IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> SR Advancement Spectrum, Apparently (in)sufficient room to grow
Do 400 BP characters have enough potential for meaningful advancement?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 107
Guests cannot vote 
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 08:57 PM
Post #1


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



Linked in from another poll about starting character power levels.

Keep in mind when answering that some people prefer to minmax characters while some people prefer a more balanced approach. Obviously the minmaxers are more likely to hit their head on the metaphorical advancement ceiling, so I suspect this poll will be skewed accordingly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Butterblume
post Mar 17 2006, 09:04 PM
Post #2


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,150
Joined: 19-December 05
From: Rhein-Ruhr Megaplex
Member No.: 8,081



It is a bit ambivalent. Which is, i think, a good thing. Players who want to start as pros aren't disappointed. Players who want to start more on street level aren't disappointed. Since there is a discussion which statement is true, i think they got it right :D.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 09:13 PM
Post #3


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (Butterblume @ Mar 17 2006, 05:04 PM)
Players who want to start as pros aren't disappointed. Players who want to start more on street level aren't disappointed. Since there is a discussion which statement is true, i think they got it right :D.

Personally, I agree: The system as presented lets you play however you want to play. That is, after all, the whole point.

I think the problem comes in when people get it in their heads that their particular playstyle is the "best" way, and therefore the only legitimate way. Anyone else who declares otherwise is accused of being shortsighted, because "Blah blah blah opinion blah preferences blah blah you're on crack but I'm not blah!"

But hey, it'll be interesting to see what the voting reveals in a few days.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 17 2006, 09:20 PM
Post #4


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Azralon)
The system as presented lets you play however you want to play. That is, after all, the whole point.

no it doesn't, and no it isn't. there are no rules for playing a great dragon PC, or a leviathan PC. the point of a chargen system is to create characters who are balanced for the game world they're created for, and who are fun to play. my argument is that the PCs created by SR4 are unbalanced for the world they're created for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 09:27 PM
Post #5


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (mfb @ Mar 17 2006, 05:20 PM)
QUOTE (Azralon)
The system as presented lets you play however you want to play. That is, after all, the whole point.

no it doesn't, and no it isn't. there are no rules for playing a great dragon PC, or a leviathan PC. the point of a chargen system is to create characters who are balanced for the game world they're created for, and who are fun to play. my argument is that the PCs created by SR4 are unbalanced for the world they're created for.

Dragons & leviathans are balanced for the game world? C'mon, examples like that aren't useful to illustrate your point. I've seen you do better.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 17 2006, 09:51 PM
Post #6


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



that is my point--dragons and leviathans aren't balanced to be characters in the game. that's why the SR4 chargen rules don't allow you to play them. my argument is that the SR4 chargen rules should also not allow you to play someone with world-class skill.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
emo samurai
post Mar 17 2006, 09:52 PM
Post #7


Dragon
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,589
Joined: 28-November 05
Member No.: 8,019



You mean they're too weak or something? I guess you have a point... but unlike DND, SR isn't about engaging you enemies in open combat. In DnD, your enemies laid traps and set about stacking the odds; in Shadowrun, you do this instead. I don't think the comparison is valid.

And if you ever want to take on a dragon, you could always get a tank or something.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 09:58 PM
Post #8


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (mfb @ Mar 17 2006, 05:51 PM)
my argument is that the SR4 chargen rules should also not allow you to play someone with world-class skill.

As recently mentioned, that's a reflection of your personal preference and therefore cannot be argued to a logical conclusion. It's your opinion, and I'm okay with that up to the point where someone goes on a crusade for/against it.

Some people want to play world-class action heroes straight from the get-go. Just because you don't doesn't make the other people somehow "wrong." I hope you can understand that.

If you can, and my worries are for naught, then cool.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kigmatzomat
post Mar 17 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #9


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 909
Joined: 26-August 05
From: Louisville, KY (Well, Memphis, IN technically but you won't know where that is.)
Member No.: 7,626



{Dons flame retardant armor}
I'm fine with the existing skill/attribute caps. Not exactly thrilled but okay. If I run a real campaign I'll end up lifting the skill cap.

I prefer the older method of graduated stat cost with the racial Limit and the racial Max. It meant the 1-dimensional players could happily grind away hundreds of karma trying to get their stat to the max level without much bang for their buck. But they would be quiet.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geekkake
post Mar 17 2006, 10:10 PM
Post #10


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 475
Joined: 13-March 06
From: dusty Mexican borderlands
Member No.: 8,372



I think part of the issue may be time-sensitive. Over a longer period of time, those skillcaps are going to mean more than they do, say, for a troupe who plays once a week for a few months. I'm starting a new troupe (first game's tonight) which will play once a week until, y'know, we stop. If the game goes longer than, say, six months, I may consider slowly uncapping skills, then attributes. Maybe, one more point every few months, or until they're powerful enough, or something like that. This way, it encourages a variety of skills and abilities, but will allow me to keep the players from getting overwhelmingly powerful, especially in a short period of time. No one goes from gutterpunk errand boy with a gun to a respected and well-known professional street samurai in six months, game time.

