IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Adept power Living Focus: is there a way to make it, so it doesn't distract
Ol' Scratch
post Oct 29 2011, 04:35 PM
Post #26


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



And, again, all it does is make a bad power more expensive. Especially since Heightened Concentration can do much more for you in a fight. (Reducing a -5 dice pool penalty is quite a bit better than reducing a -2 penalty.)

Mages -- the good ones, anyway -- don't have much issue when it comes to sustaining spells anyway. For short duration spells, it shouldn't be a bother. If it's a long term thing, there are much better alternatives that not only do the same basic thing, but let you use your much more precious Power Points to buy powers that actually have value. Besides, perpetually sustained spells are never perpetually sustained courtesy of astral barriers and background counts.

So, yeah, giving up 2 Power Points (nearly half of what most adepts will begin the game with) just so they can mimic a Sustaining Focus? It's pretty dumb both conceptually and mechanically. Hell, I'd rather just ask the GM if I could give some of my Resources/BPs to the mage so he can buy and bind a Sustaining Focus on my behalf or, more likely, ask him for a price on getting a spell Quickened -- which is something that should already have a pricetag in the damn game. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Oct 29 2011, 04:36 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Oct 29 2011, 08:15 AM) *
Well, a Geasa is a personal thing, ansd should not be something that others work to the character's detriment. A Geas should be something that the CHARACTER has to struggle with to maintain. A Talisman Geas is the easiest to of the Geasa to maintain. Not broken, it is definitely something that CAN have the potential to cause issues if the caster is in the proper circumstances, but not something that will come up very often. The simple truth is that the only way to break a Talisman Geas is to lose (through hook or crook) the Talisman. It is still somewhat flavorful. Like the Catholic Spirit Hunter with a Talisman Geas, who uses his somehwat hard to replicate (though not impossible, of course) Rosary as his Talisman. Flavorful. He will not likely lose it, but it could happen, and could be the beginnings of a great story.


This is why I asked about being able to astrally perceive the connection of the talisman to the user's magic. If there is, and I think there should be, then it makes perfect sense for anyone that can perceive that to target the talisman. What that does is it means that Talisman has the potential to be easily maintained, but the onus is on the GM; whereas most other geas put the onus on the player.

Most players I know, or at least all the ones that play with me, are too paranoid about letting the GM have the potential to affect them that much.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Oct 29 2011, 04:43 PM
Post #28


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Ol' Scratch @ Oct 29 2011, 09:35 AM) *
And, again, all it does is make a bad power more expensive. Especially since Heightened Concentration can do much more for you in a fight. (Reducing a -5 dice pool penalty is quite a bit better than reducing a -2 penalty.)

Mages -- the good ones, anyway -- don't have much issue when it comes to sustaining spells anyway. For short duration spells, it shouldn't be a bother. If it's a long term thing, there are much better alternatives that not only do the same basic thing, but let you use your much more precious Power Points to buy powers that actually have value. Besides, perpetually sustained spells are never perpetually sustained courtesy of astral barriers and background counts.

So, yeah, giving up 2 Power Points (nearly half of what most adepts will begin the game with) just so they can mimic a Sustaining Focus? It's pretty dumb both conceptually and mechanically. Hell, I'd rather just ask the GM if I could give some of my Resources/BPs to the mage so he can buy and bind a Sustaining Focus on my behalf or, more likely, ask him for a price on getting a spell Quickened -- which is something that should already have a pricetag in the damn game. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)


What it does is give you options as an Adept. Yes, it will be expensive, and yes, it is likely a better expenditure of resources to get a quickened tattoo or anchored spell.

Would I buy Living Focus, as an Adept? Maybe, but not at character creation. It would be something for advancement, if I deemed it necessary. Heightened Concentration, on the other hand, is very useful, as you pointed out. And as a note, and not to ignite any flameing posts (for those that do not agree that Sustainment is a sinlge penalty that scales by number of spells), but Heightened concentration could cover more than a single spell sustained, dependant upon the magic rating of the Adept. An Adept with a Magic of 6, and both HC and LF, could sustain 3 spells with no penalty. Not to shabby. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Oct 29 2011, 04:44 PM
Post #29


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Caadium @ Oct 29 2011, 09:36 AM) *
This is why I asked about being able to astrally perceive the connection of the talisman to the user's magic. If there is, and I think there should be, then it makes perfect sense for anyone that can perceive that to target the talisman. What that does is it means that Talisman has the potential to be easily maintained, but the onus is on the GM; whereas most other geas put the onus on the player.

