became clear that magic was by no way a singular "miracle", and the SHABAK (Shierut Bitachon Klali, General Security Service, the Israeli equivalent to the FBI+NSA) began its own crash course for mages; by 2014, the Messianic movement began to disintegrate, both under governmental pressure and due to the general acceptance of magic as a religion-independant force. The MRP, on the other hand, having a wide social and enviromental agenda, came out of this conflict almost unscratched.
Despite these events and the growth of MRP, Chaim Sichon was re-elected in 2014. The SAIM-US civil war further damages the fragile Israeli economy, however, and public unrest grows. The MRP, prevented from running to the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) due to "the abuse of magical laws", organizes several massive strikes in solidarity with the Native Americans. Lingering nationalist sentiment, coupeled with a wide stream of corporate money to the Israeli military establishment, prevent the MRP from pushing the masses forwards towards a full-scale revolution.
In 2017, however, Chaim Sichon was assassinated by an unidentified assaliant, who was killed shortly after by security forces. Despite the general MRP position against personal terrorism, the government blamed them for the assassination and outlawed them, cracking down on the opposition party with force; Moriya Kedem went into hiding while most of her party's leadership was killed or imprisoned. While an all-out martial law was not declared, brutal repression of any opposition was carried out by the SHABAK, supported by corporate security troops. This did nothing but radicalize the opposition - and especially gave rise to the Bleeding Skies anarcho-ecological terorrist organization, which had more magic on its side than even the MRP.
The Treaty of Denver of 2018 brought hundreds of thousands of American jews to Israel after they had to leave the NAN-occupied areas. Many of these refugees had to leave in a hurry and had little money to use, and the 14-years old refugee camps around Kiriat Shmona (and the few uncontaminated ones near Beer Sheva) grew. Meanwhile, the Chief Rabbinate of Israel declared Elves and Dwarves to be Humans, and magic to be in accordance to the Jewish faith.
The early 2020's saw the fast growth of Israel economy, though most profits streamed into forien and local corporate pockets. The Goblinization of 2021 caused minor riots, but the social and environmental issues still dominated the political scene; a Faculty for Magical Studies was added to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 2025.
To be continued...
Demonseed Elite
Feb 10 2005, 03:57 PM
I don't want to stop your net material idea at all, but 2064 Israel will be appearing soon in print. But that shouldn't stop you from making your own material if you want to.
Omer Joel
Feb 10 2005, 04:14 PM
Yes, it will appear soon, but I suppose it will recieve only a slight treatment (SoA is going to talk about SO many countries). And still, I try to put out my (native) version.
DrJest
Feb 10 2005, 04:50 PM
Well, when it comes to rules just copy the Sioux Wildcat martial art across from CC, there's your Krav Maga
Omer Joel
Feb 11 2005, 07:51 AM
| QUOTE (DrJest) |
Well, when it comes to rules just copy the Sioux Wildcat martial art across from CC, there's your Krav Maga |
Krav Maga is probably more similar to Brawling, atleast for the non-elite combative units. For Sayeret Matkal... well, for close-up combat in 2064 they'll probably use either Implant Weapons with Improved Spurs or their Killing Hands (the selected few would either be combat cyborgs or adepts).
FlakJacket
Feb 12 2005, 01:57 AM
| QUOTE (Omer Joel) |
| A leak from the Ramat Hovav toxic waste storage facility added insult to injury by contaminating the nearby area and causing several thousands of deathes. |
AAAAHHHHHHHH! *Ahem* Sorry about that. I just have a major hatred for environmetal disasters and the like, courtesy of the Germany and London sourcebooks. Seems like there's some sort of obscure by-law saying every country has have them.

On a slightly more serious note, what's the water situation like? As I understand it water resources in the Middle East are becomming more and more stretched. Israel's currently having to import millions of cubic meters of the stuff last I heard to meet demand. So that could be a contentious issue.
Omer Joel
Feb 13 2005, 09:37 AM
| QUOTE (FlakJacket) |
| QUOTE (Omer Joel) | | A leak from the Ramat Hovav toxic waste storage facility added insult to injury by contaminating the nearby area and causing several thousands of deathes. |
On a slightly more serious note, what's the water situation like? As I understand it water resources in the Middle East are becomming more and more stretched. Israel's currently having to import millions of cubic meters of the stuff last I heard to meet demand. So that could be a contentious issue.
|
In my SR view: recycling and reclamation. And rationing, ofcourse. The three main resources that 2064 Israel lacks most are arable land, drinkable water and petroleum. The three solutions, apart from rationing, are all supplied by Bioguard Inc. - desert-adapted gengineered plants (and a small-scale version of "terraformation" of the Negev), bio-recycling of water and Methane production. But still, real-estate is in a premium, water is rationed (2 hours a day) to about 70% of the population and petroleum is reserved for military and corporate use (Everyone else uses Methane).
Omer Joel
Feb 13 2005, 09:41 AM
| QUOTE (FlakJacket) |
AAAAHHHHHHHH! *Ahem* Sorry about that. I just have a major hatred for environmetal disasters and the like, courtesy of the Germany and London sourcebooks. Seems like there's some sort of obscure by-law saying every country has have them. |
Sorry, can't resist the temptation
Omer Joel
Feb 13 2005, 10:57 AM
The economical boom of the 2020's was abrupty ended in Febuary 8, 2029, when the Crash Virus hits the global grids, causing a worldwide economical and infrastructure collapse, and Israel was no exception to this. By late March that year, most of Israel was without electricity or telecommunication, and the food and water supply was irregular at best. Once again, bread riots break out, and the masses pour to the streets; the MRP, slowly re-built during the 2020's, leads a city-wide takeover of utilities and governmental offices in Kiriat Shmona, and is soon joined by revolting soldiers from nearby bases. The Matriarchal Commune of the Galilee (MCG) declares independance from Israel in April 3, 2029, and begans the construction of a quasi-socialist, quasi-awakened democracy, while directing the masses in rebuilding the infrastructure in the "panhandle" of the Galilee, which was taken over by the Commune.
This revolution, followed by similar attempts in the rest of Israel, caused the Israeli government to declare martial law and send whatever forces still loyal to it to crush the revolting masses. While most of Israel was re-taken by the central government by the end of May, most of the Upper Galilee was still under MCG control; the rest was under strict martial law and supervised by an "Emergency Government" located, for its safety, deep under the "HaKirya" military headquarters in Tel Aviv. Unlike the MCG, most of Israel did not fully recover from the infrastructure failure, and instead the government poured many billions of Shekels into modernising the military forces and fortifying its police control over the population. This period saw the introduction of Magical Corps in the IDF, the complete legalization of the use of magic in Mossad and SHABAK investigations and the over-armament of the Israeli police.
Ironically enough, this militarization, originally aimed against the risk of intenal insurrection and against the MCG, helped Israel fight a completely different foe - the Alliance of Allah (AoA). In 2034, the newly-formed AoA stormed Europe, and side force of this invasion attacked Israel through Jordan, Palastine and Egypt and the MCG through Syria. Initial fighting saw the defenders lose ground to the invasion, and by late 2034 Jerusalem was cut off and the invaders have reached the eastern suburbs of Tel Aviv. House to house fighting occured in the surrounded Kiriat Shmona, but the MCG defenders, including many Awakened individuals, were able to hold the heavily-fortified center of the city (and a few of the western and southwestern Refugee Camps) against the mostly mundance (and anti-awakened) AoA invaders. The Israeli government debated the use of its remaining Nuclear assets against the AoA-backing nations, but a few successes on the Negev front in the early 2035 caused the limited cabinet/general staff (there was little difference between them at these years) to reject the proposal. Nevertheless, the massive counter-offensive of Febuary 2035 saw limited use of chemical weapons and a wider use of biological weapons, contaminating many of the AoA's supply depots in the area. In addition, both the IDF and the MCG's forces used magic, sawing death and confusion among the attackers. This, coupled by AoA's failures on the European fronts, allowed the defenders to retake most of Israel by the end of 2035; following Mullah Sayid Jazrir's assasination in 2036, a truce was signed between Israel and several factions of the fructured AoA, creating a a Demilitarized Zone in the West Bank, the Golan Hieghts and the Gaza Strip.
The MCG, while whistanding the invasion, was critically weakened by it, allowing a rapid government offensive to conquer the quasi-awakened state and to re-annex it to Israel; the MRP was outlawed and its members prosecuted, causing most of the remaining organization to go into hiding.
Israel survived the Second Eurowar, but the entire country was in ruins. Out of the flourishing economy of the 2020's now remained smoking ruins and burned craters, and most of the population lived in shanti towns and makeshift military shelters. The moderate opposition party "Ahdut" (Unity), headed by Avraham Maayan, recieved massive corporate funding and was able to force the already shaky ruling military clique to resign; a pro-capitalist "democracy" was restored by early 2037.
To be continued...
Trashman
Feb 14 2005, 10:43 AM
Right. Why do I have the distinctive feeling of charging stark naked against a nest of hornet spirits over a landmine test area with the occasional mine-drone whizzing past whistling Junkie XL’s song „Love Like Razorblade“ about playing Russian Roulette?
Oh, well, here goes...
The two major events in it's SR history already detailed in Shadowrun cannon are the "2004" chemical strike and the 2034 (?) EuroWar II in which Israel was attacked by the Alliance of Allah (AoA). In addition to this, the Israeli Prime Minister Haim Sichon was assassinated in 2017. So I have to begin from these facts.
That one mention of Israel in the original material already was bollocks. I can’t think of a nation or area mentioned in SR where reality has overtaken fiction so radically.
In my storyline the chemical strike and nuclear counter-strike never happened. Incidentally, the Alliance of Allah also never happened. Putting up a new Berlin Wall around Israel seemed to fantastic? Give me a break, whoever came up with Lybia.
But as you chose to stay with this, I’ll not be a spoil-sport and continue.
| QUOTE |
| The 2004 chemical strike caused massive political turmoil and a sharp turn to the far right; the hundreds of thousands of victimes caused an immense public outroar, which was harnessed by the extreme right to gain political support by blaiming the local Arab population of assisting the Lybians in one way or another. Race riots (and attacks on leftist activists) broke out, and the government was force to resign, declaring general elections at the end of that year. The riots, however, only intensified; eventually, IDF joint chief General Yair Berinski declared martial law and ordered the army to occpy major cities to restore order. The elections were cancelled and a "national emergency government" was established, with Berinski at its head and with sweeping powers. Most civil rights were suspended and the military was given a free hand in dealing with public unrest. Order was restored, at the price of freedom. |
Is this realistic? Been to the country myself, did my bit for the antifascist tradition, and, yes, the IDF plays a major part in the country’s character and culture, even to the extent that you sometimes feel Israel is just one big army camp. But martial law? The military always struck as me the more liberal, democratic, tolerant, whatever types. But that was 20 years ago. So something significant may have changed and you obviously have an insider’s view.
| QUOTE |
| Backing the new martial law were several local corporates, who used the general nationalist sentiment to put forward a "protectionist" policy, namely the nationalization of foriegn corporate assets and the erection of tax barriers to give local industry an advantage. Moreover, trade unions and strikes were outlawed, and any labour dispute was swiftly and harshly dealt with |
Now, I’m pretty sure trade unionism was always rather strong in Jewish culture as it developped side by side with zionism. Outlawing appears a bit harsh. Why not beating them into (corporate) line? You could then later use independent neo-unionist cells joining the fun of post-2011.
| QUOTE |
| Meanwhile, refugeees fleeing from the contaminated Tel Aviv area streamed to the Negev and to the extreme north, surrounding Beer Sheva and Kiriat Shmona with refugee camps, shanti towns and newly-built slums. |
In that case you definitely need terraforming and water industry on a grand scale very early on. To add to the list of top weird places in the Sixth World you might want to marry the bulldozing corps to the old kibbuz ideology: building a new Israel, all together, bringing life to the desert etc etc. Imagine blissful Sabras in shorts running around telling everybody how fine they feel since the IDF provides security and (insert your favorite soulless corp) provide tech.