Just remember to uncap skills for other NPCs, too. And uncap them higher than the PCs.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 17 2006, 10:16 PM
Post #11


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



QUOTE (Azralon)
As recently mentioned, that's a reflection of your personal preference and therefore cannot be argued to a logical conclusion.

the reason it's my personal preference is that SR4 is supposed to be more 'street level'. bringing things back down to the gritty gutters. i fail to see how having world-class skills at chargen fits with that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Geekkake
post Mar 17 2006, 10:20 PM
Post #12


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 475
Joined: 13-March 06
From: dusty Mexican borderlands
Member No.: 8,372



QUOTE (mfb)
QUOTE (Azralon)
As recently mentioned, that's a reflection of your personal preference and therefore cannot be argued to a logical conclusion.

the reason it's my personal preference is that SR4 is supposed to be more 'street level'. bringing things back down to the gritty gutters. i fail to see how having world-class skills at chargen fits with that.

It doesn't. But then, if a GM is allowing it despite the obvious spirit of the new edition, then that reflects a certain type of group that wants to play a certain type of game. It's very easy for a GM to make that happen, and I see no problem with it. Though it's not my particular cup of tea. I like seeing PC parts scattered hither and yon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 10:35 PM
Post #13


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



"More street level" does not equate to "is street level."

QUOTE (SR4 p72)
Characters for a typical Shadowrun campaign should be built with 400 BP total. This gives plenty of room for flexibility, but it’s also limited enough to provide adequate challenge to players. Gamemasters can adjust the value up or down to suit their tastes. For example, if a group is interested in a low-level street campaign, the GM may only allow 300 BP to build starting characters. On the other hand, if the group likes high-powered, elite-operative campaigns, they may need 500 BP for starting characters.


Per Adam's conversion guide, SR3 characters are worth roughly 450 BP. Since SR4 characters are recommended to start with 400 BP, then MFB's statement holds true: Standard SR4 characters are indeed intended to be more street than SR3. They're just not actually approaching street until you build them at around 300 BPs.

Of course, even then, they might not be considered "street" since that label is pretty darn subjective.

(Oh, and your post was better phrased than I could have managed, Geekkake.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 17 2006, 10:39 PM
Post #14


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



if the GM has to houserule everything in order to make sure the game has the 'intended' feel, why have rules at all?

SR3 chars are more street, in my opinion, because they are much further from the upper limits in terms of skill and other factors.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 17 2006, 10:44 PM
Post #15


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (mfb @ Mar 17 2006, 06:39 PM)
if the GM has to houserule everything in order to make sure the game has the 'intended' feel, why have rules at all?

It's not a house rule, as the RAW explicitly tells you what to do depending on the flavor you want. Note my book quote.

I'll let you alone, though, MFB. I'm not meaning to rag on you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mfb
post Mar 17 2006, 10:49 PM
Post #16


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,410
Joined: 1-October 03
From: Pittsburgh
Member No.: 5,670



heh, see, that's another peeve of mine about SR4: the fact that the GM has to adjudicate so much. i really dislike game systems which require lots of maintenance to work. sure, it's not technically houseruling, since the book says "do whatever you want"... but it's a rule that's not specifically in the book, that only applies at your gaming table. it's really the same thing.

i don't mind being ragged on, honestly. i wouldn't be posting here if i did.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Azralon
post Mar 18 2006, 03:21 AM
Post #17


Shooting Target
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,651
Joined: 23-September 05
From: Marietta, GA
Member No.: 7,773



QUOTE (mfb)
i don't mind being ragged on, honestly. i wouldn't be posting here if i did.

Heh, well said.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FrankTrollman
post Mar 18 2006, 05:00 AM
Post #18


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 3,732
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Member No.: 7,665



I honestly can't get my panties in a bunch about whether things are street or characters are world class, or any of that. The fact is that whatever the power level is, the player characters are the protagonists of the story and appropriate opposition will be scaled. How important the story is to the unfolding of the rest of the world is largely a matter of taste and actually somewhat outside the scope of the game system to define.

Ultimately powerful dudes can slug it out in mysterious islands that noone has ever heard of or given a damn about (like in Harlequin), and bumbling hippies can stumble through bar brawls that end up determining presidential elections. However hard core the players are relative to what could be out there, the opposition can be set to weaker, stronger, or even odd and the results of the players actions could determine the fate of the world or be lost in the torrent.

---

But I do object to the fact that a Hacker Adept can hit his practical maximum Hacking on 67 Karma and a Technomancer can get to the same place on... 391 Karma. I think that's an advancement flaw. In any game that a Technomancer comes into his own, the Hacker Adept will have long ago taken up some other task and reached his maximum in that. And then taken up a third thing and maximized that.