Most players I know, or at least all the ones that play with me, are too paranoid about letting the GM have the potential to affect them that much.


For what it is worth, I would also establish a connection to the Character's Magic/Abilities through a Talisman Geas. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Oct 29 2011, 09:20 PM
Post #30


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,252
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (Bodak @ Oct 29 2011, 03:21 AM) *
Yes, I responded to that example immediately below it. In my original post, I wasn't clear enough. I knew about Heightened Concentration and already use it. Given that HC is universally applicable, I was looking for something that could take over the -2 so that a larger negative could be handled by HC.

QUOTE (Ol' Scratch @ Oct 29 2011, 11:35 AM) *
And, again, all it does is make a bad power more expensive. Especially since Heightened Concentration can do much more for you in a fight. (Reducing a -5 dice pool penalty is quite a bit better than reducing a -2 penalty.)

Mages -- the good ones, anyway -- don't have much issue when it comes to sustaining spells anyway. For short duration spells, it shouldn't be a bother. If it's a long term thing, there are much better alternatives that not only do the same basic thing, but let you use your much more precious Power Points to buy powers that actually have value. Besides, perpetually sustained spells are never perpetually sustained courtesy of astral barriers and background counts.

So, yeah, giving up 2 Power Points (nearly half of what most adepts will begin the game with) just so they can mimic a Sustaining Focus? It's pretty dumb both conceptually and mechanically. Hell, I'd rather just ask the GM if I could give some of my Resources/BPs to the mage so he can buy and bind a Sustaining Focus on my behalf or, more likely, ask him for a price on getting a spell Quickened -- which is something that should already have a pricetag in the damn game. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Living Focus doesn't mimic a sustaining focus. It mimics all sustaining foci, up to a Force equal to the Magic of the adept. It is therefore more versatile, more functional, and more valuable than any single focus. For an adept of Magic 5 at chargen, a single sustaining focus at the same level, if she could find it, much less bind it, would cost 5 BP for the binding and 5 BP for the buying. together 10 BP, equal to 1 Magic point. Living Focus can do the job of all 5 types of Sustaining Foci, admittedly not all at once.


QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Oct 29 2011, 11:43 AM) *
but Heightened concentration could cover more than a single spell sustained, dependant upon the magic rating of the Adept. An Adept with a Magic of 6, and both HC and LF, could sustain 3 spells with no penalty. Not to shabby. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
I've always applied it to a single modifier, not the sum modifier of multiple spells being sustained.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Oct 29 2011, 10:06 PM
Post #31


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE
Living Focus doesn't mimic a sustaining focus. It mimics all sustaining foci, up to a Force equal to the Magic of the adept. It is therefore more versatile, more functional, and more valuable than any single focus. For an adept of Magic 5 at chargen, a single sustaining focus at the same level, if she could find it, much less bind it, would cost 5 BP for the binding and 5 BP for the buying. together 10 BP, equal to 1 Magic point. Living Focus can do the job of all 5 types of Sustaining Foci, admittedly not all at once.

So? It still sucks unless you want your entire purpose for existing to be a mage's sustaining focus. Which, in my experience anyway, pretty much means Increased Reflexes for the mage and maybe the occasional Heal spell in dire situations (using the same focus, since they're both Health spells), since that's the only thing I really ever use one for as a mage, even one who "buffs" the other runners in the party as needed. Psyche and huge dice pools means you can sustain a bunch of spells without it really dampening your ability to hurl spells anyway.

There's a reason most mages run around with only one Sustaining Focus, and that's pretty much why.

Besides, the only thing I can see you trying to do is come up with a cheesy way of getting Increased Reflexes without having to pay the power points for the real power. If you have something else in mind (and no, the Firewater Aura thing is just as silly, especially since few mages if any ever waste points on that stupid, Drain-intensive spell that no one's going to be walking around with perpetually active), try detailing that rather than just trying to awe the world with "OMG, I'm a universal Sustaining Focus!" Oh, and explain how wasting 2 Power Points to do it is better than a -1 dice pool penalty for the caster. Because as it stands, that's not awe-inspiring in the least.

