IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dakka Dakka
post Jun 28 2012, 04:02 PM
Post #26


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



Why wouldn't it be?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VykosDarkSoul
post Jun 28 2012, 04:26 PM
Post #27


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 27-February 12
From: Nebraska, USA
Member No.: 50,732



QUOTE (Dakka Dakka @ Jun 28 2012, 10:02 AM) *
Why wouldn't it be?



Cause if you get knocked out, you just hope to hell your team can find you?



Edit: Had it happen in D&D with a ring of invis, got caught in a fireball, brought me to -1, party had no idea...bled out (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
forgarn
post Jun 28 2012, 05:04 PM
Post #28


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 250
Joined: 22-December 09
Member No.: 17,988



Plus, if their commlink is subscribed to a Tacnet, the team should still know where they are at.

QUOTE
Edit: Had it happen in D&D with a ring of invis, got caught in a fireball, brought me to -1, party had no idea...bled out

Blood pool should have helped... unless there was a lot of that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VykosDarkSoul
post Jun 28 2012, 05:07 PM
Post #29


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 27-February 12
From: Nebraska, USA
Member No.: 50,732



QUOTE (forgarn @ Jun 28 2012, 11:04 AM) *
Plus, if their commlink is subscribed to a Tacnet, the team should still know where they are at.


Blood pool should have helped... unless there was a lot of that. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)



well..bled out is kind of a general term...i was actually downed by a big fraggin blast of fire, that charred the entire area (including me) and the HP just kinda ticked down slowly as i lay there smoldering along with everything else (IMG:style_emoticons/default/nyahnyah.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
VykosDarkSoul
post Jun 28 2012, 05:09 PM
Post #30


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 386
Joined: 27-February 12
From: Nebraska, USA
Member No.: 50,732



QUOTE (forgarn @ Jun 28 2012, 11:04 AM) *
Plus, if their commlink is subscribed to a Tacnet, the team should still know where they are at.



Problem is, yeah...they can find you...but if you need quick help, its going to be touch and go, they still can see you so they will have to work based on feel, then they have to hope that they know what to remove, or just take everything off you by feel (which could be both awkward AND fun! )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Jun 28 2012, 05:44 PM
Post #31


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



As I've said above, I'm not that big a fan of sustaining foci at all. If you're wanting Improved Invisibility so you aren't seen by cameras you'll need a Force 6 foci, which is prohibitively expensive in both nuyen and karma. It can be a good idea nonetheless for normal Invisibility unless your team fails the rolls to see through your spell and the enemy does not, in which case your team will not be able to save you as easily if you go down.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DamienKnight
post Jun 28 2012, 05:57 PM
Post #32


Moving Target
**

Group: Members
Posts: 944
Joined: 24-January 04
From: MO
Member No.: 6,014



QUOTE (darthmord @ Jun 22 2012, 12:03 PM) *
I would say yes for item number 1. No for item number 2. The reason for the no on #2 is the focus is sustaining the spell, not the caster. As such, it is keeping the mana flow active.

The sustaining foci would continue so long as the mage was in contact, even if he is unconscious. If he is dead though, then the foci becomes inactive. Thats why mages get APDS rounds instead of GEL... mages must die.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Jun 28 2012, 06:00 PM
Post #33


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



Cameras are OR 3 and vehicles are OR 5+. There has been some discussion whether you need to beat OR 3 or OR 5+ to disappear for vehicles, since vehicles perceive the world through cameras.

QUOTE (DamienKnight @ Jun 28 2012, 07:57 PM) *
The sustaining foci would continue so long as the mage was in contact, even if he is unconscious. If he is dead though, then the foci becomes inactive. Thats why mages get APDS rounds instead of GEL... mages must die.
Or they get more gel/SnS. If you can see him while he is still standing you will still be able to see him, when he is unconscious.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
_Pax._
post Jun 28 2012, 06:19 PM
Post #34


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,492
Joined: 19-April 12
Member No.: 51,818



QUOTE (Neraph @ Jun 28 2012, 01:44 PM) *
As I've said above, I'm not that big a fan of sustaining foci at all.