| QUOTE |
| In 2008, the economical situation, coupled with an international embargo, gave rise to a severe food shortage, and to bread riots. |
Why an international embargo? Where does it come from? Who is responsible for maintaining it? And by the way, what about the (old and real) mil-tech cooperation between Taiwan, South Africa and Israel? What became of that?
| QUOTE |
| A leak from the Ramat Hovav toxic waste storage facility added insult to injury by contaminating the nearby area and causing several thousands of deathes. |
I concur with earlier criticism. There are certainly more than enough ecological disasters in the SR story line, especially with regard to Target: Wastelands. Scrap that idea, chummer. I don’t think it does anything for your project. If you feel the need to keep the chemical strike bit in then that’s way enough.
| QUOTE |
| the Matriarchal Revolutionary Party (MRP), combining socialist and ecological demands with a mystical world outlook and Mother Earth worship. |
So you could use the MRP (what would be the Hebrew wording?) to rebuild the Tel Aviv area. Naturalists in the modernist architecture showpiece? Weird. Good picture.
| QUOTE |
| The strange events of 2011 and 2012 gave fuel to the new movements, but also to a fundementalist Jewish sect, headed by a "Messiah" and claiming that the Day of Judgement was coming; the Messiah performed miracles, some of which even whistood scientific evaluation. |
I know how the settlers think and feel. If ever some messianic movement crops up in Israel Ishall take the next flight to Mars – single ticket, thank you very much. Scary, chummer!
| QUOTE |
| Despite these events and the growth of MRP, Chaim Sichon was re-elected in 2014. The SAIM-US civil war further damages the fragile Israeli economy, however, and public unrest grows. The MRP, prevented from running to the Knesset (the Israeli parliament) due to "the abuse of magical laws", organizes several massive strikes in solidarity with the Native Americans. Lingering nationalist sentiment, coupeled with a wide stream of corporate money to the Israeli military establishment, prevent the MRP from pushing the masses forwards towards a full-scale revolution. |
See, that’s where you could have the independent grassroot unions come in and shake hands with the magicians.
| QUOTE |
| The Treaty of Denver of 2018 brought hundreds of thousands of American jews to Israel after they had to leave the NAN-occupied areas. Many of these refugees had to leave in a hurry and had little money to use, and the 14-years old refugee camps around Kiriat Shmona (and the few uncontaminated ones near Beer Sheva) grew. |
Hundreds of thousands?! Are you serious? A few thousand would be OK, I think. Dispossessed, harassed, hysteric and definitely with an axe to grind even such a small number should suffice to engender trouble. I mean, you’re talking here the influx of radicalised settlers as it is the fact now. Just that these people do not come out of an inability to cope with Western democracy but because they really have no other place to go. Or do they? Why not assimiliate in the NAN like many others? And there’s still the rather big UCAS.
| QUOTE |
| Meanwhile, the Chief Rabbinate of Israel declared Elves and Dwarves to be Humans, and magic to be in accordance to the Jewish faith. |
We’re not there yet but you don’t mention it further down. What happens with Orks and Trolls? It would be interesting if the people hailing from a European background gave birth to Orks and Ogres while the oriental part of the population bore Hobgoblins. Viz Trolls, Ithink it would be in order if the genuine Israeli Troll would have no horns. One could make up something like Rabbi Loew sculpting his golem in the image of the Trolls of old. See, no horns... but still mighty big buggers!
| QUOTE |
| The Matriarchal Commune of the Galilee (MCG) declares independance from Israel in April 3, 2029, and begans the construction of a quasi-socialist, quasi-awakened democracy, while directing the masses in rebuilding the infrastructure in the "panhandle" of the Galilee, which was taken over by the Commune |
.
The matriarchal concept seems quite interesting. Is that part of a subliminal Jewish tradition somehow erazed from the general picture?
| QUOTE |
| Ironically enough, this militarization, originally aimed against the risk of intenal insurrection and against the MCG, helped Israel fight a completely different foe - the Alliance of Allah (AoA). In 2034, the newly-formed AoA stormed Europe, and side force of this invasion attacked Israel through Jordan, |
Mentioned it before: I would ignore this nonsensical Alliance stuff. Complete tosh. If we were to expct any sort-of crusade at all then probably from sub-Saharan Africa, viz the containment camps the EU is discussing with mediterranean North African states.
| QUOTE |
| This, coupled by AoA's failures on the European fronts, allowed the defenders to retake most of Israel by the end of 2035; following Mullah Sayid Jazrir's assasination in 2036, a truce was signed between Israel and several factions of the fructured AoA, creating a a Demilitarized Zone in the West Bank, the Golan Hieghts and the Gaza Strip. |
Okaaay. Now we have reached the hotspot. So what about the Palestinian territories? No independent state, I take it from your writing. Hmm, difficult. As it stands now we have one more chance for a peaceful coexistence between Israel and the PT. Effectively, the two states would not be able to exist without each other. They are too small separately, Israel needs the workforce from the PT, the post-Arafat government could well turn out to do real-politik with Israel: TV sets for everybody in exchange for the familiy’s AK47, slightly rigged but very democratic appearing regular elections, military cooperation, two delegates in the UN always voting in accordance with each other.
If you include the Palestinians in your ideas you might get a very weird and immensely interesting setting for SR. Definitely more so than treating them as blind spot. That happened in the original German sourcebook with the whole of East Germany and also most everything the authors didn’t know about (so basically everything outside their hometown. That’s where these d20 fantasy states of Pommoria and Black Forest come from).
Regards and the best wishes for your project
Trashman
(retiring with a dozen Ares Alpha set on full automatic to a bunker set very very very deep inside Mother Earth)
FlakJacket
Feb 14 2005, 09:21 PM
| QUOTE (Trashman) |
| The military always struck as me the more liberal, democratic, tolerant, whatever types. But that was 20 years ago. So something significant may have changed and you obviously have an insider’s view. |
Well the military is simply an organisation made up of people. If a nation's general political mood changes, and they do seem to swing between the left and right per generation or so IIRC, then so would the IDF. Hell, if you figure the more right winger the person you could see them viewing the military as the country's only defence. The more right of centre people that join up and become part of the command structure, the more likely the shifts made.
Incidents like reservist officers saying that they'd
refuse or strongly object to orders to forcibly evacuate settlers from the Gaza strip have got to be scary for the government and IDF leadership. Hell, it's the one unifying thing in the country. Citizens putting their own feelings ahead of orders has to their waking nightmare. Or the
Jewish extremists that are
threatening government minsters they feel are too soft on issues. So you've already got a base to work with from real life.
| QUOTE |
| Why an international embargo? Where does it come from? Who is responsible for maintaining it? And by the way, what about the (old and real) mil-tech cooperation between Taiwan, South Africa and Israel? What became of that? |
Generally realpolitic. Israel does much more arms trade business with the PRC these days so they seem to be moving away from Taiwan. Plus by the 2020's China has balkanised. Relations between Israel and South Africa seem to have cooled for a number of factors, from what I've seem the ANC seems more pro-Palestinian than Israeli thanks to a number of factors. And they've got much less in common now that South Africa dismantled its nuclear program and doesn't have an active resistance movement. In Shadowrun by 2014 white rule has ended so probably a similar cooling of relations. The Oranje-Vrysraar state of Azania could re-start connections though.
Crimsondude 2.0
Feb 14 2005, 09:49 PM
| QUOTE (Omer Joel) |
| The Treaty of Denver of 2018 brought hundreds of thousands of American jews to Israel after they had to leave the NAN-occupied areas. Many of these refugees had to leave in a hurry and had little money to use, and the 14-years old refugee camps around Kiriat Shmona (and the few uncontaminated ones near Beer Sheva) grew. |
What led to this idea? I'm just curious because, frankly, I'd be shocked if there were hundreds of thousands of Jews in the parts of the U.S. that make up the NAN. Likewise, the relocation process took about ten years. People wouldn't be fleeing their houses overnight, although it would definitely be more "encouraged" in some places, like the Ute nation. But again, how many Jews are there in northern Arizona? Utah? Nevada?
There are also parts of the NAN where they could stay. Denver, being one. The PCC being another. Various Anglo reservations make up the third. There is also the option of moving west to California, northwest to Seattle, or east to the rest of the U.S.
Moreover, why would they all move to Israel, especially in light of the disasters which you have described as already haven befallen the Holy Land? On one hand, it is Israel. On the other, there are communities in the U.S. which are several generations older than the current Israeli state. Even split in half, the U.S. itself is magnitudes larger than Israel (my home state is several times larger than Israel) and more likely than not the people in the NAN would have family outside the reclaimed territory and inside the U.S. that they could join.
| QUOTE (Omer Joel) |
| The three solutions, apart from rationing, are all supplied by Bioguard Inc. - desert-adapted gengineered plants (and a small-scale version of "terraformation" of the Negev), bio-recycling of water and Methane production. But still, real-estate is in a premium, water is rationed (2 hours a day) to about 70% of the population and petroleum is reserved for military and corporate use (Everyone else uses Methane). |
And waterjacking...
Plenty of waterjacking.
FlakJacket
Feb 14 2005, 09:58 PM
If you want waterjacking on the industrial scale, just look to the Euphrates and Tigris. The amount of bickering and fighting between the up and downstream countries over water usage rights and dams is amusing.
Crimsondude 2.0
Feb 14 2005, 11:11 PM
Considering where those two rivers pass through, it's not so much amusing as it is pathetic and sad.
Omer Joel
Feb 15 2005, 08:06 AM
@Trashman:
Believe me, the Israeli military is neither liberal nor democratic; it's a military like all conscript militaries worldwide (France in the 1960's, for example). And the generals are heavily involved in politics IRL - the last Chief of Staff became (and still is) the "civilian" Minister of Defence within days from the end of his military service, not to mention the high percentage of former generals in the business and politics communities. And there were things similar to martial law in the 1950's, not to mention actual martial law on the Arab villages until 1968.
About the unions - where do you think that the MRP and the rest of the resistance movements came from?
"MRP" is "Miflaga Mahapchanit Matriarchalit", later (2040's+) "Immah Ahat", that is "One Mother".
And there IS a semi-feminist, quasi-matriarchal movement in Judaism - especially in Reformic Judaism, women who wish to be equal to men in prayers and so on, and some who are "unsure" in respect to "God"'s gender. And there is some Biblical mention of a semi-matriarchal tribal society (Debora the Profetess "judging" the people and many other small mentions).
And the boycott is only around petroleum; the main oil-producing countries are in a cold-war with Israel (Arab Nations) or not-so-happy to produce oil at all (NAN). Guns, tech, uranium etc is still widely traded between Israel and the forein corps (who control it in SR).
Trashman
Feb 15 2005, 01:58 PM
| QUOTE |
| About the unions - where do you think that the MRP and the rest of the resistance movements came from? |
Right. I like that very much. Decent idea, man!
| QUOTE |
| "MRP" is "Miflaga Mahapchanit Matriarchalit", later (2040's+) "Immah Ahat", that is "One Mother". |
Sounds great. I'll make sure my runners get to Israel and blow something up for TripleM.
| QUOTE |
| And there IS a semi-feminist, quasi-matriarchal movement in Judaism - especially in Reformic Judaism, women who wish to be equal to men in prayers and so on, and some who are "unsure" in respect to "God"'s gender. And there is some Biblical mention of a semi-matriarchal tribal society (Debora the Profetess "judging" the people and many other small mentions). |
Ace, Omer. Wish you all the energy to continue the project.
SpasticTeapot
Apr 9 2005, 07:22 PM
| QUOTE (Omer Joel @ Feb 15 2005, 03:06 AM) |
@Trashman: And there IS a semi-feminist, quasi-matriarchal movement in Judaism - especially in Reformic Judaism, women who wish to be equal to men in prayers and so on, and some who are "unsure" in respect to "God"'s gender. And there is some Biblical mention of a semi-matriarchal tribal society (Debora the Profetess "judging" the people and many other small mentions).
|
Actually, with the exception of Christianity, Islam (which are pretty new as far as religions go) or Buddhisim (which has had dozens of incarnations throught history, and varies a lot between them), most religions have some sort of matriarchal base at one time. Devi, one of the principal Hindu deities, is female; the Greeks were a purely matriarchal society for millennia. Most native american religions portray at least a few spirits as female; many also allow women to hold positions of religious importance.