(Also, did you really just try to make 10 BP -- 2.5% of your starting allotment -- for a rating 5 Sustaining Focus sound expensive compared to 2 Power Points -- 40% of your Power Points if you have Magic 5?)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HunterHerne
post Oct 29 2011, 10:35 PM
Post #32


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,019
Joined: 10-November 10
From: Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia
Member No.: 19,166



QUOTE (Ol' Scratch @ Oct 29 2011, 07:06 PM) *
So? It still sucks unless you want your entire purpose for existing to be a mage's sustaining focus. Which, in my experience anyway, pretty much means Increased Reflexes for the mage and maybe the occasional Heal spell in dire situations (using the same focus, since they're both Health spells), since that's the only thing I really ever use one for as a mage, even one who "buffs" the other runners in the party as needed. Psyche and huge dice pools means you can sustain a bunch of spells without it really dampening your ability to hurl spells anyway.

There's a reason most mages run around with only one Sustaining Focus, and that's pretty much why.

Besides, the only thing I can see you trying to do is come up with a cheesy way of getting Increased Reflexes without having to pay the power points for the real power. If you have something else in mind (and no, the Firewater Aura thing is just as silly, especially since few mages if any ever waste points on that stupid, Drain-intensive spell that no one's going to be walking around with perpetually active), try detailing that rather than just trying to awe the world with "OMG, I'm a universal Sustaining Focus!" Oh, and explain how wasting 2 Power Points to do it is better than a -1 dice pool penalty for the caster. Because as it stands, that's not awe-inspiring in the least.

(Also, did you really just try to make 10 BP -- 2.5% of your starting allotment -- for a rating 5 Sustaining Focus sound expensive compared to 2 Power Points -- 40% of your Power Points if you have Magic 5?)


Fact is, they don't need to cost that much. Although the lowest they can cost together is 1.5 powerpoints, baring a homebrew way. Regardless, it is flexible, especialy when you consider the fact you can pay a talismonger/mage for hire to cast a spell on you (say, Trid Phantasm, invisibility, the aforemention increaed Reflexes, or maybe Detect Enemies (extended)), and sustain it yourself, possibly getting a discount if the GM is nice. Don't look at the powers in the vaccuum of "your team", try to look at them with the best situation for your build, and find a way to do it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Oct 30 2011, 12:26 AM
Post #33


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,252
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (Ol' Scratch @ Oct 29 2011, 05:06 PM) *
So? It still sucks unless you want your entire purpose for existing to be a mage's sustaining focus. ...

...There's a reason most mages run around with only one Sustaining Focus, and that's pretty much why.
What a limited bunch you run with.

QUOTE
Besides, the only thing I can see you trying to do is come up with a cheesy way of getting Increased Reflexes without having to pay the power points for the real power.
Gimme a break. Cheesy?
QUOTE
If you have something else in mind (and no, the Firewater Aura thing is just as silly, especially since few mages if any ever waste points on that stupid, Drain-intensive spell that no one's going to be walking around with perpetually active), try detailing that rather than just trying to awe the world with "OMG, I'm a universal Sustaining Focus!" Oh, and explain how wasting 2 Power Points to do it is better than a -1 dice pool penalty for the caster. Because as it stands, that's not awe-inspiring in the least.
What?? You want a list!? Go through Street Magic's table at the back of the book and look at how many sustainable spells are good. Combat is not the only spell group in which such spells exist, but there are several options that make a PC tougher. Of those mages who might have that one and only one Sustaining Focus (Health) in your group, how many have it at Force 4 to be as fast as possible (as fast as 4 Power Points would be needed to make you using the 'real power')? None, unless she spent yet another 5 BP to have the Restricted Gear Quality. How many have a Sustaining Focus at Force 6 for things like Armor, Increase Attribute, Combat Sense, Detect Enemies, Improved Invisibility, Stealth, Resist Pain, Spatial Sense, Analyze Device, Deflection, etc., etc. None, because they can't at chargen, and won't find one easily even in long-term play. And in long-term play, if the adept increases his Magic, then the Force sustainable increases, too.