Something's out of scale. I think it's a matter of opinion if Technomancy is simply way too crazy expensive or the caps are too easy to reach. But something is out of scale.

-Frank
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Glyph
post Mar 18 2006, 05:18 AM
Post #19


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 7,116
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,449



QUOTE (SR4 p72)
Characters for a typical Shadowrun campaign should be built with 400 BP total. This gives plenty of room for flexibility, but it’s also limited enough to provide adequate challenge to players. Gamemasters can adjust the value up or down to suit their tastes. For example, if a group is interested in a low-level street campaign, the GM may only allow 300 BP to build starting characters. On the other hand, if the group likes high-powered, elite-operative campaigns, they may need 500 BP for starting characters.


This particular rule, I don't have a problem with. It gives a default number of build points, describes the range of campaigns that it is meant for, then gives you examples of other types of campaigns, with numbers. So it's not just saying "The GM should make up what he wants" - it's more concrete than that, yet still flexible. And the SR3 build point system was made the same way - a variable number of points to let GMs set their own power level for char-gen.

But again, the problem with SR4 char-gen is that it is too easy to max out a character's specialty at char-gen, leaving nothing to do but generalize more after that. That's a design flaw.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MaxHunter
post Mar 18 2006, 05:49 AM
Post #20


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 718
Joined: 10-September 05
From: Montevideo, in the elusive shadows of Latin America
Member No.: 7,727



True. If your group does not like it, it becomes the GMs responsibility to mantain game balance.

I like SR4 a lot better than SR3, but chargen is not balanced. I had to keep an eye on different players and not everybody is 100% happy.

Who had a flat Karma house-rule for chargen?

Cheers,

Max
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cain
post Mar 18 2006, 08:39 AM
Post #21


Grand Master of Run-Fu
*********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 6,840
Joined: 26-February 02
From: Tir Tairngire
Member No.: 178



My problem is partly MFB's-- the bar is set way too low. You should not be able to match the best of the best, right off the starting line. Even if you like a higher-powered game, the fact is that the GM cannot create anyone who's better than you as a challenge. And facing enemies who are tougher than you is part of the fun of the game.

The next problem I have is the abuseability of the system. It's got more holes in it than GURPS supers or Champions, and I once created a 100-point Champions character with 300 points worth of super powers. The skill and attribute caps would be papateable if they prevented abuses-- but they don't.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thanee
post Mar 18 2006, 09:17 AM
Post #22


jacked in
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 8,915
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 463



If you got a problem with the skill caps... just remove them, or put them higher. *shrug*

Bye
Thanee
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Mar 18 2006, 09:30 AM
Post #23


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Yeah, i don't see the problem too and did so in my games. Not that a char survived long enough to ever reach a skill cap, but at least their had the chance ;)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nick012000
post Mar 18 2006, 09:48 AM
Post #24


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,283
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 7,398



QUOTE (FrankTrollman @ Mar 18 2006, 12:00 AM)
But I do object to the fact that a Hacker Adept can hit his practical maximum Hacking on 67 Karma...

...

How? It'll cost him 110 Karma to get both his Cracking and Electronics skill groups up to six, and then you throw on the cost of initiation and raising his Magic, and the cost only goes up more.

Also, I'll link to this. It makes sense for shadowrunners to be good at something.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bladepoet
post Mar 18 2006, 12:04 PM
Post #25


Target
*

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 16-February 06
From: Goring-On-Thames, UK
Member No.: 8,271



I fail to see the issue when you can change the amount BP's allowed.
At the end of the day, it is up to your group.

Rules aren't rules, they are 'guidelines' ;)


Anyway, just to lighten up te mood, here's this:

<Donut[AFK]> HEY EURAKARTE
<Donut[AFK]> INSULT
<Eurakarte> RETORT
<Donut[AFK]> COUNTER-RETORT
<Eurakarte> QUESTIONING OF SEXUAL PREFERENCE
<Donut[AFK]> SUGGESTION TO SHUT THE FUCK UP
<Eurakarte> NOTATION THAT YOU CREATE A VACUUM
<Donut[AFK]> RIPOSTE
<Donut[AFK]> ADDON RIPOSTE
<Eurakarte> COUNTER-RIPOSTE
<Donut[AFK]> COUNTER-COUNTER RIPOSTE
<Eurakarte> NONSENSICAL STATEMENT INVOLVING PLANKTON
<Miles_Prower> RESPONSE TO RANDOM STATEMENT AND THREAT TO BAN OPPOSING SIDES
<Eurakarte> WORDS OF PRAISE FOR FISHFOOD
<Miles_Prower> ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTENCE OF TERMS


regards

Bladepoet
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:40 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.