In my opinion, Reform Judaisim will embrace all metahumans as Jewish, while the Conservative denomination will only accept elves and dwarves, if any, and the Orthodox tradition will consider them all non-Jewish. This will lead to some interesting alliances. (For example, there will be a good-sized number of Reform Jews in the Sons of Sauron, as that's pretty much the only western religion that would accept them.)
I do'nt know who'se been brainwashing you, but women do not merely "wish" to be religiously equal to men; they ARE religiously equal to men except in the most opressive of religions...such as Orthodox Judaisim.
In case I'm not mistaken, a good portion of the Orthodox community refuse to send their daughters to college, believing that they do not need an education to become a good homemaker. One of my kid brother's best friends had an older sister who could speak five languages by the age of 12. If that's not a glaring case of religiously based female repression, I don't know what is.
And for the record, I'm a male Jew who has been through several years of religious school under an orthodox rabbi, not some crazy bolshevik who likes to flame people.
EDIT:
Guess I goofed; I apparently have Shiva mixed up with Devi.
SECOND EDIT:
I've never played Final Fantasy in any of its incarnations. SquareEnix is in no way responisble for my god-related errors.
Penta
Apr 9 2005, 07:28 PM
Um, why do we have two threads on the same topic?
Ancient History
Apr 9 2005, 07:34 PM
Two different topics. One just wants to know how Israel is portrayed in SR, this one suggests a netbook for Israel in SR. Ghost only knows why.
FlakJacket
Apr 9 2005, 07:57 PM
| QUOTE (Ancient History) |
| Ghost only knows why. |
Same could have been said for the EuroSB project. On why the netbook idea, because people might be interested in the place?
Ancient History
Apr 9 2005, 08:10 PM
Nah, why limit it to Israel? Do the whole Middle East while you're at it!
hermit
Apr 9 2005, 09:12 PM
| QUOTE |
| Shiva, one of the principal Hindu deities, is female |
Uh ... what Final Fantasy did to the world ...
Read here about Shiva . *sigh*
| QUOTE |
| Nah, why limit it to Israel? Do the whole Middle East while you're at it! |
Yup, I'm all for it.
FlakJacket
Apr 9 2005, 11:43 PM
| QUOTE (Ancient History) |
| Nah, why limit it to Israel? Do the whole Middle East while you're at it! |
Because that's the only country from the region we've got people for so far?
Penta
Apr 10 2005, 02:38 AM
Well, you're not really likely to get people from anywhere else.
Is SR even published in Arabic?
Edit: Or Hebrew, for that matter?
Rory Blackhand
Apr 10 2005, 07:49 PM
Shalom Omer,
I assume you posted this on the forum for input, advice, or help? Here are some of my ideas in a very rough draft. It would have to be detailed out, modified, or deleted to fit, but what I have listed is based on history and future speculation.
Overview: Some points to keep in mind when designing Israel.
1) The main point in developing Israel would be that the Holy Land is likely magical in nature itself. The Jews have never given up on Israel for two thousand years of persecution. Europeans have butchered them, Arabs have ethnically cleansed them from the entire middle east, but they love the land dearly. With that much love and history there is likely something to it that should be brought out in SR.
2) Also, Israelis are a very liberal and tolerant society, in contrast with their neighbors. When meta humans express I am sure the Israelis will welcome them as people regardless of race. I am just as certain the Arabs won't. apparently there is a Jihad at some point to back my opinion up.
3) Israelis are very industrious, they are on the cutting edge of technology. It is likely that per capita they are some of the most highly trained and advanced thinkers we have.
4) Every Israeli is a soldier by neccessity. Military technology like cyber ware, armor, and weaponry will be a common sight. It is not unusual to see hitch hikers wearing street clothes carrying machine guns. Nor is it unusual for a family sedan with kids inside to stop and pick these armed men up. It is just part of unique Israeli society.
5) Much of the reason the world can't openly side with the only democracy in the middle east is because of our dependency on oil. We promised Palestine to the Jews and in good faith they came and created roads, hospitals, and industry, only to be told that they must give up first 75% of the Jewish Homeland (Jordan), and now another division of what's left (future Palestine). Each time the Jews spent their fortunes thinking they were home, each time they were murdered and chased out of the lands they loved, all the while thousands upon thousands of Arabs immigrated to the region illegally in search of better lives their own countries were and are still unable to provide.
6) Once Japan takes over the energy market, oil loses it's value. With nothing to blackmail the world with the Arab governments will likely collapse. Like Africa, they will have little resources but a huge population to sustain. Open support for Israel will increase, human rights will not be so easily ignored, and governments will be free to take a closer look at the problem. Islam, of course, the driving force behind the intolerance, will still be there as an opiate for the masses of miserable citizens throughout the mideast. And their leaders will continue to scape goat the Israelis for anything that goes wrong and divert attention from themselves.
7) With a land of green growing life amid a desert and collective working kibbutz style, Israel itself will be a nice place to live in contrast to the great desert and the wild bandits that will populate it.

With Israel's technology edge they will be able to accomplish much with small numbers.
The biggest event affecting Israel in my opinion is the change from reliance on oil to the availability of cheap microwave energy beamed to earth from solar collectors. Pg 24 under Japan Inc. The reason I think this will be the biggest event is because at the moment the west is a slave to the whims of the oil producing despots. We allow Islamic tyrants to get away with crimes against humanity for one simple reason, our dependence on oil and the fear of what those who control it might do if angered.
Most of the world's oil wealth was placed in the hands of Islamic nations. The UN has around 200 members, 54 of these are Islamic theocracies. Any vote concerning Israel starts with a 54 to 1 disadvantage. Along with this vote discrepancy comes strong arm bullying by the oil thugs. The third world must comply out of a real fear, an oil embargo would crush any emerging economy on earth. This makes the cheap energy provided by the Japanese megas a critical event to break the power of the Islamic oil tyrants. With nothing to fear from the Islamic nations the third world is free to look at the true facts on the ground. The EU no longer has to play along with the charade either. This comes at a perfect time in history since the one bastion of reason and support, the US, is fracturing.
So with this event in the first decade of the 21st century, it is reasonable to say that there was a desperate "chemical strike" by fanatics as they recognized their power slipping away.
In 2011, the year of chaos, weather patterns changed and Israel becomes the promised land of old. It literally becomes a "land of milk and honey", some say it is due to the great reverence thousands of years of Jews have held for the land. UGE Israelis are accepted with open arms the same as Jews of all races are accepted today in Israel. Israelis have traditionally been very tolerant of all others, fully 20% of the population are Arab Muslims with full rights the same as with Jewish Israelis, same sex marriage is accepted, and women are treated as equals in every way.
In 2012 as waves of secessions were hitting all over the world the so called Palestinians declare independence. At first they claim Gaza and the territory liberated from Jordanian occupation in 1967, Judea and Sumeria (west bank). They use Ramallah as a temporary capitol, but maintain Jerusalem is to be the eventual capitol of Palestine once the Israelis have been exterminated. Immediately the Islamic nations recognize the land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea as being Palestine and begin arming the Palestinians with billions of dollars worth of heavy weaponry. Much of the weaponry ends up in the hands of terror groups and Israel comes under constant bombardment. Lacking the ability to govern themselves the entire country falls into chaos and bitter infighting. To divert attention from themselves and their abuses the first action the Palestinian Authority takes is to declare that the Jews living in what was previously known as Israel are illegal squatters. Any Jews found in the part of the Holy Land now called Palestine are rounded up and shot. Being Jewish becomes a capital crime. Islam becomes the official religion of Palestine and elections are cancelled in favor of an Islamic Council.
2017 Haim Sichon was slain. Without more info it is hard to say why? My suggestion is that he was killed by Jewish patriots because he was going to hand over East Jerusalem to the Palestinians as a gesture of good will. It is likely the Palestinians would have viewed this as a weakness, so this averts war for the moment.
By 2018 the last of the Jews has been ethnically cleansed from Palestine and flush with victory the population is clamoring for more blood. To placate the mob and keep attention focused away from the corrupt governing body, Palestinian leaders begin a series of pogroms against UGE Arabs, driving the Palestinian elves and dwarves underground. At the same time fatwas are issued all acrosss the middle east and the great hunt begins. Jihad is declared on meta humanity and millions are slaughtered in the blood bath. For the most part the entire middle east is cleansed of dwarves and elves the same as it is cleansed of Jews.
In 2019 Palestine with it's new weapons attacks and conquers Jordan, uniting over 80% of the original Palestine. The Hashemite king Abdullah is exiled back to Saudi Arabia. His American born wife is executed along with their children.
In 2020 the great dragon Aden destroys Tehran as punishment. The Ayatollahs and the Alliance of Islam declares magic and metahumanity to be the work of Satan and blames Israel for all it's problems. The rest of the middle east in despair and lacking the oil clout they were accustomed to follows suit. Much rioting and fracturing of governments takes place, mostly along tribal and clan lines. Bands of nomadic tribesmen begin raiding each other's communities much like the old days. With oil becoming next to worthless there is just not enough resources to sustain the population.
In 2021 goblinization hit. Once again another Jihad swept across the middle east. Even worse than the previous one. Orks and trolls were beheaded in public displays. Only Israel, ever tolerant, accepted it's ork and troll population. Once again Israel was blamed for the evils that befell the middle east.
Between 2020 and 2034 tensions escalate between Israel and the newly armed and expanded Palestine. With an exploding population, and dwindling aid money the people become more and more restless. With the collapse of the UN and the end of the age of oil the Palestinians find themselves with nothing to build an economy on and no more hand outs to keep them sustained. All they have in abundance are weapons of war and a desire to commit genocide on the Jews once and for all. From birth they are taught that the Jews are the enemy and that the duty of every Palestinian is to kill Jews and rid them from the middle east by any means.
In 2034 Eurowar II breaks out and the Alliance of Islam uses the distraction to attack Israel. After months of mobilization and build up, coupled with genocidal rhetoric, the Arab nations once again attacked Israel with the goal of driving them into the sea. With no support and no friends, the tiny country of Israel once again produces a miracle. Nuclear weapons launched at Israel from Iran and Libya never impact. With no pogroms against magic use, elite IDF forces quickly destroy advancing columns of tanks and infantry. Israel, always a leader in bleeding edge technology fielded cyber modified units, the Gholani Brigade field tested cyber technology and performed very well in battle, taking only light casualties while inflicting enormous losses. New innovative tactics by israeli generals combined magic and technology to once again destroy a much larger force arrayed against them.
The war is over in just 3 weeks, Israeli counter attacks had expanded the border of Israel to include the entire area of the Holy Land. With no desire to expand it's border further, Israel stops it's advance and the Arabs sue for peace.
In 2035, after much debate and division, Israel annexes the now liberated Holy Land and begins an unpopular program of forced relocation. Activists across the world descend on Israel to act as human shields, liberals and anarchists disrupt IDF operations, and governments recall their ambassadors. The Arab nations lacking funds and their armies beaten are powerless to intervene. The Mullahs curse and vow revenge. The Israeli information service seems woefully unprepared by the media hype surrounding the event. They point out that millions of Hindus and Muslims were exchanged between India and Pakistan. Millions of Germans were uprooted from East Poland. Millions of Fins were deported from russia. Turks and Greeks exchanged populations. And that the entire region was brutally cleansed of Jews and meta humans by these same people. Etc... but the world does not listen.
Coinciding with decades of rising anti-semitism, massive pogroms are instituted across Europe to also cleanse that region of any Jews. In short, millions of hostile Arabs are transferred out of Israel to live with culturally, ethnically, and religiously similar peoples, while millions of Jews are forced to flee to Israel and learn to speak Hebrew. For their part the IDF allows compensation for the departing Arabs, but the incoming Jews are arriving with the shirts on their backs.