... I like it for Healing spells. You can drop the spell through a sustaining focus, then go do somethign else (possibly, Heal another wounded ally).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Jun 28 2012, 06:23 PM
Post #35


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



QUOTE (_Pax._ @ Jun 28 2012, 08:19 PM) *
... I like it for Healing spells. You can drop the spell through a sustaining focus, then go do somethign else (possibly, Heal another wounded ally).
Not really that good an idea unless you are willing to spend a lot of Karma and nuyen on it. Usually you cast Heal at maximum force (either at MAG or 2*MAG if you are willing to take physical drain) so you do not lose hits. Since most magicians start with MAG 5 a Force 5 or 10 focus will be very expensive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 28 2012, 06:37 PM
Post #36


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Neraph @ Jun 28 2012, 10:44 AM) *
As I've said above, I'm not that big a fan of sustaining foci at all. If you're wanting Improved Invisibility so you aren't seen by cameras you'll need a Force 6 foci, which is prohibitively expensive in both nuyen and karma. It can be a good idea nonetheless for normal Invisibility unless your team fails the rolls to see through your spell and the enemy does not, in which case your team will not be able to save you as easily if you go down.


Cameras are only OR 3 Neraph... Therefore, only a Force 3 Sustaining Focus is required.
EDIT: Dakka Dakka beat me to it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Jun 29 2012, 02:01 AM
Post #37


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



But *IF* the camera is part of a sensor suite... say Camera + motion sensor... then the OR goes up to 5.


That's the reason drones get the higher resist on their sensors... that and magic doesn't let you break the drone down into it's constituent parts. (with some exception for material specific direct spells... shape metal would allow you to reshape metal bits of the drone without affecting the electronics for example).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 02:35 AM
Post #38


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Falconer @ Jun 28 2012, 07:01 PM) *
But *IF* the camera is part of a sensor suite... say Camera + motion sensor... then the OR goes up to 5.


That's the reason drones get the higher resist on their sensors... that and magic doesn't let you break the drone down into it's constituent parts. (with some exception for material specific direct spells... shape metal would allow you to reshape metal bits of the drone without affecting the electronics for example).



Which I do not agree with. In our Game, Cameras, whether on a drone or not, are OR3. You are not targeting the Camera/Sensor array. You are setting up a condition that the Camera/Sensor array then perceives. That is a VERY big Difference.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Irion
post Jun 29 2012, 05:53 AM
Post #39


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,236
Joined: 27-July 10
Member No.: 18,860



QUOTE (Falconer @ Jun 22 2012, 11:51 PM) *
Umi... actually the rules are clear on whether drugs and other stuff stacks or not. Most of them include text saying not cumulative with any other IP booster or not cumulative with certain types...

Adept - improved ref... cannot be combined with technological or other magical increases to initiative (drugs aren't excluded by this)

Questionable. Or what category would "drug" be?

QUOTE ("DakkaDakka")
Not really that good an idea unless you are willing to spend a lot of Karma and nuyen on it. Usually you cast Heal at maximum force (either at MAG or 2*MAG if you are willing to take physical drain) so you do not lose hits. Since most magicians start with MAG 5 a Force 5 or 10 focus will be very expensive.

Depends on how you handle the heal spell. If you just heal "hits" points of damage, it is probably not such a bad idea to cast it at a lower force.
Anyhow: Sustaining foci below 4 are useless anyway. (Due to BC)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 01:13 PM
Post #40


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Irion @ Jun 28 2012, 11:53 PM) *
Questionable. Or what category would "drug" be?


Chemical...