Any mage with any spread of spells will almost surely have something he can cast on this guy. My PC wants to be toughened, he can be. He wants to be sneakier, he can be. He wants to see things better, he can. And it doesn't require any teammate to be worse at what he does, or take drugs, or whatever. Holy shit, why is it so hard to see that as being useful?

My guy (the archaeologist with MAG 6) is in the Post or Die thread here on DS, and that game cycles through players like a meat grinder. The current mix includes a mage who has Increase Attribute(INT), so my guy who is strong in Perception, Assensing, and a bunch of other Skills related to that Attribute is currently really good at them. he chose this Power option (ie. I chose it) to make him adaptable to whatever opportunities come his way. It makes sense in his back story, it makes sense in that campaign, and it makes sense as a PC in any long-running campaign in which PCs will cooperate with each other to make the team stronger.

It's not 2 Power points, it's 1. The discussion has already established that Heightened Concentration is good on its own. We're talking, now, about Living Focus. 1 Power Point.

QUOTE
(Also, did you really just try to make 10 BP -- 2.5% of your starting allotment -- for a rating 5 Sustaining Focus sound expensive compared to 2 Power Points -- 40% of your Power Points if you have Magic 5?)
No, I succeeded in demonstrating that the 1 Power Point for Living Focus costs no more BP than a single, equivalent Force, Sustaining Focus pertaining to only one of 5 spell categories, and unusable by adepts as far as I can see according to RAW (hence the question of the thread), which had been suggested earlier as being a better option.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ol' Scratch
post Oct 30 2011, 12:50 AM
Post #34


Immortal Elf
**********

Group: Validating
Posts: 7,999
Joined: 26-February 02
Member No.: 1,890



QUOTE
QUOTE
Besides, the only thing I can see you trying to do is come up with a cheesy way of getting Increased Reflexes without having to pay the power points for the real power.

Gimme a break. Cheesy?

I'm guessing by that response I pretty much nailed it then. And yes, that's cheesy.

QUOTE
Any mage with any spread of spells will almost surely have something he can cast on this guy. My PC wants to be toughened, he can be. He wants to be sneakier, he can be. He wants to see things better, he can. And it doesn't require any teammate to be worse at what he does, or take drugs, or whatever. Holy shit, why is it so hard to see that as being useful?

Because it's not. It's that simple.

How often do you hear players lamenting, "Oh man, I wish we had an adept with Living Focus! I just can't do my job without one. So no spells to make you tougher or sneakier. Sorry!" The answer is: Never. Because it's not a big hindrance to sustain spells on your teammates, especially if you chose your spells to do that. It's something you fully expect, it isn't a big deal, and in the end at most you're saving 2 dice pool for the mage, and more likely just 1. That's a horrible investment all around especially -- and I can't stress this enough no matter how much you want to dismiss it -- considering all the alternative solutions available.

It's even worse because, in the end, you're wasting all those power points for a net gain of only 1 or 2 dice for another character.

Also, just because this is a ridiculously awful power, I've never once said you can't take it if you really feel it's an integral aspect of your character, only that it's a really awful power with better alternatives. But trying to make it sound like it's the best thing EVER is completely and utterly foolish because it truly is one of the worst adept powers in the game. And keep in mind that this is coming from someone who's built a character around the Empathic Healing power, which is another pretty awful one compared to the other options.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Oct 30 2011, 02:17 AM
Post #35


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,252
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (Ol' Scratch @ Oct 29 2011, 07:50 PM) *
But trying to make it sound like it's the best thing EVER is completely and utterly foolish because it truly is one of the worst adept powers in the game.
It's not "the best thing ever", and I don't characterize it as such. I believe flexibility is a useful characteristic. That's all. OK, look, I still am asking the original question, even though some feel the power is not much use.

QUOTE
And keep in mind that this is coming from someone who's built a character around the Empathic Healing power, which is another pretty awful one compared to the other options.
I have one of those, too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryu
post Oct 30 2011, 06:14 AM
Post #36


Awakened Asset
********

Group: Members
Posts: 4,464
Joined: 9-April 05
From: AGS, North German League
Member No.: 7,309



Where in SR4A do you find a rule excluding Adepts from binding any type of focus? "..an Awakened character can bond any type of focus..." (The Precious p. 199, Foci), and even bound by an adept, the focus would still empower a magicians spell.