In 2036 the Revava Party gains control of the knesset. A state of war exists between Israel and all of it's surrounding neighbors. Military service is mandatory for every Israeli with all governmental benefits tied to length of stay, rank, and performance. Work begins on the Third Temple. The Alliance of Islam declares that the destruction of the Al Aqsa's Mosque is a crime against Allah and vows to never end the war until every last Jew is annihilated from the face of the earth, (so what's new?)
To present, the quasi communistic ideals of the kibbutz are implemented creating a government based on military service, dedication to the state, and the preservation of the Holy Land.
Conclusion: I think you can picture Israel as a walled community, tolerant to others, technologically advanced from it's neighbors. Military hardware will be openly carried and displayed. It will be a fort mentality, where everyone inside is a friend and everyone outside is an enemy. They will likely guard the Holy Land with great pride. And they will likely be under constant attack from forces on their borders. I imagine there will be lots of opportunity for runners to make forays into the wilderness to destroy mortar pits, rescue captured parties, etc...
Penta
Apr 10 2005, 08:26 PM
...
...
No more crack.
See my Israel 2070 thread for my viewpoint. I'll expand on it in a bit.
Rory Blackhand
Apr 10 2005, 08:42 PM
What is that supposed to mean? You have been out all night getting wasted so you can't understand what I have posted?
| QUOTE |
| See my Israel 2070 thread for my viewpoint. I'll expand on it in a bit. |
Why don't we just keep one thread? Yours was started after this one and is much less detailed, not to mention flawed. You need to address the politics of oil for starters. You do not mention Islamic intolerance or Israeli liberal accepting attitudes. Try again after you have learned more about Israel and and it's hostile neighbors.
Fortune
Apr 10 2005, 09:11 PM
I'm (almost) speechless! This sheds a whole new light on your thought processes Rory.
Rory Blackhand
Apr 10 2005, 09:28 PM
| QUOTE |
| I'm (almost) speechless! This sheds a whole new light on your thought processes Rory. |
That is pretty vague. I could take it to mean, wow you did a good job making an interesting place to run shadows or you think I am smoking crack? I have to admit that it does bug me when posters comment or attack the poster and say little or nothing to further the discussion at hand.
I will be happy though to elaborate on any aspect of what I posted. I am pretty sure I can use history and logical speculation to support everything I wrote. Of course history does not always take a logical turn, but I think I have addressed some interesting aspects of Israel. The rebuilding of the Jewish temple, the "Holy" aspect of the promised land, Jewish liberalism and tolerance, Islamic intolerance, Israeli technology advantages, immigration, etc..
This thread was created to collaborate on a fantasy future of Israel. Lend a hand if you have an understanding of the region. Show your misconception if you don't. But add to the discussion, please.
Sharaloth
Apr 10 2005, 10:04 PM
Interesting take on the 6th world possibilites of the middle east. The heavy anti-islamic bias is understandable, if politically incorrect, and the end result is somewhat plausible.
I'd modify a great deal of that particular history to account for the sudden dissapearance of US-financial support (Israel being the largest receiver), and the vast outnumbering and outgunning that Israel would experience in any large-scale war with the rest of the middle east.
Israel has a history of taking on larger foes and coming out victorious, but it has never had to do so without military and economic support from the US and European nations. The palestinian problem alone could swamp them without such support, unless they decided to become even more brutal in their tactics than they are now. With the rest of the world lost in its own escalating problems, especially Isreal's number 1 supporter, they would truly be alone against a sea of enemies.
Assuming Iran doesn't make it far enough in their nuclear program by this point, there are two possibile ways for israel to survive if a united middle east attacked them.
1) the middle east doesn't unite. Israel can hold its own against one, maybe two other nations at once, and possible grab some land from the deal. This situation would be ideal for Israel, and indeed for much of the rest of the world. A united Islam historically means widespread conquest, 'convert or die' mentalities and the complete union of church and state. Honestly, with the amount of hatred between the two main Islamic sects, I doubt unification is a possibility (The feelings are similar, if more pronounced to a Bible-Belt Protestant Christian Fundamentalists feelings on Catholicism, only going both ways)
2) nuclear weapons. Israel's got 'em, nobody else in the region does. This gives Israel a trump card in any conflict. If the arab nations got as hit as hard as you suggest, though, they are going to be in a state of desperation, and with the amount of weapons, force-fed hatred, jealousy and sheer starvation that you give them, they will be marching en masse into Israel. Not even the Israeli threat of nuclear retaliation would mean much to the arab nations at this point.
If either condition is not met (Fractured middle east or nuclear armament as deterrent), then Israel is going to get pulled under, despite legions of cyber-augmented warriors, smart tactics, and magical integration.
On that note, actually, in MitS, pages 10-11 there is some notes on how Islam accepted magic. The Sunni's take to it fine, and though they find Metas distasteful, I bet they wouldn't be above using them in a war. The Shiites are the ones who forbid magic and stone metahumans (and normal humans, yes, but for slightly different reasons) to death.
Also, many middle east nations were fairly rich and powerful long before they became the oil barons of the world. Loss of that income will force them to re-evaluate, but the reason they were more or less european dominated in the 19th and 20th centuries is because of Europe's superior technological resources. That difference has vanished. I'm sure several of those nations will just collapse into something worse than a central american banana republic, but a couple just might survive the hard times and grow up. (Before the US-invasion, Iraq would have been a good choice for this. Strong-handed dictatorship, prolific propaganda, quelled citizenry and purely secular govornment. If you're in an economic depression, the fastest way out is to find a scapegoat and declare fascism).
So, while I find your idea interesting, I don't find it very likely.
I do like the idea of the holy land getting magic-ed into weirdness. Tibet's got a Veil, something's going on in India (from a line in the corebook), the Australian Outback's a mana-stormed weirdness, blood sacrifice resurgent in Aztlan. All of those are a kind of 'holy land', though not along the lines of Canaan. Does anyone know what's going on in Egypt? (Another holy land) or the South American west coast? Heck, if all these holy lands are gettin' some magical-powerup, what about mesopotamia, THE birthplace of civilization? (Well, I'm not sure what it was during the 4th world, but they had written language in 5000 bc, putting them leagues ahead of everyone else in RL) It's close enough to Israel that I could see one hell of a series of Mana-lines springing up between them.
Edit: This was aimed specifically at Rory's version of things.
and technically, Shiva can be seen as a hermaphrodite, so he can sometimes be a she. Though I prefer to leave that to Parvati/Kali 'cause I think their marital relationship is hilarious.
FlakJacket
Apr 10 2005, 11:39 PM
What's the status of Pakistan by the 2050's? Whilst they didn't join in the Alliance for Allah as I recall, they seem like the easiest place for a couple nukes to conveniently fall off the back of a truck. Hello smoking crater called Tel Aviv. Or carve the heart out of a massed armoured formation.
Penta
Apr 11 2005, 12:51 AM
Sharaloth: Actually, no. A lot of the oil states were really poor before the oil boom of the 70s.
Exceptions exist in some of the tiny Gulf states (Bahrain, Qatar coming immediately to mind), but most of the oil states depend on oil for 60-90% of budgetary revenues.
Without oil, they'd face massive revolts, and would be unlikely to keep their militaries in any useful conditions without the money provided by oil. See the relevant country studies at the Library of Congress.
Rory Blackhand
Apr 11 2005, 12:55 AM
Sharaloth, thanks for the input. Here is my response to your concerns.
| QUOTE |
I'd modify a great deal of that particular history to account for the sudden dissapearance of US-financial support (Israel being the largest receiver), and the vast outnumbering and outgunning that Israel would experience in any large-scale war with the rest of the middle east.
|
First lets talk about US aid and the impact you feel it would have. Israel produces 100 million a year. The loss of 2% is not significant. Egypt on the other hand is a close second in US aid as a reward that never ends for recognizing israel's right to simply exist. Egypt is the largest enemy Israel might face, but without it's almost 2 billion a year in aid it would be seriously damaged. Also consider the effect of losing the billions sent to other potential Israeli enemies and you will find it is of little impact. Further, much of this aid has been nothing but loan guarantees, not direct cash aid as in Egypt's case. Let's also talk about the aid given to the Palestinians themselves. Every refugee on earth is covered under one UN organization except the Palestinians. They have no less than 5 special UN organizations to deliver aid and perpetuate their demeaning reliance on begging. All together they receive about 1 billion a year from various organizations. That gets canceled, not to mention that there is current legislation to double that figure with a new genocide coordinator at the helm (Mazen).
Let's talk about being outgunned. I addressed this as a miracle how they always fight from a disadvantage. Israel has always been outgunned. The moment the Arabs perceive they have an advantage they attack, as they have done time and time again ever since Israel was formed. There is no doubt in my mind that if Palestinians had nukes they would use them without blinking an eye. But what Israel has enjoyed is arguably the most experienced battlefield commanders on earth. If not now, then at least during the October war, when they were caught by suprise due to their smug sense of invulnerability. The Arab armies suffer from nepotism and politics. The best soldiers are not necessarily in command of the army, so they are plagued by poor leadership.
How can Israel stand on it's own? Simple. They are probably the world's most industrious people:
Facts about the 100th smallest country, with less than 1/1000th of the world's population.
# Israel leads the world in the number of scientists and technicians in the workforce, with 145 per 10,000, as opposed to 85 in the U.S., over 70 in Japan, and less than 60 in Germany. With over 25% of its work force employed in technical professions. Israel places first in this category as well.
# Israel has the highest ratio of university degrees to the population in the world.
# Israel has the highest per capita ratio of scientific publications in the world by a large margin, as well as one of the highest per capita rates of patents filed.
# In proportion to its population, Israel has the largest number of startup companies in the world. In absolute terms, Israel has the largest number of startup companies than any other country in the world, except the US (3,500 companies mostly in hi-tech).
# Israel is ranked #2 in the world for VC funds right behind the US.
# Israel has the highest percentage in the world of home computers per capita.
# Outside the United States and Canada, Israel has the largest number of NASDAQ listed companies
# Israel has the highest average living standards in the Middle East. The per capita income in 2000 is over $17,500, exceeding that of the UK.
# With more than 3,000 high-tech companies and start-ups, Israel has the highest concentration of hi-tech companies in the world (apart from the Silicon Valley).
# Israel's $100 billion economy is larger than all of its immediate neighbors combined.
# The cell phone was developed in Israel by Motorola-Israel. Motorola built its largest development center worldwide in Israel.
# Windows NT software was developed by Microsoft-Israel.
# The Pentium MMX Chip technology was designed in Israel at Intel.
# Voice mail technology was developed in Israel.
# AOL's instant message program was designed by an Israeli software company.
# Both Microsoft and Cisco built their only R&D facilities outside the US in Israel.
# On a per capita basis, Israel has the largest number of biotech start-ups
# Twenty-four percent of Israel's workforce holds university degrees -- ranking third in the industrialized world, after the United States and Holland -- and 12 percent hold advanced degrees.
Precursor to battle tac? Just a quick example of Israeli miltech coming up.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=550475 | QUOTE |
| Israel has a history of taking on larger foes and coming out victorious, but it has never had to do so without military and economic support from the US and European nations. |
That is simply not true. Aside from it being ridiculous to insist that the Israelis are dependent on the aid in the first place. In 1948 the Jews had no tanks, no artillery, and had a small air force of civilian planes. There was an arms embargo placed on them enforced by a British blockade. The Jordanian army on the other hand was well trained and led by a British officers and had no such restrictions. The Egyptians had tanks, planes, artillery, anything they wanted as well. It was only the Israelis and the Arab Palestinians that were not allowed to purchase arms. When the British pulled out of Palestine they opened their forts and armories to the local Palestinian Arabs. Not much support there.
Also, in the 6 day war the Arabs enjoyed a 2 to 1 advantage in armor, 2 to 1 in air, and a huge imbalance of infantry. The Israelis in just 6 days penetrated in depth on three fronts, captured land three times it's size, and destroyed the myth that they could not defeat the Arabs without military assistance. All with inferior arms and equipment. Even the Israeli commanders admitted after the war that the state of the art Soviet T-54 and T-55 tanks were better than what they had fielded. The key being complete air superiority after the preemptive strike on Egypt's MIGs.