QUOTE
Depends on how you handle the heal spell. If you just heal "hits" points of damage, it is probably not such a bad idea to cast it at a lower force.
Anyhow: Sustaining foci below 4 are useless anyway. (Due to BC)


No, they are not...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Jun 29 2012, 01:59 PM
Post #41


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 28 2012, 10:35 PM) *
Which I do not agree with. In our Game, Cameras, whether on a drone or not, are OR3. You are not targeting the Camera/Sensor array. You are setting up a condition that the Camera/Sensor array then perceives. That is a VERY big Difference.


Invisibility is NOT invisibility in the classic DnD way... remember it's sort of a fading/shimmering... it's more akin to blur/better blur/eventual invisibility. At least against living targets.


The point of a sensor suite is it has extra sensors working in concert which have a greater chance to see through the invisibility... the motion sensor would still detect the invisible target. It would then direct the camera to pay more attention looking for odd things (such as heat shimmers or similar bits which would allow the camera to see the target). Yes OR is all or nothing... but that doesn't mean you can't fluff it up a bit.

So no, the RAW here does make some sense to me.

To me I've always viewed this as... the ultrasound motion sensor picks up something... the camera then looks to corroborate the motion sensor... if you got 5 or more successes... the camera doesn't corroborate so the sensor doesn't detect you. As opposed to something which is only a camera which has no extra corroboration (sorta like a much more limited version of a single node tacnet).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 03:10 PM
Post #42


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



I do understand that Falconer... But Motion is not covered by Invisibility anyways, which is why the Invisibility Spell would fail against that particular Sensor, regardless of whether it was OR1 or OR 1000. It does not cover Motion Sense, nor Ultrasound, nor UWB Radar, etc. Invisibility is only effective agaisnt visual sight.

A Sensor Suite gives you MORE varied ways of penetrating the Invisibility, but it is not harder to cast the spell whether those sensors are on a Vehicle or a box mounted to the wall, it is the same sensor suite. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Irion
post Jun 29 2012, 03:12 PM
Post #43


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,236
Joined: 27-July 10
Member No.: 18,860



@Tymeaus Jalynsfein
QUOTE
Chemical...

So Gentech and Bioware are biological?

@Falconer
QUOTE
Invisibility is NOT invisibility in the classic DnD way... remember it's sort of a fading/shimmering... it's more akin to blur/better blur/eventual invisibility. At least against living targets.

Nope, it is perfect. You can't see the target. Or their would be sensor/perception tests against it. What you are talking about is camoflage.

QUOTE
vTo me I've always viewed this as... the ultrasound motion sensor picks up something... the camera then looks to corroborate the motion sensor... if you got 5 or more successes... the camera doesn't corroborate so the sensor doesn't detect you. As opposed to something which is only a camera which has no extra corroboration (sorta like a much more limited version of a single node tacnet).

If somebody got you with ultrasound, he got you with ultrasound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Neraph
post Jun 29 2012, 03:45 PM
Post #44


Great Dragon
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,542
Joined: 30-September 08
From: D/FW Megaplex
Member No.: 16,387



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 28 2012, 01:37 PM) *
Cameras are only OR 3 Neraph... Therefore, only a Force 3 Sustaining Focus is required.
EDIT: Dakka Dakka beat me to it... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/frown.gif)

Did they re-errata that? Just checked by SR4A book and it lists Electronics as OR 4.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 04:53 PM
Post #45


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Irion @ Jun 29 2012, 09:12 AM) *
@Tymeaus Jalynsfein

So Gentech and Bioware are biological?


Genetech and Bioware are Bioware Augmentations per the RAW. They are Technological in nature. Drugs are not classified. You COULD count them as Technological (I know many that likely do so), but you could argue otherwise as well. Some could be natural, some could be biological, etc. I chose the term Chemical, because I thought it was funny. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 04:54 PM
Post #46


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Neraph @ Jun 29 2012, 09:45 AM) *
Did they re-errata that? Just checked by SR4A book and it lists Electronics as OR 4.


