You can, if the GM decides to do that. It's probably a bad idea to ever allow that, so…

Technically, yes. I wouldn't allow it.

There are already enough small drones with weapon mounts. I don't really want to use up all my capacity by adding a weapon mount to a drone. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/grinbig.gif)

Anyway, any answers for ggodo's question on how many steampunk dragons may be carried on a STR 1 BOD 1 character, and why we were given a statless flamethrower?

Don't burn yourself out man. The drone you're looking for is the MCT Hachiman, which has an external reinforced remote turret. It's in "This Old Drone", page 5.

...How do you know that? I can't find any reference to that picture anywhere.

An assumption based on art from previous editions maybe?

At least motorcycle sized, and up to the size of a small car. Since the cutoff for medium drones is motorcycle size, I would say most large drones are larger than that. Ggodo's right to keep that thing out of doors though, and I like the fact that he used its size instead of bringing security down on us when I tried to bring it inside.

I'd shoot for that, except your impression of the balloon part. The gas portions of these airships are described as being very resistant to gunfire due to their multiple-compartment design and framework which prevents popping.

Honestly, yes, based on artwork from previous editions. On top of that here is a pic I recall seeing from a 3rd edition book of a steel lynx.

With the power pack for size reference as well. Nice. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Speaking of drone sizes, I'm curious if anyone who writes for SR has ever read any of the other books. I'm a little ways through "Spy Games", and I've already hit a bump:

This does not fit the descriptions of micro, mini, and small drones that I'm familiar with from Arsenal. Try fitting a GMC chariot in your shoe (or even the smallest minidrone in the books)!

Well, it seems there is truth to the claim of Frank Trollman's that the core rules expansions are not required reading for the current crop of authors ...

Which is sad because I hate it when he's right. It's like the guy with the "End is Nigh" sign and the end really being nigh.

Yeah, notice how those guys usually have the worst, "OH DREK" face in the crowd when they find out they're right. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

I can confirm an active dealership in Pittsburgh. http://www.smartcenterpittsburgh.com/ I drive past it on the way to a friend's apartment. But there are plenty of those wee little "cars" sold here. It's no longer a case of seeing one and being surprised like you would at seeing, for example, a 57 Chevy or a Stutz Bearcat or something.

I know I prefer giant super cars of doom, but then I'm a fluffy gamer who ain't going to fit well into one of those toy cars.

Cordially,

Eric
(who drives a Grand Am GT and a VStar Custom 650)

To be fair, the drone size descriptions in Arsenal (at least for mini and micro drones) are a bit skitso anyway.



Well, if they are insect sized, I certainly hope that they are less than 10cm in length, cause that's just under 4 inches, and that's a big bug. Which raises the question of what do they mean by insect size? Is the average Microdrone the size of a House fly? Cause thats what I think of when I think "insect sized", and thats 8-12mm long. Or is the average Microdrone the size of a Cicada, which measure 2-5cm?

We know they have a concealability modifier of -6, which theoretically puts them around the size of an RFID tag, which is described as "Ranging in size from
microscopic to the size of a price tag". Slap patches are also in this category, but the book doesn't actually say how big they are. (I would imagine about 2 inches square)

Then Minidrones:


So these are the size of a "large insect or mouse". Well, the house mouse is about 10cm long (in the body) at its biggest, though the "Fancy Mouse" can range from 15-30cm, but that includes the tail and tiny top hat, so the actual body is about half that. Alternatively, they are described as fitting in the palm of ones hand, which fits with the whole "mouse" description. But the actual length is described as 10 to 25 cm, or 4 to 10 inches. 10 inches does not fit into the palm of ones hand. (insert penis joke here). For reference, a normal (size 7) basketball has a diameter of about 9.5 inches. While you can hold a basketball in your hand, I wouldn't really say that it "fits" in there, and you definitely cant put one in your pocket.

So lets look at the concealability. Minidrones are Concealability -2, which puts them in the same category as Light Pistols. The Beretta 92 (what I would consider a decent modern example of the class) ranges from 7.8 inches (for the compact version) to 8.5 inches. That fits pretty well in the 10-25 cm range.

Of course, the other issue is that both mini and micro drones can theoretically be 10cm "long" (whatever that actually means, what if its round?) Which would result in two objects of essentially the same size having a 4 die difference in their concealability. But whatever, those rules aren't perfect (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)

Overall, it seems to me that in the case of mini and micro drones, the rules have no idea how large they actually are. And that's kind of irritating.

A drone is never too large or too small, it is exactly the size it intended to be..... wait a second.

That said I do agree, I always thought the size descriptions in arsenal were just slightly off. I mean 25cm is nearly a foot long, which is fairly noticeable. Even micro drones aren't really all that small if 4cm is the lower limit. That's the size of a fairly large beetle. May be somewhat easy to overlook, but if it is just hanging out somewhere, it is going to stick out quite a bit, which seems to be the opposite of what many microdrones are intended for.

*shrug* It's the vagueness that bothers me. I'm fine with micro meaning '1-4cm' (maybe 0.5cm for a truly limited drone), as opposed to the yet-nonexistent nano-drones.

For those interested, the picture is from the second edition book Fields of Fire p. 68.

This is a big failing of SR4's more abstract gear system, I agree.

With the piece of gear in SPy Games, I think it was less that the author wasn't familiar with core SR stuff... It's that he made a call. Drone Body sizes simply don't automatically equal a specific size. THey're really, really screwy and, as Spanky_Harrison notes, they're a bit Schizo. Some drones are intended to be that small, others with the exact same body rating, are obviously bigger. If I was in the same boat, I may have done the same thing, and simply assumed (hoped? Probably Hoped futilely) that most GMs and players would be smart enough to use an ounce of common sense with these things.

One of my fervent hopes is that when/if SR5 comes around, we can actually go back to being more specific about sizes of things (Length, width, height, seating, cargo capacity, and a size comparison chart would all be wonderful additions, and are badly needed IMO).

Bull

Rigger 3! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Even Rigger three didn't go far enough. There still weren't actual sizes for a lot of vehicles. But it did have seating and cargo, which was very important (And helped gauge size for vehicles, at least. Drones were always a "Take a guess" though. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) )

Somewhat off topic rant:

It's amazing how much little things like sizes and gear weight can matter, especially in a world that it fairly 'real'. I understand that they left it out to reduce bookkeeping, but at times I think it can be quite important. I mean, just how big is a commlink? Considering how important they are, it is never really explicitly stated that a normal commlink is about X size with the high end models maybe being as big as Y size. We have concealability to go off of, but that covers a fairly large range.

Personally I'd have preferred a 'here are the weights for reference, but don't feel the need to keep track of exact weight unless it becomes particularly important to the game'

Oh hell, yeah. On a similar note, The basic purpose of a vehicle is to carry cargo or people from point A to point B.

That, for me, rather suggests that how many people of how much cargo should have been one of the primary stats of the vehicle rules, not something to be done away with to make the book shorter.

Hear, hear!