The Israelis have shown us time and time again they are innovative and quite adept at waging war. They may buy planes from the US, but they are credited with making over 200 improvements to the F-16 for example.
| QUOTE |
| The palestinian problem alone could swamp them without such support, unless they decided to become even more brutal in their tactics than they are now. |
The Palestinian problem won't swamp them if they lose aid any more than the Palestinians will be swamped if they lose their aid. That is unless they become humanitarian to their enemies and start footing the bill to sustain them. Which they have done and still do.
You say Israelis are brutal? That is absurd to the extreme. Let's put this into perspective. The death rate from the current conflict is around 3500 on the Arab side. This of course takes into account the suicide bombers, the militants engaging in gun battles with IDF, collaborators being lynched, etc.. All casualties are counted in this figure. That leaves us with about 700 dead a year, which is a lot. Divide that between the roughly 4 million Arab Muslims living in the liberated territories and you get around 175 deaths per million. Detroit's population is just over 800k and had around 400 homicides last year. As you can see the city I live in, Detroit, is over twice deadly as living in the liberated territories of Israel.
If you want to talk about being brutal to Arabs you need to talk about Black September in Jordan, or the Syrian town of Hama where 30 thousand men women and children lay buried under a paved lot where their town used to be. Or we can talk about Algeria?
| QUOTE |
| With the rest of the world lost in its own escalating problems, especially Isreal's number 1 supporter, they would truly be alone against a sea of enemies. |
They are that now. The destruction of the UN and the loss of Arab income from oil will be the greatest gift to Israel that has no measurable parallel.
| QUOTE |
| Honestly, with the amount of hatred between the two main Islamic sects, I doubt unification is a possibility |
You have zero understanding of the middle east if you don't recognize that Israel is the one catalyst that transcends all religious boundaries. You can say and do anything you want in the middle east as long as you hate Israel.
| QUOTE |
| Israel's got 'em, nobody else in the region does. This gives Israel a trump card in any conflict. If the arab nations got as hit as hard as you suggest, though, they are going to be in a state of desperation, and with the amount of weapons, force-fed hatred, jealousy and sheer starvation that you give them, they will be marching en masse into Israel. |
The Arab nations will lose income. The royal family in Saudi Arabia will likely be deposed in favor of an Islamic theocracy. Only their fabulous wealth staves this off right now. Oil is the key. Without it world opinion will place them no higher than African despots, who are a little too dark, and a little too needy to be heeded. Without oil their usefulness will end. If they have diversified they will continue for some time, but will never regain their power again...barring magic.
| QUOTE |
| Also, many middle east nations were fairly rich and powerful long before they became the oil barons of the world. Loss of that income will force them to re-evaluate, but the reason they were more or less european dominated in the 19th and 20th centuries is because of Europe's superior technological resources |
You need to go back and look at history before making this kind of statement. Those countries did not exist prior to the 20th century. They were all part of the Ottoman empire. Europe had nothing to do with dominating them, it was the Turks. The Europeans gave them independence after WWI. Oil was not really developed as an industry until the middle of the century.
| QUOTE |
| (Before the US-invasion, Iraq would have been a good choice for this. Strong-handed dictatorship, prolific propaganda, quelled citizenry and purely secular govornment. If you're in an economic depression, the fastest way out is to find a scapegoat and declare fascism) |
Actually, just the opposite. Because of the US invasion Iraq has the greatest chance of becoming a lasting power. Once you let people live in freedom instead of fear they will choose that state of existence every time.
| QUOTE |
| So, while I find your idea interesting, I don't find it very likely. |
If I shared your misunderstanding I would not find it likely either. But I hope this reply has shed light so that now you do.
| QUOTE |
| I do like the idea of the holy land getting magic-ed into weirdness. |
And I like the idea of the middle east reverting to Ali Babba and the tales of Aladdin. Germany goes back to the feudal system, the Arabs return to the desert, Dune anyone? Mad Max?
Sharaloth
Apr 11 2005, 03:21 AM
Alright, first of all let's address this:
| QUOTE |
| And I like the idea of the middle east reverting to Ali Babba and the tales of Aladdin. Germany goes back to the feudal system, the Arabs return to the desert, Dune anyone? Mad Max? |
huh? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, Rory. Are you saying that the SR middle east should become 1001 nights and the rest of the world go feudal? How does that at all tie in to what you had quoted from me?
| QUOTE |
Actually, no. A lot of the oil states were really poor before the oil boom of the 70s. (snip) most of the oil states depend on oil for 60-90% of budgetary revenues.
Without oil, they'd face massive revolts, and would be unlikely to keep their militaries in any useful conditions without the money provided by oil. |
Yokay, I bow to superior middle-east knowledge, with the caveat that I really do know something about what I'm talking of here. Double-addressing this with Rory's comment to the same effect, I recognize that the arab states did not exist prior to (what was it? WW2?). But I also know that despite the lack of arable land in the area (yes there is arable land all over the place, but really not that much) and a truly bloody history the middle east has been, in the past, a very, very rich place. The wealth was concentrated in the hands of a few (like it is now), but the wealthy were rediculously wealthy. Garnered as much from the lucrative position the middle east held on some major trading routes as from anything else. Byzantium was going strong while Europe collapsed into the dark ages, and even after that kept its place as a top power until europe got the tech and economic power to squash them. That this could happen again does not deserve to be dismissed out of hand, just because it doesn't look like it now.
Towards the US and the impact it has: Yes, Israel needs that money (even if it's promissory notes, they still spend it like cash), otherwise they wouldn't be getting it. The US's lumbering debt can destroy the world's current superpower, and the money they send to Israel could be much better directed to staving off that ravening monster, if Israel could do without it. The Israeli economy is exceedingly healthy, and I absolutely love the way they run certain aspects of the country, but it requires vast amounts of burnable cash to maintain, and the US is currently a major supplier. If it were suddenly cut off (say, by a huge internal war between the US and it's own native population, forcing it to fracture and then unite with a severly gimped Canada, gaining it practically nothing and losing it vast amounts of precious natural resources in the bargain) then Israel would be feeling it to the bone. Israel would survive while Egypt would deflate like the big rubber balloon it is, sure, but it would not be simply shrugged off.
The loss to the enemies of Israel would be worse, true, especially the oil-producing nations who will suddenly lose, what was the figure again? 60% of their total gross income? But this will only accelerate the problems. Economic hardship has always, always called for a single, elegant solution: war. That solution has become difficult in modern times, as the world decides to put down rules as to who can invade who and why (Which the US ignores, but that's because they're the current superpower, and nobody really wanted Saddam in office anyway). With the collapse of the UN and the US, suddenly there is no more authority to tell you what is right and what is wrong to do with your country. The middle-eastern nations that suddenly have no money, an intact (for now) military and a population out for blood and anything edible will likely decide to attack the nearest place with an infrastructure in the hopes of ganking something valuable and hocking it for bullet and cheeto money (To keep the population from eating it's rulers, and the military from degenerating to nothing).
Even hurting like they would be, (and when the crash comes, don't expect Israel's tech industry not to hit the wall and splatter. They'd be outclassed by the Japanese Megas and the US's Matrix technology in no time flat. It wouldn't be a total killer blow, but it'd be another major blow to the country, perhaps enough to stagger it, definitely enough to weaken it) I'm willing to bet Israel could take out one or two of these starving nations at once. It'd be a boon for Israel, really, as they could declare wartime economy and get a 'get out of depression free' card. More than this, and they'd be seeing an ever increasing toll taken on their military forces. If the whole of the middle east united against them, they'd be screwed. Just. Plain. Screwed. They'd be inflicting 100 to 1 casualties and they'd still get mowed under by sheer numbers. Tactics mean dick all in that situation. Here's a handy analogy. Starcraft. Fun game, but have you ever played against someone who zergling rushes you? Bastard sends legions of the cheap, disposable and not very tough critters at your base, and no matter how well-developed it is, they do some damage. Now, if you're sitting in a heavily-fortified maxed out base, one of these things can be dealt with at the first line, it won't even be felt at the core. Now against two opponents things get a little hairy, but given the fortifications you've got you get away with some losses and a lot of dead zerglings, but your infrastructure remains intact. Now what about six opponents? They'll run roughshod over you, and yeah you'll take out hundreds of the bastards, but in the end you're still out of the game.
Not that this would actually happen, as I have stated, but it is a worst-case-for-Israel scenario. The actual casualties inflicted on the united middle-eastern-nations would have to be in the hundreds of thousands if not the millions, especially with Israeli air superiority. It's an option for the arab nations, of course, especially if they have much more population than they can feed.
Actually, the palestinian problem, if left unchecked, threatens all of Israel, regardless of support from the outside for either side of the conflict. Israeli actions piss off the palestinians on a regular basis, and the palistineans blowing up Israeli's pisses the Israeli's off on a regular basis. Without outside intervention, the palestinians would either stage a revolt, or the Israeli military would evict every palestinian from whatever Israel decides to claim for themselves, and kill whoever decided not to go or resist. About it being safer to live in Israel than it is to live in Detroit . . . why the hell are you living in Detroit if it's that bad? Ah, well, hopefully the murders in Detroit aren't mass murders, that would up your chances a bit, ne?
As to the other incidents you mentioned, no, I don't have to talk about them. Because they are off-topic.
| QUOTE |
| The Arab nations will lose income. The royal family in Saudi Arabia will likely be deposed in favor of an Islamic theocracy. Only their fabulous wealth staves this off right now. Oil is the key. Without it world opinion will place them no higher than African despots, who are a little too dark, and a little too needy to be heeded. Without oil their usefulness will end. If they have diversified they will continue for some time, but will never regain their power again...barring magic. |
World Opinion, Smorld opinion! The rest of the world can go hang (and is in fact actually attempting this very action!) this is the Middle East! Nobody's going to interfere, they all have their own problems, and with the bloody natives trying to take back the land stolen from them, who's going to notice a bunch of arabs trying to do the same? (from their point of view, of course, Israel is territory stolen from the palestinians, so they'd just be liberating it from oppressors and godless conquerors). Oil is not the key, oil is the catelyst. Without the fuel-oil sales (the oil would still be sold and used in the huge amount of products refined from it, if not for energy purposes, but that's not a whole lot of money comparatively) the depression hits, and it's time to look for that convenient scapegoat sitting just beyond the borders... And usefulness? riiight. I think they'd see it differently, and that's the entire point. Diversification is all fine and dandy, but it won't feed your people, so better start shining those guns up, 'cause to distact the populace while the big guys vie for British and UCAS citizenship, there's a war on.
| QUOTE |
| They are that now. The destruction of the UN and the loss of Arab income from oil will be the greatest gift to Israel that has no measurable parallel. |
There is no way I can currently think of to address that without sounding insulting. So I will leave it be for the moment.
| QUOTE |
| You have zero understanding of the middle east if you don't recognize that Israel is the one catalyst that transcends all religious boundaries. You can say and do anything you want in the middle east as long as you hate Israel. |
Ditto. But I will make an exception: You have zero understanding of religious intolerance if you think something like Israel is enough to unite Shia and Sunni. Sure, they both hate it, but they hate each other just as much and for many more reasons with a long, long history to back it up. As to my understanding of the middle east, I will admit that I'm no expert, but I will also assert that I am not uninformed. My understanding of the middle-east situation is not perfect, but that's because middle-east politics are worse than Quebec language laws. It's a mess, and unless you make the middle-east your full-time study subject (or, alternatively, your job), you're not going to have the full picture.
| QUOTE |
| Actually, just the opposite. Because of the US invasion Iraq has the greatest chance of becoming a lasting power. Once you let people live in freedom instead of fear they will choose that state of existence every time. |
Counterargument: In its current state, Iraq could not handle a massive economic and social hit such as the events of the early 21'st century SR timeline. Their democracy would collapse into bloody conflict drawn along religious lines. They are disunified and chaotic, unable to hold themselves together or properly govorn... yet. Give them a decade without incident, and I'll give that Iraq could survive. Given a despotic and tyrannical rulership such as Saddam's, it WOULD survive. Read the actual quote, and you'll see what I mean. The US invasion of Iraq weakened the country greatly, blew apart its infrastructure and fractured its people. Eventually it might stabalize into something other than a quagmire, like, say, a bastion of civilization to all the world. Given current trends, it'll become a second world democracy, barely getting by and relatively easy to topple from within or without. If things get worse, well, it'll just fall apart. And it's true that there's nothing like fascism to pull a country out of depression. The best for it too, since in fascism you might want to choose to live in freedom, but you aren't really given a choice, so that taste of freedom the Iraqi's got will just be ashes in their mouths. Fear is a powerful control, just look at the US.
| QUOTE |
| If I shared your misunderstanding I would not find it likely either. But I hope this reply has shed light so that now you do. |
And if I shared your misunderstanding, I might be inclined to think it likely. I hope I've clarified things up so now you don't.
ps. That last bit was sarcastic, because your quote was you being a jerk. Don't do that, it annoys the hell out of people.