As a GM I would let you develop a custom focus based on ancient knowledge you´d have to work for - Mary Sue in true style. Say 3 karma and support for one spell category per rating point, with a user-specific focus formula.

As a player I tend to bind multiple Sustaining Foci; Living Focus as the only adept power on a mystic adept could be interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Makki
post Oct 30 2011, 10:33 AM
Post #37


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,373
Joined: 14-January 10
From: Stuttgart, Germany
Member No.: 18,036



QUOTE (HunterHerne @ Oct 29 2011, 05:29 PM) *
Except, that as pointed out in another thread, it's usually a dick GM move to target a specific object/character like that. Sure, if it is valuable, someone might steal it, but by the RAW, there is no way to tell if the character has a talisman geas, unless he/she (truthfully) tells you he does.

there's a 73% chance you posted it on your facebook profile
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Grinder
post Oct 30 2011, 12:56 PM
Post #38


Great, I'm a Dragon...
*********

Group: Retired Admins
Posts: 6,699
Joined: 8-October 03
From: North Germany
Member No.: 5,698



Hey pbangarth & Ol'Scratch: keep it civil.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pbangarth
post Oct 30 2011, 01:25 PM
Post #39


Old Man of the North
**********

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 10,252
Joined: 14-August 03
From: Just north of the Centre of the Universe
Member No.: 5,463



QUOTE (Grinder @ Oct 30 2011, 07:56 AM) *
Hey pbangarth & Ol'Scratch: keep it civil.

I think we're over it. Thanks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bodak
post Oct 30 2011, 09:34 PM
Post #40


Moving Target
**

Group: Dumpshocked
Posts: 584
Joined: 23-July 03
From: outside America
Member No.: 5,015



QUOTE (Stalag @ Oct 29 2011, 02:14 PM) *
NM
QUOTE (Caadium @ Oct 29 2011, 07:16 PM) *
Nevermind.
Was there any point to either of these posts other than raising your post count? I don't see their value but you've got me really curious now.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yerameyahu
post Oct 30 2011, 09:48 PM
Post #41


Advocatus Diaboli
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,994
Joined: 20-November 07
From: USA
Member No.: 14,282



Yeah, and TJ said "Heh (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ", get him!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Udoshi
post Oct 31 2011, 12:23 AM
Post #42


Runner
******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,782
Joined: 28-August 09
Member No.: 17,566



The thing I really don't like about Living Focus is that it can only sustain stuff cast on the adept.

If it operated more like Spirit spell sustaining, then it might actually be worth a power point, just because it can take a load(any load) off of the group's mage.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HunterHerne
post Oct 31 2011, 12:34 AM
Post #43


Running Target
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,019
Joined: 10-November 10
From: Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia
Member No.: 19,166



QUOTE (Udoshi @ Oct 30 2011, 09:23 PM) *
The thing I really don't like about Living Focus is that it can only sustain stuff cast on the adept.

If it operated more like Spirit spell sustaining, then it might actually be worth a power point, just because it can take a load(any load) off of the group's mage.


Well, if that's the way you feel, why not put it up as a suggestion in your group? After all, ultimately everything is a suggestion, and it is fairly well known a few adept powers are over priced.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Oct 31 2011, 02:19 AM
Post #44


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Yerameyahu @ Oct 30 2011, 03:48 PM) *
Yeah, and TJ said "Heh (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) ", get him!


Hey, it was mildly amusing... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Caadium
post Oct 31 2011, 03:57 AM
Post #45


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 604
Joined: 1-December 08
From: Sacramento, California
Member No.: 16,646



QUOTE (Bodak @ Oct 30 2011, 02:34 PM) *
Was there any point to either of these posts other than raising your post count? I don't see their value but you've got me really curious now.


Sorry, nothing exciting on my end. I had a question about Heightened Concentration, but reading thru the other thread linked earlier I found my answer and therefore removed the question. However, I couldn't delete the post, so I just edited the content out with a "Nevermind".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th July 2025 - 11:12 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.