Used an Old SR4A didn't you? All mine, including the PDF and the Precious, Use 1,2,3,5 for the OR table. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
Cameras are OR 3 per that progression.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dakka Dakka
post Jun 29 2012, 05:42 PM
Post #47


Prime Runner
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,507
Joined: 11-November 08
Member No.: 16,582



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 29 2012, 03:13 PM) *
QUOTE (Irion @ Jun 29 2012, 07:53 AM) *

Questionable. Or what category would "drug" be?


Chemical...
Well unless the drug dose occurs naturally (which none do AFAIK) at least some technology is needed to make them, so you could argue that drugs are included in technological initiative enhancers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Irion
post Jun 29 2012, 05:44 PM
Post #48


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,236
Joined: 27-July 10
Member No.: 18,860



QUOTE (Tymeaus Jalynsfein @ Jun 29 2012, 04:53 PM) *
Genetech and Bioware are Bioware Augmentations per the RAW. They are Technological in nature. Drugs are not classified. You COULD count them as Technological (I know many that likely do so), but you could argue otherwise as well. Some could be natural, some could be biological, etc. I chose the term Chemical, because I thought it was funny. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

My point is, if you are talking magical, technological the only thing left out is natural.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Falconer
post Jun 29 2012, 05:53 PM
Post #49


Neophyte Runner
*****

Group: Validating
Posts: 2,283
Joined: 12-October 07
Member No.: 13,662



Irion:
I see your point... drugs could be technological... good catch.


Also good catch in the invisibility... I was confusing it with camouflage. Sometimes I confuse myself with prior editions as well.

I just don't see a problem with higher OR on certain systems than others. IF the camera is built into a commlink the commlink is OR5... just like the drone... what about redundant process manufacturing... I disagree that casters should be able to pick and choose certain systems out of a complex technological system and not have to beat the full OR.

Why is it I can fool the drones camera with an OR3 roll of an improved illusion given TJ's house rule, but I can't target that same camera seperately from the drone using powerbolt to blind the drone permanently? It's a logical inconsistency in the approach.

Like I said, if I have multiple sensors and a processing node behind the camera... the camera has more sources of information and might notice more. The higher threshold also helps keep mages in line... as it keeps riggers/drones as their achilles heel and otherwise I feel it does make things a bit too easy. Yeah there's a camera on the wall... great you beat it... but that patrolling drone.. it still saw you because you didn't make your infiltration roll (you relied only on magic and didn't avoid the drone).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tymeaus Jalynsfe...
post Jun 29 2012, 06:00 PM
Post #50


Prime Runner Ascendant
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 17,568
Joined: 26-March 09
From: Aurora, Colorado
Member No.: 17,022



QUOTE (Falconer @ Jun 29 2012, 11:53 AM) *
Why is it I can fool the drones camera with an OR3 roll of an improved illusion given TJ's house rule, but I can't target that same camera seperately from the drone using powerbolt to blind the drone permanently? It's a logical inconsistency in the approach.


Because your Illusion DOES NOT ACTUALLY TARGET THE DRONE OR THE CAMERA. it establishes an effect that the Camera Perceives. That Improved Illusion Spell NEVER targets the camera, it targets that which you wish to make invisible. Why would a drone mounted camera all of a sudden get more "protection" from that spell than one mounted to a wall? Simple case: It wouldn't. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

The benefit of a Drone is taht it can have MORE than a simple camera, most of the time. Because of that , it will have sensors that are likely unaffected by the Spell.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th June 2025 - 09:44 AM

Topps, Inc has sole ownership of the names, logo, artwork, marks, photographs, sounds, audio, video and/or any proprietary material used in connection with the game Shadowrun. Topps, Inc has granted permission to the Dumpshock Forums to use such names, logos, artwork, marks and/or any proprietary materials for promotional and informational purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not affiliated with the Dumpshock Forums in any official capacity whatsoever.