Penta
Apr 11 2005, 03:50 AM
| QUOTE (Sharaloth) |
Yokay, I bow to superior middle-east knowledge, with the caveat that I really do know something about what I'm talking of here. Double-addressing this with Rory's comment to the same effect, I recognize that the arab states did not exist prior to (what was it? WW2?). But I also know that despite the lack of arable land in the area (yes there is arable land all over the place, but really not that much) and a truly bloody history the middle east has been, in the past, a very, very rich place. The wealth was concentrated in the hands of a few (like it is now), but the wealthy were rediculously wealthy. Garnered as much from the lucrative position the middle east held on some major trading routes as from anything else. Byzantium was going strong while Europe collapsed into the dark ages, and even after that kept its place as a top power until europe got the tech and economic power to squash them. That this could happen again does not deserve to be dismissed out of hand, just because it doesn't look like it now. |
You have points...We're speaking on different timescales.
I was speaking of the 19th-20th centuries. You were speaking of wider timescales.
We're both right, in short.
Yes, there were large periods of time where the ME was at the head of the class. From the 9th through (more or less) the 15th Centuries was one period. Arabia then sort of fell away from the curve as power shifted to Asia Minor, while the Maghreb fell under Ottoman domination.
Then, well, it was the Ottomans' time in the sun, and Arabia became a nomadic backwater, and everybody was screwed when the Europeans began to sail around Africa.
In the 19th century through til the 50s (more or less), the ME was generally poor, backwater, and waayy behind the curve. Then, in the 50s, the big wave of nationalizations began. That pumped a lot of wealth into the state systems, and the 70s oil boom put everything into overdrive.
(Bernard Lewis is seen as politicized these days, and has been in some cases rightly criticized by Said and others earlier on, but his work (and Fouad Ajami's) is excellent in this area. His history of the Ottoman Empire and Ataturk's time is justly classic, IMHO.)
I'll see if I can...Yes. The IMF's
latest Article IV Consultation on Saudi Arabia, which is from Jan 12, 2005, has some interesting 2000-03 data. Namely, the preliminary 03 data has central gov't revenue as 34.5% of GDP, of which oil revenue is 28.7%.
For reference: The UAE's Article IV thing, from 29 June 04, is
here, but is too complex for this time of night for me to try and comprehend.
You can go through the other states, if you want, at imf.org.
The thing is, Shoraloth...You're right, in a historical sense, but the factors to which you refer don't exist anymore. The moment you could ship by sea in any real way, those trade routes started to die. Which meant that the economic power of the Mideast began to die, until oil came onto the scene.
Now, unless navigation by sea becomes completely impossible and the Suez Canal is unbuilt, that's not likely to change.
Sharaloth
Apr 11 2005, 04:00 AM
*shrug* I suppose. It wasn't really a main point of mine, since most of the argument centers around starving masses of angry and desperate people, but what you say, Penta, makes sense. Again, I urge not to dismiss the possibility out of hand simply because it is ulikely (highly unlikely in this case, but then again, so is Israel surviving through the wars it's had, especially if Rory's right and they had no outside support whatsoever during them. So, hey, I guess it could happen).
Edit: Oh, and I think we might be working on different timescales again. The idea of middle-eastern nations regaining the glory days of Byzantium by 2065 is laughable in the extreme. I'm thinking give them a couple centuries.
Penta
Apr 11 2005, 04:11 AM
OK, there I could agree.
Not dismissing anything as *potentially* possible...
But we can set stuff aside as very unlikely.
Rory Blackhand
Apr 11 2005, 05:38 AM
| QUOTE |
huh? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, Rory. Are you saying that the SR middle east should become 1001 nights and the rest of the world go feudal? |
No I said the SR game has sent Germany back to feudal times, China back to dynasties, Japan to an Imperial empire, Ireland back to an age of magic, America back to an age of Native American control, etc... It is simply likely that the middle east would become 1001 nights and or Lawrence of Arabiaesque, in my opinion. Like Ireland, I feel Israel should be given special attention as it is at the center of so much political turmoil. The land of milk and honey concept is nothing more than an idea. Everything else is based in history and speculation.
| QUOTE |
| Yokay, I bow to superior middle-east knowledge, with the caveat that I really do know something about what I'm talking of here. |
Haven't seen a whit of evidence to support this claim. Among other really idiotic staetments you said the Europeans squashed the Arabs, which is just not the case at all. The Ottomans held the area for 600 years. The Arabs were empowered by Europeans at the end of WWI.
| QUOTE |
| in the past, a very, very rich place. The wealth was concentrated in the hands of a few (like it is now), but the wealthy were rediculously wealthy. Garnered as much from the lucrative position the middle east held on some major trading routes as from anything else. |
With the invention of modern air craft those trade routes are no longer much use. If you are speculating on the future, at least try and make some sense.
| QUOTE |
| Towards the US and the impact it has: |
Blah blah blah...Tell me why losing 2% of a nation's income has such an apocolyptic impact that my simple speculation must be reworked from scratch? The oil thugs lose over half their income, all their aid as well, and the Israelis lose 2%. Do the math. Who is hurt worse? The Israelis beat the Arabs hands down on the battlefield every time. With a weaker Arab economy how does this add to Israel's concerns? I feel I am missing something either funny or big here. The Israeli strength is in it's innovation, technology, and fierce desire to live in Israel. Not to mention they have literally no place else to go. When they fight they fight for survival.
| QUOTE |
| The loss to the enemies of Israel would be worse, true, especially the oil-producing nations who will suddenly lose, what was the figure again? 60% of their total gross income? |
I thought it was 60 to 90 percent, but you can say 50% to account for some dwindling need for oil.
| QUOTE |
| Economic hardship has always, always called for a single, elegant solution: war. |
Is that how you describe what the people of Taiwan did when faced with economic hardship in the 40s? You made a foolish blanket statement that is easily ripped to shreds with history. You should try to put more thought into what you write if you wish to be taken seriously. The main problem you ignore with this leap of logic is that the Arabs have no chance of engaging the Israelis now. Once their economies start to deteriorate they lose the ability to maintain training and servicable equipment. With the passage of time it gets worse in favor of Israel that has built a robust and thriving economy completely independent of oil wealth.
| QUOTE |
| (To keep the population from eating it's rulers, and the military from degenerating to nothing) |
There is no evidence that Arabs are or ever were connibals to my knowledge? Making shit up again to suit your rather uninspiring view of future Israel?
| QUOTE |
| Even hurting like they would be, (and when the crash comes, don't expect Israel's tech industry not to hit the wall and splatter. They'd be outclassed by the Japanese Megas and the US's Matrix technology in no time flat. |
I won't argue the developer's view of the Japanese megas if they choose this route. However the Israelis are very much a part of the tech world and cutting edge. If they ignore this as you have it would be a shame. I have no doubts Israeli partnerships will be regarded as huge assets to any mega smart enough to take advantage of it.
| QUOTE |
| I'm willing to bet Israel could take out one or two of these starving nations at once. It'd be a boon for Israel, really, as they could declare wartime economy and get a 'get out of depression free' card. |
You are imposing non historical thinking onto the Israelis now. This is something out of depression era US history and has nothing at all to do with Israeli policy. The entire Israeli war doctrine has been one of self defense and survival. They have never waged an offensive war and never will. They have no desire for territory or offensive expansion. They could have marched to Damascus, Aman, and Cairo unopposed several times in history, but halted at defensible borders. Israel's economy has little to do with wartime. War for this small nation is counter productive and will be avoided at all costs.
| QUOTE |
| If the whole of the middle east united against them, they'd be screwed. Just. Plain. Screwed. |
So you do understand what it is like to be an Israeli? Now add in smarmy Canadians and European America bashers using Israel as a whipping boy by proxy and you get the picture. The fact is Iran has stated as a public goal it's committment to the destruction of Israel, Syria is in a state of war, along with Iraq, and Saudi Arabia. The Arabs can't admt that Israel exists, because the moment they do will be the moment they admit they were crushed on the battlefield.
| QUOTE |
| They'd be inflicting 100 to 1 casualties and they'd still get mowed under by sheer numbers. Tactics mean dick all in that situation. |
I'm glad you weren't in command when the Germans overran Bastogne, you would have surrendered with this flaw of yours.
| QUOTE |
| Here's a handy analogy. Starcraft. Fun game, but have you ever played against someone who zergling rushes you? |
Bad analogy. Nothing to do with reality. Perhaps you should do more reading instead of playing dumb games. Better yet, get out and experience life. You need it. Using your own bad analogy, aside from the fact that we are not starting from scratch with no defense, I have explained the difference in leadership. If 6 players that do not know how to play your little game go up against an experienced player they will be destroyed in no time.
| QUOTE |
| Actually, the palestinian problem, if left unchecked, threatens all of Israel, regardless of support from the outside for either side of the conflict. Israeli actions piss off the palestinians on a regular basis, and the palistineans blowing up Israeli's pisses the Israeli's off on a regular basis. |
The issue is far more complex than simple revenge killing.
| QUOTE |
| Without outside intervention, the palestinians would either stage a revolt, or the Israeli military would evict every palestinian from whatever Israel decides to claim for themselves, and kill whoever decided not to go or resist. |
Are we talking in your future Israel or is this you opinion of Israeli motivations now? Your ignorance is frightening me. It is exactly outside interference that keeps the refugees in a perpetual state of squallor. The surrounding Arab nations use the refugees as political pawns. Under Israeli government every man has a vote. If the hostile Arabs in the liberated territories were given Israeli citizenship they would overwhelm Israel and destroy it without a single shot fired. Israel would lose everything that makes it the one Jewish sanctuary on earth. No nation can be asked to comit suicide this way. Which presents the main dilema the Arabs are taking advantage of. Either the Israelis are made out to be the bad guys or they die. The Arabs know this and have been promoting high birth rates to destroy Israel from within. The most humane solution to end the suffering of the Palestinian people is quite literally forced eviction. The middle east has vast amounts of land and oil money. It is easily accomplished, but this would be admitting defeat at the hands of infidels and the imams would never allow it, so we have Israel giving away land in the false hopes that it will bring peace.
| QUOTE |
| About it being safer to live in Israel than it is to live in Detroit . . . why the hell are you living in Detroit if it's that bad? Ah, well, hopefully the murders in Detroit aren't mass murders, that would up your chances a bit, ne? |
It's not that bad. That is my point. I feel perfectly safe walking the streets at night anywhere in Detroit. Your judgment is clouded by media hype. I just wanted to put it into perspective for you since you claim the Israelis are so brutal. If they were guilty of half the crimes they are accused of the death toll would be enormous. You are guilty of spreading bias and ignorance.
| QUOTE |
| As to the other incidents you mentioned, no, I don't have to talk about them. Because they are off-topic. |
Like Starcraft is?
| QUOTE |
| World Opinion, Smorld opinion! |
Since you seem to place so little value on world opinion and oil power, perhaps you can explain why we allow the situation in Congo to exist, Rawadan genocide, genocide in Sudan? The answer is simply they have nothing to offer us and are not exporting the violence to us. The same fate awaits the Arabs as soon as the world finds a viable alternative fuel source. You can quote me on that.
| QUOTE |
| (from their point of view, of course, Israel is territory stolen from the palestinians, so they'd just be liberating it from oppressors and godless conquerors) |
Here seems to be the heart of your dislike for Israel. Once again you are misinformed. The Palestinians never owned Palestine. There never existed a country called Palestine and a Palestinian all thru history was a Jew in conversation, not until the 60s did that change. The land was empty while under control of the Turks. The once thriving Jewish communities of biblical times were long covered in sand and neglect after the Jews were scattered and forced to flee for their lives. The Treaty of Sevres at the end of WWI formed all the middle east nations and gave this waste land to the Jews. When Jewish pioneers came and changed the land into something productive thousands of Arabs flooded in from all over to grab a piece of the action. In good faith the Jews spent their live savings building Israel only to have it taken away from them once oil was discovered on Arab lands and became valuable enough to renige on promises to them by the League of Nations and Britain. The legal rights to Palestine belong to the Jews, all of Palestine, including Jordan. It is the Israelis whose land was stolen by the British who gave 75% of it away to the Hashemites, and to the Jordanians who captured Judea and Sumeria and renamed it the west bank, and the Egyptions who invaded and stole Gaza. But this is all for another thread except that you need to know Israel's history and current setting to speculate on it's future.
| QUOTE |
Diversification is all fine and dandy, but it won't feed your people, so better start shining those guns up, 'cause to distact the populace while the big guys vie for British and UCAS citizenship, there's a war on.
|
You know nothing of stocks either, huh? You diversify to avoid disaster. The Arab economies are dependent on oil, the Israeli's is not. The Israelis will come out much better in the long run and this needs to be shown in an accurate depiction of future Israel.
| QUOTE |
| There is no way I can currently think of to address that without sounding insulting. So I will leave it be for the moment |
Too late. You already post a lot of words as if you know something, but it is obvious you don't.
| QUOTE |
| You have zero understanding of religious intolerance if you think something like Israel is enough to unite Shia and Sunni. |
Explain the first alliance against Israel in 1948 then, smart boy. And the 6 day war, and the October war. Sunnis and Shias fought along side each other against the common enemy with no problems. You keep digging ourself deeper and deeper into a hole on this subject and it is amusing.
| QUOTE |
| As to my understanding of the middle east, I will admit that I'm no expert, but I will also assert that I am not uninformed. My understanding of the middle-east situation is not perfect |
No? Really? You're not just being modest? How will you sit there and refute my speculations which are based on years of extensive study if you admit you know nothing of the middle east?
| QUOTE |
| Counterargument: In its current state, Iraq could not handle a massive economic and social hit such as the events of the early 21'st century SR timeline. Their democracy would collapse into bloody conflict drawn along religious lines. |
This is a bit tricky since we have already passed the timeline. But yes I agree that the situation would collapse if pressured right now with SR future scenario. I am also of the opinion that we should form three states in Iraq as well. Fuck the Turks. The Kurds were passed over by the British and they deserve a homeland.
| QUOTE |
| The US invasion of Iraq weakened the country greatly, blew apart its infrastructure and fractured its people. |
Absolutely did. The country was held together in fear. It needed to be blown apart, and it was using it's strength to threaten and attack it's neighbors agressively. It needed to be taken down. The US may have destroyed the infrastrucure of an evil empire, but it empowered millions of helpless Iraqis by giving them a vote. Don't sound so bitter. You make it sounds as if you preferrd Sadam to freedom for Iraqis.
| QUOTE |
| Fear is a powerful control, just look at the US. |
Agressor nations, despots, tyrants, and militants should fear the US. We have the balls to do something about evil. Sometimes you have to punish your kids to mold them into adults. That is a good type of fear.
| QUOTE |
| And if I shared your misunderstanding, I might be inclined to think it likely. I hope I've clarified things up so now you don't. |
Actually you have cleared it up nicley for me. You don't know jack about what you talk about. Apparantly you just like to argue? Or are a masochist that doesn't mind being beaten up all the time?
| QUOTE |
| ps. That last bit was sarcastic, because your quote was you being a jerk. Don't do that, it annoys the hell out of people. |
Look who is being a jerk now.
Omer Joel
Apr 11 2005, 05:56 AM
| QUOTE (SpasticTeapot) |
| And for the record, I'm a male Jew who has been through several years of religious school under an orthodox rabbi, not some crazy bolshevik who likes to flame people. |
Flame? what part of your post should be considered a flame? Telling me that I was "brainwashed?" Well, I live in Israel, and here the Orthodox sect is dominant and extremely repressive; Most of Islam and some major sects of Christianity repress women, or atleast intend to. And yes, in Reform Judaism a woman could be a Rabby. I know that. But reform Judaism is rare in Israel IRL, while Orthodoxism is kinda of the "state religion".
Yes, I'm of Jewish nationality too; I just live in a country dominated by reactionary Orthodox sects.
Sharaloth
Apr 11 2005, 06:21 AM
Wow, Rory, it's as if you read my post, went back, and then worked out a way to read it, word by word, in a completely different way than I had written it. We are obviously talking about entirely different things here, except that I do not insult you, and you do insult me. Over, and over again.
Now, since you've obviously not learned proper etiquette or logical argumenation procedures since the last time I kicked your ass, why don't we just leave this as is? Flame-wars are fun and all, and I know we all want to see more crazy Rory-logic on this board, but let's save it for later and not hijack Omer's thread beyond all hope of recognition.
Omer Joel
Apr 11 2005, 07:02 AM
Ok, first cool off the flames, k?
Yes, the Arab regimes, being the corrupt dictatorships that they are, have used (and in some cases, still try to use) Israel as a universal bogey to scare their population into submittance and unite them by empty hatered. But they are still split and still fight each other over their real interests: see the Iran-Iraq war for example. Sure, the like to speak alot about "destroying Israel", that diverts the population's attention from the fact that their countries are dictatorships and that the rulers are criminals.
Yes, Israel is quite democratic in comparison to the Arab regimes (all of the developed counties are) but it's quite militaristic (originally for justified reasons but this has grown far beyond proportions), and somewhat opressive - and I'm not talking about the Arab population in particular here; I'm talking about brutal capitalism, an extreme gap between haves and have-nots, one million citizens living below the poverty line, 20% of the population not having enough to eat, 11% unemployment, arrest of opposition activists (both from the left and the right) for indefinite amounts of time and torturing them and so on. I live here; I could see it. I see elderly persons rifling through trash cans to find food; I know so many people, who, despite being talented and well-educated, suffer from unemployment. Militarism is in excess, far beyond anything needed for survival. There are too many generals in the government. Too many generals going to give "lectures" at schools. Too much hatered - the Israeli right wing isn't much better than the Arab regimes in terms of propaganda and hatered.
The western media likes to talk all day about the intyernational conflists within the Middle East (blood and explosions attract viewers), but usually forgets entirely about the fact that "Israel" isn't one unit (it's devided into a very few haves and alot of have nots), the "Jewish People" isn't one unit (for the same regions), "Islam" isn't one unit and the "Arab Nations" arne't one unit (they hate each other more than they hate Israel; they've united in 1948 but grew less and less united over time; the "United Arab Republic" experiment between Syria and Egypt in the 1960's fell becauise of these internal conflicts).
In essence, this is a war between two elites who brainwash the masses with pointless hatered and use them as pawns in their games of power and money. The rulers use religion, patriotism, hatered and fear to their advantage.
And Abu Mazen? He isn't a "genocide coordinator" (that's Nasralla, the Hizbullah leader, and even for him it's a fantasy), he's just a corrupt figurehead bent on increasing his Swiss Bank account by stealing aid funds (just like Arafat) and by opressing his own people.
And how does all of this reflect to 2065/2070?
First and foremost, the Middle East remains militarized. Extremely militarized. An Armed Camp. Shiite extremists (the NIJ/"Arabia") are in a constant Jihad against the Awakened, the Metahumans and Israel (active opression and even extermination of the first two, cold war and occasional terrorist attacks on the latter). The more moderate Suni nations signed, after the 2034-2036 War, a peace treaty with Israel (though that's quite a cold peace) due to economical reasons and the ressurgance of magic which lead to a new golden age (remember that in golden age Spain, Muslims and Jews lived togather in peace; Jews could become ministers and generals in that Islamic kingdom, but the New Golden Age is far less harmonic and far colder in terms of peace, especially due to the previous century of hatered-filled propaganda); Metahumans are still opressed. The West Bank DMZ is more of a larger version of the Barrens than a nation-state; it's ruled by various armed gangs and organizations, some engaged in terrorism against Israel, some just in "normal" criminal activities. The Free City of Gaza, on the other hand, is a Megacorporate enclave, where the cheap labour force (atleast 3 millions of them in 2065) lives in shanti towns in the shadow of the corp enclaves.
And Israel sits in the middle of all of this as the ultimate militarized nation, fallen back to the 1950's in terms of an authoritative government (not a dictatorship but a very militaristic semi-democracy) and of a centralized economy built over the combination of foriegn corps (Yamatetsu and Ares in the most part), local corps (BioGuard and IMI Inc) and governmental-subsidized and semi-controlled companies. Israel has survived due to an ultra-high-quality military (by 2065 it'll be cybered to the teeth and have major mojo and the latest Ares and IMI Inc weapons; it'll be the only over-funded agency of the Israeli government), due to major magical capabilities and due to the fact that it fights with it's back to the sea (a very strong motivator). The gap between haves and have-nots is more extreme than ever, when large parts of the population live in slums and "refugee camps" away from the chemically-contaminated tel Aviv (the Lybian attacks had massive and lasting side effects, see "Target: Wasteland"), while the government officials, high-ranking corporate officers and corpers live in high arcologies and skyscrappers. Beurocracy is quite heavy, too.
And the MRP (Matriarchal Revolutionary Party) is an Awakened, pro-metahuman group fighting for social equality and the overthrow of the corps and the religious extremists (Orthodox hegemony in Israel and Islamic mullahs in Arabia) in the Israel-Lebanon-Syria area; it's semi-legal in Israel and an underground resistance in Arabia. Add to that the Metahuman Liberation Front, funded, trained and equipped by the IDF, which attacks Arabia government and military installations, and you'll get quite a volatile middle east.
torzzzzz
Apr 11 2005, 01:37 PM
Ok, I have only skimmed through this post as I am at work and it is hellish long, but one thing I would like to know...... to talk about Israel is to talk about its neighbors as they are all relevant to the situation in the Middle East. So what will be the state of Palestine in 2070? will it still exist? We are told in the news (UK) that Israel is handing back land to Palestine, will this still be true in 50 years?
Also on the point of Islam and women, like all religions things can be interpreted and taken advantage of, just because of recent events in the Middle east it is not faire to condem all muslims to be killers and women haters! I am not a Muslim but have grown up in the Middle East ( Saudi, Egypt and Oman) and though these countrys are pro western We never experienced any problems (and that was in the 80's). I would like to think that sensible opinions can be expressed about the Middle East as it is difficult to understand now let alone in the future.
I know I have gone off topic abit, but to talk about Israel as a place involves the rest of the Middle East as well!
torz x
Rory Blackhand
Apr 11 2005, 08:57 PM
| QUOTE |
| Wow, Rory, it's as if you read my post, went back, and then worked out a way to read it, word by word, in a completely different way than I had written it. We are obviously talking about entirely different things here |
Try making sense instead of posting gibberish and we won't have that problem. Some advice. Posting a lot of words does not help anyone understand what you are saying. When you start to ramble and wander it becomes clear you are clueless.
| QUOTE |
| Yes, the Arab regimes, being the corrupt dictatorships that they are, have used (and in some cases, still try to use) Israel as a universal bogey to scare their population into submittance and unite them by empty hatered. But they are still split and still fight each other over their real interests: see the Iran-Iraq war for example. |
They are not trying to scare their populations so much as anger them against israel. It is a smoke screen to cover corruption and misery at home. The entire region is quite insensed at Israel from all the propaganda. Iran is not an Arab country though. Bad example. Jordan 1970 is a better one (Black September). The Syrians sent about 200 tanks into Jordan to battle the Jordanian army because Hussein was butchering thousands of Palestinians. In 10 days they killed far more than 5 years of israeli so called brutality has. But that is not news worthy.
| QUOTE |
| Yes, Israel is quite democratic in comparison to the Arab regimes (all of the developed counties are) but it's quite militaristic (originally for justified reasons but this has grown far beyond proportions), and somewhat opressive |
This is where you and I part in agreement. I do not see Israel being militant far beyond reason! To me that is an absurd statement. Israel's enemies are to blame for Israel's level of militancy. Your leaders do not have the luzury of making mistakes. The public goal of the Arabs is GENOCIDE against the Jews. It's been attempted 3 times in my lifetime. If you want to throw caution to the wind and get yourself killed, more power to you. But it is Tali Hatuel and her 4 daughters and unborn son that I won't forgive you for for getting killed do to your lack of conviction. No matter what it takes Israel must arm itself and stay ever vigilant. Don't get caught by surprise again like in 73 thinking you are unbeatable or the Arabs wouldn't dare attack. Just don't do it. It is my opinion that Israel's greatest enemy is young liberal Jews who have never experienced pain and suffering.
| QUOTE |
| I'm talking about brutal capitalism, an extreme gap between haves and have-nots, one million citizens living below the poverty line, 20% of the population not having enough to eat, 11% unemployment, arrest of opposition activists (both from the left and the right) for indefinite amounts of time and torturing them and so on. I live here; I could see it. I see elderly persons rifling through trash cans to find food; I know so many people, who, despite being talented and well-educated, suffer from unemployment. |
Funny I took this quote and asked if this described Israel and of the 20 or so I asked none agreed. And I don't recall a single starvation in Israel at any point. Maybe you have a news link to a starvation? If you want to sob about not having food go to the Congo where there are real problems.
| QUOTE |
| Militarism is in excess, far beyond anything needed for survival. There are too many generals in the government. Too many generals going to give "lectures" at schools. Too much hatered - the Israeli right wing isn't much better than the Arab regimes in terms of propaganda and hatered. |
Once again, you are way of base. I challenge you to give me one single public statement from an Israeli leader calling for a massacre of an Arab country. I'll match you 10 to 1 if you can find one. To put it bluntly, you are full of it if you think Israeli patriots are in any way comparable to Arab fanatics.
| QUOTE |
| I live here; I could see it. |
I live in the US but that doesn't make me an authority on US government, foreign policy, or anything else I don't have a mastery over. It means I have experienced what I have and my judgments are colored my situation.
| QUOTE |
| The western media likes to talk all day about the intyernational conflists within the Middle East (blood and explosions attract viewers), but usually forgets entirely about the fact that "Israel" isn't one unit (it's devided into a very few haves and alot of have nots), the "Jewish People" isn't one unit (for the same regions), "Islam" isn't one unit and the "Arab Nations" arne't one unit (they hate each other more than they hate Israel; they've united in 1948 but grew less and less united over time; the "United Arab Republic" experiment between Syria and Egypt in the 1960's fell becauise of these internal conflicts). |
Congratulations, you just described nearly every nation on earth, get over it. But that is totally false if you think the Islamic nations hate each other more than they hate Israel! Just look at the UN voting pattern for evidence. The ONE uniting factor in all Islamic nations is the mutual unadulterated hatred of Israel.
| QUOTE |
| In essence, this is a war between two elites who brainwash the masses with pointless hatered and use them as pawns in their games of power and money. The rulers use religion, patriotism, hatered and fear to their advantage. |
Your self loathing of your country disturbs me considering the great sacrifice your grand fathers made to give you the chance to belitle them without fear. I wholeheartedly disagree with you about brainwashing. My observation is that it appears you are a teenager who is divorced from reality. Enough of you standing guard and the Arabs will easily finish what Hitler started.
| QUOTE |
| And Abu Mazen? He isn't a "genocide coordinator" |
Quote me on this. Mazen is a criminal that needs to be shot and he is a dog that will bite Israel the first chance he gets. He is stalling for time to rearm and regroup, nothing more. If he gets Jewish Homeland for peace he will get bigger weapons and use them the first chance he gets.
| QUOTE |
| So what will be the state of Palestine in 2070? will it still exist? We are told in the news (UK) that Israel is handing back land to Palestine, will this still be true in 50 years? |
The developers will have to speculate. But let me clear one thing up for you. There has never been a Palestine. That is a fabrication made up by Islamic fanatics to use as a weapon against the Jews. Israel is the legal owner of the land, if they choose to give some of it away as a reward to terrorists in a desperate grasp at peace it will be thier own undoing, but it will not be giving land back to Palestine, not hardly.
torzzzzz
Apr 11 2005, 09:10 PM
| QUOTE (Rory Blackhand) |
| But let me clear one thing up for you. There has never been a Palestine. That is a fabrication made up by Islamic fanatics to use as a weapon against the Jews. Israel is the legal owner of the land, if they choose to give some of it away as a reward to terrorists in a desperate grasp at peace it will be thier own undoing, but it will not be giving land back to Palestine, not hardly. |
I am not looking for an argument but please take a look at the following link!
http://www.mideastweb.org/misrael.htmtorz x
hermit
Apr 11 2005, 09:47 PM
*growls*
Yeah, let's stay on topic.
EDITED.
Oh, and Rory, I'd suggest you keep to that too.
FlakJacket
Apr 11 2005, 09:47 PM
Oookay. Lets just remember to keep it game related and on topic eh? 'Cause these kind of debates never turn out well.
Rory Blackhand
Apr 11 2005, 10:24 PM
Your souce is inaccurate:
| QUOTE |
| The present state of Israel formally occupies all the land from the Jordan river to the Mediterranean ocean, bounded by Egypt in the south, Lebanon in the north, and Jordan in the East. The recognized borders of Israel constitute about 78% of the land. The remainder is divided between land occupied by Israel since the 1967 6-day war and the autonomous regions under the control of the Palestinian autonomy. |
There is no "recognized" border of Israel today. I challenge anyone to find it and define it. The border is in dispute. This web site is not based on fact. The regions Israel liberated in 1967 were not autonomous regions under Palestinian control. They were controlled and annexed mostly by Jordan. Only a hand full of nations ever recognized Jordan's claim. The people living there held Jordanian passports and id cards, thye were Jordanian in every way. When Jordan staged an army on that land and attacked Israel in 1967 Israel captured it, thereby liberating it from the Jordanians. The author of your site is literally lying about history.
Also, many of the so called settlers were origional Jews that had their homes confiscated by Jordanians when Jordan captured the west bank and ethnicly cleansed it of Jews, many of whom could trace an unbroken lineage for over 3 thousand years in the land.
| QUOTE |
| Prior to 1917, the territory that is now called Palestine and Israel was ruled by the Ottoman Turkish Empire, and included three sanjaks (districts). The name "Palestine," that was used by Roman and briefly by Arab rulers, was revived by the British, who received a mandate from the League of Nations to administer Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people. |
This is correct. If you said something like "I am a Palestinian" back then, everyone assumed you were a Jew. Palestine comes from the Romans. Judea and Sumeria were on the maps when I was a child. The west bank is what it is inaccurately called today. Both names were changed to strip the region of it's Jewish character.
And according to that mandate:
http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/db942872b...33;OpenDocument" Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country"
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of the object"
Their best endeavers degraded into imposing immigration quotas to appease violent Arab extremists. Oil was discovered and it's importance superceded promises to dirty jews.
"shall facilitate Jewish immigration under suitable conditions and shall encourage, in co-operation with the Jewish agency referred to in Article 4, close settlement by Jews on the land"
| QUOTE |
| srael was created in 1948, after UN Resolution 181 partitioned the territory of the British Mandate for Palestine into two states for Jews and Palestinian Arabs. The Arabs objected to the creation of the Jewish state and fought a war against it. The Arab side lost the war, and the Palestinian state never really came into being. The territory allotted to the Palestinian state by the UN partition resolution was taken over by Israel and Jordan. About 780,000 Palestinians became refugees. |
Sort of. Your author forgot to mention that Jordan was included in the origional Jewish Homeland, but it was arbitrarily stripped from the Jews in 1921 and given to the Arabs. It is also worth mentioning that the reolution was non binding, it was nothig more than a suggestion by the General Assembly, not a law or binding contract in any way. The Jews accepted it though, while the Arabs rejected it and instead tried to take the whole region by force. What is also amusing is that your author is contradicting himself, here he says Jordan took over part of the land while Israel was formed, above he said Israel took over autonomous Palestine, which is it? Also, the 780,000 refugee figure is inflated. Not to mention that the Arabs were begged to stay, the majority left without ever encountering a Jew. They were told by the invading Arab armies that if they left they would be able to return and confiscate the lands of the Jews after they had been wiped out. Many took up arms against Israel. The thousands that stayed behind, many to simply loot the homes of those that left were made into full Israeli citizens. Today there are a million Israeli Arabs and many legitimate family members have been reunited under generous Israeli programs.
| QUOTE |
| Following breakdown of the final status negotiations in the summer of 2000, riots erupted in September 2000 when Israeli right wing political leader Ariel Sharon paid a controversial visit to the temple mount, in the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, holy to Muslims. |
The muslims built this structure on the sight of the most holy place on earth to Jews. It is the site of the first Jewish temple. Under freedom of religion Jews are allowed to pray there. If the Islamic radicals have their way it will be a muslim only place. Sharon only exercised his rights as a human and a citizen of Israel.
| QUOTE |
| srael has reoccupied large parts of the territory it had ceded to the Palestinians in the West Bank during the Oslo peace process, and continues to build settlements on Palestinian land (click for map). Election of relatively moderate Mahmoud Abbas as Palestinian Authority President and the Israeli disengagement plan (withdrawal from Gaza and four West Bank settlements) offer new hope of peace. |
The only land Israel has ceded is the entire Sinai, which the Egyptians used as a staging area to launch agressive wars against Israel. And this even after Israel developed the oil fields there. This was over 90% of captured lands. The Arabs have yet to show a 90% reduction in violence. But Egypt did recognize Israel as a nation. Of course Saddat was murdered for this affront and we have to pay them almost 2 billion a year to repay them.
Hope this helps?
Rory Blackhand
Apr 11 2005, 10:30 PM
| QUOTE |
*growls*
Yeah, let's stay on topic. |
| QUOTE |
| Oookay. Lets just remember to keep it game related and on topic eh? 'Cause these kind of debates never turn out well. |
Ummm, how can you speculate on a nation's future without a good grasp of where it has been and it's current state? This thread is about Israel. Add to the debate or leave. Nobody is twisting your arm to read it.
| QUOTE |
Oh, and Rory, I'd suggest you keep to that too. |
Suggestion noted. If you can explain another way to speculate on Israel's future without understanding Israel I am interested. Otherwise I "suggest" you only ADD something to discussions you post in.
hermit
Apr 11 2005, 10:52 PM
Rory, take your zealotry elsewhere, okay? I don't think Dumpshock is the place for anyone spreading ideology, is it?
Rev
Apr 11 2005, 11:00 PM
| QUOTE (Rory Blackhand) |
| Coinciding with decades of rising anti-semitism, massive pogroms are instituted across Europe to also cleanse that region of any Jews. In short, millions of hostile Arabs are transferred out of Israel to live with culturally, ethnically, and religiously similar peoples, while millions of Jews are forced to flee to Israel and learn to speak Hebrew. For their part the IDF allows compensation for the departing Arabs, but the incoming Jews are arriving with the shirts on their backs. |
I love the way in this paragraph all the governments are basically doing the same thing (kicking out people they hate for idiotic racist reasons) but when rory's group gets the kicking it is "anti semitic pogroms forcing them to flee" while when his group does the kicking it is "transferring hostile people to live with culturally, ethnically, and religiously similar peoples".